In the 787 we can call up a maintenance page that has these exact values (touchdown vertical speed and peak g-load). That is important for determining a threshold for mandatory maintenance checks in case of a hard landing.

Hi

Guess it has to do with personal preference, but I don’t think the E-Jet cockpit was unusual dark. For me, the FF777 is too bright.

Of course I know president JFK. Now I also know who Ellbj was 👍🏼

ok

Thank you. Apparently the real 777 doesn’t have IAN.

The 787 has IAN, that I can confirm.

@@Blackbox711 thx for you info

I definitely commented on the bad elevation model at the airport. It is missing the steep slopes. Also I commented on the bumps in the runway.

I know you did. Pls read my msg: it is about, when you are using the drone, there is a big error in the scenery, look at 03:07:40.

I am very happy to hear that you find this feature helpful. Happy Landings ✈️

Oh, didn’t expect that. Cool to know, thank you ✈️👍🏼

Thank you 🙏✈️👍🏼

Thank you for your kind feedback ✈️

Thank you as well 👍🏼

Glad the video helps ✈️

Very kind of you to say. Thank you ✈️

Thank you for watching ✈️

Thank you for watching ✈️

Sorry, Yoke and Stick? Could you please be more specific?

In the video you are talking about a guy, who is using both Brunner : the Yoke and the Airbus-Stick base. You are saying, that it is not fitting your table.

@@user-ui5rr4ke8j ahh, that is V1-Simulation. He owns both. However he only uses the stick with the Airbus flightsims.

Happy to hear that you are enjoying it. The only issue is the flightmodel in MSFS for me.

@@Blackbox711 The flight model isn’t an issue for me. I have the use of only my left arm, so it’s autopilot on asap, and off <1000ft. 🙂 We hardly ever hand flew them irl either in the mostly British airlines I flew for, they’re not designed for it.

Unfortunately nothing is simply plug&play in MSFS. Some axis/buttons are set automatically however some still have to be assigned manually.

Best to report it directly to PMDG

@@Blackbox711 I think I'll start with TFDI first 🤣🤣

X-Plane can look very nice. Just takes a bit of work to download Orthos.

That is a perfect task for Shared Flight

Yep I would love to do traffic patterns in an Airbus with a co-pilot/instructor - take turns helping each other out.

I will try that next week

@@Blackbox711 awesome. Thank you

@@Crazyitalian997 spoiler: the rotate flies better. It has a pretty heavy pitch axis though, which I dont think is the most realistic thing as many pilots say the md11 is very sensitive

Correct. Big hope lies in MSFS2024. Hopefully they deliver.

What do you think of the presentation they held at fs expo? They talked about the new cfd and wake turbulence ​@@Blackbox711

completely agree. Such a shame. Everything looks so perfect in MSFS.. however.. the most important part (flying) just completely ruins the experience with how bad the microsoft physics are. But then again this is made for the masses, and therefore physics come second to visuals and content. shame.

@@SunSkipper360 even if it’s made for the masses a significant part of those 15 million users are hardcore simmers, Id argue they are even more than the x plane users alone, so the reasoning “it’s for the masses so the physics is trash” doesn’t really hold up to me. What I believe is that msfs 2020 was basically an alpha for 2024 at this point. They must get things right now or they’ll lose a chunk of their userbase

@@valet2972 100% agree with you. If they don't and Xplane13 is announced - I might have to make the move back to xplane!

In the real aircraft pilots get an instant feedback through the yoke. If the aircraft isn’t trimmed to the current speed the pilot has to continuously push or pull on the yoke to maintain the current flight path (i.e. level flight). This feedback isn’t available to flightsimmers unless they have a force feedback yoke.

I agree. I have 3 springs installed. Not exactly the same feeling as in the real 787 but as you mentioned best balance.

During flare: flight director roll and pitch bars retract from view between 25 and 50 feet radio altitude, the autothrottle begins retarding thrust levers to idle

During flare: flight director roll and pitch bars retract from view between 25 and 50 feet radio altitude, the autothrottle begins retarding thrust levers to idle

@@Blackbox711 thanks for info

Why are some people so sensitive these days? I got the feedback on stream and turned down the notifications sound levels.

Yep. Also the autosaved state doesn’t load correctly in the aircraft anyways. At least in the PMDG777

From our Discord server . discord.g.g/EyPAkuJWaP You need to type hello in the welcome channel to get access to the Flightsim-Help channel where the plugins are located

Do you see the Flightsim-Help channel in my Discord?

@@Blackbox711 No I looked for that and i do not see it at all.

Did you type hello in the welcome channel?

@@Blackbox711 I just did and now i can see it. Thanks ! (I didn't know I needed to do that !)

Excellent. Let me know if you need help.

My pleasure and thank you for watching ✈️

As you change flaps setting and reduce speed you are changing the relationship between Center of Gravity and Center of Lift. That causes the necessity to change the stabilizer position, hence the pilot needs to trim in manual flight. You trim the FBW speed reference to the new desired airspeed that you need. The FBW speed reference setting does not influence the autothrust! The position of that FBW trim reference speed is the airspeed the aircraft will stabilize at eventually if you let go of the yoke. So the FBW in the background will pitch the aircraft up and down (depending on the actual airspeed being fast or slow) until that trim reference speed is attained.

That has more to do with nose wheel deflection/ground friction. Something needed to be tuned.

Thank you. Indeed, that approach was visually extremely appealing. Happy Landings

Yes, setting Primary Flight Control Switch on the Overhead panel to off.

But be aware that also kills the autopilot

@@Blackbox711 thank you sir! My next question for you is, does the Y/D work all the time as long as the fmc is powered or is there a switch I’m missing? (I’m used to the 737-800 overhead switch)

Yep same in the 787. Hence speed control is so important here.

@Blackbox711 I heard that some airlines write in their SOP that AT has to be on during landing. What are your thoughts about this and what does your airline say?

@@midair2376our airline has a manual flight/manual thrust philosophy. I don’t see any of those two options (manual thrust/autothrust) being more or less safe.

That I found out today 😁

@@Blackbox711Are you type rated 777 or only 787

@@user-qc8np2sw8h787/777 is a joint rating here in Germany. However I only fly the 787.

It really was 👍🏼

Hey. Compared to what aircraft? 777/787? Or 737?

My pleasure. Thanks for watching

Hi. Taking your example: lets say you are flying manual and trimmed nicely for 250 kts, flying at 3 degree pitch. Then you want to climb at a pitch of 6 degrees. You would pull on the yoke and put in a 6 degree pitch value and manually (or autothrust) add thrust to maintain the 250 kts. Then no pitch trim input would be needed as the FBW would do its thing to maintain the pitch. The principle of the FBW system is mainly to help stabilize the aircraft and to keep it within its flight envelope. Boeing has a slightly different design compared to Airbus where the automatic pitch trim does not include speed changes in manual flight. Airbus on the other hand does this too.

@@Blackbox711 Ok so you’re saying that if I did the same thing in the 737 I would have to re-trim as I changed from 3 to 6 degrees whereas in the 777 that’s not required.

@@speedbird8326 a pitch increase changes several aerodynamic factors. The 777 adusts those in manual flight apart from a speed change trim requirement. In a 737 there will be a trim requirement already for the thrust increase. So yes, in manual flight the 737 will need more trimming.

@@Blackbox711 Ok thanks for the explanation.

Thank you very much