Unconformities
9:09
7 жыл бұрын
Relative Dating
15:01
7 жыл бұрын
Permeability & Water Retention
13:38
7 жыл бұрын
Porosity
11:44
7 жыл бұрын
Grinnell Glacier Overlook
2:31
7 жыл бұрын
Capillarity
6:13
7 жыл бұрын
Factors Affecting Infiltration
10:19
7 жыл бұрын
Field Maps
10:14
7 жыл бұрын
Stars
11:31
8 жыл бұрын
Energy Transfer
9:58
8 жыл бұрын
Physical Weathering
9:31
8 жыл бұрын
El Nino
8:30
8 жыл бұрын
Air Masses
8:11
8 жыл бұрын
Skaftafellsjokull Glacier (Iceland)
2:12
Introduction to Wind
9:22
9 жыл бұрын
Factors Affecting Air Pressure
9:29
9 жыл бұрын
Rock & Fossil Correlation
15:01
9 жыл бұрын
Radioactive Dating
15:01
9 жыл бұрын
Temperature vs. Heat
12:55
9 жыл бұрын
The Greenhouse Effect
10:02
9 жыл бұрын
The Dynamic Earth
9:35
9 жыл бұрын
Dinosaur Provincial Park
2:13
9 жыл бұрын
Cracker Lake
4:51
9 жыл бұрын
Grand Geyser
0:37
9 жыл бұрын
Sperry Glacier
2:19
9 жыл бұрын
Mass Movement (Talus Slope)
1:22
9 жыл бұрын
Limestone Formation (St. Maarten)
2:29
Пікірлер
@baumulrich
@baumulrich 2 күн бұрын
i imagine it's reasonably easy to pinpoint the time within a few hours within at least the tropics, but if you get further north or south, it actually is fairly difficult to guestimate the time from the sun alone.
@ttime808
@ttime808 21 күн бұрын
Where my nerds at learning this for fun lol
@wweshorts186
@wweshorts186 29 күн бұрын
1. 12'o clock -> 90° - shadow angle = Q angle 2. Latitude angle on place - 23.5° = P angle 3. Q angle - P angle = R angle 4. R angle ÷ 0.25 = B days Final step = 21 june + B days = Today's date Note: above 23.5 degree latitude
@SherlockFootball828
@SherlockFootball828 Ай бұрын
Sir is there anyway i can contact you on few problems on astronomy please sir
@Dispatchedd
@Dispatchedd 2 ай бұрын
thanks so much 3:35 already and im learning so much
@walterbrown8694
@walterbrown8694 2 ай бұрын
How is longitude determined only by celestial observation ? (Hint: If your answer requires use of a chronometer, I would point out that a chronometer is not a celestial object)
@marcg1686
@marcg1686 2 ай бұрын
Do you understand how a sextant is used in celestial navigation?
@walterbrown8694
@walterbrown8694 2 ай бұрын
@@marcg1686 A sextant can not be used to determine longitude. Longitude determination requires a reference time and location, and local time. (we took celestial sights with a sextant to determine latitude and used a reference chronometer to determine longitude when I was in Naval Aviation in the 1950s)
@marcg1686
@marcg1686 2 ай бұрын
@@walterbrown8694 A sextant always requires a 'reference time'. That will be GMT aka UT. The method you describe to determine your longitude is commonly used. If you are at a latitude close to the Equator you could sight stars with a low single digit declination. Alnilam, Menkar and Procyon spring to mind. Knowing the altitude and azimuth you could determine your longitude with reasonable accuracy. Also at higher latitudes plotting the zenith distance and azimuth on an actual globe will also allow you to determine your longitude with reasonable accuracy, accurate enough to allow you to calculate an intercept to another star. So you served in the Navy in the 1950s? That makes you about 90 years old.
@Dawzirgaming
@Dawzirgaming 3 ай бұрын
this is so good and it can understand easy
@MrArtVendelay
@MrArtVendelay 3 ай бұрын
I thought the readings required trig created charts to figure the latitude
@Mysterious_guy46
@Mysterious_guy46 3 ай бұрын
Helped me make a small model of tsar bomba!
@johhnyapplesseed9776
@johhnyapplesseed9776 3 ай бұрын
How did u know what time is was??? Did u ask the native Americans what time it was here?
@mikewinston8709
@mikewinston8709 3 ай бұрын
I’ll keep it simple for the simple minded on here. Time was determined by an hourglass. This was turned by the officer of the watch every hour. That is how one determined time. Simple…..just like some of you lot.
@mikewinston8709
@mikewinston8709 3 ай бұрын
The British control the world’s time……..fact.
