Crash course on Information Theory
2:08:39
Пікірлер
@axe863
@axe863 3 күн бұрын
Causal DAGs are very very restrictive...
@Malvarez062
@Malvarez062 3 күн бұрын
Wasn't able to join but thanks for the recording and thanks to Dr. Yang for the presentation and leading the discussion!
@pankajdey2053
@pankajdey2053 7 күн бұрын
Excellent talk.
@micbab-vg2mu
@micbab-vg2mu Ай бұрын
Great presentation:)
@mdbayazid6837
@mdbayazid6837 3 ай бұрын
Would you please share link that you mentioned at the beginning for paper reading group?
@Neural-Awakening
@Neural-Awakening 5 ай бұрын
Awesome information, Thank you for breaking down exactly what causality inferring is and how LLM's go about performing these function.
@MrSkor92
@MrSkor92 5 ай бұрын
Don't have a video 😢
@damon8645
@damon8645 6 ай бұрын
*promo sm*
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 7 ай бұрын
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Subgroups are dual to subfields -- the Galois correspondence. Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@adhyasuman
@adhyasuman 8 ай бұрын
As the footage of the participants in the meeting overlaps with the slides, it would be greatly appreciated if we could have access to the slides, as certain portions may not be sufficiently clear otherwise.
@sergushkinkov
@sergushkinkov 10 ай бұрын
Жзз
@madarauchiha1352
@madarauchiha1352 10 ай бұрын
😂😂б😂нб🎉😮дед женат кща Нжд😅щ😢ж Ж😂😊 14:36 утра ж Будет щешш Ющг 14:47 ю жю Тебя уд л😂😊ежжжл 😂😂й Звук ж😅 А🎉 З Э Гн Зги В 😅д 😅щэ Ю З😂 😊гол щ Ж Б😮😂 дщ😂джз З 15:13 😅нж😅ю😊😢😂бюд😂❤😂😂 😊😅😂😊
@ianoas
@ianoas Жыл бұрын
Very happy to see this discussion occuring in the geosciences. I came across this paper on my own several months ago and as an independent scholar right now (left academia for private sector), I was looking for a group of people with which to discuss this. Watching your discussion was a perfect substitute! Thanks for recording this and sharing. Very appreciative and excited to follow your community in the future. 👍
@SVbayMotorrad2
@SVbayMotorrad2 Жыл бұрын
The problem is we're trying to solve universes paradigms with the knowledge that with the derived from earth... there's still a-lot of missing information. What I found interesting the the limitation Vopson mention regarding protons.
@Freederick1
@Freederick1 Жыл бұрын
If God is a teenager in their parents basement and it took 6 days to compile the code for this simulation using the latest and greatest GPU hardware rig, I am going to be terribly disappointed…
@johnnynirvana
@johnnynirvana 2 жыл бұрын
at around the 23 minute mark, is he talking about the one and zero as a binary two state because "null" is in superposition in this context perhaps? That's why it isn't a true three state system?
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 7 ай бұрын
Alive is dual to not alive -- the Schrodinger's cat superposition. Being is dual to non being creates becoming -- Plato's cat. Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- Hegel's cat. Sine is dual to cosine or dual sine -- the word co means mutual and implies duality. The word superposition also implies at least two or duality! On is dual to off -- binary.
@pankajdey2053
@pankajdey2053 2 жыл бұрын
I thank Prof. Gupta and Prof. Kumar for sharing these videos on KZfaq.
@pankajdey2053
@pankajdey2053 2 жыл бұрын
In addition, there are numerous ways to formulate complexity. Do different formulations yield different results?
@pankajdey2053
@pankajdey2053 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice work Uwe Ehret. I am just wondering what is the physical interpretation of the difference between maximum observed complexity and theoretical maximum complexity (denoted by "Limited Complexity")@29.53. For example, can we interpret in terms of contributions of physical processes (such as baseflow, time of response etc.) or any variable that controls the long-term coevolution of catchment (for example aridity index)?
@djbabbotstown
@djbabbotstown 2 жыл бұрын
If information is truly physical. Does this not have some spooky implications. If words have mass/energy. Would thoughts? This sounds almost woo woo to me.
@Freederick1
@Freederick1 Жыл бұрын
Isn’t a spoken or written word but a thought manifest in the physical world?
@luisdelafuente7660
@luisdelafuente7660 2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed the discussion :-)
@uhj7Vb
@uhj7Vb 2 жыл бұрын
good explanation!