Romanian Tanks of World War Two
21:33
Romanian Aircraft of World War Two
19:34
Switzerland During World War Two
12:03
Polish Aircraft of World War Two
13:15
Why Did the U.S. Join World War 1?
9:07
How Effective Were Kamikaze Attacks?
6:37
German VS Soviet Infantry Weapons
10:02
Пікірлер
@gerhardris
@gerhardris 12 сағат бұрын
Great that you pay attention to the Dutch aircraft in WW2. BTW the Fokker C10 was incorrectly deemed obsellecent by the Dutch who in part used them correctly flying low. The commander at Bergen airfield escaped the fate of the G1's by having been smart enough to have the hangars hidden in the treeline. Not having a decent intercome and radio system was a dire inexcusable error for a country with Philips. The Fins proved that the C10 was the Apache helicopter of its day. Flying not to high or low as an armed scout plane along the seemingly quite parts of the front attacking targets of opportunity. When bounced by fighters it would cross the T and cross rudders. As soon as the enemy fighter was just about to open fire a snap role pointint straight down and in pull up toward the fighter made it impossible to pull lead. None were shot down by fighters. Most survived the war. I think two or more were built in ...1944 ..... due to losses mostly by accidents. It soldiered on after the war in Finish service. The Germans/ Dutch engineers drew the correct lessons after WW1 off the Bristol Fighter success in the C5 and C10. The British got it wrong with the Defiant and Roc turreted fighters. The C10 had 3 wing options fighter, recon and light bomber. As far as I know only the latter was ever built. Yet, it was the greatest danger for small artillery spotter planes being able to fly the Bristol Fighter WW1 way. 0:32
@Renae82
@Renae82 Күн бұрын
Wow
@markrowland1366
@markrowland1366 9 күн бұрын
Not casted. Cast only.
@erikhesjedal3569
@erikhesjedal3569 10 күн бұрын
You sound like someone reading directly from Wikipedia and using pathe for footage
@General_History
@General_History 10 күн бұрын
I don't use Wikipedia or Pathe. Pathe footage is typically not Creative Commons and, from my experience, is not free to use.
@mathewkelly9968
@mathewkelly9968 14 күн бұрын
4:33 The suspension of the Sentinel was based off French Hotchkiss designs not the M3 , considering a French guy was the main designer ......... probably where the cast design came from too , although that could have been industrial limitations of not being able to roll plate
@mathewkelly9968
@mathewkelly9968 14 күн бұрын
Australia having a shortage of Nickel is so hilarious these days , we're amongst the largest producers these days
@redtobertshateshandles
@redtobertshateshandles 15 күн бұрын
Quite strange that they were concentrating on German armour and not just worrying about what the Japanese had. We're they considering that the Germans might defeat Britain, and Australia might become a redoubt??
@General_History
@General_History 15 күн бұрын
Good point. But Japanese armor wasn’t as sophisticated as German armor, and Australia wanted something that could compete with German tanks operating in North Africa.
@mynameismin3
@mynameismin3 17 күн бұрын
General Monash was using combined arms concepts back in WW1.
@damienhudson8028
@damienhudson8028 11 күн бұрын
Any true military historian should know names like Monash and Battle of Hamel
@valvio1331
@valvio1331 18 күн бұрын
Given the go-karts the japs used as "tanks"... The AC was good enough.
@ryguy-qh2qk
@ryguy-qh2qk 22 күн бұрын
Love your videos covering individual countries ww2 armor Take care friend ☮️🫶
@General_History
@General_History 22 күн бұрын
Thank you for the comment!!
@lyndoncmp5751
@lyndoncmp5751 22 күн бұрын
The overwhelming vast majority of the tanks were light tanks so it doesnt compare to Kursk and Normandy.
@General_History
@General_History 22 күн бұрын
When comparing the types of tanks, yes. However, when comparing sheer number of tanks, Brody is the largest.
@garyzimmer4149
@garyzimmer4149 23 күн бұрын
6.20The first12 tanks did not have "serious defects in the armor", they were intentionally mild steel.
