Lean lesson 11 - 5s Standard Work
5:47
Lean lesson 10 - Shadow Boards
9:42
Lean lesson 7 Lean Parts Feeders
8:21
Lean Lesson 5 Batch Size Calculation
5:32
Lean Lesson 4 Min/Max Production
6:47
Lean Lesson 1 - Standard Work
6:07
My Cpk is too high??
11:44
2 ай бұрын
Case Study Cpk Improvement 2
23:49
Case Study 1 Cpk Improvement
27:34
The KPI for low volume production
12:41
Using a DOE to improve your MSA
9:50
The Power of the Run Chart
12:00
3 ай бұрын
DOE independent Variables
11:36
3 ай бұрын
MSA Question From Viewer...
13:07
4 ай бұрын
Measuring Lean waste the easy Way!
13:29
Пікірлер
@cristianomacieldeassis7082
@cristianomacieldeassis7082 2 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing Paul, Great explanation of a real challenge that happened in a daily basis in a manufacturing environment, perhaps, one of the main discussions when you have a company with the organizational structure departmentalized "silos" (commercial x Manufacturing)
@sindredyngen183
@sindredyngen183 5 күн бұрын
Dear Paul, is there any chance you could give us more information about the Six Sigma BB handbook? Maybe a short video going more into what the book covers or get Lulu to post some photos of the context On a side note, thank you for all the videos! 🎉
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 5 күн бұрын
Sindred - drop me a mail on [email protected] and i'll something to you...
@ritmanik1
@ritmanik1 11 күн бұрын
Respected sir, I want to do stress analysis of laser cladded samples . I have 3 laser powers and 3 scanning speeds . Then how i can use minitab to decide best 6 sets out of them?
@DrKate_stories
@DrKate_stories 11 күн бұрын
I have never understood RSM to this extent, thank you very much🌹
@Jean-PhilippeGarde
@Jean-PhilippeGarde 14 күн бұрын
Super cool explanantion. So great
@Bandhon123
@Bandhon123 14 күн бұрын
Very help full vedio ❤❤
@NilaIslam-lb9wl
@NilaIslam-lb9wl 14 күн бұрын
Sundor video
@sanjayt1250
@sanjayt1250 15 күн бұрын
Very Nice I was looking simple video which you did very Nicely thanks Sir
@deanopenn
@deanopenn 16 күн бұрын
Hi Paul, Another comment on your videos haha. i have seen a scenario where If PP and PPK fail to achieve the minimum requirement e.g. 1.67 but CP and CPK passes. The big factor is the tolerance is so small it doesn't leave much room for any process variation as PP and PPK is long term. What are your thoughts on this due to tight tolerances?
@dmaradiaga44
@dmaradiaga44 18 күн бұрын
Hi Paul, first I have to say that I'm happily surprised with your fast response!! I really appreciate it. Now my question is mostly about which type of MSA should I perform, due to such small quantity, however they do are expensive devices that we most make sure are their measurements are accurate.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 18 күн бұрын
drop me a message on [email protected] and i'll see if I can help...
@dmaradiaga44
@dmaradiaga44 18 күн бұрын
Hi Paul, thank you so much for your very informative videos. Could you please advice what type of MSA would you recommend to perform in a service shop where you can only find 2 pieces of the device to be measured on any given day? and no more than 50 devices are serviced per year, do we really need to perform MSA?
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 18 күн бұрын
Good to hear from you, it really depends on what those measures are for. If you make expensive business decisions or important customer checks that could be costly it would be great to be accurate. If they are not important measurements, sure don't need an MSA...
@deanopenn
@deanopenn 18 күн бұрын
Hi Paul. What are your thoughts about the main difference between MSA TYPE 1 study and MSA TYPE 3 study? if you are measuring a Diameter of a product with a non contact measuring device, would either be ok to use? any advice would be appreciated
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 18 күн бұрын
Type 1 only works where the process is all machine based. You'll get bias if you try type 1 with operators. Otherwise type 2 is always best to do.
@deanopenn
@deanopenn 18 күн бұрын
@@paulallen5321 Thanks Again for your swift response, so you wouldn't do a type 1 study based on the operator placing the component onto the measuring device and its a non contact measurement? once its in place the operator has no influence and can only work if its placed where it should be? Also do you thing a type 3 study is feasible, somebody has mentioned this before but this is something i have not come across (only seen type 1 and type 2)
@kalyanbasak5344
@kalyanbasak5344 19 күн бұрын
Best MSA explanation using Minitab that I have come across so far. Brilliant 🎉
@deanopenn
@deanopenn 22 күн бұрын
Hi. In regards to this would you suggest also doing CP and CPK after you do CM and CMK? Do you think CM and CMK is enough for PPAP submission also.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 22 күн бұрын
Hi Dean - good to hear from you. I would say that in the PPAP you only have enough data to work out CmK. You havent completed a production run yet, so the first 50 or 100 peices is all the variation you can see..and that is essentially a Cmk value...
