anywhere from 120milion - 300 milion dead

It was richer.

You have the imppresion that the red army awlays was equiped and well fed while in reality the ussr would have lost the war if not for the british and us capitalists who sent them so much equipment and food, also if you wonder why so many soviets died its because they would abandon their tactics and send waves of people to die , shooting of retreating and escaping soldiers is very realistic. Im not capitalist and im eastern european and your whole channel is disgusting my own family which didnt have much was poor was robbed by the communists my people and nation too anywhere from 30 - 330 k people died , the first concentration camps in my country were made by the communists and you who sits in a house made by capitalism uses a phone made by capitalism and food produced mainly by capitalism talks about how the worst ideology which is worse than nazism is great and good. Your ignorance is so painfull i want to do unspeakable things to myself. You think you are so righteous for defending the ,,opressed" proletariat. Just stop.

Hey man this video is a great sedative. Helped me fall asleep last night and feel very refreshed now. Thanks!

yo cant be trans you born man you gonna be man your holl life😊

Ah yes, Capitalism and the free market have killed hundreds of millions because these ways to organize an economy, are unwilling to feed the starving masses in far away countries with fucked up and corrupt gouvernments which have recieved hundreds of billions in foreign aid and still fail to function properly on the kost hasic level, while communism is unfaily mistaken for authoritarianism. How the hell does communism always turn into a murderous authoritarian system, no matter where it was tried? Europe, Asia, Southamerica,... ?

How convenient and truly communist first let the capitalist build and then let the communist or socialist leach off of that hard-working class. This is why communism is a pipe dream and socialism always fails because sooner or later you run out of what the capitalism worked so hard to create.

The employer: Employee contribution is 3:1. The employer bears all the capital risks. What is not mentioned in this video is the cumulative factors of production i.e., Entrepreneurship, capital, land and labor.

15:55 being pro-gun ain't very progressive of you Vicky, what about every statistic being against pro-gun legislation?

And there a goes a sizable amount of my trust for this channel. Though it could definitely be worse, at least he admitted that North Korea escaped the famine through ROK and US aid

mega biased video

Stonism: where in all companies the wage is determined on how much work you do. People are hired to watch how much work you do and if you are on vacation than you can still live on a good vacation wage. The government is a democratic Oligarchy where in order to change ideologies all oligarchs must be apart of the same party also there’s one house that must also have the majority vote to change ideology. The oligarchs job is to make sure everyone keeps working and wants to work more. They must act on the will of the people or the people will unelect them. In cities the planners use polls to find out what people want and what they vote on doing.

There's a few more Harry Glück made buildings in Vienna, which are smaller, but also have even MORE pools (how the hell did they manage THAT?), a bunch of them in the 21st district

I feel like this all anarchy went like trying to put 10 people to play minecraft on a same computer where every time they struggle they called soviets to help them and them again they went their way

He is the father of, what the bolshevick left calls "neocons".

10:48 😂 exactly

as a vietnamese i like femboys and transgirls for some reasion =w=!

So, on the issue of the RAF being terrorists, as the definition you put on screen implies a terrorist organisation is one which uses violence against civilians to accomplish its goals. By this definition the RAF is unequivocally a terrorist organisation, the only thing that is in question is whether their terrorism was justified. Of course many in the west apply the terrorist label to non terrorist revolutionary organisations as well as fail to apply it to state actors (hell, with a bit of stretching one could argue that the state is by definition a terrorist organisation) but that's besides the point

19K views. The original has 10M. 😂 It is a good film. Yes, goldsmiths is where banking started. Yes, Jekyll Island happened. Yes, the Fed in concert with our government saddles us with horrific debt and inflation. No sensible educated person could argue otherwise. We had incredible growth under the gold standard while prices dropped for average people. Since we went off the gold standard, it has been a steady decline. One man could work one job and support a family of 6. Now, both man and wife are working outside the home, two or three jobs between them, can't afford kids, and still are going into debt.

