i imagine it's reasonably easy to pinpoint the time within a few hours within at least the tropics, but if you get further north or south, it actually is fairly difficult to guestimate the time from the sun alone.
@ttime80821 күн бұрын
Where my nerds at learning this for fun lol
@wweshorts18629 күн бұрын
1. 12'o clock -> 90° - shadow angle = Q angle 2. Latitude angle on place - 23.5° = P angle 3. Q angle - P angle = R angle 4. R angle ÷ 0.25 = B days Final step = 21 june + B days = Today's date Note: above 23.5 degree latitude
@SherlockFootball828Ай бұрын
Sir is there anyway i can contact you on few problems on astronomy please sir
@Dispatchedd2 ай бұрын
thanks so much 3:35 already and im learning so much
@walterbrown86942 ай бұрын
How is longitude determined only by celestial observation ? (Hint: If your answer requires use of a chronometer, I would point out that a chronometer is not a celestial object)
@marcg16862 ай бұрын
Do you understand how a sextant is used in celestial navigation?
@walterbrown86942 ай бұрын
@@marcg1686 A sextant can not be used to determine longitude. Longitude determination requires a reference time and location, and local time. (we took celestial sights with a sextant to determine latitude and used a reference chronometer to determine longitude when I was in Naval Aviation in the 1950s)
@marcg16862 ай бұрын
@@walterbrown8694 A sextant always requires a 'reference time'. That will be GMT aka UT. The method you describe to determine your longitude is commonly used. If you are at a latitude close to the Equator you could sight stars with a low single digit declination. Alnilam, Menkar and Procyon spring to mind. Knowing the altitude and azimuth you could determine your longitude with reasonable accuracy. Also at higher latitudes plotting the zenith distance and azimuth on an actual globe will also allow you to determine your longitude with reasonable accuracy, accurate enough to allow you to calculate an intercept to another star. So you served in the Navy in the 1950s? That makes you about 90 years old.
@Dawzirgaming3 ай бұрын
this is so good and it can understand easy
@MrArtVendelay3 ай бұрын
I thought the readings required trig created charts to figure the latitude
@Mysterious_guy463 ай бұрын
Helped me make a small model of tsar bomba!
@johhnyapplesseed97763 ай бұрын
How did u know what time is was??? Did u ask the native Americans what time it was here?
@mikewinston87093 ай бұрын
I’ll keep it simple for the simple minded on here. Time was determined by an hourglass. This was turned by the officer of the watch every hour. That is how one determined time. Simple…..just like some of you lot.
@mikewinston87093 ай бұрын
The British control the world’s time……..fact.
@maya_arts453 ай бұрын
this was so helpful thank you!
@lauriefranchi5693 ай бұрын
Thank you, this was very good.
@primditshane93634 ай бұрын
Well explained thank you.
@blaine74784 ай бұрын
yeah no i’m failing geo 100%
@rajendrapundge59014 ай бұрын
This is amazing. you have explained in such a manner that even the layman can understand.
@mannycalavera1214 ай бұрын
10 years later, random middle aged Australian doing some landscaping. Thanks for the video :)
@HtetwaiNaing-qn6ek4 ай бұрын
Thankful for this video,because l interesting in this rock ,many kinds are found in my home ,so l research this
@mangsolawati70955 ай бұрын
Tq sir
@abdullahgamezer95165 ай бұрын
İf we dont have A watch and we dont know the time in UK
@briancoia82185 ай бұрын
Hello Seth, excellent video! how can you be contacted? I am in the limestone regenerative business for sustainable architecture, and from what I see we have highly common interests that could really be something as a documentary. Please contact me!
@zedphotoediting5 ай бұрын
The distance between them I don't understand I see 4 but u say 5 lines
@shellbark5 ай бұрын
If I could refund my tuition and give to you for doing my prof’s job, I totally would. Thank you for this amazing video.
@amynguyen68196 ай бұрын
My teacher barely explained to us anything. This video is a life saver! Thank you
@vykxa6 ай бұрын
thanks bro
@AcademiaProdigy6 ай бұрын
Wow your explanation is topnotch ❤. Loved it , you oversimplify things .
@user-yv5zu3fm8k6 ай бұрын
There is a problem with this method. If the ship is anchored and is not moving from its current position, the clock continues to move forward. Therefore the clock's difference to GMT is irrelevant to current position of ship.
@novierjohnabdallahyousefebrahe6 ай бұрын
god bless you
@robertlacaille73596 ай бұрын
5 points reflecting polaris's position is Psedeuoscience. Quit asking me to do you a favor or prove myself. I commented on the stupidity. Sextants, compass ,knowledge of the stars ,speed and a flat horizon is how navigation was performed. Simpler question "does water always find its LEVEL? Cmon big boy.
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin53676 ай бұрын
simpler question? dont you mean since you don't know how celestial navigation works you need to change the topic? Why you need to change the topic? Why dont you want to learn?
@robertlacaille73596 ай бұрын
It's your topic not me ne.Celestial navigation does NOT INCLUDE 5 Polaris. You still believe water bends ,but want to teach me something. Go learn about water and maybe your celestial navigation skills could be considered rational. Bendy water😂
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin53676 ай бұрын
@@robertlacaille7359 yes water bends, a water drop destroys your whole argument, you have absolutely zero evidence.
