Интересно у меня на seikoга черепаха безель немножко не совпадает двенадцати часами буквально на пол деления если разогреть этот клей и чуть-чуть повернуть застынет останется наверное в таком же положении как положено?на 12 )))?

Technically, you can not steal a design once it has been released, only copied, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. Regarding the precision of movement - I often don't wear my automatic Tag Carrera on a weekend, long enough that it stops, and on Monday I have to set the time and the date. San Martin losing tge whole minute a day (probably the worst case scenario, as Seiko movement is pretty good) - five minutes a week - is not a big deal. As far a small details are concerned, it is all about comparison, and when you have one watch on your wrist little flaws are not as obvious (or important for that matter) as when comparing watches side by side. And yes, making a watch review while driving a car is not adding credibility to it.

I have many expensive watch and this one was a steal for me (skx sport gmt) one of my favorite watch

And then sell it for $200.00 ?

Hey burbinghard, what does this cologne smell like?

Excelente información yo tengo un Seiko V172 0AL0 y para cambiar la batería me cuesta casi 80 dólares .... Muchas Gracias

quick change my balls, wasted $65 on Tissot prx strap, impossible to get on, bracelet goes right on. China garbage

If you don’t like that San Martin, give it to me please. My son is about to enter his senior year in high school. Could use a good beater for college.

I bought a dozen of San Martin watches , and I love them , go screww yourself

I feel like many people earned their scratches from their dogs 😂. Got my Nomos Club Campus on Wednesday and on Friday my dog jumped at my and scratched the stainless steel

can i use absolutes the same way instead of essential oils?

''it's never cool to be a copy''? so why is everyone getting Tudors? oh and before Rolex made real tool watches, they did not copy? they did not borrow movements from others????

Next video , “ are Kia good cars “ … comparing them to Bentley … lmao

I own some of the original expensive watches and some San Martin hommages. They are good watches and definitely good value for money!

You mention that male end on one side is 10mm, can anyone confirm this? I have an after market clasp and want to use it with this bracelet.

It comes with 2 sets of screws. Which size do I use the thinner or thicker ones?

I mean I hear what you are saying but their some that are not copies, would be nice to mention this or take that into consideration when making a video in a watch community.

Pompous, self aggrandising drivel. I didn't bother watching the conclusion.

This is a lazy review, borderline disingenuous. Not good.

San Martin is my go to for travel... UK, Mexico, etc.

High end watches are not accurate....

I own a rolex a tutor and 5 san Martins. 3 of my san martins keep better time than my rolex and blackbay. I think you just got a bad movement.

Dont review a watch while you're driving a car, and then criticize San Martin as if it cost the same as your Tudor. Where's the justice in what your did? Compare fairly; please consider the price point as well.

Amazing video! I carry a small Inkosi Micarta inlay drop point as my EDC.

Watched this review with concerns regarding your assessment style. I am a small time collector and I can only afford watches that are valued up to $500. Comparing this San Martin to a watch like a Rolex is ridiculous and hardly fair. Most of us can't afford to spend 10 to 20,000$ on a watch. Looking down on those of us who buy watches that look like more expensive watches is snobby and disingenuous . Suggesting that watchmakers come up with original designs is also unrealistic. I don't remember Rolex or even Omega coming up with a completely original design in the last 20 years. Complaining that these so-called fake watches lose 20 or 40 seconds per day is also a joke. Most of us don't have the machine that measures such a thing and also if we have a bit of a collection we only wear the watch for a day or two or maybe a long weekend and then we change to another watch in our collection not even noticing the piece may have lost a minute or two. Is youre schedule actually that tight? I regularly watch and subscribe to Jody, Teddy, Marc, Andrew and others who purchase, recommend and wear the watches you look down upon. They also own the Black Bays and Seamasters. I'd put my 1973 Accutron or Citizen Blue Angels Eco-Drive AT up against any 20,000$ watch for accuracy any day. Also, the NH35 is bullet proof. It would cost me 80$ to replace if it fails--which it won't. How much is a calbre 3135? Out.

First time viewer and a last time viewer. This dude is a watch snob. 😂😂😂😂

Of course an tudor homage is not a tudor,also a minimum salary is not bill gate salary,so let the poor people who are the majority in this planet naving the sensation to worn a tudor they will never buy,not because they dont want just because they cant...so i am ok with san martin and dont hope to have a tudor for 300$

Due to the significant price gap, Tudor and San Martin are not comparable. However, when San Martin demonstrates unparalleled value for money, it prompts people to consider whether Tudor possesses quality commensurate with its high price. This encourages consumers to rethink their purchasing strategies, indirectly compelling Tudor to seriously consider quality rather than relying solely on its brand to maintain high prices. This is also advantageous for Tudor's consumers.

I don’t own any San Martin watches but I have never seen a bad watch review for a San Martin watch. Will watch snobs look down on someone for wearing a San Martin? Probably but who cares about the opinions of snobs.

Sorry they also use PT500 or even a Selita SW200

Unfortunately you lost me within the first minute or so seeing you come in with a massive bias. I subscribe to many watch channels. Yours will not be one.

Great video. It makes it easy when you see someone doing it. Thank You.

