Wasn't able to join but thanks for the recording and thanks to Dr. Yang for the presentation and leading the discussion!
@pankajdey20537 күн бұрын
Excellent talk.
@micbab-vg2muАй бұрын
Great presentation:)
@mdbayazid68373 ай бұрын
Would you please share link that you mentioned at the beginning for paper reading group?
@Neural-Awakening5 ай бұрын
Awesome information, Thank you for breaking down exactly what causality inferring is and how LLM's go about performing these function.
@MrSkor925 ай бұрын
Don't have a video 😢
@damon86456 ай бұрын
*promo sm*
@hyperduality28387 ай бұрын
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Subgroups are dual to subfields -- the Galois correspondence. Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@adhyasuman8 ай бұрын
As the footage of the participants in the meeting overlaps with the slides, it would be greatly appreciated if we could have access to the slides, as certain portions may not be sufficiently clear otherwise.
@sergushkinkov10 ай бұрын
Жзз
@madarauchiha135210 ай бұрын
😂😂б😂нб🎉😮дед женат кща Нжд😅щ😢ж Ж😂😊 14:36 утра ж Будет щешш Ющг 14:47 ю жю Тебя уд л😂😊ежжжл 😂😂й Звук ж😅 А🎉 З Э Гн Зги В 😅д 😅щэ Ю З😂 😊гол щ Ж Б😮😂 дщ😂джз З 15:13 😅нж😅ю😊😢😂бюд😂❤😂😂 😊😅😂😊
@ianoas Жыл бұрын
Very happy to see this discussion occuring in the geosciences. I came across this paper on my own several months ago and as an independent scholar right now (left academia for private sector), I was looking for a group of people with which to discuss this. Watching your discussion was a perfect substitute! Thanks for recording this and sharing. Very appreciative and excited to follow your community in the future. 👍
@SVbayMotorrad2 Жыл бұрын
The problem is we're trying to solve universes paradigms with the knowledge that with the derived from earth... there's still a-lot of missing information. What I found interesting the the limitation Vopson mention regarding protons.
@Freederick1 Жыл бұрын
If God is a teenager in their parents basement and it took 6 days to compile the code for this simulation using the latest and greatest GPU hardware rig, I am going to be terribly disappointed…
@johnnynirvana2 жыл бұрын
at around the 23 minute mark, is he talking about the one and zero as a binary two state because "null" is in superposition in this context perhaps? That's why it isn't a true three state system?
@hyperduality28387 ай бұрын
Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- Hegel's cat. Sine is dual to cosine or dual sine -- the word co means mutual and implies duality. The word superposition also implies at least two or duality! On is dual to off -- binary.
@pankajdey20532 жыл бұрын
I thank Prof. Gupta and Prof. Kumar for sharing these videos on KZfaq.
@pankajdey20532 жыл бұрын
In addition, there are numerous ways to formulate complexity. Do different formulations yield different results?
@pankajdey20532 жыл бұрын
Very nice work Uwe Ehret. I am just wondering what is the physical interpretation of the difference between maximum observed complexity and theoretical maximum complexity (denoted by "Limited Complexity")@29.53. For example, can we interpret in terms of contributions of physical processes (such as baseflow, time of response etc.) or any variable that controls the long-term coevolution of catchment (for example aridity index)?
@djbabbotstown2 жыл бұрын
If information is truly physical. Does this not have some spooky implications. If words have mass/energy. Would thoughts? This sounds almost woo woo to me.
@Freederick1 Жыл бұрын
Isn’t a spoken or written word but a thought manifest in the physical world?