Thanks for the video sir! where is video 55? oligopoly?

The most underrated channels

Thanks

Thanks alot man.

It was helpful Thanks

Thank you

I need this spreadsheet

Hey! I was wondering if you can use the derivative of the PPC to calculate the opportunity cost in the case of a concave diagram

Thank you so much for this lesson!

so helpful thank you

🇹🇿🔥🖐

Thanks really helpful

Hi, can you please put an insight of how would it be if in both average cost price and marginal cost pricing strategy, the marginal cost of the firm is assumed to be zero.

thank you for this! i have a college final tomorrow and i was stressing about this.

Awesome presentation , makes lot of sense now

Thank you sooooooo much

easy to understand!! thank you

Thank you so much

Thank you for the extremely intuitive breakdown / explanation of CS & PS

Tnq

That was one of the best Econ "comparison" videos I've ever seen. You broke it down beautifully.

Isn't one of the main assumptions of HO model is that the technologies used to produce the two goods are **identical** across countries? (Your saying 7:20-7:22 "the technologies to produce the commodities are different")

Really good thanks

THANK YOU SIR

Numerical also plz

Thank you, you are a life saver. I have exams today

thank you!

You should have explained a litle bit about the cone of diversification.

THANK YOUUUUUUUUUU NOW I UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING!!

You need to actually use the right formula... Negative Income Tax requires an exemption level... so you set the Exception level at say the poverty line of $4k; so your formula becomes I = M - (M-Ex)(T); so for your example we have I = 4000 - (4000- 4000)(0.5) = $4000; and I = 2000 - (4000 - 2000)(0.5) = $3000; thus you have a gradiant up to the exemption level just like in a progressive tax system.

How do firms operating under four different types of market structures such as pure competition, monopolistic competition, monopoly, and oligopoly achieve their profit-maximizing price and output objectives?

Bad formula bro

Excelente

Thanks,,,,got helped

This video is all kinds of wrong. The formula is completely incorrect. The entire point of the Negative Income Tax is that it guarantees a basic income while incentivizing work by guaranteeing that more work will ALWAYS mean more money. And the calculation is based on the tax exemption amount, not the guaranteed income.

Thank you! This was really helpful

According to Milton Friedman, your Negative Income Tax formula should be as such: I = M - (M - Ex)(T), where I = Income, M = what you make/earn, Ex = tax exemption, and T = Tax Rate. Using your numbers with this formula, someone earning $2k will receive $3.5k ($1.5k negative income tax). Someone earning $4k will receive $4.5k ($500k negative income tax). Note that this formula does not include a GI. Instead it uses a tax exemption that guarantees a minimum income of $2.5k if you have no earnings. MF preferred this method so that there is always an incentive to work and earn a salary.

You went in bro, my lecturer is shit, awesome job

Thanks a lot, perfect summary of all the market structures we learned! Very helpful!!

Thanks man this really helped me understand the difference. The other videos were not that easy to understand

Great video! Your graph is on backwards. It should look like an L

which software do you use sir?

Thank you! :)

i dont get it at all

How do the labour allocations change in each country?

This video was great! Thanks!

great video, could you make one that then applies this model to labor migration? Thank you

Good lecture. But I had a question, shouldn't the US have a higher comparative advantage in the graph just like ROW had with Cotton. In my opinion the US should have a similar curve like ROW, but towards wheat instead of cotton.

Great summary

Thank you so much! I highly appreciate this video. Is there any way you could explain how the rybczynski theorem branches off the H-O model?