Eh idk about that but there’s a lot of problems where it stands right now I’ll probably make another video on a deeper dive into this cause the shit I’m seeing is crazy

It just did. It will be awhile for big mods to come through but hopefully people haven’t given up completely and feel a desire to come in and bring some big time mods.

It’s so crazy and like I wanna be pissed at Bethesda but the bastard gamers have no self control they keep buying it 😂

It sucks cause fromsoft is the only company that can release a DLC at $40 and universally everyone will say worth it. But now every company is going to see it do well and try it themselves

@spicy.tuna_ correction, from soft is the only company that can release a $40 DLC that IS worth it. And so what? Do what I've done for the past 10 years and DONT BUY IT!

I just just have to convince my friends to pick it up

It looks pretty good. It’s been so long for me I feel like I have to buy it lol.

Exactly and something I forgot to cover which is more prevalent in traditional news is the need to be first. It creates a situation where it gets reported wrong and they have to go back and revise it but no one reads the revision. Hasn’t happened too many times in gaming but there’s always the risk of dishonesty due to the pressure of clickbaiting or being first. But yeah I overall think they’re out of touch from the average gamer.

Probably a good idea. So many of them have this sense of superiority over the common reader or gamer.

100% agree, I can't decide which game is my favourite, kingdom come deliverance, Elden ring, or divinity original sin 2. But kingdom come deliverance is the most immersive RPG ever

That’s the plan but likely closer to release of the second. Check back I’ll keep it updated 😌

@@spicy.tuna_ It's a lot playing through an entire playthrough for the first time. You might want to start early, especially if you are buying the Royal Edition with all DLC's.

Yeah trying to do everything on my 3rd play through took about 140 hours, doing it in Ur first play through could take up to 200 hours

Thank you! and very true, like i mentioned i think in terms of graphical fidelity etc players have hit the point where the need for improvement isnt there until we can get a full immersive vr experience. its kind of like the whole 8k for TVs and monitors or newest iphone, theres really no need for the improvement as it doesnt really offer much

absolutely agree with all your points. starfield just felt too big of an idea for them to make in their original idea. ES6 is going to really tell us the future of bethesda and if they truly have fallen off.

tru

appreciate the kind words, i try my best to bring the goods!

Good eye I didn’t notice that but I could see it being the case their AI is still a little janky with how they follow and maneuver with you. It’s still incredibly difficult to do stealth with any companion, but hopefully these things will get tweaked.

@@spicy.tuna_ I might be mistaken, I though it looked like VASCO on the back of the vehicle in the update video. Yeah, at the moment the best you can do is tell them to wait and then move forward on your own. I've not tested how close they have to be to come running to help when the shooting starts.

One of the best for good reason. I hope one day we can get a remaster.

@@spicy.tuna_ yes, if they make the remaster right, I would love it as well! But despite talking about New Vegas, this Starfield video is much appreciated :⁠-⁠D

That’s completely fair and all criticisms I have for the game as well. It was a massive disappointment due to the hype. But fortunately for Bethesda there’s still a lot of people who have hope the game can age well over time. We’ll see tho, the dlc will really determine if I can believe in it long term or not.

@@spicy.tuna_Even if Bethesda releases the dlcs, the game is still very lackluster with constant load screens and. a bad procedurial generation. They have a low amount of Points of Interest, meaning you'll get the same exact generated "random" event in the same playthrough. Modders generally have left for this game (I know there's still modders, but that scene is drying up here) and mods have kept a lot of newer Bethesda games alive. Bethesda is somewhat trying, but their attempts have been implementing a lot of features that were already present in former games.

@@lawofanubis2996 I agree for sure. The game will never get even close to being their next fallout or elder scrolls. A lot of those issues can likely never be fixed, and you’re correct I unfortunately don’t foresee any kind of mods that will “fill” the planets like many hoped. But I hope it at least becomes respectable because there are some features in the game that are close to being really good if they were only fleshed out. But after a couple dlcs I hope they essentially abandon the game and move on to their strong IPs and learn some key lessons from this

@@spicy.tuna_ Unfortunately I don't think that Bethesda will learn. When you look back to Oblivion, Bethesda was trying to move to monetizing things ingame, and the game itself was a downgrade from the game before it. Fallout 3, even for its time, was years behind other games in terms of mechanics and gameplay compared to others releasing that same year. Look at Skyrim today. It's so extremely monetized it's not even funny. It's been re-released on purchasable 11 times. It was really just a beta test game for the new Creation engine. I don't have faith in Bethesda making a quality game in either ES6 or FO4. Fallout 4 had the "Next-Gen" update which was a catastrophe. Even Fallout 4, for its fun shooting mechanics, was a very flawed game and is both years behind the other games in the market for the time, but also lackluster in a bit of content from other Fallout games. Mechanics like having a viewable weapon were gone, weapon durability, et cetera. That being said, I don't hate or dislike the Fallout series. They're among my favourite regardless of their flaws. But Bethesda isn't a powerhouse studio that people think it is. They employee modders into their teams or rely on modders outside of the core aspect of the game. It's disappointing because the best game released in one of their main IPs was Fallout: New Vegas and that was a time crunch game with numerous flaws due to crunch and the engine and not having a fully experienced team. That being said, don't take any of my criticism as being a hateful message, nor that I'm trying to say that you shouldn't be excited for the next game, but just be wary of expectations.