@sunildesha5598
@sunildesha5598 25 күн бұрын
Very good video bro
@shanehansen3705
@shanehansen3705 27 күн бұрын
the man who designed the sentinel also worked in the design group that designed the original MK1 it was also designed for the English 76 from the start with the Matilda could you imagine being a Japanese solider at Milne Bay having run roughshod over everyone with your Hago's and then running into a real tank employed by combat veterans
@roderernst9990
@roderernst9990 28 күн бұрын
NO conscription in AUSTRALIA, WW1,WW2 All Volunteer Army,Navy and Airforce. NO Shermans used by Australia. Grants,Stuarts >
@chadrowe8452
@chadrowe8452 27 күн бұрын
Even the territory defense battalions were volunteer?
@keithmcwilliams7424
@keithmcwilliams7424 25 күн бұрын
There was concription in ww2
@aaronleverton4221
@aaronleverton4221 14 күн бұрын
There absolutely was conscription in WW2, all unmarried men over 21 were required to complete 12 weeks basic training with the militia, there was no standing army, just a professional officer and NCO corps. The troops who went to North Africa and held Tobruk were not the Australian Army, they were the 2nd Australian Imperial Force. By law the militia were not available for overseas service outside of Australia or Australian territories. The 39Bn that stopped the Japanese at Imitia Ridge on the Kokoda Track? Militia. Called Chocolate Soldiers by the volunteers of 2AIF, but who fought harder?
@keithmcwilliams7424
@keithmcwilliams7424 14 күн бұрын
Yes the was conscription ww2 in australia my father was one of them . @roderernst9990
@damienhudson8028
@damienhudson8028 11 күн бұрын
There were Australian conscripts in WW2... but you are very close, and in terms of practical deployment, correct on the tank comment about M4 (Sherman) tanks to 1945...
@davidhobson7652
@davidhobson7652 29 күн бұрын
from what i heard and read the ACIII was only ever a test tank equipped with single or twin 25 pounders to see if it could withstand the recoil as it was equivalent to the recoil of the 17 pounder, Britain didn't supply any 17 pounder guns to Australia but gave the technical data for it to be constructed there instead, and all technical data learned through ACIV developed sped up the implementation of 17 pounder into creation of the Firefly, the recoil system was a that of a modified 6 pounder gun breach was sideways making loading "easier" too there was also some Matilda II tanks armed with 3inch howitzers that were traded from New Zealand for original Matilda II
@fordprefect80
@fordprefect80 Ай бұрын
Enjoyed the video. 😀
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Awesome!
@allanyoung6231
@allanyoung6231 Ай бұрын
The German A7 tank is in the Queensland Museum in Brisbane. It has been preserved and is worth seeing.
@user-cd7zu9yl2v
@user-cd7zu9yl2v Ай бұрын
Top Stuff, it is great to see a good informative doco on our endeavours in this field 👍
@mylesdobinson1534
@mylesdobinson1534 Ай бұрын
The Sentinel was cancelled because of the availability of Matildas and M3's. The Sherman was never taken into service, although one was tested after the war in Bougainville.
@stevekazenwadel5423
@stevekazenwadel5423 Ай бұрын
I expect that you might include the use of the Stuart light tank and M3 Grant in Australian service. You mentioned the M4 several times, but it was never taken on. The Australian Armour and Artillery museum has some very good videos on Grant restoration, which shows the numerous modifications made to the Grants in Australia.
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Interesting stuff! I’ll have to look into that
@davidhobson7652
@davidhobson7652 29 күн бұрын
i believe there were a few stuart light tanks at Milne Bay used in defense/counter attack during the japanese attempt of caputring airfield and at Buna when Australians assisted US Marines there
@chadrowe8452
@chadrowe8452 27 күн бұрын
The Japanese had tanks at milne bay
@davidhobson7652
@davidhobson7652 26 күн бұрын
@@chadrowe8452 they weren't of any help to the Japanese trying to capture the airfield there was only around 3 to 4 tanks and they all got stuck in the mud, Australian troops only found out when they started pushing the Japanese troops back and then got shot at by their immobile tanks Most of the Japanese troops died near the airfield as the decided to charge straight done the runway itself straight into the Vickers Machine-gun emplacements defending the installations and aircrafts
@stevekazenwadel5423
@stevekazenwadel5423 25 күн бұрын
@@chadrowe8452 They did indeed, but were defeated anyway
@danielflynn5746
@danielflynn5746 Ай бұрын
Sentinel was a good looking tank.
