Thank you! This does clear up the picture now a bit better for me. I hear the word eigenvalue and usually run away

"I'm not gonna draw on top of Brittany out of respect" 😂

this is GREAT, i couldnt find anyone else explaining it this well. thank you so much!

Wow thanks a lot 🙏such a crystal clear presentation

Good video you are from a few people who explain it.

You save me

Thank you

This obsession with cubit quantum state screws everything up with these video and make everything so confusing. Where is generalization of these concepts?

Dr. Ackerman is great. So lovely explanation

where that i imaginary coefficient came from? you just assumed that negative spin should have imaginary coefficient?

we are dealing with countable finite vector space here… it’s interesting if we would have wave function is a vector space has infinitely countable or uncountable dimensions.

what we will have if just avoid using imaginary i unit?

in what physical state scalars applied to kets would be imaginary? can you, please, correlate it with physicality?

U are amazing ❤❤❤

please mention the reference book...thank you.

Thank you, this is very helpful c:

Thanks for the video. It's an important concept for my exams.

The best explanation I have seen so far. Thank you so much ma'am

Nice

I love your teaching very much. I believe that a good professor makes complicated stuff clear and "simple" to follow by beginners. Unfortunately, some professors like to confuse their students to show how smarter they are than their dumb students.

if the cross product vector is in a coordinat, can it be move to another coordinat?

I was struggling to find video explaining basics. Thank you very much <3

Thank you so much, this video is so clear and useful.

This is one of the most clear and well put descriptions I have probably ever watched for a physics topic that I've been struggling with. I was so surprised to see the low view number and zero comments on this video. Thank you so much.

Thanks really. But i have a little confusion with the Px isn't there any error in the formulation of the matrix?

Adamsın lan sen

If the fxn is already normalized, would we take out psi star?

It really super clear explination but please where did you find 1/sqrt (2)

absolutely amazing, thank you for saving me, gonna watch the entire playlist.

Thanks for this lecture.

In the real world, do you ever know what quantum state a system is in (the 2 and 3i in your problem)? If so, how are they discovered? If not, why would it matter that you can use the state to calculate probabilities?

That means .. if the thumb It points up...then the movement is positive, counterclockwise...and if it points down, the movement is negative, counterclockwise. Is this is right??

What is there is no A in my wavefunction

Thanks for this video.. but the noise is hardly bearable...

U Shape Wave Forms Thanks for your well produced video If you add all the possible wave functions together will it make a “U” shape wave or square wave function as described by Fournier Transform and as represented by Feynman Path Integrals. I have been trying to describe the “U” shape wave that is produced in the model in the video linked below. In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave function shifts to the next higher energy level. Your viewers might be interested in watching the test video the model. See the load verse deflection graph in white paper. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rdhyptSaqpbad2g.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3

Lovely videos! Helped me a lot before the exam) Thank you!

Great explanation!

These videos are pretty easy to follow. Its a great format.

Thanks for the video :)

Hey, thanks for the videos :) . There's not much content out there that's as claryifying as this video series!

Wow doing quantum physics math in a mirror with no violation of CP for sure. 0:08 Your viewers might also enjoy this elementary model that has some interesting graphs that go with it kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rdhyptSaqpbad2g.htmlsi=3RF3qV49JIG_gtNN

I love you

thank you

U’re a life saver!!! Thanks a lot

These are such good lectures. I wish I’d found them a couple of years ago.

Thankyou for the lessons! Maybe the correct result of the calculation is 1/6 * (5 + 4*sin (E2t/h)cos(E1t/h) - 4*sin (E1t/h)cos(E2t/h) ) ? If so we shoud have a real number (absence of imaginary units "i"), a dependence from time and something between 0 and 1.

Thank you maam

Holy shit thank you <3

Thank you so much 😊

Well-explained. I had a dream I ran into a physics professor carrying a demonstration. It was a wooden rectangle, maybe 2'x4', with several simple pendulums of different lengths and angles drawn on it, all "hanging" from the pivot point of the wooden block. I think the idea was to find the equation of motion for any of those simple pendulums. I realized I didn't know how to solve it so I googled it when I woke up. So all you would need to do is solve the equation of motion for the center of mass, and then make a position substitution to find it for any given point in the object. Thanks