man just made the best quality high educational video ever and then quit the platform
@thomasknapp78073 ай бұрын
That is one great explanatory video. Why no more?
@qewqeqeqwew39774 ай бұрын
Nice video, except the music.
@YoungJackRack5 ай бұрын
I actually really like the background music! Its similar to Grants videos. You are using Grants python library for these simulations, correct?
@OpenEngineeringRF5 ай бұрын
Yes, called Manim.
@poxilos6 ай бұрын
Ευχαριστούμε πατριώτες, πολύ καλή εξήγηση των παράμετρων σκέδασης!
@omarakdh-xp4eo6 ай бұрын
The best in video parameters s
@JB-1239 ай бұрын
Love to see a smith chart video. This was a really good video.
@brunobarajas11 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you. Please continue to do more. I notice its been a year and just one video, don't stop, this is great video and great production, continue and you will get many more views and subs.
@andreasskaliontas6380 Жыл бұрын
Wow damn great videos please make more!! Εξερετική δουλεία παιδιά Μπράβο
@El650Jefe Жыл бұрын
This video was absolutely beautiful 😮💨
@dbharathi2003 Жыл бұрын
Awesome
@mengxinlin9580 Жыл бұрын
An important point to understand about scattering parameters is that the reflection coefficient looking into port n is not equal to Snn unless all other ports are matched. Similarly, the transmission coefficient from port m to port n is not equal to Snm unless all other ports are matched. -- Pozar
@OpenEngineeringRF Жыл бұрын
I tried to note this assumption in the description.
@uav-pixel9046 Жыл бұрын
PLEASE MAKE MORE AMAZING CONTENT
@Laura-Yu Жыл бұрын
This video is amazing thank you🙏
@damarantes7583 Жыл бұрын
Excellent summary on S-parameters. Thanks a million!
@ZectricFOZ Жыл бұрын
amazingly made video.
@goodchange124 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video, it's very nice.
@elfeituri Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the awesome work!, I wish if you can talk about balanced/Mixed-mode S-parameters in another video 🙂
@oleksiishekhovtsov1564 Жыл бұрын
fantastic! :D
@gravmath Жыл бұрын
Very well explained and I'm down with the jazz. My only critique is that you used 'reciprocal' several times before actually defining in terms of the symmetry of the S matrix. It would have been better to make that connection before the example.
@OpenEngineeringRF Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, I think you raised a good point. I tried to keep the mentions of reciprocity as minor comments to expand on what we'd expect to see in the plots, but it might indeed have been a better idea to introduce that section first, as the meaning of 'reciprocity' might not have been obvious to newcomers.
@Astartos22 Жыл бұрын
Hi, thanks for the video. At 1:57, why is the voltage divided by 2 to give ai?
@OpenEngineeringRF Жыл бұрын
Apologies for the late reply - for a more detailed derivation of the power wave equations, I'd refer you to: Kurokawa, K., "Power Waves and the Scattering Matrix", IEEE Trans. Micr. Theory & Tech., Mar. 1965, pp. 194-202 (if you haven't got access, please let me know) As well as the following document: ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20000056853/downloads/20000056853.pdf
@Astartos22 Жыл бұрын
@@OpenEngineeringRF Thanks for the info!
@katyar4883 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this
@Who5tealmynamE Жыл бұрын
This video is solid gold nugget
@xxgoku77742 жыл бұрын
excellent video
@walterufsc2 жыл бұрын
The video is good, but the music is unnecessary and annoying.
@microharmonics61862 жыл бұрын
This was a fantastic breakdown on S-parameters. Thank you for producing it!
@valdesgallardo75932 жыл бұрын
😡 P*R*O*M*O*S*M.
@plaksyuk2 жыл бұрын
You opened my eyes. Thank you!
@OwenDuffy2 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on a very good instructional video. I will make one comment... At 13:00 you stated that S11 "corresponds" to Return Loss and VSWR, and you expand on the relationship with VSWR but you leave Return Loss hanging. More specifically, the relationship is with |S11|, and Return Loss = -|S11| where both are expressed in dB. The - sign is often omitted, a common error, very common in ham radio. You might consider adding a 'slide' to expand Return Loss (correctly). Well done to all involved.
@OpenEngineeringRF2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment! You are correct that, strictly speaking, RL = -|S11| (and you can find lots of datasheets and other resources where return loss is 'misleadingly' provided as a negative value, but unfortunately this has become a bit of a convention to some, so I didn't want to introduce a lot of confusion by giving an algebraic relation between the RL and |S11|). This is why 'corresponds to' was used instead of 'is equal to'. The reason I expanded on the relationship between |S11| and VSWR is because it is less obvious how these two quantities are mathematically related. In any case though, perhaps the "Loss (≤ 0 dB)" note may serve as a reminder that it doesn't make sense for return *loss* to be negative. :)
@davidlewis13752 жыл бұрын
@@OpenEngineeringRF Much kudos for a "well done" by Owen Duffy, he is a legend.
@davidlewis13752 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video, please get rid of the music as it is so distracting.
@OpenEngineeringRF2 жыл бұрын
Will avoid background music next time, thanks!
@Bebsiman2 жыл бұрын
This actually soo cool , I always wished to see nicely done visual explinations for EE and now my wish is true :D , thank you soo much for making this <3
@DahliaTrimble2 жыл бұрын
I can never remember which subscript is input and which is output. Thanks for making this and please make more!