Etruscans were turks

Attention, from the latest genetic tests (who knows why only now...) it was discovered that the Etruscans had the same DNA as the Italic and Latins. So they too were Indo-Europeans, but they did not speak an Indo-European language, but a proto-Indo-European one. This means that the Etruscans were most likely genetically one, if not actually the only, of the proto-Indo-European peoples who migrated from the steppes and settled in Italy thousands of years before the famous three Indo-European waves. Over time their proto-Indo-European language would have had influences from the other Indo-Europeans, Italic, Celts, Greeks, and even Latins!

Rasccena, Rascia, Russia, Raška

Where were the Etruscans before they came to Italy. It should be thoroughly investigated. Read Mario Alinei's books

Etruscan people and language and history is kept secret because they are Turks.

Why mistery, Etruscans are an Turkic tribe.

Uhm... the "14 alphabets" is a hard to die myth and Georgian DOES have a written form that is different from printed form. When I was learning it, most people asked me why I was always writing wirh the printed form (the answer was that I wanted to be able to read that more than the handwritten form).

Nice ! Cut out the annoying music and please please work on your English pronunciation and intonation. Otherwise very interesting video, for which I thank you. I like the fact that you present information in a scientifically serious manner.

🇮🇹🤔THE ORIGINS OF THE ETRUSCANS: There are essentially three positions: origin from the East, origin from the North and autochthony. (google translate) The first theory is that of Herodotus and has small variations within it. According to the author, the people originated from Lydia or Asia Minor (both located in modern-day Turkey) and, across the sea, migrated to what was Umbria, in Central Italy. Other versions see the Etruscans as an evolution of the eastern people of the Pelasgians, who before arriving in Italy had colonized the Aegean islands of Lemnos and Imbros, a theory later supported in modern times with linguistic and epigraphic comparisons. The most authoritative version among the Eastern ones soon became the Lydian origin, with which the poet Virgil also agrees. For a long time this was the most accredited hypothesis and among its supporters it found a great scholar like Bloch. This idea was strengthened by various elements: first of all the linguistic one, as mentioned. In fact, the languages ​​of Asia Minor and Etruria have very similar terms. Furthermore, the discovery of the Lemnos stele, written in a pre-Hellenic language very similar to Etruscan, helped to corroborate the hypothesis. Another element was the advent of Orientalising, a phenomenon that coincides with one of the most flourishing phases of the Etruscans. According to this vision, this artistic style would have arrived in Italy with the arrival of a new people. The last element that gives strength to the theory is the presence of the Trš.w in important Egyptian inscriptions (1230-1170 BC) which speak of the invasions of mysterious "sea peoples". Even today the identification of these peoples is not clear, but attempts have been made to interpret them in various ways. In this specific case the translation would be "Tyrsenoi", Tyrrhenians, the Etruscans precisely. The second theory is the northern one, which was never very successful. It was born following the discoveries of Pigorini and is based on the possibility that the Terramare civilization, which had cremation as its funerary use, had moved southwards. Another theory is linked to this theory, which would see a certain kinship between the Etruscans and Networks due to the linguistic comparison. The third theory is autochthony, which gave rise to the question of origins since the Augustan age, with Dionysius of Halicarnassus. This thesis, in modern discussion, starts from linguistic considerations. Etruscan is considered a non-Indo-European language. According to this vision, therefore, the Etruscans would be traces of the pre-Indo-European populations. The language, in fact, bears witness to a previous layer, which is linked to the famous "Mediterranean civilisations" that lived in atavistic times in Asia Minor and the Aegean islands. In reality, all three theories have plausible elements and some points of criticism and this impossibility of giving a univocal definition made the issue very heated: each had good reasons to support their hypothesis and, at the same time, received attacks from supporters of other theories, all acceptable. Even today the controversy is open, even if more and more scholars accept mediation. Pallottino was the first to make a satisfactory summary. The scholar highlights the incorrect initial approach. All three theses, in fact, consider the Etruscan people as a single block since their birth. This approach is most wrong: the people, by definition, are never something static. Borders are merely socio-political and economic superstructures created by man for his own convenience. It is much easier to impose laws when you leverage an identity that resides in a certain territory. This conception was greatly strengthened with the birth of the National States. In the ancient world, presumably, the concept of boundaries was much more labile than now, as can be seen from the many cases of acculturation. It is rare to talk about submission at all levels; even when it occurred on a political level it did not occur, for example, on a cultural level. Just think of the Romans who, despite achieving an extraordinary conquest, always respected the habits, customs and religion of the subject peoples, by whom they were often influenced for example in art or fashion. This process is what all ancient peoples went through: although they were well aware of their own ethnos, at least from a certain point onwards, they absorbed like sponges everything they considered positive about the other people they came into contact with. We have therefore now come to the conclusion that talking about Etruscan origins up to a certain period is useless. The people that we can call Etruscans began to form in central Italy starting from the Iron Age (11th-9th century BC). In this first phase, as for all Italians, a great revolution occurred which led to the awareness of being a people. This period is traditionally called Villanovan and sees people well organized in more or less important villages, who used iron, who knew the division of labor and that between the sexes and above all who used incineration as a funerary rite. This civilization evolved until Romanization. The last city taken was Velsna-Volsinii (now Orvieto), in 264 BC. Despite this, the Etruscan culture did not disappear immediately, but persisted until the 1st century BC. During these ten centuries the Etruscans changed a lot, they came into contact with various and different people. Furthermore, depending on the area, the relationships were different. Despite this, the Etruscans were aware of being a unique people, who had the same customs and above all spoke the same language. The differences were superficial, for example artistic and artisanal productions. In fact, "federations" were created, called twelve cities (one in the centre, one in the North and one in the South) made up of city states which did not always agree on the common policy to follow, but which recognized themselves in common elements. Before the 11th century, therefore we cannot speak of Etruscan people, but of training processes, which were full of encounters and as long as Prehistory.

