Birdbrain

Пікірлер

@salinasbatrezjose1434 3 күн бұрын

Hello, I am a student of electrical engineering, and I am doing a research project, to make known the axial flow motor. It would be very gratifying for me if you would give me your help, providing me with electrical data, and under what principles you did it. Either way, the video provides a lot of information, thank you and keep up with what you do. Success and greetings from Mexico

@BirdbrainEngineer 3 күн бұрын

For this one, I just sort of winged it based on intuition and what I had seen on the Internet haha. But I am currently designing a diy axial flux bldc motor that I intend to use as an e-bike motor. For the ongoing project I have used FEMM (unfortunately it is not good for axial flux motor electromagnetic simulations as it is a 2D-only FEM software) to do the magnetic analysis, and I have used FreeCAD to do a bit of structural analysis, namely to figure out the deflection of the rotors due to the magnetic forces pulling on core iron/the opposing rotor.

@um_idkw 5 күн бұрын

this video is almost a year old ^^

@BirdbrainEngineer 4 күн бұрын

Yeah... life is too busy to make videos unfortunately :/ I'll probably make another cellular -continuous- space-time automata video this year though... but after summer

@cyanuranus6456 7 күн бұрын

More Digital Organisms

@Kram1032 8 күн бұрын

I think Asymptotic Lenia is a great idea for making Lenia more real-life-plausible. There is another very nice variant, Flow-Lenia, which makes Lenia far more robust and also seems to me to at least partially tackle one problem Asymptotic Lenia has. It introduces mass conservation of sorts. I would love to see those two variants combined into one to see if something even more plausible emerges. If we managed to implement full mass conservation, it'd potentially become possible to literally simulate Lenia in a petridish with carefully balanced reagents.

@guygerstel-wd6bs 10 күн бұрын

your cute

@Neptune185 10 күн бұрын

Where do you code in?

@BirdbrainEngineer 10 күн бұрын

VS Code

@Neptune185 10 күн бұрын

@@BirdbrainEngineer thanks

@sentinelav 12 күн бұрын

This is what autism was invented for. Amazing

@streetos 14 күн бұрын

Please mix your music lower, it's way too loud compared to your voice

@lorenbush8876 20 күн бұрын

It's not the number of turns , it's the length of wire or the same resistance.

@802Garage 20 күн бұрын

Very cool! Just makes me realize I still need to learn so much more, hahaha.

@Ericevijayohiani 20 күн бұрын

Can you make it brushless? Its cool though never seen such before

@InfiniteBubbles 28 күн бұрын

just a small thing it is physically kinda impossible to go much under 500nm with light microscopes because your light wavelenght is literally maxing out in that range. you are pretty much at the edge of what a normal light microscope can deliver.

@BirdbrainEngineer 28 күн бұрын

With no extra tricks, optical microscopes can resolve objects as small as half the wavelength of visible light, which means it would be possible to make out features down to about 200-250nm or so. So, technically there's still some ways to go, not to mention having worked with it a bit by now, in practice, without painstakingly finding the most optimal z height and all, I am only able to resolve features down to about 500nm (with the 40x objective that the microscope came with)... beyond that it's really a chore to really see anything on a real IC for example.

@InfiniteBubbles 22 күн бұрын

@@BirdbrainEngineer yuss you just sounded so dissappoinnted with the "just to 300nm" and thats already about so close to how good it gets especially if you dont use a single wavelength light source love your video and will definitly use all the inspiration I can get for my own microscope, want to stalk bacteria with it tho

@HavenInTheWood Ай бұрын

This video is tremendously appreciated! This is just the guidance I was looking for!

@Poellieone Ай бұрын

Really like your approach. It's entertaining, educating and I very much like the fact you integrate historical knowledge. Keep up the good work ❤

@olhoTron Ай бұрын

You did it in Rust eh... now I feel compelled to do it in glorious Go!

@BirdbrainEngineer Ай бұрын

Go for it! :D

@qondonyon Ай бұрын

8:17 my eyes when i rub them

@Thenoobyone2981 2 күн бұрын

i see the 4th dimention when i rub them

@zhangzq71 Ай бұрын

it is a great design, I want to build one but there URL is not valid, can you update the URL?

