Judging from your comment section you did not convey this text well, which is disappointing because it has such great messages to spread

3:48 yeah, but how do we know what others want? (its hard enough for us to even know what we ourselves even actually want) (sorry, i hope this wasnt sounding rude or anything. I was just sincerely confused by how one is supposed to make such a judgement)

I am currently writing a critique of BCH so you've given me some new info to look into. I actually think BCH work borders on theological writing, especially the way he talks about "the Other." He's a very dogmatic philosopher.

Exchanging money to make more money via investment and return isn't absurd, IMHO. There nothing inherently wrong with it as far as I can tell. First of all, in a free market, one can only do so by taking a risk, the investment might flop and the capitalist could lose money, not make it. Second, they are only able to get a positive return by producing or providing a product or service that a consumer wants. This makes the consumer's life, generally speaking, better in that they get what they wanted, as well as satifies the aims of the capitalist who makes even more money than before. Thus the whole of society is theoretically enriched. They are, of course, cases where a capitalist may be conceived as being evil in the sense of forging ethics, morality, etc., in the course of making money but the same could be said about a consumer who resorts to like behavior to satisfy their basic needs; thus neither being a consumer or a capitalist - and let's not forget capitalists also consume and are, in that sense, also consumers - is inherently good or bad but it's a matter of how one conducts oneself in the aim of their pursuit, IMHO. So why isn't it inherently bad for the capitalist to want to make more money than is needed to satisfy their basic needs? Well, for one, again, a person can only do so by enriching the life of another, and two, again, that person's own life is enriched theyby. Plus many people are charitabl and give to those who are less fortunate.

Stephen Hicks is a scholar against post modernism. Search.

Lyndon Larouche and Jill Vickers. Socialists. To bad.

Mark Mills is a good witer agains green agenda. Hydrogen fuel is a myth.

I read Aion and there’s some incredible insights in that book but I must confess most of what I remember him talking about was fish and Jesus for some reason.

Do you do anything to try to communicate with your unconscious?

I read some of Joseph Campbell's Thousand Faces and some of Women who Run with the Wolves. Now time for (a very late) breakfast. What did you read?

I think that this can be worth my time. the difficulty is that the production quality leaves much to be desired. If you know what you clearly know (because the subject matter is spot on) you can make this better. I have faith in you.

such a cozy reading with comfy knitted stockings. looks like you had a great time! also u r really cute! makes me wonder what philosophical findings did you encounter during the reading : ]

Thanks for joining. What vol. of Jung's collected works should I get for my May book haul? This study session, I finished reading "The Transcendent Function," pp. 75-91. What did you read during this session?

IM FUCKING HYPED

I usually read multiple books at the same time, so when my brain gets tired with one, I can switch to the other and be re-set, in a sense. Anyone else like this?

6:58 Han also seems to have quite a deep (albeit philosophical) understanding of narcissism so I'd say it's alright that you draw from the technical subjects; after all narcissism is ultimately one thing, no? I'm so glad to have discovered this channel because you seem to talk about a lot of thinkers I currently have a huge fascination with: Han, Ayn Rand, Jung, etc.

Heidigger is down BAD.

Excited for this one!

What did you get done today in terms of reading? How is the weather where you are lately/today?

Tldr; pay attention in your writing classes

What is your favorite paper that you've ever written about?

Забавно что Симона закрыла тот глаз которым надо целится в мишень! На обложке. В этой ошибке они оба

Did you ever resolve the perceived conflicts in the section concerning Marx?

What can you read in one hour?

great insights to put on the background the whole "insist on your own desire against external norms" thing reminds me of what some lacanians talk about

Random guy here! Just got your video in my feed. Hope you are doing well. keep going! Have a great day.

Are you happy as long as you can read at least a few pages in a busy day?