Outstanding, thank you.

It's a nice video, thank you, I just gave some information, We will be happy if you also make the languages of the Ural-Altaic peoples!

The word SIK or ZIK means girl in Etruscan. It comes to mind that here, it's quiet against "metathesis", which is a phonetic phenomenon consisting of the displacement of letters. We are here. This is a linguistic phenomenon that is encountered very frequently in Turkish dialects. As known, In Turkey, where the city people call MATCH, the villagers often say KİRBİT, instead of pottery. DESERT says… Now, according to etruscologists, CLAN, which is reported to mean son in Etruscan Let's take the word. As I said before, in my opinion, the initial vowel is There is a possibility of swallowing. For this reason, it is necessary to read the word as UKLAN. As it is known, the word 'boy' is pronounced this way in some Turkish dialects. (Uklan, uglan, boy) In Etruscan inscriptions, the city of Rome is called RUMAH or RUMAK. Mine In my theory, this word should be read URUMAK. As it is known, in Turkish, according to dialect The words URUMAĞ, IRIMAĞ, IRIMAK, IRMAK, whose pronunciation varies, mean river. Thus, for the Etruscans, the most important river49 was the Roman River, which lies on the Tibre. It is called the city. It can be said that Rome used to be the Italians' FIUME (Italian The city they called 'river' and today the Yugoslavs call RIYEKA (river in Yugoslavian) It constitutes the equivalent… Continuing this comparison between the Turkish language and the Etruscan language throughout the pages it is possible

this is great. the exploration of old, no longer understood languages, is fascinating "dead" languages have a habit of showing up in strange and unusual modern places.

The Etruscans have connections with the Scythians and the Pelasgians.

Rome was the first modern empire that erased and manipulated history. There sources are suspiciously void of Serb/Slavic and Kelt cultures. We now know that on the territory of Serbia there have been discovered 8000-10000 year old settlements with iron working and pottery. I think Rome lied and absorbed many nations and created many other. Cirilic script is suspiciusly same as Etruscan script. I think church is lying.

