The problems with theists is that they have a very low standard of evidence, which is necessary for them to believe.

The truth of what has really happened here. "The way things really are"(factual reality) Is that William Craig successfully dismantled every single one of these atheist arguments. Lots of fun to watch.

You are correct about Paul. Peter in his epistle is treating the words of Paul as though they were doctrinal.

God bless you, brother. Not sure if your church is on the Gregorian but if so, then blessed feast of Dormition!

That guy in the blue 🔥🔥🔥

The arabs are illerate so it is easy for Mohammed to deceive then and their kings as well. And it is still the trend in Islamic countries presently .

Craig is ridiculous nonsense

♦"Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." ♦"The delusional religious fools are cocksure and the intelligent full of doubt." ♦"Only fools revere the myths just bc a book claims itself to be the holy truth." ♦"The religious believe by the millions what lunatics could believe on their own." ♦"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." ♦"It's difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."

The Gospel of Saint John chapter 6 States Jesus saying, for my body is real food, and my blood is real drink

Wow! A humble and honest man before he could ever become fully converted to the Orthodox Catholic Church

Great presentation. Very Lee Strobel-esque, and I mean that as a compliment. I love the analytical approach, using your expertise to add strength to the arguments. The ton of anecdotal and illustrations you use are really helpful in determining the weight of each piece of evidence.

God bless you brother. As I always say: John 20 is beautiful when you reread "the beloved disciple" as "I" or "me" because it makes you realize how authentic his account of the empty tomb is.

Craig is so wound up in his own lies. He knows that the old guy at 17 mins has cornered him, but still isn't honest enough to concede the point.

Is this the best you fairy tale believers can do? Ridiculous

He couldn't destroy a wet paper back.

It sounds compelling until I remember that the Bible isn’t really true. If the Bible is not true, then any conclusions based on the Bible are absurd. Besides, I’ve read the Bible and it sure as hell isn’t moral. (I made a playlist)

Craig thinks that killing a turkey is a morally neutral act under an atheistic view. I wonder what it would be under his view. I guess he must be vegan now.

The only difference between Atheist and Theist is one simply demands more evidence than just "words" or "personal experiences". The more I research Christianity the less I believe, there seems to be nothing beyond philosophical reasoning and faith-based premises.

Fomet Lutheran, Non-denom, and Roman Catholic here. Now Orthodox as of seven years ago. It is the True Faith and the True Church!!

what about a man who doesnt cross dress outside of his home? And just likes wearing womens clothes, ie panties, skirts, lingerie and other stuff inside his home but not in public? Like is it still a sin then? Or what about people with certain sexual kinks or whatever who crossdress with their wife or husband during sex, is that a sin.

I am am atheist/Christian. 8:34 50%.atheist, 50%Christian. Like forest gump sai 8:34 d,i thin k they're both happening at the same time. I think if we start this as a new religion it would settle the argument.

all he did , was destroy any chance of me thinking that a religious person has a brain in it's noggin ''appalling'' is way to mild a word to describe all this religious nonsense , and that this is still being done TO children , social species , MY ASS !!

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

How can you destroy an atheist when it’s purely a rejection to a claim not an assertion of one? Totally impossible

Why do apologetics get a pass on false testimony

Is it or is it not a sin to lie.

The only thing Craig has destroyed is his since credibility.

Pride.

There’s no such thing as the orthodox church they don’t believe in the immaculate conception. They blaspheme Mary and it’s over for them now why the pope excommunicated the whole lot I have no idea they’re all in mortal sin other than those that remain incredibly ignorant, which is impossible and they have a legitimate priesthood, it’s a joke. It’s idiots. It’s a disaster and Mary hate it. They appear to Saint Faustina. The three children of Fatima Padre Pio Juan Diego never will Jesus and Mary dishonor the Catholic Church appear to an orthodox. It will never happen that is Jesus and Mary promised.