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
It sure was!
@seanlander9321
@seanlander9321 Ай бұрын
Australian Corporal Lance de Mole was acknowledged by the British as the inventor of the tank during WWI.
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Yes! Interestingly, he developed the idea of a tracked vehicle even before WWI began.
@damienhudson8028
@damienhudson8028 11 күн бұрын
I read a lot about history, esp Australian military history but can't recall this name... As a proud Aussie, I will need to read more, but will say this, 'inventions' often have lots of precursors... maybe the tank was invented by Leonardo da Vinci and HG Wells:) Or maybe Jan Žižka. That's said, who gets the concept off the ground often gets credit... just look at the history of flight, radio and the lightbulb...
@totensiebush
@totensiebush Ай бұрын
pet peeve: "casted" isn't the word you're looking for. it's cast or it's a casting. firearms cartridges tend to have specific names that aren't always equal to their size. I believe the MGs were .303 caliber,. 7.7mm usually refers to a Japanese cartridge.
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Ah, thanks for clarifying that
@totensiebush
@totensiebush Ай бұрын
​@@General_History it's silly that different supposed calibers are in reality the same caliber, but it's reality. .221, .222, .223, .224, .225 all use identical projectile and barrel diameters, just different cartridges. The 40mm you mention was generally called a 2pdr (2 pounder). The 57mm was generally called a 6pdr. The Sherman 75, 76, 17pdr all use the same diameter projectiles/barrel diameter. I wish that the numbers were right, but in reality it's largely so that you can tell them apart rather than being an accurate number.
@dominictaylor8672
@dominictaylor8672 Ай бұрын
Haha we still got that German ww1 tank
@mylesdobinson1534
@mylesdobinson1534 28 күн бұрын
@dominictaylor8672 Yes, I used to climb around on it when it was at the old museum, before they did some restoration work on it before it was transferred to its current position at the QLD museum at Southbank. 😎
@damienhudson8028
@damienhudson8028 11 күн бұрын
Mephisto
@damienhudson8028
@damienhudson8028 11 күн бұрын
Mephisto!
@realtsarbomba
@realtsarbomba Ай бұрын
What's up with the sound? There's a heavy droning bass sound in the background going on for up to 30 seconds then off for 1 second and on again?
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Sorry! My mic isn’t too great
@NelsonZAPTM
@NelsonZAPTM Ай бұрын
Aussies can only wish they had a Semple!
@seanlander9321
@seanlander9321 Ай бұрын
Yep, always better to train on a moving target.
@damienhudson8028
@damienhudson8028 11 күн бұрын
:)
@robertmansfield7656
@robertmansfield7656 Ай бұрын
The Aciii would have been a decent bumker buster, with 200 ish hulls already cast it was a shame to end it just to keep US and uk production lines going.
@ap9019
@ap9019 Ай бұрын
Quality content 🎉
@user-og8zt7bi2z
@user-og8zt7bi2z Ай бұрын
Ha, first one here.
@user-og8zt7bi2z
@user-og8zt7bi2z Ай бұрын
How have you been lately? Hope everything’s going well.
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Thank you for the comment! Everything is going good!
@Daniel-m9e
@Daniel-m9e Ай бұрын
I research this and watch this due to armor age game. I just got this tank. Man hungary really made some dopplegang taks like Zyrinyi or even 44 tas which looks like a panther
@hassanabokor7861
@hassanabokor7861 Ай бұрын
Young turks, cup and sultan husein shariff of makkah = sellouts + traitors🙄
@normanvandergeer2176
@normanvandergeer2176 Ай бұрын
The aircraft shown from 0:50 to 1:40 aren’t actual DXXI’s. They are modified North American Harvards used in the film Soldaat van Oranje to represent DXXI’s. Since last year there is an actual flying DXXI in the netherlands. Built from scratch by a team of volunteers at the airfield of Hoogeveen. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o-B9YLpo3N6yeas.htmlsi=hkEa1Cf3-JB6QuK2
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Thank you for pointing that out! Cool stuff!