@maya_arts45
@maya_arts45 3 ай бұрын
this was so helpful thank you!
@lauriefranchi569
@lauriefranchi569 3 ай бұрын
Thank you, this was very good.
@primditshane9363
@primditshane9363 4 ай бұрын
Well explained thank you.
@blaine7478
@blaine7478 4 ай бұрын
yeah no i’m failing geo 100%
@rajendrapundge5901
@rajendrapundge5901 4 ай бұрын
This is amazing. you have explained in such a manner that even the layman can understand.
@mannycalavera121
@mannycalavera121 4 ай бұрын
10 years later, random middle aged Australian doing some landscaping. Thanks for the video :)
@HtetwaiNaing-qn6ek
@HtetwaiNaing-qn6ek 4 ай бұрын
Thankful for this video,because l interesting in this rock ,many kinds are found in my home ,so l research this
@mangsolawati7095
@mangsolawati7095 5 ай бұрын
Tq sir
@abdullahgamezer9516
@abdullahgamezer9516 5 ай бұрын
İf we dont have A watch and we dont know the time in UK
@briancoia8218
@briancoia8218 5 ай бұрын
Hello Seth, excellent video! how can you be contacted? I am in the limestone regenerative business for sustainable architecture, and from what I see we have highly common interests that could really be something as a documentary. Please contact me!
@zedphotoediting
@zedphotoediting 5 ай бұрын
The distance between them I don't understand I see 4 but u say 5 lines
@shellbark
@shellbark 5 ай бұрын
If I could refund my tuition and give to you for doing my prof’s job, I totally would. Thank you for this amazing video.
@amynguyen6819
@amynguyen6819 6 ай бұрын
My teacher barely explained to us anything. This video is a life saver! Thank you
@vykxa
@vykxa 6 ай бұрын
thanks bro
@AcademiaProdigy
@AcademiaProdigy 6 ай бұрын
Wow your explanation is topnotch ❤. Loved it , you oversimplify things .
@user-yv5zu3fm8k
@user-yv5zu3fm8k 6 ай бұрын
There is a problem with this method. If the ship is anchored and is not moving from its current position, the clock continues to move forward. Therefore the clock's difference to GMT is irrelevant to current position of ship.
@novierjohnabdallahyousefebrahe
@novierjohnabdallahyousefebrahe 6 ай бұрын
god bless you
@robertlacaille7359
@robertlacaille7359 6 ай бұрын
5 points reflecting polaris's position is Psedeuoscience. Quit asking me to do you a favor or prove myself. I commented on the stupidity. Sextants, compass ,knowledge of the stars ,speed and a flat horizon is how navigation was performed. Simpler question "does water always find its LEVEL? Cmon big boy.
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367 6 ай бұрын
simpler question? dont you mean since you don't know how celestial navigation works you need to change the topic? Why you need to change the topic? Why dont you want to learn?
@robertlacaille7359
@robertlacaille7359 6 ай бұрын
It's your topic not me ne.Celestial navigation does NOT INCLUDE 5 Polaris. You still believe water bends ,but want to teach me something. Go learn about water and maybe your celestial navigation skills could be considered rational. Bendy water😂
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367
@iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367 6 ай бұрын
@@robertlacaille7359 yes water bends, a water drop destroys your whole argument, you have absolutely zero evidence.
@baia582
@baia582 7 ай бұрын
alhamdulilah
@anonymous-ws2nu
@anonymous-ws2nu 7 ай бұрын
alhamdulillah
@fitri_razman3636
@fitri_razman3636 7 ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@nurinnajihah3811
@nurinnajihah3811 7 ай бұрын
alhamdulillah
@muhammadhaziq8413
@muhammadhaziq8413 7 ай бұрын
Alhamdullilah
@wvziv
@wvziv 7 ай бұрын
Alhamdullilahh
@user-bg6rl1pg1p
@user-bg6rl1pg1p 7 ай бұрын
ALHAMDULILLAH
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 7 ай бұрын
To a traditional navigator things like GPS are very new and only by political chance available to civilians anyway. Its quite something to realise that young folk take the electronic systems as a given. It's like asking how Roman soldiers texted home. Quite shocking really. We learned the elements of CelNav in (UK) school about 14 yrs of age and today still use it in tandem with a modern ECDIS system. It might ?? have helped clarity here if the kind content creator (did a good job tho !) mentioned that altitude is measured from a Tangent to the earth's curved surface. That's the Apparent Horizon. Cel Nav does indeed seem to make use of a pre-Copernican perspective. Means nothing really ... the average person ought to be able to visualise celestial movement according to P-C and Proper motion (Heliocentric) at the same time .
