Jaime Medina

Пікірлер

@LuciaMimotti 2 ай бұрын

The man in the picture...he's a writer, Michael Lewis has another aspect...

@danalakshmin6419 5 ай бұрын

Mind blowing teaching sir 💯💎🌟

@PATHSHALA.1 5 ай бұрын

Superb sir

@katiacastro5677 5 ай бұрын

I love that ppt of Mario Bros <3 How did you do it?! Where can I find it? please, share . BTW, I loved your class!

@Perceptive_Chhavi 6 ай бұрын

That's pretty much a good experience ❤ Even though i am not able to read mandarin but watching the mandarin vlogs are pretty nice

@ReturnOfWilderness 7 ай бұрын

very good teaching for young learners, do you still teach kindy?

@mouad7755 9 ай бұрын

thank u so much

@erikaacosta3145 Жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot , it is a good exaplanation. The best .

@tullochgorum6323 Жыл бұрын

Very clear summary - but I feel that enthusiasts for new approaches run the danger of throwing out the baby with the bathwater (to use a couple of lexical chunks!). Clearly there is a lot to learn from the Lexical Approach. It fits with what we know about the value of chunking to overcome the limitations of short-term memory and speed up processing. But that surely doesn't mean we have to entirely reject working directly with grammar? There are still patterns such as, say, agreement between article and noun, formation of plurals, use of the correct indirect object etc that would benefit from some judicious and imaginative drilling? There is no logical or practical reason to see the two methods as mutually exclusive.

@robertfrischmon678 Жыл бұрын

Fantastic video Jaime. Thank you! I really love incorporating the lexical approach into my classroom. I see and teach chunks of language all the time.

@inhaoi7673 Жыл бұрын

thanks but i could not get it at all

@juanramonmorenoliranzo7720 Жыл бұрын

Hola! Necesito mas información

@memo-mv9rf Жыл бұрын

We can see our vocal chords on mirror

@mariamchairi3602 Жыл бұрын

Thank you

@assassafa5905 2 жыл бұрын

remove the music cause it's really noisy and we cants understand the lesson

@pro369 2 жыл бұрын

Informative and helpful plus a great explanation, thanks for sharing

@pro369 2 жыл бұрын

Nice job, so helpful sir

@ricardocongiu8027 2 жыл бұрын

Me parece muy desafortunado abordar las diferencias de percepción de la realidad desde los matices de "denominación" de los distintos colores. En todos los idiomas tenemos matices lingüísticos para acercarnos a los diferentes colores...

@ricardocongiu8027 2 жыл бұрын

@@jaimemedina1370 En español tenemos Celeste y Azul(azul claro,azul oscuro) para indicar exactamente lo que indicas. Sin mencionar el hecho de que normalmente matizamos los colores ...pensemos en los grises,por ejemplo...o en los lilas(lila,violeta,morado etc) y,si me apuras,incluso en los blancos matizamos(hueso,roto,marfil) . Los idiomas latinos son por antonomasia los más "matizadores" ...en contraposición a los anglosajones o eslavos que tienden a la economía de palabra. Yo considero que las diferencias lingüísticas no son un buen comienzo para abordar las posibles diferencias de relación con la realidad. Al fin y al cabo los distintos idiomas y las diferentes expresiones no hacen más que encerrar en un sonido/signo random (o aprendido)las caracteristicas del objeto al cual se refieren. Pero en mi modesta opinión nada dicen sobre cómo realmente es captado a nivel neurosensorial por cada grupo étnico/lingüístico.

@esdrasgnamien954 2 жыл бұрын

I really enjoyed

@rameshn1336 2 жыл бұрын

I think You got wrong Michael Lewis picture.

@gar19830811 2 жыл бұрын

It wasn't Michael Lewsis the intiator of this movement,but he summarised and shaped the ideas of a long - standing tradition which is located in the mid 13th century.

@brunotosini3117 2 жыл бұрын

epico amigo, ta nashe tu video gracias bro

@gustavokant9454 2 жыл бұрын

tu video es para tarea xd

@oyetadeopeoluwa981 3 жыл бұрын

how can i get the mario video

@sergio17407 3 жыл бұрын

en se me de rramo el agua

@angerventing2694 3 жыл бұрын

Guys below (or above, depending), don't just 'study' this for a test, try to also take something from it to implement in your own classes/language learning. A lot of ppl in my country just study all this methodology, perhaps say it is interesting, but all they ever teach is grammar again, thinking it can get anybody fluent.

@fredericroy 3 жыл бұрын

Not good to steal the images of sounds American : kzfaq.info/love/-MSYk9R94F3TMuKAnQ7dDg

@axelramos7483 3 жыл бұрын

thanks for this clear explanation, my last final exam at college is about this and some other theories. I'll be sitting for it next Monday!!!

@ooichoonmengipg-pensyarah5257 3 жыл бұрын

Very clear explanation. Thanks.

@Kartaljuzin 3 жыл бұрын

very useful! thank you!

@NataliaFedre 3 жыл бұрын

Excelente video!. Felicitaciones!. Estoy estudiando para un examen de lingüística y este material es excepcional!!

@janet77822 3 жыл бұрын

2:06 is "epiglottis" tks!

@richardgere9365 4 жыл бұрын

You've got a picture of the wrong Michael Lewis. The most likely collocations the guy on your screen is likely to produce are bear market, swap defaults, future trades etc. This is the master of 'sentence stems' is here next to Scott Thornbury scottthornbury.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/lexical-approaches.jpg

@pjsenior79 4 жыл бұрын

great video. thanks

@fabreddos 4 жыл бұрын

Caballero , excelente video , felicidades por la informacion saludos desde Colombia, aunque siento que tienes acento Bogotano

@speakingenglishtoday8543 4 жыл бұрын

Hi Jaime! I love this video. It really illustrates the lexical approach and why it works better. I have a talkshow about learning English, and I'd love to invite you onto my show. We could totally geek out over language learning strategies! If you are interested, you can choose the times you want to be on the show here. calendly.com/speakingenglishtoday/coffee-with-amanda