so sad...

The Dome of the Rock on the Temple Mount is a shrine, NOT a mosque. Sadly, the structure is built directly over the Foundation Stone. There IS also a mosque named Al-Aqsa on the Temple Mount.

The narrator is someone from my school days, old nature documentaries sounds like ? Familiar! 👍

I watched a show about old houses. One house had a long underground tunnel that went to a well. It was made that way at the time so they wouldn't have to walk out side to the well so they wouldn't get attacked by Indians getting water.

Donna Mills!!!

This is a good show..not ruined by fake scenarios or drama or name calling ...😊

Yeah surprisingly good, congrats on what you accomplished! You should be so proud.

The lessons ppl learn from you ...can and will change life's of those that may not understand some things u say ..could be after they left your words ring a bell for them and it can n will go full circle .

The middle east were friends of the convention. What happened? Religion and the war between them. That's what His-Story has prepared for the future. If anyone believes the official narrative they're a Dumbass at this point beyond the 1900s. People are stupid because they won't look beyond 10- years ago. Look a couple of thousands of years ago. Choose to learn instead of being told. Being told is your downfall. Learning is your upheaval. You've got a brain inside your head and a supercomputer in your pocket. Learn now because learning later is a downfall to mankind.

I don't like headgear...I've gotten more headaches w that on getting hit...I feel like it works against u

Worth the watch good job girl

Wtf zero likes after 79 views ..sorry number 80 here is setting the tone for u posers

Was this documentary made back in the ‘70’s? If not and was made recently, turn the damn music down! Holy crap! You ruin the video with all the incessant loud-ass music. 👎

There is no mystery in homeopathy sir. When tiny amount of a poison is diluted in alcohol the alcohol absorbs it 100 percent as it becomes the whole that poison. The body considers those drops as big amount of that poison and immediately starts the natural anti bodies to heal that poison effect but infact that is not poison so body gets no harm but benefits from the anti bodies made by natural healing process. Sir this is just because of the alcohol. When you pour a little substance of some harming agent in alcohol, alcohol absorbs it hundred percent as it becomes that substance fully.

Wow house cover and family bring him back

Agree !

There's one thing about the shroud the hair of a male in the first century might of been short.

Thanks!

Not a chance.

I know it's cliche... but they really don't make em like this anymore! Great Documentary!

I loved this series!❤

Spent 2 years on Fort Riley KS so found thus interesting, must have been a joyful area to be stationed in the early 1800s.

The music got very annoying.

It's a 3,000-year-old story. Why are you worried about it now?. Resolve the old ancient gold that the Egyptians had the syrians the Babylonians the Hittites, the Greeks the Romans. Most of the recycled through other nations that conquered them. What makes the ark any different?. If God told them to make the ark then how come it looks so much like other Egyptian antiquities of its time?. It would be another really cool artifact that would be displayed at a museum.

For the interest of the receiving Catholic church this doc is fake there too many parasites living from Virgens ang Guadalupe lie apart from sending people to hell 5hey collect huge amount of money to pay historian's Fake Religión

I lived at #4 Reynolds Ave. Ft. Leavenworth, KS. I was also a Whipper-in at the last military foxhunt in the USA, The Ft. Leavenworth Hunt. I went to visit the German POW graves, tucked away in a long forgotten part of the fort.

I dont understand how 7 people and animals would fit in such a small ark i think it would have sunk to the bottom of the ocean where it may be today

I have a relative on my fathers side, Del Rue, he was Quarter Master to the Osage in Pawhuska. His House is a Historical Landmark.

No, the Trail is now Highway 50 it is not gone.

Should have ate Mulberries to get rid of Scurvy

You ask us for the way to Gold, we told you it was right through a bunch of Crazy Indians that would Kill You. Kitowa Treaty of 1817.

If the ark was made of gold you would need more than four people to carry it

Pikes Peak is what you see but the Trail goes over Monarch Pass, the beginning of the Arkansas River.

Fort Scott is difficult because it is on the Arkansas Trail.

Buffalo's followed the Rivers leaving a Buffalo Trail to follow, before white man arrived.

My relatives were Kitowa Scouts from Knoxville TN to Pueblo Co on the Tennessee, Mississippi, and Arkansas Rivers. Actually with the Savannah and the Colorado Rivers, all the way across the USA on The Santa Fe. Kitowa Union Cherokee Scouts. Our Treaty is the Treaty of 1817

such an aries, i just love her

What a fable

More than just a story. All historical fact. Believe the bible.

Erradicate implant chip

"You have died of dysentery."

