Surely making the sky looks more "dramatic" is gonna make your photos look more decent. But idk these examples are way too obvious or too extreme

Real answer: Whatever you think looks best

The winning formula wasnt even one of the options you presented

Love it

How did you do this

I have my D850 on order and am eagerly awaiting delivery. I chose it because I have f-mount glass already and virtually every review I could find rates it as an incredible camera. I needed to upgrade from my D5500 which I use primarily for bird photography. I do very little video or I would have considered one of the mirrorless models but that would require new glass. I watched several KZfaq videos with the D850 matched to a Sigma 150-600 C and they were all very positive. Since I already have this lens, and considering all the features of this camera, choosing the D850 seemed like a no brainer. I am very excited to get it in my hands to start playing. Videos like yours were what helped my make my decision. Thank you.

🥱

Ibis as low as 1/2 a second dependent on camera ...ive shot 1/10th woth a 100-200 the lens Fujifilm ibis works better than a nikon ...follow william patino. This information isnt right and yes i shoot tack sharp images. Also, the way you hold the camera is critical.Which Tim didn't mention?There are 2 other factors involved.Then just coming up with some mathematical equation.And just because of photo wins in award doesn't make it a great photo either.That's just rubbish.Those competitions are paid and often.The winning photo is not particularly great

Xd

boring

Neither because all of those choices are really poor compositions and done to death..... Flat out unimaginative

I still think the fake blur from smartphones looks a bit off and feels really cheap, so if I have to use it to tone down the background a bit, it'll usually keep it light.

How would you describe yourself? you have three options. •Opinionated •Snooty •Annoying

"Tell me you're incredibly snooty in your hobby without telling me you're incredibly snooty in your hobby."

I think that it is ok in the before........ more realistic

What if the subject insists that you photograph her whole body?

Where the main subject sir?

Sometimes i have the camera on selfie mode by accident. i feel like that makes the image alot worse.

thanks have learn a lot today.

Forgot the leading lines

It's a photography, it's art. Not a standardized thing. Dome places are just empty, some are too colorful, some are really detailed. That's the world. Tips should help people to make a photo that they like. Not to make s photo that you want others to make

If? You think it's okay to replace the sky? Then it would also be OK just to take a photo of a landscape and place the animals in the landscape because they are exactly the same thing now you wouldn't do that, would you? You wouldn't place those African animals in an english field, would ye, do you see my point?

No thanks.Tim with all jures respect.That's too far and you know it!

These all seem incredibly subjective. A lot of these example photos look really cool. Surely most of the things you describe as mistakes are things people could be doing on purpose? Like any art form, surely it's quite hard to call something like not having a main subject a 'mistake'? The example photo shows a vast space, you don't need a person or a windmill or something in the middle to look at, you can just appreciate the whole photo, the whole landscape. A main subject could take that aspect away from a photo like this, since it would distract from the vast landscape. I could probably make similar arguments for most of the 'mistake' photos here. I just don't see how you can blanket call something a mistake when you don't know if that was actually the original intent.

So many rules... I don't agree. 👎

great tips!

before was so much better

Wow

No offense but they look better before, they look fake in the after pictures.

You didn't "just" change the sky. And the last one doesn't look good at all. The other ones though 👌👌

You are the mistake

No

what an amazing video, that indoor lightning and green screen part was the best to demonstrate. thanks a lot.

Absolutely. Lighting is everything. As above, so below.

How is this possible?

I don't know, man.That mountain is my hero

The sky looked great. Dreamy.

I thought it was a trick question so I chose 3 but 1 was obvious from the start

Your videos are very helpful thank you

I think they all look great. Who invented these rules and what makes them the judge of what can and can’t be a good photo? A pretty landscape is a pretty landscape. Does this make every photo of a barren desert a dud since there’s nothing in it but sand dunes? This is why I will never be able to get into art. Too many gatekeepers.

No 2 looks photoshopped....

I agree about the lines and the river line but the colors and the color contrasts are the focal points in all photos .. the focal points are what makes each photo interesting and unique 😊

I thought it was the uper one because it looks cool

I have no clue. I don't care. And why is this being shown to me?? KZfaq keeps giving me garbage videos like this and I hate it

I got it immediately does this mean I'm improving

Excellent Photography Tip Tim. Thank you.

😮

Probably number 1, it fells kinda dull compared to the others

I wouldn't put option 3 on my wall at home

U r so talented.