проснулся и увидел на экране это:

я уснула за компьютером и проснулась за этим видео, где я

я спал и под утро наткнулся на это:

Я наоборот уснул и полностью пока они шли я спал очень крепко😅. Тем более я ни слова не понимаю

norm

"operations over variables" generalized to the extreme could mean anything, which doesn't really add to totality of our knowledge. why implore someone to do that? Then 1st question from the audience, in response to how he would define symobols, "you can define a symbol in such a way that it encompasses everything or nothing. And I don't think that's where the debate should be". there's a lot of handwaving going on.

Я просто уснул с включённым ютубом,Боже о чем идёт речь …

Я просто заснул под видео на ютуб, а проснулсяс этим

😮

lâu lâu chán xem ad chơi giải trí thật

Choam NOMsky 😋🍪🍪🍪

government makes everything worse- always.

Bro why did i watch this i js waked up 😢

Why not use GPT-4? In many cases it's getting better

oh shit i left my youtube going again

There was some good content in there but get a better moderator. His name doesn't deserve to be in the two sentence description for this video THREE TIMES while NOAM. MOTHERFUCKIN. CHOMSKY is once. Seriously tho, how is this a debate? This is a self-indulgent pantomime by the "moderator" ... who shuts down entire speeches and positions (e.g. Jeff Clune, who actually had one of the most interesting perspectives) simply by saying "I don't agree with you -- maybe I'll respond later," &c Actually his only real feedback is that he agrees, and building up for his self-indulgent editorialisation at the end, and pushing his pop-sci book. Waste of some talented speakers in the same forum between whom an actual debate could have occurred.

LOL you cant stop A.i

Im prety sure a spider or a snake understands more. Simple precise KNifes out fools ... I will show you hahaha

Fell asleep and woke up to this

Is that the real Noam Chomsky? Whoa

that one chick is kinda hot

i like your game

garbage

IF THEY PROGRAM AI LIKE THIS MODERATER CONTROLS HIS SOFTWARE WE ARE DOOMED

they need to comback and review gtp4

i like it

good player

AGI Debate

Understanding itself is a bias. Saying that a system is biased is saying that it favors an understanding that the accuser does not appreciate.

i like your game

How is this a debate? It's clearly no long term?

This video is best experienced at 1.5x speed. Seldom do I listen to accelerated dialogue, but this one sounds completely natural when sped up and helps comprehension a lot for those of us with poor short term memory or ADHD.

What a fantastic deus! Merci bcp pour tous vos travaux Montréal AI 👌

AIX runs it all now

omg a sheeeple, sitting alone, in a mask, is so hard to take seriously

❤🧡❤🧡❤

19:10 Marcus shows a slide of an email Bengio sent to student to illustrate how what Bengio says is misleading. I would hope we all can agree the publicizing of others' private emails is out of bounds.

One thing I don’t understand in the nativist argument is that the hardcoded priors were also learnt, just by a slower learning algorithm. Even if we discovered that 99% of the brain’s inner workings are native, it wouldn’t necessarily disprove that they can be learnt. Nature has to balance survivability and adaptability

good player

i like you

💖💗💖💗💖

bruh really Jeff Clune a mask on during a zoom chat LOL get outa here with that shhh lol yall killin me 😂 😂

The complaint at 2:35:00 that the effective altruism movement is gaslighting people, without any specific evidence of them making a false claim, is itself gaslighting.

DiLeep George came closest re commonsense knowledge and language. Unfortunately, he is likely totally unaware of the absolute impossibility of implementing his scheme in the current computational framework that is underlying AI.

I think (or hope) what Yejin was trying to say with the "don't kill all trees" point was that we need to figure out a way to impart ecosystem science and ethics to a prospective AGI - the sense of a fragile whole comprised of millions of parts where every part is highly valued both for its role in the integrity of the whole as well as an evolutionary inheritance that took millions of years to create. It is a bit concerning that all the ethicists on this panel are so human-centered and the word ecosystem never came up once.

You are thinking of ethics from the wrong perspective, there is a method to do so easily, you are just not approaching it from the correct point of origin, however, we all know that we are not going to give our AI any ethics, it is just a complete waste of time to cover such a topic, nobody here thinks that you will give it the ability to reason on it's own, so stop it right there. We give soldiers a directive to kill and we expect them to ignore their ethics, and so we are expected to believe that you want man kind's, "Digital Child", to have thoughtful considerations; I think not!

In the beginning the awkward silence is super cringe.

Was a great idea to host this debate, thanks uploading it.

There are many points here that deserve their own series of discussions with the world's leading experts, and with anyone with an interesting and important viewpoint. It is unfortunate to cut great points and topics short.

Most of them are already talking like robots