i've watched this video at least 20 times and i'm still learning new things. what a great video.
@AHouse1816 күн бұрын
cant hear shit
@FG-fc1yz6 күн бұрын
10:40
@andreysimeonov835627 күн бұрын
It's remarcable that what the lady describes has nothing to do with interpretation or any other standard element of psychoanalytic technique. In the very end, at its very basic and deepest level, this is what therapy, and analysis in particular, is all about. This is what cures, not some clever or highbrow interpretations or theoretical ideas. This comes to prove that Lacan probably understood the more subtle relational agenda of theorists like Fairbairn, although he had criticized him in not very fair and comprehensive way.
@user-fk8rb8ue5h27 күн бұрын
Pseudoscience
@-Llama_95Ай бұрын
Hello! Would you make a video on the death drive?
@martindimitrov4357Ай бұрын
why this strong background music, i have difficulty hearing the speech. nevertheless, Thanks.
What you say at the beginning of the video is not totally accurate. In Joyce le symptôme, Lacan recognised the efficacy of the subject, which, far from being just an effect of language, is also the origin of a constitutive saying of non-duality. According to Lacan, Joyce has shown us that conditionality can be broken and that unity is the symphthome.
@birke571Ай бұрын
17:01
@fangednoumeno777Ай бұрын
Its an orange
@OntologicalCatastrophe2 ай бұрын
Extremely useful, thanks you!
@canreadandsee2 ай бұрын
For me, the mantis example doesn’t work for illustrating the “expectant anxiety.” The experience/knowledge that some males have their heads bitten off after sex by the female presupposes a collective memory passed on to and stored in other males’ brains. This is too much of an assumption, because this experience cannot be passed on to the living males as the messenges themselves are dead. On the other hand, despite wearing a visually indistinguishable male or female mask (what about communication via pheromones?) allows mantises to recognize (and accept) the other as an opposite-sex partner. The poorly understood post-sex decapitation event can thus be only a wired-in reflex (maybe instinct) of the female (now it’s my pure speculation) to prevent the male from spreading his genes among other females or to eliminate the chance of a re-encounter (for whatever reasons). Anxiety is thus a higher-order cognitive experience and an expression of either communicated (learned/memorized) traumatic event or hardwired and retractable (DNA?) information.
@frederickanderson18602 ай бұрын
1:35 he was good in neurology he recommended taking heroin l think for his friend Bauer.
@andreysimeonov83562 ай бұрын
Bye-bye...enough for today!...
@cristy022 ай бұрын
this is the best video i ever seen! happy birthday to me! it makes sooooo much sense
@anniehow703 ай бұрын
What's with the macabre true crime-type anecdotes to illustrate aggressivity in constituted rivalry, was that necessary?
@blu3_fish8693 ай бұрын
i am not going to pretend i now understand the graph, but this was a great overview that i will return to.
@notlok85593 ай бұрын
6:53 💀💀💀
@joethelionjoethelion3 ай бұрын
This is important information
@anupamdebnath18843 ай бұрын
Thank you for coming back!!
@chaychay16403 ай бұрын
speculations given by O'Donoghue of Freud's dream cut short by Freud and the fraudulent activity of family member(s) has more of a punch.
@shimmohsensheini87524 ай бұрын
Goat
@pobblebonk34 ай бұрын
Thank you
@wadesharp80174 ай бұрын
I am having trouble understanding the process order of Graph two with the examples you gave.. why does the punctuation or quilting point come before the A or Big Other?
@exxcellbx61394 ай бұрын
xXx
@mattbutler67424 ай бұрын
Yes, what on earth else could be anxiety provoking about a pack of wolves staring at you from outside your open bedroom window.
@CharlesManuel14 ай бұрын
Incredible. Your videos changed my life. Thank you
@vikmnatsakanyan4 ай бұрын
What a gem of an analysis and presentation. Thank you!
@rohanquinby31884 ай бұрын
This has been so helpful for me!
@shimmohsensheini87525 ай бұрын
Good job, great job 👏 👍
@EdT.-xt6yv5 ай бұрын
11:00
@jamesanonymous23435 ай бұрын
ANOTHER BRIT BULLS--T MEDICAL VIDEO,,,,,,,,FOR THE BRAIN DEAD !!!!
@CharlesManuel15 ай бұрын
Grateful for these videos! Going to grab some of his books and see if I actually understand any of it! Haha
@matiasvedia67575 ай бұрын
Grafo 3: 37:30
@matiasvedia67575 ай бұрын
46:10 fantasía
@matiasvedia67575 ай бұрын
50:40 grafo 4
@rohanquinby31885 ай бұрын
My god
@SilverBackGorillaSak5 ай бұрын
I call it my mind map but now we term the nodal points! 8:09 If you can create a personal mind map of triggers both dormant and active, you can research what topics can help you to unlock your mind and thoughts…possibly 😅✌️❤️
@SilverBackGorillaSak5 ай бұрын
5:24 underlying factors can be triggered unconsciously which is why mind altering medication 💊 should be taken very seriously!
