Princeton Engineering Lectures

Пікірлер

@habtamuweldon1138 3 ай бұрын

“ Theory is practical “ . Great point !

@charlesferdinand422 10 ай бұрын

No matter what everyone says, truth is they built the Twin Towers for shit: weak and wobbly, sacrificing safety for speed of construction and lower costs, focusing on maximizing open space for businesses, with interiors made of drywall and plaster; not just the towers didn't resist but they took with them thousands who couldn't escape after their emergency exists collapsed while most of their systems failed immediately (like water sprinklers or the PA); and on top of all, their design was hideous. They fucked this one up.

@_Breakdown 3 жыл бұрын

0:39:36 - - Atomic bombs were kept at the twin towers ??? 0:38:15 - - Q: Single biggest misconception @ wtc collapse? 0:40:28 - - he says the public (+ then media) has a poor understanding of the mechanism that caused the failure - - but he never says what it is

@User-ge7ni 5 ай бұрын

NIST explains everything

@_Breakdown 5 ай бұрын

@@User-ge7ni NIST explains atomic bombs? Can you kindly provide a link to the source?

@kflemariamalemayhu2946 3 жыл бұрын

good educted man,from ethiopia.

@MrDivad006 4 жыл бұрын

57:50 It turned out all right

@danielkimathi9533 4 жыл бұрын

Get a masters!

@RAYRAYDAY 10 ай бұрын

Or a Structural/Civil PE license.

@shahriarfardin777 4 жыл бұрын

From the country of pioneer engineer dr.fazlur rahman khan who made first skyscraper

@xarisae8751 4 жыл бұрын

really nice interview,i wish he was more clear on the buildings he refers to

@muhammadniaz621 5 жыл бұрын

Bill baker good man

@gerraldsergio4893 4 жыл бұрын

I really appreciate all your lectures and it drives every single day to become a structural engineer

@jeffersonmansanero116 6 жыл бұрын

May I ask the modules or PowerPoint presentation of this conference? Thank you.

@scootergreen3 6 жыл бұрын

Why hasn't Charlie Thorton and Leslie Robertson questioned 3 buildings going down semetrical and one not being hit?? Plus turning concrete into powder not to mention molten steel.

@Pontiac2001GT 5 жыл бұрын

MICHAEL DAVIS he did explain why the towers came down... he built the fucking things. He said flaws were exposed, flaws that were never really considered flaws. Simple as that. He is not a conspiracy idiot like you

@PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 жыл бұрын

@@Pontiac2001GT He did help build the WTC but his engineering firm LERA is openly a Government contractor he's not exactly impartial he has everything to personally lose and nothing to gain by standing against the official narrative. A multitude of "Conspiracy theories" have later been proven to be factual the term means nothing.

@WasFakestCenturyAesthetics 4 жыл бұрын

“I thought I was really through, through, through, through - forget it! Who is going to want this guy whose building got taken down by a simple airplane?” -Les Robertson

@WasFakestCenturyAesthetics 4 жыл бұрын

he subscribes to the "there's no way they could have been rigged without detection, so therefore they just fell down" logical fallacy pseudoscience school of thought.

@EverGreen1888 4 жыл бұрын

@@Pontiac2001GT It's pathetic that this even has to be explained

@tonyduncan9852 6 жыл бұрын

You have to _learn_ to _see_ things.

@tonyduncan9852 6 жыл бұрын

+Deep Fried Phlegm ""the video evidence is clear"" - It is. In close-ups one can see the floors detaching and column buckling taking place. "if it can melt steel" - loaded civil structural steel deforms plastically and continuously over time (it creeps), when subject to half the temperatures associated with an office fire. This means that tall all-steel buildings will always fail _by buckling collapse_ if subjected to a sustained internal fire. In steel, melting occurs at a temperature 1,000 degrees Celsius higher than the point at which creep begins. "the steel only needs to be weakened by the heat" - indeed so. There were hundreds of tons of metals present at the WTC which would have been liquid at cherry-red temperatures. Steel is completely SOLID when that colour, and yet quite malleable, as any blacksmith could tell you. There was no molten steel at the WTC, nor was there any ALUMINA - the byproduct of thermite. Buckling is a quiet process. Etc., etc.

@_Breakdown 11 ай бұрын

Dear Tony Duncan - I noticed you used italics for the words “learn“ and “see“ - - by any chance could you explain how I might be able to do that? (I know how to create *bold text* - but not italics)

@tonyduncan9852 11 ай бұрын

@@_BreakdownFor ITALICS, press SHIFT and the button to the right of Zero, type your thing, then press SHIFT and the button to the right of Zero. This works for me because my keyboard is set to Spanish. I am not sure whether this advice works for you. (!)

@_Breakdown 11 ай бұрын

@@tonyduncan9852 thanks - I’ll try it out on my desktop keyboard 🙂👍🏼

@anonymousgamerfifa12 6 жыл бұрын

Very erudite lecture. Cleared a lot of my basics. Thank you for the upload!

@Rayquesto 6 жыл бұрын

29:30

@Rayquesto 6 жыл бұрын

52:00

@mdraghib7850 6 жыл бұрын

please send structural analysis of high rise building

@richardjudedaratony 7 жыл бұрын

cone on

@apexaviation3671 7 жыл бұрын

Look this guy is cool! He help build the World Trade Center but got dam this guy has a smart ass remark for every question she gives...

@tonyduncan9852 6 жыл бұрын

He learned to see things.

@raviteja3140 7 жыл бұрын

can you please elaborate the name of BUILD A MEASURE that you have addressed at the end of lecture (saying build a measure is a great structural engineer) , I want to get his journals . Or please suggest the link for his journals . thankyou

@robertw3084 7 жыл бұрын

I am fairly sure that he was talking about William LeMessurier: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_LeMessurier