Sadly i dnt have the expertise that I have in lightroom/PS than Davinci, so i always end up tweaking my photos into davinci, its a good thing delivery is mostly for social media so its not high res ;)

As beautiful as it is useful, thanks a lot

Legit juat did the same thing a couple a days ago for one of my photo shoots. Im used to DaVinci's color tabs aswell, so its just easier yo get the desired look i wanted

ive been looking at a way to get halation in my photos without photoshop thanks so much man

bazinga

now it's a 100$ camera

You are so real for this

billionaires must listen

You can get a used gh5 for 500 and its a much much better camera

Great video! Brutally honest 😭😭

thaks for the video, still im buying it

Fantastic video! I knew that voice sounded familiar

I was about to splurge on an expensive gimbal but this tip made me think twice. I already mount an 8 inch tablet on my camera as a monitor, why not just use the sensor logger app to stabilize footage in post? It's awesome how much you can achieve nowadays as a videography cheapskate

he he unionise

hey can u use gyro nd hdmi capture'9use it as monitor) at the same time?

How to sync gyro data from phone to the video? One must start first then the other so how we sync them?

I bought this camera new in 2012 and have taken many thousands of images with it. But, the vid footage is just OK for 1080p, and only if on a tripod. The thing is, though, stills are surprisingly excellent with the 18-55 OSS kit lens - it really is one of the best kit lenses of that era like the Fujifilm 18-55. Pairing it with E-mount adaptor/charity shop Pentax lenses (Fotodiox - PK-NEX), the images are brilliantly sharp over 250th. Downsides are the poor screen, the horrible menu and the awful jog dial and buttons - easy to press but easy to set to a different function/value unwittingly. Having looked better at the comments now, many seem to have the same experience, but still love it!

I think GxAce is trying to copy you dude. you're obviously the original.

You look ridiculous dude, and you basically did not explain anything :P with all respect tho.

Cool stylised video, man! Yup, film photography is a cruel mistress to start out with. I did my tertiary training and first 6 years of pro work in film. It does help me slow down. My suggestion... vintage lenses for your digital camera. I have a bunch of videos of cheap ones that you can check out.

Glad you uploaded again, wondrous content as usual and I'm looking forward to seeing more from you! :)

w quality

vid quality is soo good

you are so handsome guys! thank you so much, this is very useful!

Oh, much better version than the original long form video (see my comment there)

Thanks for the idea and the video. Although I was about to stop watching early in your video as this weird cut to the cyborg? robot? came. Why? Voice was hard to understand. By the way the Audio is difficult to understand on a device with normal to cheap loudspeakers, e.g. the piano music was too loud etc. You have probably high quality Hi-Fi loudspeakers or a Dolby System, but remember to adjust and tune to the lowest standards your viewers might use :-))) Keep up the ideas and good luck and success!

This is a hidden gem for a6000 users. ❤ What lens are you using along with the a6000?

Hey bro , i have around 600 USD can you suggest me a good photography camera and a good quality piece of glass pls

What SD did you use?

coems 🤑 straight fire 🔥 put it out 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑

Can you compare this with leica q2?

You didn't do your homework, you didn't invest in the proper tools and you are disappointed with the results. Maybe instead of whining about it on youtube you should figure out what is required to succeed with film. --Nail your exposure-- Use the best lightmeter you have. It isn't the one on the praktica. If you don't have a hand held one use the meter on the camera you recorded this video. Just mirror the settings on the cameras. You have this amazing tool in a dslr you can use as a 21st century polaroid back not just a light meter. Your paying 30 bucks a roll you may not nail focus or composition every time but you can nail the exposure. At 30 bucks a pop you really should consider developing your own. Plenty of educational vids on here. I've had my kit for years but i average 8 bucks a roll for film and chemicals to process it. --Scanning-- Scanning film requires more effort than you put in. Did you even bother to align the camera and the negative? That's a deep rabbit hole with mirrors and bubble levels. What about sampling just a section of the film base to help you process the negative digitally? Spend the 10 bucks to get a replacement epson scanner holder. Spend the hours on research on how to do it properly. --you-- You are an amazing human being. You can accomplish any task if you put the work into. but if you half ass any artistic process your not going to like the results.

