How sad 😢

Somewhat marred by the fact that the current owner murdered her.

If gravity is an effect of one mass upon another, then surely the neutrons within a neutron star exert gravitational attraction on each other? That is how all objects like planets, stars and black holes are held together. Gravity is also not the only force acting upon the neutrons in a neutron star; they are prevented from further collapse by neutron degeneracy pressure and I believe the strong force as well. About 2000 neutron stars have been discovered since the 1960s. Notable ones are the Crab pulsar, the Black Widow pulsar, PSR J0952-0607, and RX J1856.5−3754. I think it's safe to say that they do exist. If astronomers discover evidence to the contrary, then they will certainly adjust their models, but at the moment there's arguably more evidence for the existence of neutron stars than even the existence of black holes.

There are 2000 objects they have may named Neutron stars, but, there is no empirical evidence of them actually being neutron stars. Neutrons once removed from an atom decay onto a proton, electron and a photon. It is one thing to hypothesize that gravity is doing as you say, it is a whole other thing to prove that gravity is doing as you say. These are, like Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Black Holes hypothetical objects. Planet and stars are not held together by gravity. In QM, they pretty much ignore gravity as its effect is so inconsequential. The attractive force of the gravitational effect is 10^39 times weaker than the electric force. When Vera Rubin observed not enough mass in a galaxy to maintain its cohesion against its angular momentum it should have been seen as an invalidation of the theory that gravity was/is the dominant force in space. Rather than question their model, they invented a hypothetical stuff which cannot be found. This is called confirmation bias. The problem with astronomers is that they are for the most part a narrow minded lot who are attached to materialist reductionist mode of thinking. If they discover something that invalidates their model, they just make up some virtual or dark stuff, even though there is absolutely no physical evidence of it. Both Dark Matter and Dark Energy are the products of confirmation bias. If you want to believe in that these hypothetical stuffs do exist, by all means, go for it, it is your right to put your faith where you desire. But frankly, it is a load of hypothetical nonsense which from my perspective borders on pseudo science. I do not care what the majority of experts astronomers say, because a consensus belief is not evidence of anything but a belief. All these hypothetical objects are assumed to be as you say based on a narrow minded perspective supported by institutional tyranny. . @@harvey854

It's still hilarious