It’s definitely at least worth tinkering around. Especially as the DLC gets closer. I’m hoping a proper survival mode is added before then so you’ll really have a reason to have multiple outposts to refuel your helium for grav jumping.

I’d say a significant amount of Bethesda fans hold hope that it can get significantly better over time, not in a complete cyberpunk way because it’s not Bethesdas forte for that kind of overhaul but for many of the game improves significantly in 1-3 years they’ll jump in just like they did for fallout 76

Exactly. Just like the stellar blade thing it doesn’t matter all that matters is how the game plays.

I agree with you. What I worry is because companies are always trying to push the needle, always trying to find news ways to give you less and ask for more and they will keep pushing until they can do game play systems. In my video I used the example of the new yakuza game, new game plus was behind one of the ultimate editions and it was argued that NG+ isn’t a core mechanic etc but this is how it starts they keep pushing things and people rationalize and defend it and they keep going. I don’t think it’ll ever go back but like the OG horse armor I’m scared of where it could lead.

Also, keep in mind the Xbox Gold subscription is $10. Xbox gamepass ultimate is like what 15-20? It's by far worth it to people who play on xbox, not so much on pc.

@@thenassim3512thank you for the comment! And true I think overall Xbox isn’t going to lose that many subscribers especially for console players because the value is too good when you can’t trust if a game will be good or not. And I really don’t think they’ve been losing money I think they’re just seeing the profits not rising enough VS the amount they had to dish out on the acquisition. But yeah I think cloud is their future which honestly would be crazy cool being able to boot up games almost seamlessly without worry of hardware and storage space.

Probably good for consumer because ultimately all digital will happen anyway. Gamepass has been the best bang for your buck gaming wise for the past 8 years coming from someone who has all the platforms no fanboy ish

Welcome and thank you!

As someone who has always been a PlayStation guy I respectfully disagree. The 360 was an amazing console. A much better console than PS3 and I loved my PS3 at the time. The system itself was nowhere near as good. I’m talking the system not games BTW.

@@Oneil1570 You can disagree all you like based on personal opinion but I am not using personal opinion. I am using hardware specs. The PS3 was a superior system to the 360... the PS3 CPU had 7 CORES to the 360s 3 cores. These two are not even comparable and the CPU was an embarrassment for Microsoft. The PS3s GPU had DEDICATED memory. The 360s had SHARED system memory. While the eDram did give the 360 a bandwidth advantage, it lacked the clear general performance of the PS3 that comes with dedicated memory. The above shows Microsofts lack of understanding of how consoles work...shit, it does not even make sense on a PC. Now the ram...the PS3 had XDR ram that was far faster and efficient while the 360 was using already outdated DDR3...that was SHARED. Hell even the flipping storage was far superior in the PS3 with its 2.5 SATA that was faster AND had more storage PLUS was 100% UPGRADABLE while Microsoft tried to lock theirs down to FUCK OVER their customers by trying to make them have to buy an entire new system with more storage capability... Well wait, how about the disc driver, surely Microsoft can get the win here right? Not even close. The PS3 had a Blu-ray drive and the 360 had an HDD. HDDs spun single layers much faster but had 1/4th the storage space and a dual layer disc had no advantage so the 360 could not even have the largest games the PS3 could on a single disc and the 360 had no ability to also be the movie player everyone wanted. Lastly. The 360 had mostly games in 720p while the PS3 was 1080 all the way...Microsoft could not even get that right even though 1080p had been THE standard for years before its release... Microsoft could not even match them on the audio front either. PS3 had 7.1 surround while the 360 was sporting a decade old Pro-logic II. So long. PS3 wins on all fronts.

@@thomasjones4570 I don’t care about the specs. PS3 was notorious for being difficult to use. Yeah it was powerful but developers defaulted to 360 because of ease of use and sales. Also, I had both PS3 and 360 at the time. updating and downloading on PS3 was horrendously slow. This is not hyperbole but easily proven facts. As someone who preferred my PS3 for the games the 360 was a better machine by far. Power is not the whole story of a console. You can live in your delusion all you like. Have a good day.

@@Oneil1570 So you say you are not talking about the games because the games were obviously better on the PS3. Now that you were shown the hardware is better, you are not talking about the hardware specs. Now...its "use". You literally have nothing and are just shit posting because your new argument also holds no water and cannot be proven. it CAN however be proven wrong. The PS3 outsold the Xbox not only in units sold, but game copies sold. There was no "companies defaulted to 360" bullshit. There are a grand total of ZERO games that were on both systems that sold more copies on the 360 than the PS3. In fact of the top 10 selling 360 games the CLOSEST the 360 came to selling as well as the PS3 was Grand Theft Auto 5. 22.95 million copies on the 360... compared to the 29.95 million on the PS3 I mean, that is only a difference of about $300,000,000.00 in sales for Rockstar Games...but yeah, go on tell yourself they DEFAULTED to 360... Just post that YOU liked the 360 more and move on...trying to prop up a personal opinion with lies is double moronic and makes you extremely pathetic.

The original xbox was like 3 times more power than the ps2.

It’s so true how bad marketing is. It’s probably also because I grew up on the halo 3 Burger King days, you couldn’t go anywhere without being hyped tf up for halo games.

@@spicy.tuna_ Complacency