Shot film for the first time. Suck at it. Didn't give it time to improve his skills. Filmisdead

your perspective is too limited, as is your experience. My first rolls were shitty too. That was 10 years ago, still shooting it. Trust me, take a darkroom printing lesson, shoot medium or large format, learn to develop yourself, try alternative processes. Film provides an almost limitless experience, the only caveat is expense. Digital is just...digital. Quick and pain free but nowhere near as rewarding.

If you want to be successful with film you need to understand how it works and what doesn't work. Like a good road trip, film isn't just about the destination: The journey is part of the adventure. To have success with film, you need to understand some of the rules of photography, which can also help in your digital photography. White balance on film is fixed and can't be changed halfway through a roll. Most films are balanced for daylight or flash. Tungsten balanced films are intended to give good results under old fashioned lightbulbs and not flourescent lighting as on your shots. To shoot film right can be very satisfying, producing shots that can't really be replicated by digital, but it takes learning, especially if you grew up in the digital age.

Yeah digital is better I won't argue with it, I just like the process of shooting film even though I'm amateur. Sometimes it's cool to get things the hard way

Soory to say but..film is daed anyway. It is dead since the early 2000´s when digital came around the corner. Bevore it was a mass-product, because there was no other choice. But now..? A roll of the badest film Kodak Gold200 or Ultramax for 10$ each..or better a roll of Portra800 for 25+$..? Came on guys, this is not fun anymore! I must pay 10$ to develope one roll of film and i have to wait nearly two weeks for it. To shoot film is a pain and fun at the same time. My last few rolls wich are stored in the fridge and thats it. For me it does not make sense anymore. Happy shooting 🙂

OMG FAVLRRIRITE IM URNJUNBER ONE FAN

i think the issue here is, you just dont know how to use the median, i shoot both film and digital so im not like some hipster all about film chick, if you are interested in film you really need to put more thought in the stock you shoot, learn your own style and so on. it takes more than hand full of rolls to know what you are doing so hate to say it but its kinda a skill issue bud.

Man, I love the content! The production quality is amazing! Teach me your ways, oh wise one.

i have to say as person who has the pratika it is nice however, there are ways to save money whilst shooting film. i also scan my own film, and develop it myself. so at first shooting film is well shit to be honest however, as you shoot more film and learn the different film types you'll start to find the films you like and good at shooting (hp5 and gold 200 for me) and ill take that one photo i love and it will all be worth it.

So you wanted film look without making any proper reaserch? For me it seems like you were expecting cartier-bresson straight out of your camera without actual knowledge about film process.

Old digital cameras > Film , ngl the 2000s look is just too perfect and film is similar but with some disadvantages, some people like those bc limitations make for better idead and problemsolving that results in nice photos but thats not for everyone and film is way too expensive

You've entirely missed the point. Sorry you shot a couple rolls in a way they weren't meant to and let that make you bitter because you shot it wrong.

I think you completely and utterly missed the point.

The biggest mistake of digital era photographers who just come into film - they think it’s just another part of photography and treat it as more complex version of digital. And it’s not how you treat it. Think of film photography and digital photography as making a bust from wood and printing it on 3D printer from your own 3D model you made on computer. These busts will be similar or even identical in form or size, but different in materials and require different skills to produce them. “When you “better underexpose” your digital, you “better overexpose” your film” and so on. Perhaps it would be easier to get into if you try some digital rangefinders and then try some cheap film rangefinders (Soviet stocks got you covered on this one). It’s quite an adventure.

Not everybody is meant to shoot film. I don’t regret quitting