@roykliffen9674
@roykliffen9674 Ай бұрын
TBF the D-XXI was indeed - as the video mentioned - specified as a fighter for the Dutch East-Indies. As such the requirements asked for a rugged, simply to maintain fighter as there was little infrastructure there for complex maintenance. Choosing a fixed undercarriage contributed to that simplicity. It was never meant to face cutting-edge fighters like the Bf-109; it lacked the speed and the armament to do so.
@monostripezebras
@monostripezebras Ай бұрын
I love those dutch designs..
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
They really are fascinating!
@gerhardris
@gerhardris Ай бұрын
Nice to see interest in Dutch warplanes. Alas several mistakes. The D21 had two times two machineguns in the wings. It was of mixed construction. Because we Dutch needed to import engines we didn't have engines in the 1000 hp range. The D21 could compete Me 109e even though 200 hp less. The D23 tryed to solve the same issue. Yet with aircooled engines this never would have worked. The video with Tros in de corner are Harvard T6 trainers representing D21 for a film. 15:44 The G1 was akin the much later Mosquito made from woud. The prototype shown in the video had counter rotating props. Later used by Lockeed in the P38 with the nose gear of the D23.
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Thank you! Very interesting stuff!
@harcovanhees394
@harcovanhees394 Ай бұрын
Small adition: D23 had an engine in front and in back not (only) to solve the rotation issue of the propellor but to reduce drag from a second engine. The engines and the fuselage are all in line so very little drag. The problem they encountered and still were working to solve was the cooling of the engine in the back without causing more drag.
@lancesteele9719
@lancesteele9719 Ай бұрын
That was an excellent video ! The vintage film clips really give the viewer good details of the various aircraft. Well done !
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@cliffthelightning
@cliffthelightning Ай бұрын
Awesome!
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@cliffthelightning
@cliffthelightning Ай бұрын
@@General_HistorySure did, as somebody from the Netherlands its rare to see people get into our few in house designs
@fortificationenjoyer1919
@fortificationenjoyer1919 Ай бұрын
Thanks you for this video! It's rare to find good English videos about secondary nations in WW2. My family is from north Transylvania and one of my grandparents was in the tank crew
@General_History
@General_History Ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@ALLMOUNTAINMTB
@ALLMOUNTAINMTB Ай бұрын
Very interesting thank you! Do you have some recommended reading material on the subject?
@andreasvrabl5658
@andreasvrabl5658 Ай бұрын
thx!
@hagiucatalin6892
@hagiucatalin6892 2 ай бұрын
Aviation was born in Romania, look like you don't know nothing. You may pretend as an inocent but at your age this is called stupidity ! ...disgusting missinformations, disgusting history filted with shameless lies. 2000 bolshevic aircrafts and american turned to scrap and 600 airplanes losted in WW2 by romanian air force....what about this ? ...any clue ?
@jaspersnell432
@jaspersnell432 2 ай бұрын
Supreme W
@user-fj5wn9iq5r
@user-fj5wn9iq5r 2 ай бұрын
great as always
@General_History
@General_History 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the comment!
@boggiewoggie1012
@boggiewoggie1012 2 ай бұрын
W video
@General_History
@General_History 2 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@rekababa6671
@rekababa6671 2 ай бұрын
I wonder if Stalin had "invaded" Poland first....would the Germans have been the "protectors" of the Polish nobility? 🤔
@New-nr5ty
@New-nr5ty 2 ай бұрын
7:10 They did that in Ukraine as well
@minhthunguyendang9900
@minhthunguyendang9900 2 ай бұрын
Absent from this narrative is the destruction of the Italian Chaberton fort, a kind of mountain battleship with 8 turrets. But its guns were only of 150mm in caliber. The French used a heavy spigot mortar of ww1 vintage.
@General_History
@General_History 2 ай бұрын
Interesting stuff!
@spare-ribs
@spare-ribs 2 ай бұрын
Wow this channel is really underrated You can tell how much research he did
@General_History
@General_History 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the comment!
@minhthunguyendang9900
@minhthunguyendang9900 2 ай бұрын
The Italian alpine troops in Greece suffered from being thrown too hastily into battle, & from the enemy-underestimating Benito who thought but of the Athens victory parade.