bro you are saving my ass every day a decade later
@drg111yt7 күн бұрын
But who CALLs the Grand Jury and how are they called and composed????
@USLawEssentials7 күн бұрын
RANdomly. Citizens get a notice in the mail from the court, show up, and if selected do their civic duty.
@drg111yt7 күн бұрын
@@USLawEssentials Thank you for getting me nearer the full tral.
@kennethkinsfather61508 күн бұрын
Shoutout to Darryl Brooks for sending me here
@joninja791612 күн бұрын
From the depp trial. So basically you can't put words in someone else's mouth especially when they're not in the court with you.
@Sizdothyx15 күн бұрын
Who's here from the Dogpack404 videos?
@j.murray895719 күн бұрын
so sue the police department not the officer...
@RachelLovelace21 күн бұрын
Crystal clear! Thank you!
@ericklymn541624 күн бұрын
Yea. Tell that title IVD/child. They violate the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment
@mahmmadAbraahim-o5w24 күн бұрын
Mahamadabrhim
@butchjones148625 күн бұрын
Good info. Makes it a little clearer.
@user-st8jk4cn6u27 күн бұрын
Qualified immunity is a foolish idea that courts dreamed up so that cops aren't held to accountability when they make a mistake or break the law even on purpose. When that happens the public (you and me) are the ones who have to pay for those mistakes because fines and judgements are paid for with our tax dollars from city, county and state taxes. The cops who break the law don't have to pay because of qualified immunity. QI must be stopped. The bill to stop it has been tabled in congress by corrupt politicians. Write your congressmen/women.
@yelo7242Ай бұрын
Subtitles show the word "quark witnesses". In fact, this is "court witnesses". This is for non-native speakers.
@hyojinleeАй бұрын
Thank you for this video!
@Tns85Ай бұрын
Why? Would you need the case for controversy clause and when
@USLawEssentialsАй бұрын
Good question. There are at least two reasons. First, the idea is to make sure the judicial branch (federal court system) doesn't intrude on the powers of other branches of government - the legislative and executive branches. The courts can only hear certain types of cases and can't issue advisory opinions. Second, the requirement that the court can only hear actual cases and controversies helps prevent the courts from being overburdened. If anyone could bring a case without having suffered actual harm, we would encourage frivolous litigation where no one actually suffered an injury.
@Tns85Ай бұрын
Thank you for explaining that to me! I am a first year paralegal student and sometimes youtube Can be a great reference thank you!
@terencewinters2154Ай бұрын
Correct .
@nyamuochpaul4279Ай бұрын
Thank you
@sheetalgowrea9108Ай бұрын
Do yu have the video on specific and minimum contacts please?
@haafizxhmrАй бұрын
is it the same with striking out?
@KetoklubzАй бұрын
Are civil wrongful termination cases worse in federal court ? What if a defendant from the same state is hiding and we can’t find her to serve ?
@annag3862Ай бұрын
I would just add that it shall be made on the same grounds. A lot of students, like me, fall for this trick, when JMOL is brought on different grounds
@MurdaQ50Ай бұрын
so i had tickets, i had zoom calls coming up, then that same day got scheduled as an expert, what does that mean
@JesUSking17Ай бұрын
Well done gentlemen. *nod*
@luciokeyboardsАй бұрын
Here after dr. Disrespects tweet
@dominicc83322 ай бұрын
Yes yes, it all makes sense now. Bravo! Great work!
@NelmarSen2 ай бұрын
0:50 wouldnt that be called a fee simple defeasable? glenda gave it to alexa under 1 condition
@askmshaymes2 ай бұрын
Are you still responding to these chats via email?
@albertotorres3212 ай бұрын
Muy bien muy útil que tengan un muy buen día
@lamar58032 ай бұрын
Great Education!
@filho44372 ай бұрын
Grand Jury's are more of a shield for the prosecutor than a defendant.
@truthfreedom85062 ай бұрын
What is the official commentary of the N.Y.U.C.C. called?
@USLawEssentials2 ай бұрын
There are official comments to the UCC but I'm not aware of official state-specific comments.
@ez33332 ай бұрын
😇👍
@ez33332 ай бұрын
😇😂
@RajaMuzamal-ig5xe2 ай бұрын
Sexy dikhana full sex dikhana sexy dikhana full
@lakeishamcfall48333 ай бұрын
Great stuff and I have t taken civ pro yet!
@tracyhazelton18783 ай бұрын
What can I do if the judge in circuit court has denied me due process? He is allowing the prosecutor to use recycled documents and holding me to a deferred prosecution agreement that I did not have any knowledge of or given a copy of until after the defense attorney had withdrawn from the case. I have tried to withdraw my plea and the judge refused the motion.
@marvinbrando7223 ай бұрын
It is basically a santa inquisition
@RowlandKolajo3 ай бұрын
thank you very much. 👌👍
@matthaytham18863 ай бұрын
I FINALLY UNDERSTOOD WHAT INTERPLEADER IS! HOLY COW! Why is it needs to be English before being understood? Why wouldn't I get it with Filipino words? Thanks for the good animation
@YvetteWilliams-xm6vs3 ай бұрын
😢😂🎉❤
@omegaservices59093 ай бұрын
Helpful
@Turalcar3 ай бұрын
If David didn't see her enter the bank this can probably be objected to as speculation. If that's because Debbie told David she was going to the bank, this is hearsay but allowed under the "statement against interest" exception.
@USLawEssentials3 ай бұрын
Remember, for an opposing party statement you don't need the declaration against interest hook. .
@Turalcar3 ай бұрын
@@USLawEssentials I suppose they don't need the declaration because if one side brings it up it's almost by definition against the opposing party's interest.
@USLawEssentials3 ай бұрын
@@Turalcar It's a little different. When you're dealing with a party you don't need the statement against interest. Please look at FRE 801(d)(2)
@Turalcar3 ай бұрын
@@USLawEssentials Weird. So it's not even an exception. Just not hearsay
@USLawEssentials3 ай бұрын
@@Turalcar Right.I think the hearsay rules get a little odd (IMHO) but the distinctions are important if you're taking a law school exam or a bar exam.
@jeffking88903 ай бұрын
The Supreme Court decisions in the 1920s cases of Fairchild v. Hughes and Frothingham v. Mellon were wrong as there is no concept to limit bring a case to just 3 requirements or even the term of “standing”. The Government can act without a Constitutional basis which the remedy will not be able to redress the grievance or grievances. Even the act of passing a law in Congress can create an injury to the States as the Legislature had no authority to pass a bill or act that was not already in its power. The Federal Government has passed too many laws, bills, and acts in contradiction to the powers that were reserved for the States.
@kiranshah80113 ай бұрын
3 sister one brother one brother is expire after marrage his wife and two sons after expire his wife doing new marrage his mother inlow is only in his house three sister married now his mother is agree his properties is given three daughter hosekta hai please answer
@monkeybudge3 ай бұрын
A lot of Trump fans need to understand standing
@coolmom55723 ай бұрын
thanks for explaining clearly what to expect at a Discovery for average people.
@jasminehendricks83043 ай бұрын
“Performance is the acceptance of the contract” couldn’t explained it any better!!
@yes-fy5gx3 ай бұрын
Shared or concurrent??
@johnwerner693 ай бұрын
I'm here after i heard Kendrick say "and your homeboy need subpoena"
@prayenergy73763 ай бұрын
Lets say a Judge didn't get a mandatory certificate to deal with cases that had to do with "tieing your shoe", (just a hypothetical).... And the deffendent objects to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Would the defendent be correct that the court doesn't have subject matter Jurisdiction because the Judge is not qualified by not having approved credentials?