Hi You lost me at 4 minutes when you did the solution You also lost me at 7min when you did the 1st order equations 😭.How did we jump from one formula to the other .Im sorry about this,its just that l am writing this Friday and don't seem to understand anything 😕
@tinashemondwani7065Ай бұрын
What do you mean by if we integrate this equation around 7:10
@chemplisticАй бұрын
Hi, When I say integrate, I'm talking about using "Integral Calculus" to solve the equation. For context, since many students have not taken calculus prior to this topic, I just write out the solution without showing how, since the "how" is calculus. Once you have the formula after integration, you just need to use it to solve for unknown quantities using the rules of algebra. I hope that makes sense :)
@chemplisticАй бұрын
Hi, When I say integrate, I'm talking about using "Integral Calculus" to solve the equation. For context, since many students have not taken calculus prior to this topic, I just write out the solution without showing how, since the "how" is calculus. Once you have the formula after integration, you just need to use it to solve for unknown quantities using the rules of algebra. I hope that makes sense :)
@user-xo5dh2lc2mАй бұрын
Thanks 👍
@mdnahidseo2 ай бұрын
Hello sir Are you looking for a Professional youtube thumbnail designer and video SEO expert?
@chemplistic2 ай бұрын
Hello! Not at this time. Out of curiosity, what are your rates?
@mdnahidseo2 ай бұрын
@@chemplistic how can i connect with you
@kingbeauregard2 ай бұрын
Significant figures have always frustrated me. If I'm doing a formula twice, and one of the figures is 99.9 on the first pass and 100.1 on the second pass, I've got effectively ten times the precision on the second pass. I realize significant figures are a shorthand approach that is simpler than trying to factor plus-or-minus at every step, but even so.
@chemplistic2 ай бұрын
I think I need to look at the calculation understand what you are referring to.
@kingbeauregard2 ай бұрын
@@chemplistic I think I explained it badly. Let's say I measure 99.9g of salt and do some chemistry calculations on it; I've got three significant digits, and maybe I'll determine that my chemical reactions result in 1.48 mJ of energy released (three significant figures). Now let's say I measure 100.1g of salt and run calculations on the same chemical reactions; this time it works out to 1.493 mJ of energy released (four significant figures). You see how I get one whole more digit of precision, just by adding a fraction of a percent more salt? It wouldn't have happened if we were using base 11 or base 9.
@chemplistic2 ай бұрын
Thank for the explanation. How many significant figures you end up with depends on the precision of your initial measurement. This is decided by your instrument. For example, if you use a scale that gives you only 1 decimal place, then that’s going to be the limiting factor; however, if you use a different scale which is more precise and gives readings up to 2 decimal places, then that increases the precision of your measurement and hence calculations. I hope that makes sense.
@johnterrell37032 ай бұрын
Very clear explanation! I get it!
@chemplistic2 ай бұрын
Thanks, John!
@kalidanstormblessed94693 ай бұрын
temp do be in Kelvin
@chemplistic3 ай бұрын
That is correct
@johnterrell37033 ай бұрын
I see how it’s done!
@punyapatel43173 ай бұрын
Good elucidation ❤
@chemplistic3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@chemplistic3 ай бұрын
There is a typo in this video. Heat Capacity is an Extrinsic quantity. Extrinsic quantities depend on the amount of a substance (mass). The video incorrectly states that it does NOT depend on the mass of a substance.
@johnterrell37033 ай бұрын
I like the decimal technique in certain situations. I like the save balancing the oxygens for last in combustion reactions since oxygen appears once o the reactant side and in two places on the products side.
@clee8885 ай бұрын
when I click on New, the dropbox tab does not show up
@clee8885 ай бұрын
when i click on New dropbox tab does not show up
@-nitroace7 ай бұрын
thank you so much my chemistry teacher should have just done it this way
@chemplistic7 ай бұрын
You’re welcome! Glad you found it helpful!
@user-ce8el1lz5s7 ай бұрын
Wow this simple method made understanding much easier. All other videos made this topic more confusing so thank you!
@chemplistic7 ай бұрын
Glad it helped!
@johnterrell37039 ай бұрын
I like your checking of the assumption that x is so small we can ignore it. That makes sense.
@johnterrell37039 ай бұрын
Now I know exactly the point of LeChatelier’s Principle. Simple and to the point!
@chemplistic9 ай бұрын
Thanks, John!
@johnterrell370310 ай бұрын
I like how you showed that the Arrhenius equation was just like y = mx + b!
@johnterrell370310 ай бұрын
Now, remind me please, why are there 2 significant figures?
@chemplistic10 ай бұрын
Because we started with two sig figs.
@johnterrell370310 ай бұрын
I like how you put things you’ll need for the problem on right side of the green line.
@johnterrell370310 ай бұрын
I was initially surprised you can get the half-life from just knowing the rate constant k. Nice touch alerting us to one of the important rules of logarithms!
@chemplistic10 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it, John! It’s easy to forget the rules of logarithms.
@johnterrell370310 ай бұрын
If you work along with these Chemplistic problems, not just watch them, after a while, you get pretty good at them.
@AdarshPatel9910 ай бұрын
Straight forward and right to the point! Thank you!
@chemplistic10 ай бұрын
You’re very welcome! Glad you found it helpful, Adarsh!
@johnterrell370311 ай бұрын
Very clear explanation!
@chemplistic11 ай бұрын
Yay!! Was the timing good? Like enough time to absorb what was being explained.
@Matt-ft4wb11 ай бұрын
😁 "promo sm"
@johnterrell370311 ай бұрын
I’m ready to work examples now! Seems easy!
@johnterrell370311 ай бұрын
Wow i didn’t know that trick of holding the New button instead of just touching it. Who knew?!!!!
@chemplistic11 ай бұрын
There’s always something new to learn :)
@johnterrell3703 Жыл бұрын
I’ll be on the lookout BOLO! Great tip!
@chemplistic Жыл бұрын
The first answer should be 730 because we need to add a placeholder zero to keep the number similar in size to 731. Note, the zero that we add is not significant so 730 has two significant figures. Sorry about this!
@andygranja2816 Жыл бұрын
Comment
@chemplistic Жыл бұрын
@andygranja2816 did you have a specify question or comment?
@fennerdy Жыл бұрын
bro teach me more than school did
@chemplistic Жыл бұрын
Thanks @fennerd glad it helped you!
@johnterrell3703 Жыл бұрын
You might add the phrase that “the first number is a number between 1 and 10.” It might or might not be obvious.
@chemplistic Жыл бұрын
Good point. I’ll keep that in mind for future videos. I think I said something about that in example 2 of scientific notation.