I was actually a DC, but really should have gone ET or MM.

It was just a fuel cut off solenoid I had laying around and some springs. www.amazon.com/Solenoid-Replace-Lister-366-07197-SA-3405T/dp/B0837G237X

The pre 91-92is flex plates have a different bolt pattern for the converter than the magnum series. One version has the 4 bolts equally spaced and the converter can be bolted to the flex plate in any orientation, the other had one of the bolts slightly out of position so that the converter could only bolt on in one orientation. It has been a decade or 2 since I have personally dealt with it so you may want to search the forums or call a transmission shop to verify

Or it may be best to just use a 46re/rh that is made to work on the magnum engine. It is basically a 727 with overdrive

@call_me_danger the more I think of it ..I might use the the 46rh and also keep it efi

The factory air hat?

Check the other videos I posted. I was using 3 different thermal imagers and some of the videos can see a bit more detail on the moons surface.

I have a couple different thermal scopes. But I mostly use my atm rattler ts25-384 and just hold its lens right against the end of my telescope eyepiece.

This is a video through the setup in the video above kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eK-cZcqZ1bHYfqc.htmlsi=2NR3378yx3DDRgZ3

@thenightvisionlab the problem is that with just one lens, I can’t get a clear picture at all. When using 2 I can get a decent picture. I have about 5 or 6 different focal length lenses from about 1.5” to 5”ish. But not sure which lenses are which focal lengths lol. I will have to buy another set and keep them in their original boxes. The thermal scope I am using does have a focus able lens but it cannot be removed to use as a prime focus setup. I do have another thermal imager that has no lens and I have used it as a prime focus setup but the picture is really really bad.

Hopefully it will be clear tonight so I can try to get a better view of the moon.

Nope, that’s a telescope

The lens coating is cracked and pealing, every time I clean it, it gets worse.

@@call_me_danger could you replace the lens ??? 🔭

@@treystephens6166 yes. I was just outside testing a spare lens set. I am still trying to get more zoom from different lenses but here is the spare I just tested kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eK-cZcqZ1bHYfqc.htmlsi=Aes4SLWsKUFVFeHH

Here is what I have come up with. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fJeYhaydup25nWg.htmlsi=8y4e1dsek2thRw10

I took it out because it was a bit longer than practical for that location. It would really poke up when I closed my hand, and being a mechanic, I was afraid it was going to get broken. I had it in for about 6 months. Not really sure how much,if any radiation was absorbed from it. When searching the forums I found about 50/50 mix of, “it is harmless” to “it will poison you” lol. So I cannot recommend it one way or the other.

@@call_me_danger Thanks for the answer! Yeah not really dangerous, I'm not a nuclear physicist but basically tritium just emits beta radiation (electrons) which doesn't make it through the glass and is almost completely absorbed by the phosphor coating that shines. The thing biohackers worry about is Bremsstrahlung radiation (literally "braking radiation" in German) which is product of the electrons' inertia when suddenly collapsing emitting X-rays continuously. The thing I've seen with some biohacker friends is that this Xray radiation is so little anyways (less than taking a normal 5 hour plane trip IN A YEAR or having an xray in your hand once per 2 3 years, they did calculations of the dose). The MAIN REAL ISSUE is breaking the vial and releasing the toxic phosphor (zinc sulfide with green for example). Anyways this wouldn't really do much harm if immediately extracted most of the pieces. Again thanks for the answer Jacob on this old video. Just dropping this comment here for anyone interested. -- One last question though that we couldn't figure out when we found your video: how did you sterilize the tritium vial and injector? We assume it was a normal vial without any encapsulation or did you modify it? ***

@@gdn246 it was just a normal vial, I just soaked it in rubbing alcohol and wiped down with an alcohol pad and shoved it it the 10g needle, used a length of abs printer filament to push it all the way in.

@@call_me_danger wow so normal vial, it's borosilocate glass but still everyone that I know has one is encapsulated in more glass, silicone or parylene thing. Didn't you get scared in those months of breaking it doing manual labor?

@@gdn246 yes just a normal vial, and yes, that’s why I removed it

What do you think it was?

@@call_me_danger honestly I have no idea, it just looks like a little speck, maybe the whyfiles will cover it lol

Yes, the 05-07up will have this type of wcm.

Atn rattler ts25-384

@@call_me_danger Thanks 👍

@@jakubkrcma most all of my recent thermal videos are taken with the rattler ts25-384

Is it switzerland

@@Mme.SwisstellaPennsylvania

You didn’t ask for help. The video is was made by request from someone who did ask.

Ето в Dodge Dart?

Thermal imaging scope

No, it is a tritium vial

An airplane flying over at night viewed through a thermal imaging scope

I keep searching for ufo’s, Bigfoot and ghosts lol. No luck yet

The mygig radio on the far right came out of 08-11 Dakota and various other mopars from 08-18ish. There are about 6ish different models of the mygig that come in 2 different bus versions, a low speed bus and high speed bus version. So there are around a dozen different versions you will come across that look nearly identical. and only one of them is capable of being used in non canbus situations. And even with that one specific model, you still need specifically modify the wiring to make it work.

Atn sucks. That scope is only about a year old and has only been used as a spotting device, it was never on a weapon that was fired and it just stopped powering on. It won’t take a charge, it won’t power on with the battery or with the usb plugged in. It was a waste of 1500+ bucks.

@@call_me_danger wow! That’s big bucks for that kinda results. Thanks for putting the info out in the world for folks!

@@UncleRoots413and the new agm scopes I got say they aren’t for use during the day lol so I guess I will be looking to replace them now. I have had a dozen or so thermal and this is the first time I heard that you cannot use them during the daytime. That’s the whole point of thermal scopes, so I can get superior target detection day or night without needing 2 different optics.

Just need to buy a mygig from another mopar with the same speed bus system. They came in a low speed and high speed bus version. LOW SPEED APPLICATIONS SWITCH 1,2 UP 2007 - 2011 CHRYSLER SEBRING 2007 - 2013 DODGE AVENGER 2008-2010 CHRYSLER 300 AND 300C 2008-10 DODGE DURANGO 2008-2010 CHRYSLER ASPEN 2008-2010 DODGE CHARGER 2008-2011 DODGE DAKOTA 2008-2010 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE 2008-2010 JEEP COMMANDER 2009-2013 CHALLENGER 2009-2013 PATRIOT/COMPASS 2011-2013 CHRYSLER 200/CIRRUS

Yeah I don’t really do the whole KZfaq thing regularly. Mostly just when someone in a group asks a question that I can better answer in a video, I post it on KZfaq. I use KZfaq because the video can be much longer than what a Facebook post will allow. But thanks for the sub, I subbed to yours as well. You have some good videos there too.

@@call_me_danger Funny all things considered. At least to me. Same sorta reason and how I ended up making some videos myself, do it for similar reasons as well. Made one of a chainsaw I built to share on a forum and couldn’t, so put it on you tube. That’s how it all started for me. Was encouraged to keep doing so several times and so now I do so. Just post things I think are cool or helpful. Sharing with the world. Thank you for the sub as well! Stay well sir!