@deanopenn
@deanopenn 22 күн бұрын
@@paulallen5321 thanks for responding, but you would still do Cp and CPK inline with this? Also if you let's say collect 50pcs for CMK, what that then be a subgroup size of 1?
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 22 күн бұрын
Yes Dean at some point you need to go back and check a proper production run and complete the CpK and yes the sub group is 1...
@oscari-j9380
@oscari-j9380 27 күн бұрын
Why are there copies of the style section all over the place, d-do you have a dog? A little chow or something?
@blidardiapinal
@blidardiapinal 29 күн бұрын
Let's see Paul Allen's purchasing systems.
@davidhill3618
@davidhill3618 29 күн бұрын
Great stuff. Will be getting this book. Got the drink tea and also point my green belt Ip4 learners to your videos.
@ovdickson
@ovdickson Ай бұрын
Thank you Paul. How do I install this DOE add-in in my excel
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
if you go to Sigmazone.com you can try DOE pro for 5 days free, then it will cost $229 dollars. if you just click on the desktop icon, it will automatically install in the ribbon....
@ovdickson
@ovdickson Ай бұрын
Thank you.
@ovdickson
@ovdickson Ай бұрын
Good day Paul, I have a quick question. I have chosen to use 2levels instead of 3 levels to save me time. But I included a centre point in the experiment which is the average of the 3 factors I have each. Is there a way to include this centre point in DOE analysis on DOE pro or on minitab software?
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 29 күн бұрын
@@ovdickson send me a message on [email protected] and I'll explain...
@Strider9655
@Strider9655 Ай бұрын
Clean desk, empty skull. I used to work as a bench repair engineer, I had 7 desks, i'd have multiple jobs on the go at any one time. Company director was an accountant by trade, wanted "clean desk policy", wanted any jobs waiting for parts to be put into a box and hidden away, like good luck finding out which screw goes where when you bunch them all into a plastic bag, I lay out fixings/etc as a screw map around the item i'm working on. People who don't do your job, don't understand why you work the way you do, they just see an untidy mess and try to apply office logic to it. Now I work in manufacturing, from a desk in an engineering office, I don't have so much physical mess around, but I may have product samples laid out, they can't be tagged because if anyone accidentally puts one back into the production line it'll snag on the conveyors and cause a breakdown, as well I have 2 laptops, 1 PC and 3 monitors, same nonsense though "clean desk policy", when we already use 5s, it's just people with little/no work to do, looking for problems to solve, constantly pointing the finger at other people, other departments, so that nobody ever questions why that person is actually needed. Same people keep getting on at the engineers for not wearing our ID lanyards (ie noose) around our neck, again people who don't do the job, office admin types with absolutely no idea what other peoples jobs involve, sticking their beaks in and trying to control everything.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
Hi Strider - I'm a favour of a bit of organisation to help you, but as you say we often get organisation that gets in the way!
@hopefullysoonaweldingengineer
@hopefullysoonaweldingengineer Ай бұрын
Hello, in hypothesis testings we usually define the significance level or in other words alpha. But there is a calculation for alpha in your example. Could you please give more information to where I should look for this kind of examples? I found this is interesting. Thank you for educative statistics videos. They are very good but sometimes it it very difficult for me to understand your accent :). But can pause and play and understand.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
I don't really major on the maths as most people use computers these days. But it's a T-test look the maths up on wikipedia if it's important to you...
@hopefullysoonaweldingengineer
@hopefullysoonaweldingengineer Ай бұрын
@@paulallen5321 Thanks for answer. Like your videos.👏
@user-rz6jt4km6c
@user-rz6jt4km6c Ай бұрын
Thank you Sir, you are the best!!! Simplicity. I'm a long time follower from the US.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
Carl - many thanks for your support...
@jonathanandrews807
@jonathanandrews807 Ай бұрын
Dear Paul, thanks so much for creating both this video and the model you kindly sent. Most helpful!
@cristianomacieldeassis7082
@cristianomacieldeassis7082 Ай бұрын
Great video Paul, thanks for sharing!!! I´d like to ask how to better approach when you have a daily production routine with a huge diversity of SKUs ? Thanks very much for your great work and for sharing so much wisdom!!!
@DR_1S
@DR_1S Ай бұрын
👍🏼⬆️🆙
@user-ky4mn1qo9u
@user-ky4mn1qo9u Ай бұрын
Excellent 😊😊
@ExLima887
@ExLima887 Ай бұрын
Relly amazing 😊
@ericstefko4852
@ericstefko4852 Ай бұрын
The second curve (top right) looks like a logarithmic function, am I missing something?