@nagarasings Ай бұрын

I loved this all the way... Still waiting on how you'll solve the voltage drop😊

@brianrichmond3777 Ай бұрын

I really like the stepper motor controlled bidirectional stage. You could do the same with stepper motor and a higher pixel camera for focusing so the stepper motor is controlled by software that determines when an object is first in focus, takes a photo, then incrementally focus further down in increments and taking a photo at each focus increment until the object is just out of focus then stack the individually focused photos.

@emanuelmarconi3305 Ай бұрын

Tienes que reducir el entre-hierro en motores de reluctancia

@emanuelmarconi3305 Ай бұрын

It is more efficient than the motor with magnets

@FxFRT Ай бұрын

Axial foucoult force? Lorentz movement? Try to imagine a vertical force like lorentz force in simply effect

@baongocnguyenhong5674 2 ай бұрын

you have a magnificent taste in music

@knownas2017 2 ай бұрын

My guy's gonna program an entirely new universe.

@rafakliber9147 2 ай бұрын

love the video. quick q tho: at 10:4 i am unsure why the sum goes over i. I get that you convolve a select channel j per each kernel k. Then you take the growth function of the result. for each Gk you multiply by a weight coefficient Wk. each weight belongs to one channel i tho, you do not sum over all weights, right? (also otherwise the indicies dont really work out)

@BirdbrainEngineer 2 ай бұрын

I am not good with mathematical notation, and I do remember that while making the video I was not sure how exactly to really represent the whole algorithm, but I guess you might be right that the i does not belong under the sum there, as the result is for the i-th channel in the first place. My mind works much better with algorithmic way of thinking rather than with mathematical notation... I straight out get a headache every time I need to make sense of mathematical notation in papers for something haha.

@IconicHulk-xi1xw 2 ай бұрын

Could we directly use the spin coater on windows instead of the homemade graphical interface ?

@BirdbrainEngineer 2 ай бұрын

I am not sure what you mean... Do you mean if it'd be possible to interface the spin coater to a PC running Windows? If so, then the answer is that technically you could, but one would need to write quite a lot of extra code to facilitate some sort of protocol to talk to a program or webserver on the PC. If you mean that whether the spin coater itself could run Windows, then the answer is no; the hardware is far too weak for that, and even if you used a proper raspberry pi to run say Raspberry Pi OS (Linux), then you'd technically lose the RTOS capabilities of dedicated hardware, which may or may not work out.

@danthiel8623 2 ай бұрын

interesting

@user-uk5jq4mp7v 2 ай бұрын

Amazing work!...........................💯💯💢💢

@stupid-handle 2 ай бұрын

You but did a really good job there!

@EverydayNormieMadafacka 2 ай бұрын

yo cool bird dudette! 1:10 Now I might be flying a little to high, if you catch my drift, but could you like idk combine them or smt? Surely more means better, right?

@BirdbrainEngineer 2 ай бұрын

IIRC, that would be called a "raxial flux" motor, and they do exist, and they are basically the highest power density motors in the world. Maybe one day I will try to make one.

@EverydayNormieMadafacka 2 ай бұрын

@@BirdbrainEngineer❤

@user-ft4nc9ei7f 2 ай бұрын

wow, I.. didn't think I'd enjoy this video so much, however indeed it was really enjoyable. thank you for sharing it with us👍

@diegogutierrezraghunath9315 2 ай бұрын

Where did you how to do all of this

@CollinKeegan 2 ай бұрын

The simple explanation of axial flux and synchronous motors followed by "reluctance is.... uhhhh........" was so real

@nuttyDesignAndFab 2 ай бұрын

you could probably skip the rubber membrane; rubber has a lot of hysteresis that eats your efficiency. these things often have some sort of slippery plastic piston seals? teflon, UHMW Polyethylene, or maybe nylon?

@nuttyDesignAndFab 2 ай бұрын

the gap created by the print between your windings and the laminations probably causes a lot of reluctance. reluctance motors in general are lower torque and are more sensitive to air gap also. for your KV: you should do the opposite test, drive the motor at a set RPM and measure the output voltage under open circuit

@svn5669 2 ай бұрын

Impressive work ! 👍🏻

@interhaker 2 ай бұрын

Is this lad trans?

