4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@PianoFlyte Сағат бұрын
Wow you are so incredible! Now it all make sense thank you!!!
@R.VRajan.Pushkarha 2 сағат бұрын
Moral Sciece
@maqboolahmed7755 2 күн бұрын
Ezzz
@tothetable1867 2 күн бұрын
ditto.
@am55446 2 күн бұрын
Interesting
@damon-burton 7 күн бұрын
Mental health awareness among educators is absolutely essential. By openly discussing this topic, we're creating a supportive environment for teachers to recognize signs of distress in their students. Early intervention is key, and providing teachers with the tools they need can make a huge difference.
@damon-burton 7 күн бұрын
I love the emphasis on consistent effort in "Warm Up to Greatness." It's a powerful reminder that success isn't about sudden bursts of brilliance but persistent dedication. Education is a cornerstone, but life experiences are the mortar that holds it all together.
@user-gy2oi7ul7q 7 күн бұрын
An Abrupt - Ending, Leave's One in Suspense!!!
@eggs9499 8 күн бұрын
People that say that this is wrong, reamber he says using pemdas. Without it it would be 1
@ceochala 9 күн бұрын
Just here doing my job. Thanks for sharing! 🎉
@lebo3793 10 күн бұрын
I think there is a false dichotomy. They are two sides of a coin. They compliment and not contrafict each other
@laila_wwjd 12 күн бұрын
anyone watching this during summer bc honors biology
@christianfiguroa7147 16 күн бұрын
Update?
@Repakabindhunehansh.1234 20 күн бұрын
Thanks for helping me
@anitabreakone 22 күн бұрын
I always thought you had to do what was in parenthesis first. So 8/2(4) would be 1. So confusing.
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
Parentheses group and give priority to operations INSIDE the symbol not outside the symbol. 2(4) is not a parenthetical priority and is mathematically the same as 2×4 When there are no OPERATIONS left INSIDE the parentheses to evaluate you can remove the parentheses and replace with an explicit multiplication symbol or leave them to represent implicit multiplication which is simply multiplication without the need for a physical multiplication sign...
@KyleDyson9346 27 күн бұрын
like if your waching this in 2024
@jameswalker5645 27 күн бұрын
The very first letter is parentheses. You have to do everything that has to do with parentheses first because you need to get rid of them in order to continue on through the equation. The answer is 1.
@GanonTEK 27 күн бұрын
P is for inside parentheses only, not outside. Otherwise you run into the 4²(3) problem. How do you do P before E here?
@Jai_LaShei 28 күн бұрын
Who said? Like why put the letters in order only to say don’t follow the order? Makes no sense.
@GanonTEK 27 күн бұрын
The order of operations like PEMDAS etc. are oversimplifications for what's really allowed when simplifying anyway. Understanding grouping and different strengths of it is more useful. Take 4 + 3²×6/2 - 4 You could follow it literally: E: 4 + 9×6/2 - 4 M: 4 + 54/2 - 4 D: 4 + 27- 4 A: 31 - 4 S: 27 However, in this example you could do: S: 0 + 3²×6/2 D: 3²×3 E: 9×3 M: 27 Same correct answer and just as valid. Shorter too in this example. + and - have the weakest grouping power. × and ÷ have stronger grouping power than + and -. Exponents have higher grouping power again. Parentheses have the highest grouping power. Depending on what you have and how they are laid out let's you simplify in different ways. Minutephysics did a short video called The Order of Operations is wrong. Worth a watch.
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
6 letter acronym that represents 4 levels not 6 exact steps... P E M&D equally left to right as they appear A&S equally left to right as they appear
@followtheflood2685 29 күн бұрын
I got 6.... and I was confused adleast I know why I didn't finish high school ;P I'm stupid. for those confused my logic: 8/2(2+2) is 8/4+4... which made 6... ;P well adleast I made you day I hope.
@AsgharKhan-co3hi 29 күн бұрын
I love that how you explain the romance very sweatly by making the eyes,face and a silent smile combination of,indeed you looked very romantic,a very distinctive style. stay happy !!!
@strictlyaesthetic9202 29 күн бұрын
Mathematician answer or the CORRECT answer is one " 1 "...... Please Stop trying to change what is correct.... PEMDAS is a JOKE
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
Your comment is a joke. The correct answer when you actually understand and apply the Order of Operations and the various properties and axioms of math correctly as intended is 16 not 1
@strictlyaesthetic9202 12 күн бұрын
@@RS-fg5mf You do PEMDAS and continue to be mocked around the world, while I will continue to answer math equations correctly ..... Have a nice day.