✂️✂️✂️✂️✂️👅✂️✂️✂️✂️ 9 dots 🐋 🐬 🐳 🌊🦆🏺🏺🏺

You used to say you were scared of becoming a social Democrat and abandoning socialism. Well it looks like it happened

You like socialism? Where do you prefer to live, Cuba or USA?

Zionist

Those dang tankies denying once again that the 1954 Yangtze Flood was caused by Mao peeing in the river.

Pro Tip: Whatever you do, do NOT, under ANY circumstances turn the comments to "latest". It's 99.99 % bots.

What the fuck?

This needs a visibility boost.

Wherever Communism went, it caused famines and killing. This happened in Soviet, in China, and in South East Asia countries.

Second Thought had the FBI at his door and he kept going, this only proves your not a communist

Thanks for these videos Viki. I can see they are going to be VERY helpful to me. There is another reason why ACAB. We only have ONE law but it's obvious the police do not enforce it. Or rather they are selective. Which means they operate NO fixed law but a system of favours. And this means the weakest are 'policed' to a higher degree then the rich. Tony Blair is still a free man after all. So actually we live in lawless times.

Well well well

i'd like to humbly note a few things i felt were off with this video and provide an explanation for inflation that i see communists often overlook. first, the supposed definition and cause of inflation as described in this video is not inflation, that is known as price gauging (prices of goods and services being artificially upped). it is a separate phenomena and undeniably screws over the working class, but is not inflation itself. for small business owners it is often a necessity to keep their businesses afloat, compete with larger corporations and sustain themselves amongst rising ever prices , for said corporations it's often merely greed. you brought up a very interesting question in the video: ''who prints the money?''. it is indeed not the government as you noted, it is the Federal Reserve in the USA's case. Central banks control the inflationary rates. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank that was established in 1913 after a meeting on Jekyll island. The world's largest financiers like Frank Vanderlip, JP Morgan and William Rockefeller gathered there in secret and proposed to erect the 3rd central bank of the US. The federal reserve act was narrowly passed through congress right before christmas with a paper thin margin and signed by president Woodrow Wilson. Tasked with lending the US government however much money they needed against exorbitant interest, the Fed was granted the power to issue the currency. This is the current state of the US dollar: - its value is based on nothing, like all fiat currencies, it only has value because the government says it does. - as of 2020, the Federal Reserve is allowed to have 0.0% of the money they loan out to the government in their reserves, meaning that all the money they loan out is printed specifically for this cause. due to the Fed being a private bank it is not subject to government scrutiny, meaning there is no actual way to find out how much they have in their reserves. - money gets requested by the government, the Federal Reserve then prints this money loans it to the US against heavy interest rates. as of today the only thing taking up more of the US budget than paying interest is Social Security, but this is to be taken over by 2050 at the latest. the loans and interest are guaranteed to be paid because the gov't is allowed to raise taxes on the masses, draining the middle class of its savings and the money landing in the pockets of the owners and shareholders of the Federal Reserve. This printing of the money is responsible for inflation. in definition, inflation is the devaluement of the currency by artificially printing more money without anything backing its value, like precious metals. The artificial creation of money with the purpose of loaning it out to the government increases the amount of money in circulation, and is what's causing inflation. the great steal of 1913 is the biggest theft that has taken place in the history of humanity. one more thing to note, the Federal Reserve, like all central banks are based off the Bank of England. every nation with a central bank, which is all but 3 as of 2024, is subject to this system of debt based money. but since we're all connected to the US dollar as the global currency the federal reserve scheme is the most important to note. i recommend any readers read the book ''The history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind'' by Stephen Goodson. it provides the explanation that communism deliberately overlooks, because the answers to this problem cannot be found in the socialist solution as described by Marx and Engels. any questions or criteria you might have, please send them my way! i'd love to discuss this further with people who might be interested

He'll yeah Vicki still posting!!!! ❤

The hell is wrong with your voice?

Inflation can be caused by many things, I don't think there's only one thing that causes it, but saying that money printing isn't one of those causes is a total lie, the problem with the example you're giving from the US inflation in 2008 is that, even though the government did print a lot of money, that money never entered circulation, that money was instead given to the banks who sat on it, the money never entered circulation. If you inject a lot of money into the market then the prices go up, that's not only a fact but it's also a law "Inflation is more money chasing few goods" but in the case you're presenting, there was more money but also more goods due to overproduction.

