I have an R6 markii and I am using the rf. 100-500 mostly for sports and nature. I was looking for a versatile zoom lens and I’ve been trying the ef 17-40 f4 using the adapter but I’ve just bought the rf 24-105 f4 and I hope is the correct alternative.

Yeah that is the IS (Image Stabiliser) element. During normal operation IS off the element movement is locked by the motors (actuators more precisely). When IS is enabled at 70mm the physical movement of the stabiliser element is not that drastic but at 200mm that element is going to be bazerking allarround in there when handheld. Ypud have to use a faster camera to take a video of that tho

it's fine even phone cams do that when it's off. you should be ok

I need that #rodewirelesspro for my onlyfans!

#rodewirelesspro I would use this to record veterans stories for the veterans history project.

I enjoyed the video, please do more!

The only reason I have a NINJA V is because I have an OG R6 with the 30 minute record limit.

My Sergeant in the Marine Corps used to say the same thing!

One thing you forgot to mention is with the original Ninja V, they make you purchase H265 from within the damn operating system. FML

No, it would not be concerning the internal lens shakes around in order to compensate for shakes when you take pictures or record video when you have a camera turned off there’s no electrical input so it’s just bouncing around against the magnets. That is how it’s designed.

Should be normal, it's like this on my other lens as well

I think is fair to put the rude people where they belong ,good video thanks ¡

Man, you KZfaqrs get above 11 subscribers and you start smelling yourselves.

Excellent as usual. Thank you. Which would you suggest the Neewer or Meike. I have moved EOS R mirrorless just yesterday. Your videos provide a lot of info and I wanted to get your opinion on the two adapters. Thanks

That's the IBIS. Shouldn't you know better?

the stabilisation mabye?

Excellent. Thank you for this video. I am moving EOS R mirrorless and your video is an excellent help to rethink not selling the EF lenses. Did you create the R7 with speed boost.? Would love to watch it too.

Would the 24-105 f4 be the better option for a student/hobbyist than the 24-70 with the 70-200? I know that the 15-35, 24-70 & 70-200 are the "F2.8. Trinity", what constitutes the "F4 Trinity"? I hate the thought of having to invest over $6000 into lenses that whent there are more rational options for my situation...

Excellent review Jared…. f4 is the way to go for me, don’t really need the f2.8 as it’s heavy and expensive. This is a perfect lens. One question Jared, do I give away my EF 24-70 f4 for this one ? I also have a 70-200 f4

Congrats on 10k and the inbound RODE! That's awesome, well deserved, and a big milestone. I've been using the Rodecaster Duo for the better part of the year for my vids and really liking that. Would be interested to see how the iPad is working for ya, assuming it's working well enough in a photo workflow. #rodewirelesspro

Do you make good money running the business? Im thinking of making one!

It's a great video. I enjoyed watching the video. 👍❤

I bought mine used and seems like new. I haven fully taken it out to get every bit of testing done, but a few shots could reveal an issue. I may have to return it as many shots are looking soft on my R6-II. I'm going to do some comparisons against my 70-200 f/4 and see exactly what's going on. I'm hoping I don't have to return it, but the few shots I took are not even close to being sharp. I'm pretty disappointed with it so far to be honest. I still want this lens, but maybe not the copy I have.

This lens is amazing on the C70. Another fun note…at 13mm…it becomes fullframe on the R5C.

I subscribed

I've been waiting a long time for a wide angle prime lens for canon L series. So I'm going to buy an RF 35 F1.4, but after understand its real wide angle I realized that it gives too small difference with my current RF 50 F1.2L lens. I definitely like the RF 50 F1.2L for everything but its weight is not convenient for hiking. So always wanted a good fast lens at wide angle. Last year I bought the RF 24 F1.8 but in fact this lens was a compromise, it has very strong geometric distortion on edges and the camera profile stretches the corners a lot which makes many shots look very cheap. Now I want to sell this lens, it is lightweight comfortable IS lens with good aperture but with very mediocre picture and colors. I had already pre-ordered the RF 35 F1.4L VCM and was already thinking of buying it, but the thought that the 35 would be little different from the RF 50 F1.2L made it feel like a worthless purchase. I started researching and came across this lens RF 14-35 F4L IS USM and I was really interested in it as it weighs only 540 grams which is great for hiking and traveling as the RF 35 F1.4L VCM also weighs 555 grams but is not as versatile as the RF 14-35 F4L IS USM. Now I'm back to wondering if it makes sense to go for the RF 15-35 F2.8L IS USM as it is noticeably more expensive and heavier, the lens is definitely outstanding but is the one stop aperture justified in this case as I will have a significantly higher system weight.

I have an r50 currently. Could I buy a tamron 28-75 2.8 and I could it on my r50. I new to photography and need help wanting tio invest into a lenses. Also if i need a speed booster which one to invest in ?

RF are overpriced. I won't by RF-L lenses. the 100-500 isn't worth £2400 when the EF 100-400 is £1399.

Hey solid review, your vid helped me in purchasing one but I’m experiencing severe coil whine from the dock to the point where I’m getting a slight headache. Does your dock exhibit the same behavior?

Beautiful Flag 💪

Hi Jared, is there a way to shoot a merged HDR Photo in Camera?

