Nearly all the work Arkani-Hamed is doing was anticipated by the work of Mandelstam and others in the 1960s, except they were doing the massive case. His comments about the 1960s Analytic S-matrix folks are shameful and dishonest. But the work is good, and reviving their program.
@sherrysyed Жыл бұрын
Amazing! The little I am understanding haha
@paulpulaski Жыл бұрын
PLease turn on the closed captioning CC for this video/ Thank you.
@pollutedwaters8126 Жыл бұрын
" e to the fucking i theta " That's called passion kids
@timothyschmidt62282 жыл бұрын
Ah uhm ah uhm ah, lol.
@brendawilliams80622 жыл бұрын
He is a very good teacher. I just wouldn’t want that study. Thankyou
@TobiliGames2 жыл бұрын
Gutes Video! LG Matthias.
@TobiliGames2 жыл бұрын
Danke
@TobiliGames2 жыл бұрын
Sehe ich genauso!
@niklaskobelin65072 жыл бұрын
Freut mich sehr Gleichgesinnte zu finden!
@sarumansarmee11182 жыл бұрын
@@niklaskobelin6507 Danke freut mich auch!
@bambalooza19792 жыл бұрын
Great job
@bambalooza19792 жыл бұрын
Great job
@asdf-ef8if2 жыл бұрын
madlad!
@raffinee_37633 жыл бұрын
Huh..........what?.......not a clue but interesting nonetheless......
@SzTz1003 жыл бұрын
Don't ask him to explain anything, this is what you get
@brendawilliams80622 жыл бұрын
He’s messing with geometry and pointing it nuclear. Just give me the geometry and then I’ll be good.
@brikir28353 жыл бұрын
43:38 "Because this is after all a subject where positivity is important"
@brikir28353 жыл бұрын
2:12:52 also lol
@popopcorn64779 ай бұрын
@@brikir2835 6:48:45 !
@Malediction993 жыл бұрын
He's lost so much weight, I hope for good reasons and not bad ones. We need him around for a long time to come.
@TheDavidlloydjones3 жыл бұрын
Could somebody tell these people that they're on microphones so they don't need to shout? It's not a question of the volume: when I turn my volume down I just get this idjit shouting at low volume.
@davidwilkie95513 жыл бұрын
The unspoken assumption of discrete objects in empty space, and yet has a duality of probability positioning defining an energy density-intensity, has to be modified, (=>modulation/frequency amplitude), in the actual cause-effect mathematical circumstances of unity-connection of axial-tangential logarithmic singularity positioning integration sync-duration.., that is an "insideout" concept of positioning location @.dt zero-infinity instantaneous now universally. Location => density-intensity AM-FMODULES of Communication certainty. Ie comprehensible knowledge. Math-Phys-Chem and Geometry will continue to be Bio-logical in e-Pi-i sync-duration QM-TIMESPACE connectivity. The null results of MM, LHC, confirms the Doom of Spacetime.
@brendawilliams80622 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a ride on Ferris wheel while blowing bubbles.
@toniraff54883 жыл бұрын
Shout out to C.Duhr, I saw him once playing drums like a young God, when he was young and covering 'Rage against the Mashine and Nirvana with his band... Goodtimes, great guy !
@justinwinter49084 жыл бұрын
Worst camera operator ever
@richardgreen72254 жыл бұрын
If bigger is better, after the LHC ... Perhaps we should build a gigantic particle collider on the Moon. Send a boring machine up there to make the tunnel. Turn the ore that it produces into PV panels and superconductors. Ultimately we could build one with the Moon's radius: ~1700 km.
@Zeno2Day4 жыл бұрын
Nima... where’s the discussion on the philosophical aspect? Perhaps if you’d sit down with an actual philosopher of Phenomenology, you might make monumental scientific advances. At the rate and depth for which you cover topics, you’re all over the map adding nothing (so far) but rhetorical interludes.
@Zeno2Day4 жыл бұрын
Babble
@fermibubbles93754 жыл бұрын
from fermions to fermi bubbles #unifiedtheoryofcosmicplasmaphysics
@lucyoriginales4 жыл бұрын
You’re spinning over the same subject.
@Yatukih_0014 жыл бұрын
Exactly. He basically explains scattering amplitudes in 11 hours...so sometimes when you have to describe something as complex as this topic, you need to go over the details that provide others with answers to what it is multiple times.
@lucyoriginales4 жыл бұрын
Yatukih001 I’m sorry 😔. I didn’t mean to be rude 😒. But that doesn’t matter.. what matters is that Nima has disappeared as far as I’m concerned. He’s not working at the office. 🤭
@Helmutandmoshe3 жыл бұрын
No.
@davidlandelle70004 жыл бұрын
Quite far away from the "Synergetique" introduced by Renée Louis Vallée that lead me here.
@spartansEXTEEL4 жыл бұрын
Mind blowing I mean how can you come up with a geometric structure of infinity. I mean the stuff they did with fractals was pretty trippy with the little buddha looking thing.
@spartansEXTEEL4 жыл бұрын
This blew my mind here no technological use? whaaaaa? ----> 1:18:16
@jj4cpw5 жыл бұрын
I think Nima is brilliant and I've always admired his willingness to highlight the shortcomings of theoretical physics but he sounds desperate here perhaps because he realizes that to "save" the current paradigm of reductive materialism is to throw a "hail mary" pass. Instead, it may be time to dump that paradigm and begin to pay more attention to scientists like Donald Hoffman and others.
