Thanks for the video sir! where is video 55? oligopoly?
@junsupark29049 ай бұрын
The most underrated channels
@RR-og4ut10 ай бұрын
Thanks
@Yjs02-tx Жыл бұрын
Thanks alot man.
@collinsmwaniki7942 Жыл бұрын
It was helpful Thanks
@karimbassem28232 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@andrewsmith13942 жыл бұрын
I need this spreadsheet
@aryanshrestha66302 жыл бұрын
Hey! I was wondering if you can use the derivative of the PPC to calculate the opportunity cost in the case of a concave diagram
@benkyo51773 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this lesson!
@ariffazahar3 жыл бұрын
so helpful thank you
@pulltheskymusicgroup44753 жыл бұрын
🇹🇿🔥🖐
@abdullahzafar61263 жыл бұрын
Thanks really helpful
@aakashsoni78683 жыл бұрын
Hi, can you please put an insight of how would it be if in both average cost price and marginal cost pricing strategy, the marginal cost of the firm is assumed to be zero.
@xRomina4 жыл бұрын
thank you for this! i have a college final tomorrow and i was stressing about this.
@dithishetty61204 жыл бұрын
Awesome presentation , makes lot of sense now
@amalal-owasia10614 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooooooo much
@ericauuw66135 жыл бұрын
easy to understand!! thank you
@rubyl62495 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@jml03105 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the extremely intuitive breakdown / explanation of CS & PS
@farseenajabin35906 жыл бұрын
Tnq
@keithhudson31386 жыл бұрын
That was one of the best Econ "comparison" videos I've ever seen. You broke it down beautifully.
@vetoinlt6 жыл бұрын
Isn't one of the main assumptions of HO model is that the technologies used to produce the two goods are **identical** across countries? (Your saying 7:20-7:22 "the technologies to produce the commodities are different")
@t-002amirsubhanikhan66 жыл бұрын
Really good thanks
@danchevreux6886 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SIR
@saurabhpal06 жыл бұрын
Numerical also plz
@asunabest5827 жыл бұрын
Thank you, you are a life saver. I have exams today
@astrogal34277 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@kjellpell7 жыл бұрын
You should have explained a litle bit about the cone of diversification.
@fiorellab24857 жыл бұрын
THANK YOUUUUUUUUUU NOW I UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING!!
@paultaylor47817 жыл бұрын
You need to actually use the right formula... Negative Income Tax requires an exemption level... so you set the Exception level at say the poverty line of $4k; so your formula becomes I = M - (M-Ex)(T); so for your example we have I = 4000 - (4000- 4000)(0.5) = $4000; and I = 2000 - (4000 - 2000)(0.5) = $3000; thus you have a gradiant up to the exemption level just like in a progressive tax system.
@junereybaladhay52338 жыл бұрын
How do firms operating under four different types of market structures such as pure competition, monopolistic competition, monopoly, and oligopoly achieve their profit-maximizing price and output objectives?
@JohnDaCajun8 жыл бұрын
Bad formula bro
@eugesombra8 жыл бұрын
Excelente
@alikocho36848 жыл бұрын
Thanks,,,,got helped
@Dentarthurdent548 жыл бұрын
This video is all kinds of wrong. The formula is completely incorrect. The entire point of the Negative Income Tax is that it guarantees a basic income while incentivizing work by guaranteeing that more work will ALWAYS mean more money. And the calculation is based on the tax exemption amount, not the guaranteed income.
@keatonsafar52158 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This was really helpful
@meyerpflug8 жыл бұрын
According to Milton Friedman, your Negative Income Tax formula should be as such: I = M - (M - Ex)(T), where I = Income, M = what you make/earn, Ex = tax exemption, and T = Tax Rate. Using your numbers with this formula, someone earning $2k will receive $3.5k ($1.5k negative income tax). Someone earning $4k will receive $4.5k ($500k negative income tax). Note that this formula does not include a GI. Instead it uses a tax exemption that guarantees a minimum income of $2.5k if you have no earnings. MF preferred this method so that there is always an incentive to work and earn a salary.
@cordster5158 жыл бұрын
You went in bro, my lecturer is shit, awesome job
@justinadamich74768 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, perfect summary of all the market structures we learned! Very helpful!!
@ShgKwat9 жыл бұрын
Thanks man this really helped me understand the difference. The other videos were not that easy to understand
@samiahanderson98399 жыл бұрын
Great video! Your graph is on backwards. It should look like an L
@pawanpyakurel92369 жыл бұрын
which software do you use sir?
@gunelmamedova91949 жыл бұрын
Thank you! :)
@SuperJameal9 жыл бұрын
i dont get it at all
@tejaspanchal94419 жыл бұрын
How do the labour allocations change in each country?
@mohammadalisaleh20039 жыл бұрын
This video was great! Thanks!
@williamvandenbroeck38499 жыл бұрын
great video, could you make one that then applies this model to labor migration? Thank you
@ballehossan10 жыл бұрын
Good lecture. But I had a question, shouldn't the US have a higher comparative advantage in the graph just like ROW had with Cotton. In my opinion the US should have a similar curve like ROW, but towards wheat instead of cotton.
@kapamagicman11 жыл бұрын
Great summary
@IcyDragon00111 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I highly appreciate this video. Is there any way you could explain how the rybczynski theorem branches off the H-O model?