@RS-fg5mf 11 күн бұрын
@@strictlyaesthetic9202 I don't do PEMDAS but you definitely do dmba$$ ... It's not an equation, it's an expression and the only people mocking 16 are the mathematically incompetent like you...
@user-zk9bo3yr4n 29 күн бұрын
Greetings! I recently stumbled upon your Udemy course and I must say, it's truly impressive! I am thrilled to have the opportunity to work with you and help you devise custom-made strategies to increase enrollments, generate positive reviews, and drive sales. It would be great to connect and discuss further details. Looking forward to hearing back from you! Best regards.
@theyluvv.chisom Ай бұрын
I didn't expect it to end that fast
@SpazzOn31st Ай бұрын
So if it’s a fraction you don’t simplify it ?
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
8 -------(2+2)= 8÷2(2+2)= 16 2 8 ---------- = 8÷(2(2+2))= 1 2(2+2)
@splack112 Ай бұрын
did it just cut off?
@not_preet-678 Ай бұрын
8÷2(2+2) 8÷2(4) 4(4) =16 its BODMAS for the ones who dont know and the bracket simply means multiply here its just there to get things complicated And also I am sorry If I said anything wrong
@gamerworld-fl4mt Ай бұрын
people say that math is tying to simplify things but this overly complicates them THE GAS STATION EXAMPLE IS STRAIGHT UP MULTIPLICATION
@3.6Roentgen Ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/orJzd8aSm8q9oHU.htmlsi=nFglV2Rze8mt-XwB If you stopped paying attention in math class after 6 grade, you will arrive at 16. PEMDAS isn't the only tool used in mathematics. It's for grade school math
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
This is grade school arithmetic numpty... You're mathematically ignorant if you didn't get 16 as the correct answer.... Basic Arithmetic doesn't change after 4th grade Dunning-Kruger
@GanonTEK Ай бұрын
It's simply ambiguous notation. A trick. Academically, multiplication by juxtaposition implies grouping but the programming/literal interpretation does not. That's the issue. You can't prove either answer since it comes from notation conventions, not any rules of maths. Wolfram Alpha's Solidus article mentions the a/bc ambiguity and modern international standards like ISO-80000-1 mention about division on one line with multiplication or division directly after and that brackets are required to remove ambiguity. Even over in America where the programming interpretation is more popular, the American Mathematical Society stated it was ambiguous notation too. Multiple professors and mathematicians have said so also like: Prof. Steven Strogatz, Dr. Trevor Bazett, Dr. Jared Antrobus, Prof. Keith Devlin, Prof. Anita O'Mellan (an award winning mathematics professor no less), Prof. Jordan Ellenberg, David Darling, Matt Parker, David Linkletter, Eddie Woo etc. Even scientific calculators don't agree on one interpretation or the other. Calculator manufacturers like CASIO have said they took expertise from the educational community in choosing how to implement multiplication by juxtaposition and mostly use the academic interpretation. Just like Sharp does. TI who said implicit multiplication has higher priority to allow users to enter expressions in the same manner as they would be written (TI knowledge base 11773) so also used the academic interpretation. TI later changed to the programming interpretation but when I asked them were unable to find the reason why. A recent example from another commenter: Intermediate Algebra, 4th edition (Roland Larson and Robert Hostetler) c. 2005 that while giving the order of operations, includes a sidebar study tip saying the order of operations applies when multiplication is indicated by × or • When the multiplication is implied by parenthesis it has a higher priority than the Left-to-Right rule. It then gives the example 8 ÷ 4(2) = 8 ÷ 8 = 1 but 8 ÷ 4 • 2 = 2 • 2 = 4 This is just cluckbait like all the other videos picking a side when there is no correct side.
@jamesharrington233 Ай бұрын
Lol, NOPE! Literally the ONLY answer to this is 1. It's time for you to admit that PEDMAS is a broken way to teach. Distributive method clearly shows the answer is 1 and can only be 1.
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
The Distributive Property supports 16 not 1 .... How does it feel to be less mathematically intelligent than your average 4th grade 10 year old??
@true_identity Ай бұрын
How did you get to that page to search for the institutions?????
