Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@tanyamccann1747 5 ай бұрын
Thank you
@Siobhan-kw4wq 7 ай бұрын
I googled uk police college 16-start end. 24! I wish Norfolk ukcops had better training 😮😢
@spirit796 9 ай бұрын
Extremely interesting and accessible lecture. Dr phoenix's inspirational passionate honesty and clarity on these difficult concepts and realities. What a coo for the ou to have such a dedicated brilliant scholar and humanitarian in their midst.
@mukbangloverx 9 ай бұрын
I'm doing a university degree in Business Studies and a joint subject. I've had a mental illness. I'm glad they know, it's more than just having A levels and GCSE's - if you can do a university degree, you can. It's my way of getting a job. That's a paid job. Not a psychiatric unit. Karen gets confused - but I'm glad this stuff exists. Can't wait to get better - and go back to studying.
@emc3000 9 ай бұрын
I think one of the biggest complete and total failures within certain educational technology programs is the fact that the importance of learning theories is overstated, and then the flipped classroom and constructivist rhetoric is combined with this to waste actual years of student's lives without reaching any form of usable or applicable or practical outcomes. If cognitive load theory and multimedia design principles are the guiding beacons of truth they are alleged to be, then it is fundamentally against best practices to waste months or even a year of time (the students are grown adults, not children in need of busywork) making students read needlessly wordy 20-30 page texts about behaviorism, cognitivism, etc and then summarize them for peers. This is clbad pedagogy and seems more like an exuse to waste time so that faculty with no actual comprehension of computing or real world data analytics implementation can pretend to be knowledgeable while in reality having to clue. It is a waste of time.
@JoelMcCary 10 ай бұрын
I will become a leader
@anarocha-cs4dk Жыл бұрын
Yes. Very good. I just felt I was online with you. Thanks
@julianmitchell5426 Жыл бұрын
This chap is very knowledgeable.. and a gorgeous stud muffin..
@lancewalker2595 Жыл бұрын
It is remarkable just how little this "criminologist" understands of the unique developmental needs of boys... boys are the ones who are failing, not their sisters who live in exactly the same communities as their brothers do and who are exactly the same color as their brothers are; no consideration of the correlation between fatherlessness and adverse life outcomes? no consideration of the contemporary nihilism our culture abandons boys to? no consideration that even presumes to look beyond the limitations of feminist dogma? This is why these problems will continue to compound, because people like this have monopolized the conversation on subjects of which they know absolutely nothing and have absolutely no primary experience of.
@valor36az Жыл бұрын
Great discussion my thesis was submitted for examination waiting for the reports
@stevelilleyman8845 Жыл бұрын
Awesome. You’re changing the world!
@dr.chandraupadhyay489 Жыл бұрын
Great !! I really appreciate your mission for social justice!!
@dr.chandraupadhyay489 Жыл бұрын
Great to hear your idea !! I think this is a very practical and sustainable approach for community transformation !!
@OliverlifestyleJa Жыл бұрын
Wow lots of deep information here 🙂
@OliverlifestyleJa Жыл бұрын
I'm here showing the support
@peterallam6494 Жыл бұрын
22/12 22 It appears then that our choices can affect how we age.
@user-gf2jh4wj4t Жыл бұрын
Conclusion- nothing is to be believed with certainty, it's up to everyone to form one's opinion. That statement maybe is nothing that wasn't initially supported by the interested on the subject
@ssejjdelorenz3152 Жыл бұрын
How was the diabetes related distress differentiated from Depression?
