Пікірлер
@nanosiempre Жыл бұрын
Colombia 🇨🇴
@lutzweb Жыл бұрын
does it work in salty water like in a port?
@funkystuf23 Жыл бұрын
These companies are so dodgy
@DanWrench Жыл бұрын
I can see this as being a useful temporary clean up of toxins but algae thrive on Nitrogen and phosphate which aren't broken down by your technique. It's not removing the root problem of high levels of nutrients in the water. So this would need repeating regularly and may give the impression that pollution upstream can be ignored. Also not all microbes are harmful. Just think how important your gut microbes are
@palmharbor6317 Жыл бұрын
Really? Clean an entire lake. Give me a break! Even if you could get it clean, a week later rain run-off would pollute the lake soon.
@Michel.Samaha Жыл бұрын
do you have solutions for a smaller application (a small pond)?
@frankspetland3770 2 жыл бұрын
This is madness. O3 is a powerful poison that will kill everything in the ater; no matter it gets "pure" and clean - its all dead!!??? we use ozone as a disinfectant between production cycles in aquaculture - it has nothing to do in nature. Replace the ozone with oxygen and still use the nanobubble technology, youll have a different story - a positive one; not a clean deadpool
@aznmien1871 3 жыл бұрын
wouldn't this damage fish gills and fish slime ? i think it would..
@MalaysianTropikfusion 2 жыл бұрын
It would, I think, but I doubt that there were any fish in that algae-infested, almost dead water.
@kazimaliravjani9460 2 жыл бұрын
Whats the cost n how much water can it treat
@jimc8361 Жыл бұрын
Fish need oxygen and fish gills are made for oxygen. Maybe not ozone, though. Short-term would probably be fine. The oxygen would work on the sediments to effectively seal the other phosphates underneath, similar to phoslock, from what I understand. But yes, upstream point sources must be addressed to avoid a repeat.