Well here I am 4 years later.... this past LSAT (June 2024) was officially the last LSAT with a logic games section. Funny to watch this video now.
@mbrkgns24 күн бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rZuPhZB1t9mlhpc.html
@antmarzo939226 күн бұрын
New to your channel. I appreciate your educational Law School support. This shows your compassion and purpose. Thank you again.
@Nourtzrt29 күн бұрын
bro, i would kiss you right now, your channel is my new bible
@willjensen5595Ай бұрын
So smoking increasing the likelihood of one having cancer by 5% is a CAUSAL claim. Yet, the claim that "people who smoke are more likely to get lung cancer" is CORRELATIVE. It seems to me the only difference between these is the quantification of these likelihoods. I can't imagine that it is a statement having numbers or not as being the deciding factor here. So what am I missing?
@phinhager6509Ай бұрын
Thank you! I was stuck on this one.
@hannahmarie9585Ай бұрын
Sooo helpful! Thank you!
@princelancelot80382 ай бұрын
Great lessons. Clear and straight to the point. But can you please add an example or two in the same video to help visualize the concept? Examples will help us to put the lesson into practice.
@SGMukherji2 ай бұрын
Took me 10 minutes. This is one of the most brain tickling question i've ever seen on LSAT
@lucillejimenez68523 ай бұрын
i just struggle when i get down to two answer choices
@jordyntaylor8773 ай бұрын
If questions 12:15
@MohamedSam-hr6zo4 ай бұрын
Very understood
@FortressMT4 ай бұрын
Is there any point in doing practice samples if you already write fairly well? It just seems pointless since there is no metric to evaluate it, such as with practice questions from the other test sections.
@melissaholly3474 ай бұрын
Wheres Le' embrace failure explanation?
@MB-gd6be4 ай бұрын
I think a main strategy to answering the Reading Comprehension questions is, Looking at the Question 1st. This way you have in the back of your mind what to keep an eye for, particularly in some of the long passages.
@nemsa_g5 ай бұрын
Excellent
@ParadoxReport5 ай бұрын
Smexy 🤍😁 thank you for your videos.
@ParadoxReport5 ай бұрын
You're an excellent teacher!
@r.p.89065 ай бұрын
Ben seems so strong, young and so happy here. Very interesting to note what 4 years did to Ben and most of us... Thanks! Such a great video.
@FortressMT6 ай бұрын
Very helpful. Ty.
@lashawngraves64966 ай бұрын
Love your explanation of turning the passage into a kids book.
@kionnasmith89546 ай бұрын
anyone studying now for January's lsat?
@ordinarycitizenn6 ай бұрын
This guy is funny. If I had a tutor I'd want it to be like him #nohomo
@user-sd4dj3jc2v6 ай бұрын
Direct to the point and AMAZING explanation!!! Thank you
@michaelabell89217 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for these videos! The opportunity to “experience” the classroom environment as someone who can’t afford classes is so useful! The students have a lot of the same questions and misconceptions as I do and it’s so great to hear not only that the choice is wrong but why!
@EternityNMind7 ай бұрын
Pleaseeee tell me you are still teaching! This has been one of the best explanation I've come across! I've believed that my trying to understand was wrong, but indeed that's insanity, UNDERSTAND what you are reading (not for agreement sake) to be confident and pick the correct answer.
@ginaserpico63157 ай бұрын
If NO mammals lay eggs, then the platypus is NOT a mammal. What is the answer? Please show how you get the answer.
@ginaserpico63157 ай бұрын
What is the answer to sarah not crying? Is it she IS outside?
@lucywarnick7 ай бұрын
More of thee please
@nickn79397 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@mmctavish66668 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!!!
@phinhager65098 ай бұрын
Is there a playlist where you talk about types of problems and how to categorize them?
@grishabhandari18 ай бұрын
This is so helpful!!
@sweld76678 ай бұрын
The students comment at around the 27:45 minute mark really helped me make sense of this
8 ай бұрын
Hhg
@zachfinemusic8 ай бұрын
This is a poor setup. We know the contra positive is -L->-M and that for sure will happen in 1 one the groups because of the max going 2x rule (L can’t go 3x). This means that there will for sure be a group of NPQ. so the question is where can that group go? Well we know P can’t go in group 3. So make 2 options. One with group 1 with NPQ and the second option with group 2 NPQ. Further, there has to be two L and that fills out one of the charts.
@kevinpearson5698 ай бұрын
Why can’t N go twice on Friday. eg Thrus: MLP Fri: NNP Sat: LMQ?
@kevinpearson5698 ай бұрын
Can’t work twice in 1 day
@luisalvarez-fk6xn8 ай бұрын
It’s so cool to see Mike Ross prep students for the LSAT!
@fezzes4289 ай бұрын
i am going to kill myself studying for this shit test I have been studying for 6 months and I still get -8 on logic games FUCK LSAC
@AureliusAmbross8 ай бұрын
boy do i have some good news for you
@carmaniola15019 ай бұрын
wow this guy is good!
@FutureCriminalAttorney9 ай бұрын
Are there any study groups in MD that you know of?
@CMRHM9 ай бұрын
One of the best. You tell me there are two ways to make a long sentence, one is to make subject long, another is to use structure. You then suggest to use visualization to help to understand. Also, U points out the key is to understand the idea from the sentence. Your explanation is straight to the points!
@kbggrows9 ай бұрын
I’m watching the 100 hour test prep class. Where are these questions coming from?
@carmaniola15019 ай бұрын
omg i got up until 13 min and this was so helpful. i wish i watched this sooner lol
@Llkdd19879 ай бұрын
Can you do worlds for every question ? I don’t see why you wouldn’t do worlds for every single game question ?
@jeakin259 ай бұрын
Helpful and Hot. Couldn't be better!
@raelynnrae238411 ай бұрын
at 14:38, why did I have to go with F and L? there was no rule about that. Couldn't F, L, and G go under U and leave I under R, therefore putting H and M under S and K under T?