A very useful video. A similar video of Jamovi's snowLatent module would be great!
@aliciamccormick31704 күн бұрын
Thank you again! what's the difference betwen the selection of "generalized linear mixed models" and "mixed model" in Jamovi?
@aliciamccormick31704 күн бұрын
thank you! very helpful for my honours project - i Have done multiple stats courses and never considered how ANOVA is basically just a categorial linear regression, cleared some things up! Thanks!
@frankzinatra37775 күн бұрын
It seems there is no more Wright map option under Mixture Rasch model analysis in Jamovi..
@francisz26236 күн бұрын
14:01 hello , when I try to run the analysis, pops out “the variable , YXQ3 , is represented by a rectangle in the path diagram, but it is not an observed variable”. What can I do about that? Thank you for the answer in advance ❤ have a nice day 😊
@brightamenu16176 күн бұрын
i am still waiting for the other test, if the distribution is not normal and homogeneity variance is violated. KK , please in R
@sumayyahmalik94066 күн бұрын
Thanks for uploading this Dr. Will we get a second part?
@MsNancy12128 күн бұрын
You still haven't told me how to find the how to get standard deviation The given is 95% I found my mean was 8 (n -1) which is 7. I subtracted my mean from each person and then squared them after that I Added all the squared together now what? Help!!!
@littilgirl32208 күн бұрын
I am ganna try it tommorow ,thank u
@gigi-km5tj9 күн бұрын
Thank you, for the interesting Lectures, however, I faced one problem when I calculated the model the error terms were not displayed in the path diagram? therefore I kindly request your help. Regards
@huijunzhao982212 күн бұрын
Always helpful to refresh the memory👍🌹
@ernestamoateng713513 күн бұрын
Thanks, Dr
@zinabieseyoumbogale13 күн бұрын
very important one. looking for some guide from u and how can contact u
@TODM4XNL13 күн бұрын
Thanks for the great video. I have a question: Would you happen to have a reference where I could read about the material your presented in the video?
@bhavnaconnor14 күн бұрын
Hello, can you tell me why you took the first 10 items as variables?
@arininurulhidayati20415 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for the outstanding presentation. It was incredibly enlightening and provided a wealth of knowledge.
@user-mb3tn3ts8l15 күн бұрын
excellent👏👏👏👏
@ismatzahra318 күн бұрын
Amazing. Its really useful. Thank you so much.
@cathyhou529019 күн бұрын
Looking forward to the second part!
@techinfo8919 күн бұрын
nice explanation
@user-mp3xx9zt7b19 күн бұрын
You are an excellent teacher
@xuyang277621 күн бұрын
Could you tell me is there any package or software that can estimate the dynamic mimic model?thanks
@user-wx6sz3rw4p22 күн бұрын
Dr. Aryadoust, Thank you for the great videos. I want to ask about the variance explained by Rasch and the Variance by residuals. I can see that your analysis shows a 71% of variance by residuals. Should this be an issue? I will be analyzing a speaking test where the data is not dichotomous. Let me know your thoughts about this.
@andersonrayarcadio491124 күн бұрын
Hi Doc, can you a tutorial video about Canonical Correlation Analysis in Jamovi? Thank you. 🥹
@brightamenu161725 күн бұрын
Thank you very much
@nahidshams786827 күн бұрын
Great one indeed. Have one important question. The fit indices shown here, are they structural model fit? Or measurement model fit? I am under the impression that these are probably the structural model fit. If that is the case, then where can I get the measurement model fit indices? Thank you in advance.
@mfarahanynia40828 күн бұрын
Thanks dear Dr. Vahid, I have learned a lot from you. I have a question: in my model, I have two categorical independent variables (groups and time) each with two levels and one continuous covariate (anxiety as a predictor). I followed the same procedure you explained. The point is that anxiety*groups*time is significant, but no postdoc (apart from plots) is generated. How can I know where the difference lies (for instance, whether the slopes [anxiety and dependent variable] of groups significantly differ in time 1 or whether the slopes of groups significantly differ in time 2). Thanks in advance.
@ain.sudrajat49129 күн бұрын
thank you so much for sharing the calculator!!!
@efremteshome2437Ай бұрын
but how to register in to web science? I found it difficult. there is no sign up. thanks.
@johanandrewvillanuevaruiz7780Ай бұрын
Hello.Can PLS-SEM data analysis be used in Jamovi?
@gabrielalbino862Ай бұрын
This video is good, but the problem is that you seem to be withholding information and compelling viewers to go and watch other videos.
@Tahlilgar.amar.1402Ай бұрын
It was great. Thanks for your full explanation ❤
@AlmostkoyАй бұрын
14:22 Hi sir, some people say that the extraction value must be more than 0.5, if it is below that then you have to eliminate that variable. but you make a big deal out of it
@andrewmiller6049Ай бұрын
As always a really clear walk through, many many thanks
@victormanuelpardo7723Ай бұрын
Muchas gracias... thank you so much
@user-zf9lp3cb1cАй бұрын
thank you very much Sir..
@BasilTUАй бұрын
Thank you for this video What software do you use for the presentation?
@AyseBeyzaAtesАй бұрын
Thank you very much for this video, it helped a lot. One question: I have SPSS V27, working with R 3.3 or 3.6. I appreciate it if you share how I access IRT packages for R 3.6. I receive the message that "MASS" is not available for version 3.6. Best wishes
@alexandremartins1643Ай бұрын
Dear Professor Vahid, My question is, at the momemts 0 and 1 of the study all my partipants were evaluated. However, at the moments 2 and 3, some of them drop out of the study. Then, the sum of squares is Type III or I need to change the type? Thank you in adanve for your attention. Best regards
@SahraStepsАй бұрын
Interesting and also visually appealing 🙏🏻👏🏼. Tnx
@SahraStepsАй бұрын
👏🏼👏🏼
@SahraStepsАй бұрын
✨🙌🏼
@Tushi_07Ай бұрын
My correlation matrix result is not showing. Its just showing " this result is non positive definitive ". What to do now?
@jongkargrinang8012Ай бұрын
Thank you. Very helpful.🎉
@douglasthai1960Ай бұрын
may i know how to interpret below for a simple mediation : Indirect Effect: 0.47 component: 0.31 component 0.15 Direct .043 Total .09 All with significant results but seems the numbers are very small Does this considered as a weak mediation? Do I have to address in my paper? Thank you so much
@jhamdan2012Ай бұрын
Thank you Vahid, that's very helpful. In terms of calculating the number of free parameters, I noticed different sources use different formulae in estimating a total number of structural model parameters. Any suggestion?
@ahmedaremu2304Ай бұрын
Thank you, Prof. I would be glad if you could provide sources for the thresholds.
@andrewmiller6049Ай бұрын
Brilliant, many thanks for making something complex seem so straightforward
@sebastianvarkey3763Ай бұрын
Dr Luke Plonsky's enthusiasm and deep knowledge of the field make him a great choice for this series. Have benefitted from this channel. Good job Vahid jaan!
@datsme8882 ай бұрын
Thanks Prof. Can you tell me which software you are using for screen capture?? Its annotation feature is very helpful