@michaelfrancis7882 Ай бұрын
how can you be a teacher and wrong haha
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
He's not wrong.... Numpty The majority of MATH BOOKS support 16 The majority of scientific calculators and online math engines support 16 Every Math Teacher I know personally, several of whom have PhDs in math and teach at Universities support 16. Stop embarrassing yourself and get a clue...
@catherinemarsh5453 Ай бұрын
The problem is never the problem. Mum should buy a lower child sized table for her son, pour the required amount of milk he needs for his cereal into a small plastic jug that is more manageable for a small child, instead of a heavy 2 lt bottle, and have them placed on his table to do himself. The problem is not the child, the problem is never the problem. Educate the parent and you will change the behaviour of the child.
@BigJMC Ай бұрын
No, I’m pretty sure 1 is correct due to juxtapositioning. 8/2(2+2) can be easily written as: n= 2+2 8/2n In this context you would always solve for 2n first before division with the 8.
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
WRONG.... People confuse and conflate two different types of Implicit multiplication .... One without a delimiter and one with a delimiter.. Type 1... Implicit Multiplication between a coefficient and variable... A special relationship given to coefficients and variables that are directly prefixed i.e. juxstaposed WITHOUT a delimiter and forms a composite quantity by Algebraic Convention... Example 2y or BC This type of Implicit Multiplication is given priority over Division and most other operations but not all other operations... This can be seen in most Algebra text books or Physics book. Physics uses this type of Implicit Multiplication quite heavily.. Type 2... Implicit Multiplication between a TERM and a Parenthetical value that have been juxstaposed without an explicit operator but WITH a delimiter...The parentheses serve to delimit the two sub-expressions.. Parenthetical implicit multiplication. The act of placing a constant, variable or TERM next to parentheses without a physical operator. The multiplication SYMBOL is implicit, implied though not plainly expressed, meaning you multiply the constant, variable or TERM with the value of the parentheses or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression. Parentheses group and give priority to operations WITHIN the symbol of INCLUSION not outside the symbol. Terms are separated by addition and subtraction not multiplication or division. The axiom for the Distributive Property is a(b+c)= ab+ac but what most people fail to understand is that each of those variables represents a constant value OR a set of operations that represent a constant value... A single TERM expression like 6÷2(1+2) has two sub-expressions. The single TERM sub-expression 6÷2 juxstaposed to the two TERM parenthetical sub-expression 1+2. The lack of an explicit operator implies multiplication between the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses and the parenthetical value or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression... The parentheses DELIMIT the TERM 6÷2 from the two TERMS 1+2 maintaining comparison and contrast between the two elements... Implicit multiplication is always by juxstaposition but not all juxstaposition is Implicit multiplication. Example 2½ = 2.5 not 2 times ½... There is “implicit multiplication” WITH delimiters and there is “implicit multiplication WITHOUT delimiters. Two different types of Implicit multiplication and mathematically different. 6÷2y the 2y has no delimiter.... 6÷2y=3÷y by Algebraic Convention. 6÷2(a+b) has a delimiter... 6÷2(a+b)= 3a+3b by the Distributive Property... 6y÷2y = 6y÷(2y) = 6y÷(2*y) 6y÷2(y)= (6y÷2)(y)= 6y÷2*y 6y÷2y(y)= (6y÷(2y))(y)= 6y÷(2y)*y= 6y÷(2*y)*y ÷2y the denominator is 2y ÷2(y) the denominator is 2
@BigJMC Ай бұрын
No, I’m pretty sure 1 is correct due to multiplication juxtapositioning. 8/2(2+2) can be easily written as: n= 2+2 8/2n In this context you would always solve for 2n first before division with the 8.
@jiawenzhao2288 Ай бұрын
why don't you do it backward Let's say a/2(2+2)=16 a/2(4)=16 a/8=16 a=16x8 a=128 is not equal to 8!!! now let's do a/2(2+2)=1 a/2(4)=1 a/8=1 a=8x1 a=8 which matches the given equation so the correct answer obviously should be 1!
@GanonTEK Ай бұрын
That doesn't prove anything as the ambiguity is caused by notation conventions. Academically, juxtaposition implies grouping and multiplication (1) Literally/programming-wise, juxtaposition implies multiplication only (16) Whichever convention you choose will put you on the path for the respective answer. You chose the academic interpretation so any "proof" of yours will of course give 1 as it's predetermined. It's called a circular argument, which can't prove anything obviously.