Most of their recruits came from the East. The Westerners knew what a soldier's life was like and wanted nothing to do with it. They had a lot of desertion and few re-enlistments. As a matter of perspective - at Little Big Horn - there were about 6,000 Indians, men, women and children - with between 1500 and 2500 combatants. Custer had about 450 guys total - of which about 235 were killed with him. At the Battle of Gettysburg there were over 70,000 guys *_ON EACH SIDE_* . The Indians didn't stand a chance. The only reason the Army had so much trouble with them - was Congress was cheap and wouldn't pay for enough men to keep the Indians from raiding each other and the Whites. When the Whites showed up - the Indians didn't treat them any differently than they had each other. They'd send out Raiding parties that were opportunistic. They'd make a judgment call - can we take them? If the answer was - no - or we'll suffer to many casualties - they'd go somewhere else. If the Answer was Yes - they'd steal the horsed, kill the men, rape the women and kidnap the girls and children they wanted to keep. They'd then take the women they captured back to their village and put their wombs to work making babies for their tribe instead of their enemies. The difference between the Whites and the other Indian Tribes - was the Whites could call on the Army. Once the Indians were put on Reservations - they were a lot easier to control - but - then they'd leave and the Army would have to chase them back. That is what the Army was doing on the Little Big Horn. After Custer, the Indians packed up and left but they could move about as fast as the Army could - so - the Army mostly just followed them around trying to catch them which on occasion they did. The big thing though - was that while they were being chased by the Army - they couldn't forage and began to get hungry. So - they went back to the Reservation where they knew the Government would feed them - and it did. Mission Accomplished - the Army went back to it's Barracks. .

Why do people need to be near anything of Jesus, saints. Do they thing objects will make them holy? Can not prove much from 2,000 years ago especially textiles. The vatican wants your money.

All a scam.

Though The SUDARIUM OF OVIEDO is consistent with John’s gospel and Jewish practice of placing a face cloth over a corpse, it is INCONSISTENT with the Shroud of Turin. If the Sudarium had been under the Shroud, there ought to be no face image on the Shroud, it would be on the cloth. If the Sudarium had been over the Shroud, there ought to be no blood on the Sudarium unless there was evidence of extensive bleeding through the Shroud. That proves that both could not have been used in the burial of Jesus. When it comes to SHROUD OF TURIN, it turned out to be a Medieval art(!) that was fraudulently presented as the genuine burial shroud of Jesus. The claim that is was from 1st Century was refuted using independent and verified carbon-dating. 3 samples taken from the "Shroud" 1988 and were dated using the latest C-14 radiocarbon dating technology by 3 of the best dating labs in the located in Tucson, Oxford, and Zurich. All three came back with remarkably similar result, dated the Shroud to the Middle Ages! The Church refused to accept this. The other evidence that Turin Shroud being a forgery; Anatomical evidence shows that the proportions of the figure depicted on the "Shroud" do not match those of an actual human being, but conform to the proportions of the Gothic art of the 14th Century. Archaeological evidence shows the fabric of the so-called "Shroud" is a form of linen woven in a 3 to 1 herringbone twill - a weave common in France in the Fourteenth Century and the style of linen most common in Medieval western Europe generally. Linen from the First Century Middle East, however, was almost always plain or tabby weave linen. We have many examples, from mummy wrappings to the linen wrappings on the Dead Sea Scrolls, and they are all plain weave linen. The stain of “blood” on the cloth is paint, composed of pigments. When the shroud was first “discovered,” an investigator from the Catholic Church located the forger who made it. The forger admitted to the forgery and explained how it was made. The Bible describes the shroud Jesus was buried in. The Shroud of Turin is not even close to the biblical description. If you believe the Shroud of Turin is real, that means the bible has to be wrong. Conclusion: Desperate creationists have spent years trying to come up with counters and denials of this evidence, or to discredit the carbon dating results. But the evidence is clear. The "Shroud" first appears in the heyday of Medieval relic faking - the 14th Century. It was immediately investigated by the local bishop and found to be a fake, with the artist who faked it admitting as much. It was later condemned as a fake again, with this condemnation upheld (reluctantly) by a relative of the family displaying it. Its iconography conforms to the art of the 14th Century, but not to what we know of the appearance of First Century Jews. It conforms to 14th Century artistic depictions of facial proportions, but not to actual human anatomy. And it conforms to what we know about Medieval linen in the Fourteenth Century, but not to burial cloths from the 1st Century. Despite desperate and often ridiculous and hysterical attempts to discredit the 1988 carbon dating results by devout religious believers in the "Shroud", these scientific results fit all the other evidence we have about this artefact. The only logical and objective conclusion that can be reached is that the so-called "Shroud" is a Medieval fake

Great documentary

nice documentary. Ads are really terrible

I had the honor and the privilege of serving as an officer in both the 7th Cavalry and the 10th Cavalry.

Not a Civil War !!! Eleven states legally left the Union. They formed another nation . . . the Confederate States of Americs. Butt hurt Lincoln and associates invaded another nation. FACT not FICTION !!!

Pull the other one, it’s got bells on.