2001: Literally the exact breakup as the ‘95 one. 2005: A four part breakup… isn’t right. 2006: A V-Breakup isn’t a breakup at all, as it just connects back together. 2008: Not really a breakup, as it is like some people forgot to glue parts together.

2011: I don’t understand it. It just snaps like they forgot to glue that part together. 2012: I couldn’t even see it. 2012 again: Having the Stern Capsize is not really a surprise, the 1987 break up did that too. 2013: It was too dark to see it. 2020: Makes no sense whatsoever. 2021: I see nothing wrong with that.

The theory was made in 1995.

@@Wolfric_Rogers no it was not

Yes it was, look it up. It was in the 1997 movie, yes, but pre-dates it by two years.

You mean an A break?

In a way, yes. I believe that water was up to the engine room skylight when the breakup occurred, putting the whole break zone below the waterline. It accounts for a number of people seeing water get over the whole base of the third funnel before they saw the stern settle back or the ship just suddenly seem to disappear as the last lights went out. Frank Goldsmith: “By now, the ship was tilted way down in front, and when the ice water reached the back stack, something exploded. I started crying and my mother wrapped her arms around me and pulled me to her breast.” Edward Buley: “She went down as far as the after-funnel, and then there was a little roar, as though the engines had rushed forward, and she snapped in two, and the bow part went down and the after-part came up and staid up five minutes before it went down.” - Boat 10 Joseph Scarrott: “When the third funnel had nearly disappeared, I heard four explosions, which I took to be the bursting of the boilers. The ship was right up on end then. Suddenly, she broke in two between the third and fourth funnels. The after-part of the ship came down on the water in its normal position and seemed as if it was going to remain afloat, but it only remained a minute or two and then sank.” - Boat 14 Samuel Rule: “Just before she disappeared, there was a rumbling inside the ship like an earthquake. Then the stern settled back a bit, and she went down so slowly and quietly that there was no suction or commotion in the water at all. I think the noise we heard was that of the boilers and engines breaking away from their seatings and falling down through the forward bulkheads. At the time it occurred, the ship was standing nearly upright in the water, with her stern in the air and the forward part as far as the after-funnel underwater.” - Boat 15 Robert Daniel: “After the last row of lights went out, I noticed that the great hull lurched slightly, like any water-logged craft, and shortly afterward the bow began to settle slightly more on the starboard side, where the plates had been torn from the bow and where the gaping wound in the ship’s side must have been. Then she sank gradually until the four funnels had almost been hidden by the rushing waters, and a moment later, she went down without creating the great suction I expected she would make.” - In the water

@@Wolfric_Rogers Out of interest, how many accounts were their of the third funnel being partially submerged / water up to 4th funnel before split / disappearing?

Off the top of my head: 1. George Symons 2. John Poingdestre 3. Edward Buley 4. Frank Evans 5. Samuel Rule 6. William Nutbean 7. George Crowe 8. Frank Goldsmith 9. Thomas Ranger 10. Joseph Scarrott 11. Alfred White 12. Robert Daniel 13. Olaus Abelseth 14. Charles Lightoller (possibly) 15. Albert Horswill (possibly) 16. Jack Thayer (possibly) 17. Arthur Bright (possibly)

4, actually.

It would probably break into 3-4 parts as shown by the wreckage but with the middle section breaking into several different parts such as the Galley Decks and Boiler room 1

​@@IloveCruiseShips1912 Yep, William Lindsay said she broke in three on the surface. But the aft one probably broke underwater.

@@William_Fred_JamesYep, Their were also reports of the engines falling out aswell, for example, Thomas Threlfall.The aft tower I think came off underwater but was heavily dislodged on the surface to account for those who testified a break directly ahead of the fourth funnel.

He did that with survivor accounts. Don't blame it.

Other than the shot of the iceberg collision and the ship plunging with an explosion (which are both 1953 deleted scenes) the other pieces of footage used in Voyagers were specifically filmed for Raise the Titanic using the model seen in the final film (except without the adjustments to make it look like the ship they were using as a set). Other than the use in Voyagers, Raise the Titanic and the 1953 movie have no other connection to each other. I didn't include the Raise the Titanic scenes because they're easy to find.

I wouldn't regard it as a theory.