@5:25 I'm confused, that depends the level of light pollution, no?
@sofiavasieva1636Күн бұрын
This is a really good question, and I probably should've been more clear about this in the video. When we quote the apparent magnitude of any object, it is a standardised measure that assumes ideal observing conditions (and so this is sometimes referred to as the "intrinsic" apparent magnitude). (Note: if that answered your question, feel free to ignore the rest of this comment - I thought I'd provide some additional information but I don't want to cause any more confusion!) Meanwhile, the "observed" apparent magnitude of an object can vary due to weather conditions, pollution, etc (and we usually ignore such effects in questions like those). Apart from "intrinsic apparent magnitude" and "observed apparent magnitude", we could also talk about the concept of "percieved brightness", which is an arbitrary term to refer to how bright a star is _percieved_ to be in the sky. It is _percieved brightness_ that's affected by light pollution. If you think about it, light pollution alone doesn't change the apparent magnitude of an object, because the object is just as bright as it was before - it's just that the background sky is brighter than it would otherwise be. What happens when we're dealing with light pollution is that the background light "overpowers" those dimmer stars and so only the brighter stars are visible at all. There's a change in "percieved brightness" because the brightness contrast between the stars and the background sky has been reduced. Dim stars are even harder to see and hence appear even dimmer, but this alone does not affect their (both intrinsic and observed) apparent magnitude. An even more nuanced point that I wondered about once is the question of whether light pollution can somehow "add" to a star's brightness and actually cause its apparent magnitude to increase. Effects like that, however, are negligible (and kind of complicated) and don't really affect the observed apparent magnitude. If you have any more questions, feel free to reply to this!
@videomotioner694202 күн бұрын
Thank you so much, im worried about going to a levels and going through the whole applications process, this is exactly what I needed!! Also Sofia is an amazing teacher
@sofiavasieva1636Күн бұрын
Thank you so much, and best of luck with your A-Levels and applications!
@zhelyo_physics2 күн бұрын
Fantastic video!
@sofiavasieva1636Күн бұрын
Thank you so much, I love your channel!
@JustFamilyPlaytime3 күн бұрын
Sofia is a great explainer - looking forward to seeing her with her own channel. I'll be using this video with my A-level students. We need another Dr. Becky.
@JustFamilyPlaytime3 күн бұрын
A question about spinlaunch! LOL.
@bennolan92173 күн бұрын
Particularly liked Sofia’s pronunciation of the great Monsieur Charles Messier! Great explanations and very fun video on the rarely seen topic of astrophysics here on KZfaq 😊
@sofiavasieva16363 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for having me at your studio, Lewis - it was so fun to film the videos!
@PhysicsOnline3 күн бұрын
Amazing to work with you on this video - I learned so much about space and astronomy in the process!
@FernandoMoreiraR4 күн бұрын
great summary!!
@supasayajinsongoku44645 күн бұрын
Is there anything free for yr 12s going into yr 13 to do for physics in general?? (Summer schools etc.)
@supasayajinsongoku44645 күн бұрын
In the summer
@PhysicsOnline4 күн бұрын
I do have these www.alevelphysicsonline.com/introduction-to-a-level-physics
@jesslynprawira49406 күн бұрын
omg small sneak peek of what physicsonline looks like i love ur vids btw best physics channel
@MikeFuller-ok6ok9 күн бұрын
WOW!! I don't even understand how levers work.
@birendrashaw538110 күн бұрын
Veri good
@birendrashaw538110 күн бұрын
😢😅
@428Jonathon13 күн бұрын
I hope electricity doesn't have a future. How are we supposed to upgrade to the next power supply?
@drenters289116 күн бұрын
This is as level only right
@FaithSamuel_0016 күн бұрын
Finally I get it, cheers boss!
@ladyfoxwf107516 күн бұрын
20:17
@erhanjaved590317 күн бұрын
I was dozing in my physics class cuz I knew that you would have an even better short and simple video about kvl😂
@moys61317 күн бұрын
Thank you so much
@ChemistryByCandlelight18 күн бұрын
British teaching at its very best!
@thomaswylde997418 күн бұрын
Hi, just to let you know, I think there's an error in your title xD. what level lol
@MEMOR13S15 күн бұрын
A-Level...
@ily49218 күн бұрын
Bump
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time18 күн бұрын
Could light and matter in the form of electrons be waves over a ‘period of time’ and have particle characteristics relative to the atoms of the Periodic Table when we have the absorption and emission of light? Is the exchange of light photon ∆E=hf energy continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, as an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future unfolds?
@yaseenelhosseiny18 күн бұрын
The force of an object is directly proportional to its rate of change of velocity(acceleration) and it’s inversely proportional to its mass
@ARCSTREAMS19 күн бұрын
why were the red lines visible at first then seemed to be disappearing when looking into the red filter at the end of the vid?