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
You fail at basic arithmetic and you fail at basic algebra... a/2(2+2)=16 a/2(4)=16 a/2=16/4 a/2=4 2×4=a a=8 a/2(2+2)=1 a/2(4)=1 a/2=1/4 2×(1/4)=a a= 1/2
@jiawenzhao2288 12 күн бұрын
@@RS-fg5mf lol I think you are the one that fail at basic Algebra, do you know the rule of expanding bracket? 2(2+2) should be treated as whole
@RS-fg5mf 11 күн бұрын
@@jiawenzhao2288 you FAIL to understand the Distributive Property correctly.... The Distributive Property is a PROPERTY of Multiplication NOT Parentheses and not Parenthetical Implicit Multiplication. As such it has the same priority as Multiplication and Multiplication does not have priority over Division. The Distributive Property is congruent with the Order of Operations it doesn't supercede the Order of Operations... The Order of Operations work because of the Properties and Axioms of math not in spite of them... The Distributive Property when fully applied is an act of ELIMINATING the need for parentheses by drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out not by drawing factors in... If you can't draw a factor in and get the same result as drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out then you haven't applied the Distributive Property correctly... The Distributive Property does NOT change or cease to exist because of parenthetical implicit multiplication... The axiom a(b+c)= ab+ac however the variable "a" represents the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses not just a numeral next to the parentheses. In this case a = 8÷2 OR 4. People just automatically assume that "a" is a single numeral... A variable can represent a single value, a set of operations that represent a TERM that represents a single value or a solution set... 8÷2(2+2)= 8÷2×2+8÷2×2 Distributive Property.. Parentheses removed... 8÷(2(2+2))= 8÷(2×2+2×2) Distributive Property. Inner parentheses REMOVED
@jiawenzhao2288 11 күн бұрын
@@RS-fg5mf Expanding brackets means multiplying everything inside the bracket by the letter or number outside the bracket. For example, in the expression 3 ( m + 7 ) both m and 7 must be multiplied by 3: 3 ( m + 7 ) = 3 × m + 3 × 7 = 3 m + 21. in this scenerio, it is 2(2+2)=4+4=8, you don't do divsion before the expanding bracket is completed, you failed to understand this...
@monke7929 Ай бұрын
I think they meant this video as a tutorial in order for people to buy they paid course or something, but they could have had an outro or something Orr an actual plea to buy the course 😂
@keifer7813 Ай бұрын
That cutoff was funny. So fking random 😂
@SPS0501US Ай бұрын
i must have mesoamerican ancestry, i was born in sps, cortes, honduras :D, we still have words like palenque and sula :D
@1012Mrjesse Ай бұрын
Anyone who uses ÷ instead of / in algebra should just stop doing math. When using / you can literally turn it into a fraction. Once you turn 8/2(2+2) into a fraction you HAVE to solve 2(2+2) first on the bottom of the fraction because 8 has nothing to multiply or divide by in the top half of the fraction. Therefore it becomes 8/8 in fractional terms, which =1. Think of it this way. I have 8 apples that I have to divide evenly between two groups of 2 guys and 2 girls. This results in the following equation: 8(apples)÷2[groups](2[males]+2[females]) or 8÷2(2+2). That means you give 1 apple to each person. You can’t just magically make 120 more apples appear and give each of them 8
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
Wrong and willfully ignorant... 8 -----(2+2)= 8÷2(2+2)= 16 2 8 --------- = 8÷(2(2+2))= 1 2(2+2) FYI... This isn't Algebra, it's basic grade school ARITHMETIC and there is no mathematical difference between the obelus ÷ and the solidus / they both serve as equal signs of division and neither one serves as a grouping symbol. The vinculum (horizontal fraction bar) serves as a grouping symbol...
@andrewl5272 Ай бұрын
Can someone show this to the Supreme Court?
@petrkapitola2169 Ай бұрын
Nah. Even if I take this as a fraction, it should be parentheses first and that 2 in front of parentheses is part of it, so I have to multiply 2 by (2+2) and finally divide 8 by this result. Which is 1.
@RS-fg5mf 12 күн бұрын
WRONG....
@petrkapitola2169 12 күн бұрын
@@RS-fg5mf because?
@RS-fg5mf 11 күн бұрын
@@petrkapitola2169 because when you actually understand and apply the Order of Operations and the various properties and axioms of math correctly as intended you get the only correct answer 16...