@dominik6647 2 жыл бұрын
💦 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙢
@choops4683 2 жыл бұрын
Barbie's Abortion "Sheep May Come..." kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hapmeq5nsb7TgJ8.html
@linwoodeaton2907 2 жыл бұрын
🎉 Ｐｒⓞм𝕠𝕤𝐌
@issamahmoud2102 2 жыл бұрын
ان التداول على الشركات الكبري واستخدام الإرهاب لها واستغلال لجرائمهم حول العالم وهنا الدليل أصبح شرعي لهم ضد الإسلام ضد ابانسانيه وهل الشركات مشت كه معهم
@issamahmoud2102 2 жыл бұрын
هل أصبح التحايل على قوانين قوقل ولابتوب والفيس بوك انجاز لكبار جهله العلم
@issamahmoud2102 2 жыл бұрын
Wow بصراحه اول مره اعرف ان هناك علم يسمونه علم الضحك علي النفس وذ
@MyNameIsJef 2 жыл бұрын
MK seems like the right place to do this kind of research, with over 22 million trees 😁
@Itskaintmeenu 2 жыл бұрын
hi nice video
@MsAdel1964 2 жыл бұрын
بالتوفيق حبيبتي 💖
@braynhilton5300 2 жыл бұрын
my son’s autism disorder was completely reversed with the help of Solution Healing Home channel on KZfaq,, kzfaq.infoh0YncUMye4c?feature=share
@kingmilk4776 2 жыл бұрын
It’s 2022 well very sad ,hello from California
@30secondtalk829 2 жыл бұрын
@nxgrs74 2 жыл бұрын
Venus, we are told, has an atmosphere that is almost pure carbon dioxide and an extremely high surface temperature, 750 K, and this is allegedly due to the radiative greenhouse effect, RGHE. But the only apparent defense is, “Well, WHAT else could it BE?!” (besides/also molten core volcanism) Well, what follows is the else it could be: (Q = U * A * ΔT) aka a contiguous participating media. Venus is 70% of the Earth’s distance to the sun, its average solar constant/irradiance is about twice as intense as that of earth, 2,602 W/m^2 as opposed to 1,361 W/m^2. But the albedo of Venus is 0.77 compared to 0.31 for the Earth - or - Venus 601.5 W/m^2 net ASR (absorbed solar radiation) compared to Earth 943.9 W/m^2 net ASR. The Venusian atmosphere is 250 km thick as opposed to Earth’s at 100 km. Picture how hot you would get stacking 1.5 more blankets on your bed. RGHE’s got jack to do with it, it’s all Q = U * A * ΔT. The thermal conductivity of carbon dioxide is about half that of air, 0.0146 W/m-K as opposed to 0.0240 W/m-K so it takes twice the ΔT/m to move the same kJ from surface to ToA. Put the higher irradiance & albedo (lower Q = lower ΔT), thickness (greater thickness increases ΔT) and conductivity (lower conductivity raises ΔT) all together: 601.5/943.9 * 250/100 * 0.0240/0.0146 = 2.61. So, Q = U * A * ΔT suggests that the Venusian ΔT would be 2.61 times greater than that of Earth. If the surface of the Earth is 15C/288K and ToA is effectively 0K then Earth ΔT = 288K. Venus ΔT would be 2.61 * 288 K = 748.8 K surface temperature. All explained, no need for any S-B BB LWIR RGHE hocus pocus. Simplest explanation for the observation.
@studioartfulnow 2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting
@Nirsterkur 2 жыл бұрын
I'm going to nail my LL.M viva day after tomorrow! Thank you very much for the tips!
@jamiehouston5396 2 жыл бұрын
I have a few meteorite samples that I collected after a meteor shower last year.how can I get these looked at and maybe sampled??
@user-er9er2fr6o 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, that is so valuable. When I was a child I was frustrated by the fact that children can't vote or make decisions, and never will be taken seriously, and It was bothering for me to listen to the Constitution say that every human being has the same rights while it doesn't feel like that. I think it is important to give a voice or at least to look to the children opinion
@shauryr 2 жыл бұрын
great work! looking forward to seeing more of such exciting research
@nxgrs74 2 жыл бұрын
Venus, we are told, has an atmosphere that is almost pure carbon dioxide and an extremely high surface temperature, 750 K, and this is allegedly due to the radiative greenhouse effect, RGHE. But the only apparent defense is, “Well, WHAT else could it BE?!” (besides/also molten core volcanism) Well, what follows is the else it could be: (Q = U * A * ΔT) aka a contiguous participating media. Venus is 70% of the Earth’s distance to the sun, its average solar constant/irradiance is about twice as intense as that of earth, 2,602 W/m^2 as opposed to 1,361 W/m^2. But the albedo of Venus is 0.77 compared to 0.31 for the Earth - or - Venus 601.5 W/m^2 net ASR (absorbed solar radiation) compared to Earth 943.9 W/m^2 net ASR. The Venusian atmosphere is 250 km thick as opposed to Earth’s at 100 km. Picture how hot you would get stacking 1.5 more blankets on your bed. RGHE’s got jack to do with it, it’s all Q = U * A * ΔT. The thermal conductivity of carbon dioxide is about half that of air, 0.0146 W/m-K as opposed to 0.0240 W/m-K so it takes twice the ΔT/m to move the same kJ from surface to ToA. Put the higher irradiance & albedo (lower Q = lower ΔT), thickness (greater thickness increases ΔT) and conductivity (lower conductivity raises ΔT) all together: 601.5/943.9 * 250/100 * 0.0240/0.0146 = 2.61. So, Q = U * A * ΔT suggests that the Venusian ΔT would be 2.61 times greater than that of Earth. If the surface of the Earth is 15C/288K and ToA is effectively 0K then Earth ΔT = 288K. Venus ΔT would be 2.61 * 288 K = 748.8 K surface temperature. All explained, no need for any S-B BB LWIR RGHE hocus pocus. Simplest explanation for the observation.
