Not mine. I'm Gen-X and I always enjoy his films for what they are - but there's very little in the way of genuine feeling in them; they're exercises in genre and for the most part, very surface, visceral experiences. Even in his dialogue, which is always fun to listen to - he doesn't reveal himself at all. Don't get me wrong, I love his films - but for my money, Paul Thomas Anderson is the greatest filmmaker of my generation and is doing much deeper, more probing, artistically satisfying and emotional work. From "Punch Drunk Love" to "There Will Be Blood" to "The Master" to "Phantom Thread" to "Licorice Pizza" to whatever his new film will be - for my own taste, he has it over Tarantino and takes a lot more risks as a writer and director. Tarantino - for all of his talent - has basically been making the exact same movie since "Reservoir Dogs". Even "Inglorious Basterds", which I think was his best film, ended up copping out of the themes it teased at and ended up just being an action genre film in the end. He just can't stop winking. I keep waiting for him to grow up and get out of the video store - but he just never has. Again, not saying his films are bad at all - I love them - but they never rise above a certain level for me. To me, I see Tarantino as Hitchcock - he's a brilliant genre filmmaker - but Anderson is Kubrick. Both are terrific for what they do - but for my personal taste, I prefer Anderson's work.