@TanvirOnYT 2 ай бұрын

This is one of the most beautiful thing I've ever seen in my life. And the most beautiful thing I've seen in this year so far.

@unalkucuker219 2 ай бұрын

Good job, congratulations. It is inspiring.

@veyselk.a698 2 ай бұрын

Thats a beatiful video and channel I love it

@mickmuzzmkmz1628 2 ай бұрын

Hey, if it doesn't work too good as an ebike motor, it would make a pretty good air raid siren!😅

@the_nows 2 ай бұрын

Now try it with resistance!

@Valgween 2 ай бұрын

pretty cool but is it possible to build a computer in Lenia that runs Doom.

@BirdbrainEngineer 2 ай бұрын

Someone already asked that some weeks ago haha... The answer is... Both! A certain Lenia ruleset can simulate Conway's game of life, which is Turing complete, therefore in that case Lenia itself is also Turing complete and could compute anything that could ever be computed, including Doom. At the same time, there are some rulesets that are trivially not Turing complete (eg. The ruleset that would simply simulate diffusion/blurring). For any given ruleset, there is no known way to easily tell whether the ruleset is Turing complete or not. If somebody could figure it out, it'd be extremely big news and very useful outside of the field of cellular- and continuous automata as well.

@Valgween 2 ай бұрын

thanks didn't expect a serious answer for my not so serious comment.

@BirdbrainEngineer 2 ай бұрын

@@Valgween Haha, sorry, this kind of computer science is something I just have to nerd out over. And it's not every day you get to let someone know of a frontier of humanity's knowledge that is tied to one of your interests! :D

@CatastrophicNickName 2 ай бұрын

Amazing ! Keep pushing these designs <3

@MisterQuacker 2 ай бұрын

Great video good soul! Enjoy your day <3

@garbageman3992 2 ай бұрын

awesome video! really good production quality, extremely informative, one of the most informative Iv seen in a while, and just ingenuity at its finest with all that math and good understanding of the motor and its physics! EDIT: also Im just curious and i doubt this comment will get seen but how do reluctance motors induce a back emf/ resistance of some sort to the input voltage. all motors of some sort have some sort of back resistance because as rpm increases output power increases and thus input voltage and current draw should also change. or if there is no back emf or anything how would a motor like this work or what shape power chart would it produce?

@TiagoTiagoT 2 ай бұрын

Would the lenses of the optical drives be of any use?

@BirdbrainEngineer 2 ай бұрын

Probably not. The lenses in the optical drives are small (even the half mirrors in it are too small - I initially wanted to use a half mirror from there).

@MrFiguradaniel 3 ай бұрын

Cool stuff. PGMEA is most common solvent in spin coating photoresists, also ethyl lactate and cyclophenone is used. If you need your layers get measured properly let me know, I have both profiler and while light spectromter available

@swittman9123 3 ай бұрын

This would be a great place to use a Pi Zero given your low compute needs, but I imagine the full size pi is what you already had lying around.

@BirdbrainEngineer 3 ай бұрын

Yes, the Raspberry Pi 3 is what I had laying about and unused. As for using the Zero... I'm not convinced it could handle the stream at such a high fps (maybe the Zero 2 could), plus the stream over wlan is going to be a concerning proposition compared to just lan. I did try to stream over wi-fi in this case too, but it did have some problems... but that could simply be because my router is kind of far from the microscope and the signal quality isn't really the best it could be.

@h3dzer 3 ай бұрын

From microscope to a cyberpunk-looking microcosm world viewer.

@newtitojff 3 ай бұрын

Nice project, can the fps of the camera be higher with lower resolution?

@BirdbrainEngineer 3 ай бұрын

Yes. At 1080p you can easily get 30fps, 60 might be difficult but iirc the Raspberry Pi cam 3 is able to do it technically. You will certainly need heat sinks on your Raspberry Pi though, as the streaming is quite demanding, even with the heat sinks shown in the video, the Pi gets up to like 60-65C.

Ең жақсы KZfaq

Пікірлер