@RS-fg5mf 11 күн бұрын
@@petrkapitola2169 The Distributive Property is a PROPERTY of Multiplication NOT Parentheses and not Parenthetical Implicit Multiplication. As such it has the same priority as Multiplication and Multiplication does not have priority over Division. The Distributive Property is congruent with the Order of Operations it doesn't supercede the Order of Operations... The Order of Operations work because of the Properties and Axioms of math not in spite of them... The Distributive Property when fully applied is an act of ELIMINATING the need for parentheses by drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out not by drawing factors in... If you can't draw a factor in and get the same result as drawing the TERMS inside the parentheses out then you haven't applied the Distributive Property correctly... The Distributive Property does NOT change or cease to exist because of parenthetical implicit multiplication... The axiom a(b+c)= ab+ac however the variable "a" represents the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses not just a numeral next to the parentheses. In this case a = 8÷2 OR 4. People just automatically assume that "a" is a single numeral... A variable can represent a single value, a set of operations that represent a TERM that represents a single value or a solution set... 8÷2(2+2)= 8÷2×2+8÷2×2 Distributive Property.. Parentheses removed... 8÷(2(2+2))= 8÷(2×2+2×2) Distributive Property. Inner parentheses REMOVED
@RS-fg5mf 11 күн бұрын
@@petrkapitola2169 People confuse and conflate two different types of Implicit multiplication .... One without a delimiter and one with a delimiter.. Type 1... Implicit Multiplication between a coefficient and variable... A special relationship given to coefficients and variables that are directly prefixed i.e. juxstaposed WITHOUT a delimiter and forms a composite quantity by Algebraic Convention... Example 2y or BC This type of Implicit Multiplication is given priority over Division and most other operations but not all other operations... This can be seen in most Algebra text books or Physics book. Physics uses this type of Implicit Multiplication quite heavily.. Type 2... Implicit Multiplication between a TERM and a Parenthetical value that have been juxstaposed without an explicit operator but WITH a delimiter...The parentheses serve to delimit the two sub-expressions.. Parenthetical implicit multiplication. The act of placing a constant, variable or TERM next to parentheses without a physical operator. The multiplication SYMBOL is implicit, implied though not plainly expressed, meaning you multiply the constant, variable or TERM with the value of the parentheses or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression. Parentheses group and give priority to operations WITHIN the symbol of INCLUSION not outside the symbol. Terms are separated by addition and subtraction not multiplication or division. The axiom for the Distributive Property is a(b+c)= ab+ac but what most people fail to understand is that each of those variables represents a constant value OR a set of operations that represent a constant value... A single TERM expression like 6÷2(1+2) has two sub-expressions. The single TERM sub-expression 6÷2 juxstaposed to the two TERM parenthetical sub-expression 1+2. The lack of an explicit operator implies multiplication between the TERM or TERM value outside the parentheses and the parenthetical value or across each TERM within the parenthetical sub-expression... The parentheses DELIMIT the TERM 6÷2 from the two TERMS 1+2 maintaining comparison and contrast between the two elements... Implicit multiplication is always by juxstaposition but not all juxstaposition is Implicit multiplication. Example 2½ = 2.5 not 2 times ½... There is “implicit multiplication” WITH delimiters and there is “implicit multiplication WITHOUT delimiters. Two different types of Implicit multiplication and mathematically different. 6÷2y the 2y has no delimiter.... 6÷2y=3÷y by Algebraic Convention. 6÷2(a+b) has a delimiter... 6÷2(a+b)= 3a+3b by the Distributive Property... 6y÷2y = 6y÷(2y) = 6y÷(2*y) 6y÷2(y)= (6y÷2)(y)= 6y÷2*y 6y÷2y(y)= (6y÷(2y))(y)= 6y÷(2y)*y= 6y÷(2*y)*y ÷2y the denominator is 2y ÷2(y) the denominator is 2
@doktergaptek1504 Ай бұрын
who is team 16 like my comment
@tawamugabe6485 Ай бұрын
Can we please have Polish Language course
@JasonOnTheWeb Ай бұрын
Then why tf even HAVE PEMDAS???? Where Parentheses is literally the first effing letter?!
@RS-fg5mf Ай бұрын
Parentheses group and give priority to operations INSIDE the symbol not outside the symbol... DUH Addition wouldn't take priority if it weren't inside the parentheses.... (2+2)=4 parenthetical priority complete .... 8÷2×4= 4×4= 16