6:05 Uhm... because the holocaust wasn't caused by capitalism? because it was caused by, hell I don't know, Adolf Hitler? leader of the Nationalist Socialist German Worker's Party? now I swear if you're about to tell me that Nazis are capitalists I'm going to lose my mind. And let's say that you do, I can just easily use the argument that you are using to dismiss how many people Stalin killed, Hitler was an authoritarian, so for you to say that the holocaust was because of Capitalism when in reality it was caused by an authoritarian figure would be a contradiction to your own way of excusing things from Communism, suddenly if the Communist movement is lead by an authoritarian and he decided to kill people then it's not Communism's fault and doesn't count, but when an Authoritarian figure does it but now he, supposedly, leads a Capitalist movement then it counts.

7:48 That is actually a nice counter argument, which is something that I sometimes even debate with my dad, but with a different topic, he asked me if people should be able to own lots of land, can a guy own an entire field? he claims that no one can own a lot of land unless you use it to produce something, for example if you grow crops and you need the land then you should be allowed to. But he doesn't agree that someone should be able to own vast amouts of land if you're not going to use it, if you own a land and in the middle there's a river, then do you own the river? people can't access the river because the land around it is privately owned. But here's my argument, let's say that all beaches are public, what stops people from throwing garbage in the water? or people actually defecating on it? what about pets that are let loose by their owners? should we make all of those a crime and have the police involved? then in a way the beaches aren't really public and they still are owned by someone, and that someone is the State, the difference is that in one you have to pay to enter, and in the other you don't have to. Plus the State can also literally close down a beach and tell you not to enter if they want to, so the difference really is who owns it and if you pay to enter or not. But don't take this as me wanting to make an argument for all beaches to be private, I don't think that's a solution at all, if your population is educated enough, and I mean educated in the sense of respect for others, then you could allow people to go the beach freely, if people understand that letting your dogs loose at the beach, or throwing garbage on the beach is not good.

4:32 First we have to see at what he even means by "Normalize civilian owned Fighter Jets" does he want it to be a right for everyone? or does he mean that if a civilian has enough money to buy a fighter jet then he should be able to without the state getting in the middle of it? you do know how much a fighter jet costs right? so we gotta see what he means with that shirt. Also the counter argument you're trying to propose can be applied to almost every single vehicle, should we not let people be able to buy a car because there's bound to be one idiot who doesn't know how to drive and is going to run over children? even if you force people to get a licence, it doesn't guarantee that a guy can't be mentally insane and just run over a lot of people even if he has a licence, what about bikes? trucks? trains? motorcycles? would you be in favor of not letting people buy those vehicles?

2:41 I'll give you that one, they are different ideologies but both stand for the same premise: reducing the Power of the State and the government, Just that ones goes to the full extreme of proposing the idea of not having any government whatsoever and instead that stuff like the Police should be private. I am a Libertarian and I don't believe that there should be no government or that the State should be completely gone. But I can definetly see a Libertarian supporting Ancap views.

So hind sight president Xi is not a dictator he’s just selected by the people’s congress due his leadership abilities I also learned the govt is more of a meritocracy democracy

I love how communists rush to the defense of their cultural marxist oligarchs that they supposedly want to redistribute the wealth of.

Libertarians are NOT right wingers 😂

There’s so many errors in this video it can’t even be considered even basically researched. This is what happens when someone who hates musk decides they’re an expert on aerospace all of a sudden. Rather than getting your opinions on aerospace from ideology, it’s better to be informed by experts actually knowledgeable on the topic.

wow, you've had an amazing glow up! ( i just found your channel)

why did you render the video in 1080p when the camera feed isnt

danke mein schnitzel in christ

You need to get some noise reduction pads because the sound quality is a little off.

Please use a different voice

Good video.

This it doesn’t understand the basics of how the American system works, or even what Communism is.