Abbe Guette’s “The Papacy” is a great book that dissects the fallacy of the Latin Church. He was a Catholic priest who spent his life in study and was led to the conclusion that Orthodoxy is the true faith.

What pushed me over the edge - if we have valid sacraments, and a valid Priesthood...why do we need a Pope? The RCs have acknowledged the validity of our sacraments and Priesthood via the "two lungs" paradigm, so by their own admission, we are good to go!

My answer is simple: They deprive children of communion.

As a former catholic gone Orthodox, studying the history of the 7th through 14th centuries (especially the events of the 8th and 9th ecumenical councils involving Ss. Photios the Great and Gregory Palamas) and the general spirit of and goings on in Charlemagne's court is becomes very clear who deviated from the faith inherited and it certainly wasn't the east.

The correct answer is that we don’t know.

Craig is disingenuous. He is trying to make atheists prove that god does not exist. In fact he is making a positive claim and he has the burden of proof. He has no evidence to support his belief in his loving caring god except his word games which he presents as logic. If his god exists, (1) why does this all powerful all knowing being not make himself known in an irrefutable way, and (2) why is there suffering of innocent people on this earth?

Bunch of Marxist theologians and Afrocentrism, not even in my adolescent days did I see Moses not having a black wife but rathe Mediterranean. In those regions people were light skin like Arab, Jews, Assyrians Babylon's, Chaldeans, Egypt, Greek, Persian. I wouldn't doubt if they're being Black, but the homogenous group of that region were most probably brown skin color or light skin.

Moses wife was Mediterranean end of story, Africa doesn't mean black.

This guy is incredible, i've rarely seen such a structured and clear mind

Close these denial channels. There is a God. Billions of people believe, worship and pray. Only those who do not use their minds deny God. Islam is the last religion. It calls people to the right word for good. Islam commands to help parents, orphans, relatives and neighbors. It prohibits major sins such as interest, alcohol, drugs, homosexuality, etc.❤❤

I mostly hear the word “naturalism” while Theists are straw-manning me. What Theists told me “naturalism” means is almost definitely not what people who call themselves Naturalists think it means (in my experience, Theists are NEVER right when they describe beliefs they themselves don’t share) so this criticism of “naturalism” means nothing. Do I doubt ghosts? Yes. Vampires? Yes. Goblins? Yes. Any and all supernatural creatures? Probably. Now, that “probably” is the thing. He’s treating “there are no supernatural creatures” as a positive claim rather than a rejection of another claim. He does that a lot. If you are telling someone who’s position includes the word “probably” that “You don’t know for an absolute fact that…” you’re wasting your breath. Just show me a goblin.

That lady in green is making zero sense. She is juat spinning in circles

Im going to try and answer all these as an atheist, because i think its useful for me to know what i believe in , and useful for everyone else to see how someone can be an atheist after these OWNS

“It might be more nature!!” Smuggly tries to end on what he thinks is a win Craig:… “actually that’s a contradiction”

U do realise that no religious can ever defeat an atheist, right?

very compelling 🤔🧐

Isn’t Matthew 18:15-20 about church discipline if our brother sins? Prior to that passage, Jesus tells the parable of the lost sheep. After the brother sins passage, Jesus teaches on forgiveness. Just not sure why you brought that passage up in #4 other then that, good points, still finishing video, you’ve presented my wife and I a lot to think about and consider. May YAH bless us and draw near to us as we draw near to Him. So much love for you!

Icons are a historical record of the church. It does not makes sense that we could see Jesus on earth, but we cant see him now? How is seeing a picture of him different than seeing him physically present? If others were allowed to experience God's works on earth than we can also. The reason we did not have an iconographic tradition before the advent of Christ is because you can not properly interpret history apart from Him. Once He revealed Himself and took on flesh we see Him fully in all things.

God bless you

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The best that can be said is that we don't know. This old debate goes on, however, perhaps because people believe what they want to believe.

If you think Craig had the upper hand in the debate, you haven't seen the entire debate.