@robertlafleur5179
@robertlafleur5179 7 ай бұрын
‘’*the average person*’’ Some persons in the comments section seem to be below average as they think that earth is flat.
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 7 ай бұрын
@@robertlafleur5179 That persistent one in particular seems below average doesnt he ?
@robertlacaille7359
@robertlacaille7359 7 ай бұрын
Can you identify the 1/2 truths or not? Shows a right angle using a FLAT HORIZON. DEPICTS A GLOBE and starts lying. Pay close attention how the angles and " conclusive evidence than switches. Of course he totally omits conversion point in his discussion . As if you could see Polaris from everywhere. Then he shows decradating from Polaris lines that make no sense and is not what I observe. 5 angles of Polaris from 5 different sources?! Wtf? 5rays from 1 source is truth. How do right angles still work with a sextant when you're on a globe?😲 I know some how someway you convince yourself it is possible. Remember this technology is based on water always finds it's LEVEL. A tool researched ,devised,and invented for flat earth. It was reliable enough to successfully ship all that merchandise for centuries. Boy were they lucky that it still worked on a ball 😂🤣😂😉
@marcg1686
@marcg1686 7 ай бұрын
We don't use right angle triangles in celestial navigation.
@robertlacaille7359
@robertlacaille7359 7 ай бұрын
​@@marcg1686kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arZ6eK6f2tCsl4E.htmlsi=8We2Bqui4MtxF2pw
@robertlafleur5179
@robertlafleur5179 7 ай бұрын
@@robertlacaille7359 Hey Robert, you think earth is flat? Enough talking, you need to prove it. Solve this celestial navigation problem using only flat earth. Here are 2 real Sun sights. Find the observer's position. 1st Sun sight: February, 20 2010 17:26:26 UTC (GMT) Sextant: 40°18.2' Artificial horizon Sextant error: 0.0' Upper limb of the Sun 2nd Sun sight: February, 21 2010 00:16:02 UTC (GMT) Sextant: 24°04.4' Artificial horizon Sextant error: 0.0' Lower limb of the Sun No cheating now, you can't use globe science, only ''flat earth science''. Show all your calculations. GO!!!!!!
@robertlacaille7359
@robertlacaille7359 7 ай бұрын
​@@robertlafleur5179 show me 1 high altitude balloon footage without a fish eye lens and show me the curve. Just 1. I'll wait.
@robertlafleur5179
@robertlafleur5179 7 ай бұрын
@@robertlacaille7359 There are lots of those videos. Even the balloons sent by flerfs show curvature. Find them yourself. Now prove flat earth YOURSELF like a big boy. Do a flat earth celestial navigation demonstration. Until then you have nothing. I’ll wait.
@dastreetz1546
@dastreetz1546 7 ай бұрын
I really love all your images and how you move the mouse/cursor around to show the directions and explain what you are talking about. I am a visual learner and I really appreciate videos like this. I will now always remember capillarity, Thank you!
@Robert_henderson
@Robert_henderson 7 ай бұрын
Thank you for your help !
@zinnsoldat6493
@zinnsoldat6493 7 ай бұрын
kill me
@nats50
@nats50 8 ай бұрын
One may wonder in that if Polaris could be used in determining latitude, why can't a particular star, any bright star as the reference point since stars also rise in the east and move westward. That is, set the clock in Greenwich when that particular star is on the meridian much like what's done with the sun. The only difference is the sun is done in daylight while it's nightime with the star. Sidereal noon, for instance.
@stevendenton6003
@stevendenton6003 8 ай бұрын
Hi seth im in 6th grade this is teaching me so much thank you
@crywolf8929
@crywolf8929 9 ай бұрын
bro i love you
@pagoboy8034
@pagoboy8034 9 ай бұрын
Thank you for the mid-presentation test questions! Really helped. Keep it up brother.
@Innercirclefc
@Innercirclefc 9 ай бұрын
THANKYOU
@Mr22brian22
@Mr22brian22 9 ай бұрын
Very Good 🙂
@thedangler1371
@thedangler1371 9 ай бұрын
This stuff is too hard to remember. My interest in learning this stuff to become a better hunter just fell off the cliff opposite of the map landing me in a sea of alcohol. The more knowledge I get with activities the worst I get at it.
@toronto-policeandcityaudit1539
@toronto-policeandcityaudit1539 9 ай бұрын
So technically if you knew your lattitude and you took a noon reading at your location, then began to travel you would still be able to know your longitude without using GMT, would that be correct?