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
Hi Eric - There are lots of mathematical functions that could describe a curve the traditional one of the sq function or quadratic. These days software tends to group them as polynomial...
@panda2gunda
@panda2gunda Ай бұрын
Nice video brother thish video is good
@sylviaorodho6369
@sylviaorodho6369 Ай бұрын
Hello Paul. I really like your videos, in fact, I bought one of the books "Drink Tea and Read the Paper..." Coud you also avail the "Six Sigma Black belt handbook " as an Ebook and others too? It would be much easier to procure in E-format
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
Sylvia - send me a mail on [email protected] and I'll sort an e-copy out for you and thanks for your support...
@mikemotorsport
@mikemotorsport Ай бұрын
I would be interested to see his gage r+r results before coming to such an involved doe model. A follow up video would be interesting on this.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
Hi Mike - yes good input. I think I would want that data as well. Although now we have the DOE data, if the model it creates confirms, then the measurement system must be working ok. Also the graphs he sent over over move nice and smoothly as time is increased. So I have some confidence in this data. But I've sent him the model now and I'm waiting for the confirmation test results
@parelectricengineeringllc1816
@parelectricengineeringllc1816 Ай бұрын
Great video. Use of P-Mapping, Ishakawa diagrams, SOP are great. I am about ready to start drinking 🍵 Tea !!
@Jose-jb8xo
@Jose-jb8xo Ай бұрын
Thank you for all your work 🌹🌹 truly appreciate your help
@jamescharlier393
@jamescharlier393 Ай бұрын
Really great piece of work
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
James - many thanks for your positive comment
@tanjason72
@tanjason72 Ай бұрын
Hi Paul, why taking the lowest value can save money? For Y bar, the highest seal strength is 77.125 (Set 6), isn't that the best solution?
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 Ай бұрын
Hi Tan - row 6 looks best, but statistically it is producing no strong signal and the setting didn't confirm but it's not a bad idea to pick the best run and try it...
@tanjason72
@tanjason72 Ай бұрын
Thanks. ❤ Good video.
@kiwifrenchie6036
@kiwifrenchie6036 Ай бұрын
Like to see your sunglasses mark haha
@TheZakluk
@TheZakluk 2 ай бұрын
Nice explanation Paul.
@billsinclair6515
@billsinclair6515 2 ай бұрын
another excellent video Paul: question, what do we do with a compromised design that will not lend itself to any CpK improvement?
@alis.7553
@alis.7553 2 ай бұрын
Great video 👏👏. I will be buying that book. Love from Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦♥️.
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
Many thanks Ali - drop me a line if you ever need some help...
@oxilary2369
@oxilary2369 2 ай бұрын
Just wanted to say I appreciate the videos Paul, came for a simple explanation about DOE and now I watch every video
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
Hi Oxilary - Thanks for your support. I'm not sure there is a simple explanation of DOE? I would say this though, there are tests that will contain lots of new information and tests that contain almost no knowledge. All data is not equally useful. A DOE makes sure your tests contain the maximum information for the minimum amount of tests...
@husseinaljarwani2222
@husseinaljarwani2222 2 ай бұрын
Amazing 👏
@abhideepsingh4484
@abhideepsingh4484 2 ай бұрын
Always pleasure to see your videos
@MattRichterSand
@MattRichterSand 2 ай бұрын
Hey Paul, these videos are great. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. You mentioned the operator is not allowed to fiddle with the controls. I am curious when is it OK to adjust the controls… when you are dialing the process in? If you cannot explain the out of control data point through the control plan?
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
Hi Matt - good to hear from you. When can they adjust? 1. When dialing in standard settings 2. If the process naturally wanders and needs a reset. Some grinding processes naturally move from top to bottom tolerance. Other than that, there role is to use the rules/settings specified. If they do that and the process goes hay wire, we know there is a problem that they need help with. What are your thoughts?
@MattRichterSand
@MattRichterSand 2 ай бұрын
@@paulallen5321 thanks!
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
Hi Matt - here is a video specifically to answer your question more fully kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ja2GqLCb0Zi6d2Q.html
@gldil
@gldil 2 ай бұрын
Hi Paul, I love your simple to the point explanations! 🙂 One point I'd like your perspective about is a "too high" CPk . We should always keep in mind the long term relevance of our process limits and whether they are reflecting the quality we require from it
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
I'll make a video and send you the link....
@quality_bus
@quality_bus 2 ай бұрын
Congrats on the new Black Belt book!
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@jorgedelarosa750
@jorgedelarosa750 2 ай бұрын
Quality content as usual Paul. Thank you for sharing your knowledge 🙏
@paulallen5321
@paulallen5321 2 ай бұрын
Many thanks!