@baia5827 ай бұрын
alhamdulilah
@anonymous-ws2nu7 ай бұрын
alhamdulillah
@fitri_razman36367 ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@nurinnajihah38117 ай бұрын
alhamdulillah
@muhammadhaziq84137 ай бұрын
Alhamdullilah
@wvziv7 ай бұрын
Alhamdullilahh
@user-bg6rl1pg1p7 ай бұрын
ALHAMDULILLAH
@causewaykayak7 ай бұрын
To a traditional navigator things like GPS are very new and only by political chance available to civilians anyway. Its quite something to realise that young folk take the electronic systems as a given. It's like asking how Roman soldiers texted home. Quite shocking really. We learned the elements of CelNav in (UK) school about 14 yrs of age and today still use it in tandem with a modern ECDIS system. It might ?? have helped clarity here if the kind content creator (did a good job tho !) mentioned that altitude is measured from a Tangent to the earth's curved surface. That's the Apparent Horizon. Cel Nav does indeed seem to make use of a pre-Copernican perspective. Means nothing really ... the average person ought to be able to visualise celestial movement according to P-C and Proper motion (Heliocentric) at the same time .
@robertlafleur51797 ай бұрын
‘’*the average person*’’ Some persons in the comments section seem to be below average as they think that earth is flat.
@causewaykayak7 ай бұрын
@@robertlafleur5179 That persistent one in particular seems below average doesnt he ?
@robertlacaille73597 ай бұрын
Can you identify the 1/2 truths or not? Shows a right angle using a FLAT HORIZON. DEPICTS A GLOBE and starts lying. Pay close attention how the angles and " conclusive evidence than switches. Of course he totally omits conversion point in his discussion . As if you could see Polaris from everywhere. Then he shows decradating from Polaris lines that make no sense and is not what I observe. 5 angles of Polaris from 5 different sources?! Wtf? 5rays from 1 source is truth. How do right angles still work with a sextant when you're on a globe?😲 I know some how someway you convince yourself it is possible. Remember this technology is based on water always finds it's LEVEL. A tool researched ,devised,and invented for flat earth. It was reliable enough to successfully ship all that merchandise for centuries. Boy were they lucky that it still worked on a ball 😂🤣😂😉
@marcg16867 ай бұрын
We don't use right angle triangles in celestial navigation.
@@robertlacaille7359 Hey Robert, you think earth is flat? Enough talking, you need to prove it. Solve this celestial navigation problem using only flat earth. Here are 2 real Sun sights. Find the observer's position. 1st Sun sight: February, 20 2010 17:26:26 UTC (GMT) Sextant: 40°18.2' Artificial horizon Sextant error: 0.0' Upper limb of the Sun 2nd Sun sight: February, 21 2010 00:16:02 UTC (GMT) Sextant: 24°04.4' Artificial horizon Sextant error: 0.0' Lower limb of the Sun No cheating now, you can't use globe science, only ''flat earth science''. Show all your calculations. GO!!!!!!
@robertlacaille73597 ай бұрын
@@robertlafleur5179 show me 1 high altitude balloon footage without a fish eye lens and show me the curve. Just 1. I'll wait.
@robertlafleur51797 ай бұрын
@@robertlacaille7359 There are lots of those videos. Even the balloons sent by flerfs show curvature. Find them yourself. Now prove flat earth YOURSELF like a big boy. Do a flat earth celestial navigation demonstration. Until then you have nothing. I’ll wait.
@dastreetz15467 ай бұрын
I really love all your images and how you move the mouse/cursor around to show the directions and explain what you are talking about. I am a visual learner and I really appreciate videos like this. I will now always remember capillarity, Thank you!
@Robert_henderson7 ай бұрын
Thank you for your help !
@zinnsoldat64937 ай бұрын
kill me
@nats508 ай бұрын
One may wonder in that if Polaris could be used in determining latitude, why can't a particular star, any bright star as the reference point since stars also rise in the east and move westward. That is, set the clock in Greenwich when that particular star is on the meridian much like what's done with the sun. The only difference is the sun is done in daylight while it's nightime with the star. Sidereal noon, for instance.
@stevendenton60038 ай бұрын
Hi seth im in 6th grade this is teaching me so much thank you
@crywolf89299 ай бұрын
bro i love you
@pagoboy80349 ай бұрын
Thank you for the mid-presentation test questions! Really helped. Keep it up brother.
@Innercirclefc9 ай бұрын
THANKYOU
@Mr22brian229 ай бұрын
Very Good 🙂
@thedangler13719 ай бұрын
This stuff is too hard to remember. My interest in learning this stuff to become a better hunter just fell off the cliff opposite of the map landing me in a sea of alcohol. The more knowledge I get with activities the worst I get at it.
@toronto-policeandcityaudit15399 ай бұрын
So technically if you knew your lattitude and you took a noon reading at your location, then began to travel you would still be able to know your longitude without using GMT, would that be correct?