Yes! I do real estate. R8 with 14-35L. 5 shots. Even drone shots mini3 pro 5 shots

Thank you for sharing. I have this lens and it is my favorite vacation lens! Hate lugging around weight and this fits the bill perfectly.

Do you shoot HDR?

Would this work on macro photography?

I will reveal a secret to you. The aperture of 2.8 can be increased to 4.0. 4.0 cannot be decreased to 2.8.

Hi Jared, thanks for your videos. It is not boring I enjoy while learning. What would be your recommended tripod height? And if couldnt afford yet #5, are there any more affordable substitutes you can recommend? 😊 cheers man

Jared in one of your previous videos you talked about how canon codecs suck to use on premiere on a pc, could explain why that combination sucks bc thats my current situation on my canon r6ii, and i wondered whats the best option for me to so, and u also said you dont use clog3 all the time thank you man!

Great infos there, with quite revealing tests for ppl like me who just acquired their brand new R6II ! One question though i'd like to focus on (pun intended!), even if the answer may seem obvious to many (but i just need to be sure before investing in RF glasses): Does this focus breathing correction work in AF mode only, or does it work just the same along a manual focus change? Since i love to manually focus from my RS2 gimbal buttons as often as i can (just to keep kinda filmic approach), it would great being able to retain this focus correction in every situation. I saw a few demos here and there already showing this function from Canon, but it's always with AF turned on... So thank you by advance if you can confirm that manual focus doesnt change anything about it !

I open the vídeo because i buy this nd filters set , and i expect see kind of review in your vídeo, but i dont see what i expect, because you talk, talk and talk but i don t see any review!! You have 4 filters in your bag, witch filter you show in you vídeo???🤔🤔

Personally, I’ve never owned EF lenses though.. and theyre just as expensive as the RF for me :s The canon mirrorless camera i have is the first camera ive ever bought. Its extremely nice in IQ. We used to own old canon point-and-shoot and a camcorder when i was a kid. My issue is that canon doesnt have weathersealed lenses that arent massive or extremely expensive. In addition to that, it turns out that I HATE changing lenses outdoor with a passion. I may have messed up by choosing canon. Mainly because of the issues i have with carrying a light set with zooming capabilities. I should’ve gone for a micro four thirds, but at the same time i also want top IQ. There are times i want to shoot landscape, and times i want to photograph birds in one walking trip. I got a 70-200mm f4, my first and currently only L lens. I like the handling of it. Its soo smooth, but the expensive and overall weight is massive. I also have a 24-105mm f/4-7.1 but i dislike the feeling and use of it for some reason, even though its sharp. Maybe because of its focal lenght. So i can carry one lens, but then what if i want to take landscape images? I thought about the 24-240 RF, but honestly, what would be the point of a fullframe then? I dont regret getting this system, but i feel like I could have possibly taken a different course, possibly better. For now, im heavily experimenting with my setup. Lightest setup could be a tiny 750’ish grams, but with the L i could go up to 1900 (with battery grip). Thats another annoyance actually. I REALLY like the extra grip(and battery), but i also dislike the extra weight it gives… Its not as bad for changing prime lenses as it is with heavy zoom lenses. I suppose i could try and get used to it, or sell the 70-20 f4 and live with no weather sealing, or go for the f4 zooms (which was my original plan), and learn how to change lenses easily + invent an easy way to carry them. Using a shoulderstrap isnt bad, but weight becomes an issue, especially with the battery grip. I really dont want to let it go, but its so hard to strike a nice balance otherwise… A camera bag is great too, but i want space for other stuff too and for general walks i always carry a bag with me in case i buy something. That said, i get lazy if my camera isnt already out when i see something nice. At the end of the day, the entire issue boils down to convenience, because canon doesnt offer lightweight, weathersealed lenses.

Hi! Thanks for this vid. What about vigneting with filters? Thanks!

Hi Jared. What about the Output colour space and the Output Gamma. Do they need to be set to REC709? Thanks for the tutorial bro! Awesome!

Pretty cool! #rodewirelesspro

You are hilarious 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 10/10

I'd love to get them. #rodewirelesspro. I've been looking to start vlogging or podcasting and those will be perfect for that. Thanks.

#rodewirelesspro I have used the original Pro V1 system and its pretty good. I used it last year for a job shooting on a catamaran for a week. So I shot it on my Canon R7 and it worked very well! I'm always amazed at these smaller systems because I am a professional sound mixer/recordist and I use some crazy expensive mics most of the time. Usually my wireless systems are in the $5000 each range and that doesn't include the cost of the mic! That's another $500 or so. The point is, these Rode systems are actually pretty good for what they are. I'm not saying they are equivalent to say a top of the line Lectrosonics systems, but I have used them for some big gigs and on large productions when their small size and weight matters. Like when a camera is on a gimble and needs critical audio transferred to the camera or even just a scratch track. But I have used these for critical audio for a NBC News feature I worked on as well as on a Rogers Media (Canada) documentary on Jamal Murray (Denver Nuggets basketball player). The system just worked! I would love to get a one of my own! Thanks!

#rodewirelesspro I have been looking at this mic. good luck everyone

kzfaq.inforodewirelesspro I have been looking at mic. good luck everyone!

6K Raw is awesome but not on the R6 MK II