@DavidBrown-om8cv5 жыл бұрын
"We have to find some new laws." Consider the Milgrom Denial Hypothesis: The main problem with string theory is that string theorists fail to realize that Milgrom is the Kepler of contemporary cosmology. According to Kroupa, empirical evidence demonstrates that something is wrong with the dark matter hypothesis of conventional physics. arxiv.org/abs/1409.6302 "Lessons from the Local Group (and beyond) on dark matter" by Pavel Kroupa, 2014 In order to justify Milgrom's MOND, modify Einstein's field equations with dark-matter-compensation-constant = (3.9±.5) * 10^-5, Riofrio cutoff at high-energy density, and Riofrio cutoff at low energy-density. Google "riofrio pipino" and "weinberg graviton spin". According to Weinberg, if gravitons are spin-2 particles then string theory implies that MOND is empirically invalid. This suggests that there might be an uncertainty principle for graviton spin. MOND is empirically valid and implies that at least 4 new laws of nature are needed.
@legendarylightyagamiimmanu18214 жыл бұрын
David Brown when you say spin 2 state graviton Are we still referring to the 5 possible spin states of the graviton? Or a completely different notion of the QM and EPP I’m talking about ?
@DavidBrown-om8cv5 жыл бұрын
"Study of Fundamental Laws of Nature, governed by still-mysterious union of Space-Time + Quantum Mechanics ... " I say that Milgrom is the Kepler of contemporary cosmology. Google "kroupa mcgaugh" and "riofrio pipino". Is Einstein's equivalence principle slightly wrong? Is our universe losing gravitational energy? Sanejouand, Yves-Henri. "A simple Hubble-like law in lieu of dark energy." arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.2919 (2014). arxiv.org/abs/1401.2919 Sanejouand, Yves-Henri. "A loss of photons along the line-of-sight can explain the Hubble diagram for quasars." (2019). hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02190771/ Sanejouand, Yves-Henri. "Empirical evidences in favor of a varying-speed-of-light." arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.0249 (2009). arxiv.org/abs/0908.0249 Sanejouand, Yves-Henri. "Has the density of sources of gamma-ray burts been constant over the last ten billion years?." arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05303 (2018). arxiv.org/abs/1803.05303 Sanejouand, Yves-Henri. "A simple varying-speed-of-light hypothesis is enough for explaining high-redshift supernovae data." arXiv preprint astro-ph/0509582 (2005). arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509582
@gusprooplik90685 жыл бұрын
Just awesome.
@chrisrecord56255 жыл бұрын
The universe is a big place, perhaps the biggest. Kilgore Trout cf, me: The multiverse is a big place, perhaps even bigger.
@TheDavidlloydjones3 жыл бұрын
Compared to what? Look like the smallest bunch of Universes ever made to me.
@tenforce5 жыл бұрын
I saw him live. This dude is crazy good!
@_John_Sean_Walker4 жыл бұрын
He is the best!
@gusprooplik90685 жыл бұрын
Amazing Nima !
@aaronalanmiles5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for saving this, and sharing it!
@nyttag78305 жыл бұрын
What would this guy think about the Nirmitz incident. If he cared to study it for one hour.
@legendarylightyagamiimmanu18215 жыл бұрын
Idiotic comments and pretenders. Great Lecture......
@donaldsmith39264 жыл бұрын
..., but is your daughter getting probed?
@LongTheta5 жыл бұрын
These videos are too dim. Is that in the filming and cannot be changed?
@sebacaine69745 жыл бұрын
Lmao "...so I can't fuck around with minus signs." 43:48
@bonesjones34215 жыл бұрын
I'm happy to see that Nima is optimistic. I am now 64 years old and hoped to see real big results come the LHC. I think its harder to stay optimistic the older you are, but I should probably be more optimistic because negative attitude has no advantage.
@donaldsmith39264 жыл бұрын
I've come to the ... not conclusion, but ... something that there will always be questions. Don't know if that's the way it was set-up or the way it's turned-out; there will inevitably never be a final answer, always another question. Still wondering if all those particles and fields were there before we searched; probably, but, well, yeah, sure they were.
@JehTweenGong5 жыл бұрын
Not a SINGLE Nima’s model works out, all are just talking. Litmus test: deriving the natural constants of THIS universe, such as Alpha, Higgs mass, CC, Planck CMB data, etc. see tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/natures-manifesto-on-physics-2/
@ke_rico5 жыл бұрын
I heard 978 Uhs that was tough to go through for something I know zero about. I have no life.
@dwinsemius5 жыл бұрын
I found the uhs helpful because it slowed his delivery speed down to less than relativistic.
He spent the entire time talking like he only had 20 minutes to make his point...... truly awesome
@Yatukih_0015 жыл бұрын
Because reason!
@CoreyKatouli5 жыл бұрын
Greatest presenter in physics of all time. Love his style.
@Srednicki1235 жыл бұрын
Sadly, there are no accompanying notes to these excellent lectures. My only complain about Nima: he might be the one of the best living lecturers , but he always never puts out any notes for students. Does anybody know which of his many papers are closest to the content of this lecture? Where he *introduces* polytopes, canonical logarithmic differential forms, etc. like here? thanks!
@erkintunca5 жыл бұрын
Legend!
@speculawyer5 жыл бұрын
11 hours? On scattering?
@apollion8885 жыл бұрын
At 48:42 Nima became the first physicist I ever heard swear, and I laughed so hard. May the Gods bless him and the Man leave him alone. Good talk too.