I have advanced in the other direction… my wife and I just retired at 55 and 55 respectively and money is not a barrier for me. I started with the big boys… Rolex, 1 Patek, Omega and as I became more able to afford what I want, I have realized I want these Seiko’s. I still love and wear my GMT Master II, my Seamaster and my Doxa’s but Seiko impresses me more… it’s very hard to make a really good $500 watch and I too just got the Pepsi turtle and for the money, as well as the ssk003, these watches are incredible. I will add a Submariner to my collection but the bulk of my future buys will be these Seiko’s!

sur les 35 mn ya pas d’autre bracelet..

This has to be the worst watch review that I've ever encountered. A guy driving around with car background noise and maybe 5% of the video is the actual watch. Talks bullshit with no backup for it. Awful from all angles, first and last time I watch this.

You got a bad one… San Martins are renowned for their great finishing - better than higher end brands I am 65 and been a collector for years. I have a huge watch collection, and I can personally tell you that TUDOR finishing is awful for the price. I have 6 Tudors in my collection and 3 of them have alignment problems - 2 of them straight poor bezel alignment! I would say, hand on heart that the finishing on the couple of San Martins I have is at least equal to if not better quality than my Tudors ! The NH35 is a workhorse of a Seiko movement, reliable and stable and perfect for the San Martins to keep the price low .

Hmmm. I have five SMs, after a long series (i am 69) of Seikos, Citizens, Tissots and even a Rado. Firstly, the NH3x movements are bottom-tier, for sure, and to be avoided; both the accuracy and crown comments -- not unknown for NH3x -- are inconsistent with the ETA 2824-clones in my watches. All mine are COSC-accurate in use. But you pay for that: mine are maybe $70 more than the NH3x models. The dial and case quality are all clearly exceeding Swiss models < $2k (or more), but "no" they aren't better than top tier watches. But i *like* fully functional classic designs; you can call them clones. I will smile. -- gary ray

That was making me nervous

Best bang for buck watch on the market. This guy knows nothing

You look had a pretty bad chance. I bought a San Martin last month. After a month the San Martin only have 1 minute ahead atomic time. Also alignment of the bezel is perfect. It cannot compet with luxurious watchmakers of course but for the money, regarding that price range is hard to beat San Martin imo.

I couldn't find where to buy a new bezel insert, as my old one ( 7 years old now) is scraped, scratched. Anny suggestion?

San Martin gets a pass. They have some more original designs with great finishing. San Martin is legit

Don't care for the watch but this so called review is utter horse shit.

Jesus Christ. I don't wear a watch to be respected. You buy a watch to show others you're wort their respect. That's sad.

My San Martin 62MAS 'homage' is my most accurate watch at just +5s per day. My £1k+ watches by major brands, not so much.

The Cartier Santos is an iconic beauty but I would not buy one. Why? Because the Santos is very scratch prone, especially on the high polished bezel. Cartier knows about this flaw and refuses to fix it, meanwhile, KZfaqrs keep making excuses for the flawed and subpar metal casing. Silver colored watches, such as stainless steel and titanium, are the defacto metal of choice. There are stainless steels that prone to scratches and stainless steels that are not prone to scratches, as well as coatings too. Why, in 2024, aren't manufacturers making "scratch-proof" watches? There are PVD coatings and nomenclatures like 316L steel, super titanium, TinSkin 3.0, and platinum encasements. A company as profitable and well funded as Cartier has no excuse for making watches that are scratch prone. Invest a little R&D and fix this problem. Having the bezel on a Cartier Santos scratched by something as innocuous as the cuff of your shirt is unforgivable.It's not just a Cartier problem, but most luxury watchmakers don't put in the effort to ensure their watches are "scratch-proof" or as scratch resistant as possible. It's a shame. For this reason alone I would never buy a Cartier Santos. Profits above all. So what are the most scratch resistant metals? Tegiment steel and UltraHex titanium.

Please help and put both the Tudor GMT next to a Rolex GMT, both watches shown from the side, so we can see the difference in their thickness. Most Tudor GMT owners complain is that it is too thick. The Rolex GMT is 12mm thick, while the Tudor GMT is 14.6mm. So the Tudor GMT is 2.6mm thicker than a Rolex GMT. Thanks. Update: Just found what I was looking for here at the 6 minute mark: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j91oeZRlu-CUqp8.html The Tudor is much thicker, and I wonder how uncomfortable it maybe for its wearers?

Why do you use propylene glycol as a carrier? Im just trying to learn. What does that do? Also where did you buy those ingredients and tools?

Hello, any idea if the erasure will work with bead blasted titanium?

This company is dishonest and does not put care into their product. I received the watch, wound it up, and tested it. It was losing 3 hours a day. The GMT hand was also not lined up properly with the indices. I wrote the company directly and talked with Glenn Yu. He said it must have been damaged in transit, and to return it, after taking many pictures. I did just that. They said they would pay return shipping. the cheapest I could find was UPS. After receiving the watch, SAN MARTIN claimed that their were scratches on the bracelet, and they were only refunding 80%. I sent pictures of the watch which proved that there were NO SCRATCHES. They said the return shipping was too expensive. So, I spent $426 plus $96 (tax and duties) plus $166 in return shipping. But my refund is only $341. That's $340 gone...and no watch. Nothing. If that's the experience you want, go ahead and try doing business with them.