That is really Anglo-centric approach to word order ( 16:58 ) . If a language has object indicator the subject-object order becomes irrelevant. Only English and Scandinavian use grammatical word order like that. The more interesting question is : how are emphasis, focus and topic expressed in Etruscan if not with word-order ?

Good, i want to know more about this forgotten civilization, they were conquered by romans, so Italians have their dna, and many Italians are on America. for example, here on Argentine, many people descend from Italians...

0:07 spoken from PORTUGAL to Crimea!!!

Last month I investigated about the Etruscan language and made some sentences. I searched for a video about the subjegt but didn't find anything. Now this video was recommended to me.

ETRUSKA=TÜRK!!!

what about the Etruscan DNA?, I do believe in a connexion Anatolia, Greece, Etruria.

The whole Georgian civilization was in Europe before the arrival of the Semites (blonde people).

can it be the etruscans be pelasgians ??? if they are i might be related to them am pelasgian too kalimera to hardcore etruscan italians from kalamata

Etruscan don't have any connection Greece just old Greece they are scytian Celtic

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liber_Linteus

Stupid woman. Made videos on European Languages and forgot Greek. The oldest language in Europe. Stupid woman. Are you Jewish?

Stupid woman. Made videos on European Languages and forgot Greek. The oldest language in Europe. Stupid woman. Are you Jewish?

Stupid woman. Made videos on European Languages and forgot Greek. The oldest language in Europe. Stupid woman. Are you Jewish?

Stupid woman. Made videos on European Languages and forgot Greek. The oldest language in Europe. Stupid woman. Are you Jewish?

Procas, king of the Albanians had two sons, Amulius and Numitor, to whom he left the throne with the intention of taking it on an annual basis [so that they would have ruled alternately]. But Amulius did not cede power to his brother, but even tried to deprive him of his offspring by making his daughter Rhea Silvia high priestess of Vesta, thereby destining her to eternal celibacy. Meanwhile, Rhea Silvia became from Mars mother and gave birth to Romulus and Remus. The two founded Rome. Did the Language in Rom be at that time Albanian/ Gheg?

The original Etruscans were melanated blacks

Not only is their an effort to revitalize the Soux language but there are efforts to revitalize the culture and religion.

Amazing video as always, you will always be an indispensable part of my learning process julie

Russians claim that Etruscans are slavic.

Iran, a land with beautiful landscapes and hospitable people, full of ancient culture and authenticity, its many tourist attractions, from the green hills of the north to the beautiful gardens and golden plains of the south, encourages everyone to travel to this country. Persian language is the sweetest. This language is the most romantic and poetic language in the world. Contrary to false western propaganda, Iran is a safe, modern, ethical and cheap country. It was the best trip of my life and my family to Iran.

@7:33 Coptic is spoken by a very small group in the south of Egypt, but as you said, it is mostly used in the Egyptian Orthodox Church prayers. No body really knows how ancient Egyptian language sounded like, but in the process of interpreting the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writing, they used Coptic sounds to know how it sounded like, taking into consideration possible variations throughout time. This was based on the plausible assumption that the current day Coptic language is the direct decedent of the ancient Egyptian which was spoken more than 6000 years ago.

Why you not tell us about Serbian walls around Roma city? And who make Roma city? Serbian people, Serbian Etruscan tribes. This is old Serbian cyrilic letter!

Etruscan is Serbian tribes 1.000%

This is one fake, because Etruscan tribes is from origin Serbian people, he come from Balkan, and Sarbini-Sabini-Sardeni, Sardinian origin name is Sarbinia and Sarbini tribes, Sicilian is Serbian too. In east Switzerland we have also Serbian tribes, you call him RetoRomanic tribes. We have a lot Serbian tribes around city Trieste and Udine, around Milano and Torino, we have a lot tribes in Toscana, around Bari, around Ramona, Brescia, Palermo...... Today in Italy we have minimum 45% Serbian DNA, but maybe 64% maximum Serbian DNA. And about 22% Grekos DNA. But 2/3 is Serbian (slavic) DNA. Or how Italian said Shciavone, Sclavi!