@FG-fc1yz5 ай бұрын
EINFACH SICH DAS SEMINARBUCH 5 HOLEN "Formations of the Unconsciousness" 3:55 Subjekt bedeutet etwas ist Subjekt zu 5:30 Subjekt ist gespalten durch die Effekte des Signifikanten 6:00 Kurve S - S' 7:08 9:05 9:50 Gegenstück zum Gödelschen Unvollständigkeitssatz 10:40 die Sprache / die Begriffe spricht durch das Medium des Subjekts, welches aus dieser Sicht (wo die Sprache spricht und nicht das Subjekt) nur die leere Bezeichnung "Ich" ist (siehe vorheriges Bsp. "I"), dem Subjekt muss dies allerdings verborgen sein und es muss die Artikulationsebene als seine eigene auffassen 15:20 das Objekt ist nicht entscheidend, sondern seine Symbolisierung 16:15 Start des Graphen 21:00 Kurve s(A) - A, s(A) ist das Sprechen anderer, das an mich gerichtet ist, A ist die vorherige Andersheit der Artikulationsebene, wo die Sprache und nicht das Individuum spricht und die Bedeutung dieser Sprache dem Individuum notwendig verborgen ist, der Teil der Bedeutung der verborgen ist, entspricht der Stimme; Bsp. siehe 40:00! siehe 57:50 s(A) und später S(A/) ist der EINTRITT IN DIE SPRACHE!!! 29:22 30:08 32:00! 33:20! (siehe Text) 33:50 wir sehen uns durch den imaginierten Anderen, den wir darstellen möchten; dieser ist jedoch den anderen Menschen entliehen, die sich ebenfalls von einem imaginierten Anderen betrachten 34:50! mein Blick durch den imaginierten Anderen auf muss symbolisch vermittelt werden, also unterer Weg UND oberer Weg mit Bezeichnung, sodass sich der gr. A der Sprache selbst verkörpert und uns diese Bedeutung verschlossen bleibt, also A (siehe oben), siehe Bsp. ab 36:20 41:23 Beginn des Begehrens 42:35 Kritik der Happiness 44:50 EXPL objet a ab46:17!!! wie Phantasie konstituiert wird bzw. die Struktur der Phantasie 50:30! 55:50 lack of the other ist die Bezeichnung einer Leere, einer Nichtexistenz 57:50 complete jouissance is impossible because its runs through the signification of the language as an other with a lack (Herrensignifikant?!!!), so wie die "Coke", "der Liberalismus", der " Kapitalismus", die " Kohlenstoffkompensation"; die konkrete Beudetung der empfundenen joissance basiert auf dem Herrensignifikanten, der nichts anderes ist als die Positivierung einer Leere / eines Mangels (deshalb "is structured around a lack"); S(A/) ist der EINTRITT IN DIE SPRACHE!!!, dort erscheint das objet a als durch die Sprache hervorgerufener Mangel im Objekt 1:00:05 Phallus: der Signifikant der jouissance 1:01:00 ALLES ZUM PHALLUS WIRD ZSMGEFASST IN 1:02:46! 1:03:57! Def Neurotiker 1:04:40 Def Obsession und Hysterie 1:08:40! ab1:09:28!!! ZSM.FASSUNG
@OH-pc5jx6 ай бұрын
we are so back
@lukailic8846 ай бұрын
37:30
@felipebier76 ай бұрын
Very good man, thanks for the hard work!
@rohanquinby31886 ай бұрын
So enlightening.
@officekuroro6 ай бұрын
too quiet
@archimedes13226 ай бұрын
Could it be that the quantities of intelligence and perhaps the entire consciousness are linked to the individually different potential to interpret these signifiers on a large scale without directly colliding with the remainders? So with something like the form of the arrangement of the “Final signifiers“ (close to the remainders), the encounters with other people's desires and the resulting distraction/deflection from the remainders - is this the necessary Space for the mind?
@rawiri46936 ай бұрын
Helpful vid = succinct, clarifying. But why is the background music so distractingly high in the mix? Frustrating at times. Good stuff nevertheless.
@StAsshole6 ай бұрын
is it the hole of the cup or of the handle of the cup?
@-Llama_955 ай бұрын
The hole of the handle.
@user-eq6gj2kz1w7 ай бұрын
Wth!! Am i the only one stupid here.. HELP GUYZ i have a presentation tomorrow 😭
@hastalasopasequemo36457 ай бұрын
Very interesting how it differs from kierkagarrd and even sinilar
@christopherellis26637 ай бұрын
Montaigne had a words about this.《 Who dreads, suffers》 This is a bit dense. Overly complicated