cool..

If you were to spin just one container on its center of access it would create a sentripital lens allowing one to look into the future with the proper lighting of cores.

😑Great this is going to be something flat earthers use in their arguments.... Thanks youtube.

Fantastic! Thank you and greetings from Brazil! 🇧🇷

Thanks 😊

Potentially, should we have a dinamic shape that could inflate to the cylinder shape and deflate back to a double cone it would move up and down. But would it be useful. Would an additional load (e.g. attached via string) be pulled as well? I will have to experiment with this... Thanks for sharing!

Cool......

What is the driving force to role it forward/upward???? It is not the gravaity.

cool!

Is it solid cone ?

how can really no teacher point this out? Feels like the teachers dont wanna answer the hard questions. When the object is further away than the focal point, why do we need a piece of paper at the formed image of the object to see it? Why not just have our eyes beyond that distance where the real image formed? shouldnt we see the object as if it was at that point then? shouldnt the real formed image be enough for us to see the the object as if it was appearing at that point? way infront of the lins?

çok……

cool.....

cool....

good explanation qi didn't explain this well

wow

cool..

Superbly explained.

Anish Shrivastava sir kanpur

Thank you so much for posting, and leaving you explanation up, so many years after your initial post! You have the better mousetrap, you simply need to find a way to get the word out to the world of people looking for great answers/explanations to their physics questions.

Kinda reminds me of that time when

Sir, how the thermacoal and stone particle will distribute in such a rotating container?

It's not rolling uphill it's falling into a hole and into a slot

great example! I'm learning break down now this helps

NMU!

corona discharge

ok thanks

Thanks, Ben Affleck

Shit audio.

The camera records the sparks incorrectly - unreliably, randomly leaves them out - Nyquist sampling theorem is violated in time domain. I feel contempt towards the engineer who designed the camera and want him to be fired.

Normal force acts perpendicular to the ladder?? or from the floor

jesus loves you!

Ben Affleck !

I finally get it. The shape stands tall at the bottom but protrudes down at the top therefore the center of gravity moved downward.

Great

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mM1prJWArdislpc.html

Please upload more vid.

Plz upload more vid. Plz sr

Plz upload more vid. Sr plz

thanks for teaching me :)

nice video uncle teacher I like it

peepee poopoo

Thanks for the visualization

Nicely explained with experimentally Thankyou

Thanks ma'am you helped me a lot thank you soo much love from India

David Icke will not like this.

So if I start off with a regular tube and let it roll "downhill", and once it reaches the bottom I pinch both ends into the 2nd shape, it should roll back uphill, right? And then at the top of the "hill" I unpinch both ends making it a simple tube again and it will roll downhill again, right? So theoretically, I just repeat this over and over and the thing keeps rolling up and down without my ever inputting any energy into the system. On a large scale, two men, one at the top of the hill and another at the bottom of the hill, could do the same thing too, thereby performing work, like pulling up a small bucket of coal for instance. But that is against physical law, so could this work? What am I missing here?

What's the science here..

Thank you

first comment!