@nxgrs74 2 жыл бұрын
Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GHGs and it becomes much like the Moon, an airless, arid, barren rock with no water vapor, clouds, snow, ice or oceans, no more 30% albedo and hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. This is NOT what greenhouse theory says. It is what Nikolov, Kramm and UCLA Diviner say. The K-T diagram (TFK_bams90) counts 63 W/m^2 upwelling LWIR twice: 160 - 17 - 80 = 63 once and 396 - 333 = 63 second. LoT1 allows only one, the real one from the sun. Erase the 396/333/63 from the graphic and the balance is unaffected and the GHG warming loop disappears. 342 arrives from the sun, net albedo 70% or 240 makes it into the atmosphere, net/net 160 arrives at the surface. Per LoT1 160 is ALL!! that can leave. The 396 is “extra” appearing out of nowhere. The 396 is a theoretical “What if?” calculation for a BB at 16 C that serves as the denominator of the emissivity ratio: 63/396=0.16. IR instruments do not measure power flux, they measure temperature and infer W/m^2 by assuming emissivity and assuming 1.0 or .95 is assuming wrong. As demonstrated by experiment the surface cannot and does not radiate as a BB and as such there is no “extra” energy for the GHGs to warm whatever. For the experiment write up see: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ No RGHE, no GHG warmng, no CAGW or CO2 driven climate change.
@chrisn4892 2 жыл бұрын
this video is interesting, got my viva coming up
@nonim6978 3 жыл бұрын
Well Done Dr Gathoni. Your work is quite inspirational. Keep up the good work
@lewismwangi4834 3 жыл бұрын
..And a superb dissertation came out of this!! learnt a lot from it!
@willemvandebeek 3 жыл бұрын
Tackling a key societal challenge? Brexit perhaps?
@wildflower4052 3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, thank you.
@alfredasajizle3468 3 жыл бұрын
Hello Emmanuel J Zuza, am interested about your research. You doing great brother keep it up..........and I wish if i knew some one there to visit in Malawi. Please give me your contact and discuss in private to see what happen email: alfredasajizle@gmail,com
@therelaxedyoutuber9754 3 жыл бұрын
geniaL! Encanto! <3
@colinmcnamara916 3 жыл бұрын
Love the show 👌..meteorite gold on KZfaq now 👌
@AstrogeoJay 3 жыл бұрын
Hello Colin, wondering if you can explain something to me, as I am not an expert, just been collecting meteorites for over 25 years. so what is confusing me, is on your ebay listings you have hundreds of meteorites which you claim to have found in the UK and in your own words "WE'VE BEEN HAVING METEORITE FALLS EVERYWHERE DAY OR NIGHT ...YOU JUST DON'T LOOK OR SEE THEM" so what I don't understand if this is the case, how come it has taken 30 years since the last meteorite fall to result in the recovery of a meteorite, there are so many cameras and cctv and even dedicated cameras set up to look for fireballs, it is amazing not more are found, and and a few other things I don't get, how come it takes a team of experts around the UK with help from eye witnesses and video footage, I am sure they would say it still involved a lot of work and was not easy, yet you seem to find them all the time, and so many different types as well, strangely the only type you have not found yet is a carbonaceous chondrite. I was watching another video about the Winchcombe meteorite earlier today where one of the exports from the NHM was asked how many meteorite falls are recovered each year and I think he said around 10, although the ones you have would be considered finds, I am not sure how many finds there are each year but I thought most were found in deserts, did not think the UK had a very good climate for preserving them. It is incredible you know all the places to find these UK meteorites, maybe you should work with some of the experts as I am sure it would be a valuable contribution to science, its a shame that you don't send any of your meteorites for analysis, as far as I know its actually free. Having said that its also amazing that none of the universities or museums have searched for them as it looks like they are actually quite common, perhaps they are only interested in fresh material? Hope you can answer some of these questions as I want to learn more, if you are unable to, perhaps one of the experts here might be able to.
@addishiwot263 3 жыл бұрын
autism inclusive school የኦቲዝም አካቶ ትምህርት ቤት 0946417368 ሻምፒዬን አካዳሚ
@silvialogan9226 3 жыл бұрын
What very interesting work which they are doing.
@dinaoreilly9483 3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations....how very exciting...can't wait to read about the findings as publications permit....Well Done All...