Automation and then BeamNG Drive

That sounds like a good idea, if it happens again, I'll enter a more heavily developed version of this, maybe the FR16T Evo, with a full Failed Racers Livery instead of Automation default red.

@@FailedRacers i think you need to make an lmp2 car as well to enter the race

I would've made it diesel, but Automation wouldn't let me :(

The TS050 and GR010 were designed and made in Germany (also Cadillac is a French name, just like Chevrolet, and we don't pronounce the t in Chevrolet)

@@FailedRacers I believe that these cars were developped by Toyota engineers in Cologne but the powertrains were fully designed and developped in Japan. "Morizo" does have his history at "the Ring" I guess all great rececars have some European ties. But as a french speaker, we pronounce L's.

The mic is fine, the gain setting was wrong. I found this out after I already uploaded

But the next video will be with perfect sound quality so make sure to watch out for that 😁

Automation

Sometime while the maths may say something should work really well in reality that isn't always the case due to bumpy track surfaces, the car being hard to set up or the car being on the edge to drive. The theory often doesn't take factors like these into account. Also while most years Michelin and Bridgestone were fairly evenly matched there were some years where one was better than the other like the Ferrari years when the bridge stones where softer and offered more grip or 2005 when the Michelins were better due to the word tyre rules that year. The Michelin tyres are also a part of why Fernando Alonso was able to pull.of his very weird understeer technique while at Renault.

You'll find the 2008 win with Vettel was because Bridgestone were the only tyre manufacturer.

@@FailedRacers Hmm, let me try to put it another way, if the 2008 Trashzzo Rosso, a back-marker F1 car, was able to win on Bridgestone tires, I don't think the Bridgestone tires of previous years (except 2005) are the reason why Toyota was slower than a slug in molasses. And as for Michelin tires, the 2005 weekend at the U.S. Grand Prix is proof that their tires were not the best choice. Speaking of 2005, it's also hard not to mention how the FIA decided to end Ferrari's dominance by almost destroying their tire supplier..... Edit: If tires were really the cause of the Japanese team's embarrassment, Toyota would change suppliers. What is a greater embarrassment to the entire nation, tires not from a Japanese manufacturer, or the pity of other teams over Toyota's lack of performance? The "all japan team" image does not seem worth the downright stupid amount of money spent by Toyota on F1. I hope you now understand what I meant, I loved the video and as always I am eagerly awaiting the next one.

@@crdc9853 The math showed that the concept was theoretically feasible, and the Nissan GT-R LM Nismo showed that the concept works and has potential in real life, but further research and more funding were needed to determine how much potential there was, which Nissan didn't want to do at all. Nissan would never agree to spend money on an idiotic idea that had no potential, the people who manage such projects there are not fools.

​@@hellomadetI mean there was clearly potential there yesterday otherwise they wouldn't have committed to the project but once they actually had the car built they ran into all the problems that they likely wouldn't have known about when just looking at the car on a piece of paper. Cool idea though and I'm glad they gave it a go, kind of reminds me of the 2022 mercedes F1 car they clearly saw some aerodynamic advantage to the zero pod concept in the wind tunnel but in reality it didn't give them that advantage and they ended up abandoning it.

The idea was not stupid, it was promising. The car turned out to be a failure because it was not developed enough to race. The engine that was intended to be used in the car turned out to be prone to malfunctioning, so they used a different one that didn't fit the concept by which the bodywork was designed. And that's just one of the many hurdles associated with this project.

It definitely had some untapped potential, but I think even at its best, it'd still be down on pace. I gave a more detailed explanation of why the car's underlying concept was flawed on the car's main video. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7qjhsyGmNiRmoE.htmlsi=QTrCqRwuoiZ-NDqH

He’s back with another banger ‼️

I'll definitely have to look into that Falcon

@@FailedRacers It promised much but delivered little. Consider: 1) A healthy sponsor! 2) A driver who should have, in a different world, gone to Formula One. 3) Mediocre performance, silly breakdowns and big accidents. 4) A driver who had very little experience in touring car racing and its politics who thought he could beat all comers in that category straight away but often got outrun by the privateers. 5) Amazing features - including the centralized driving position - that actually when developed over the years by better resourced and knowledgeable entities were proved to actually make touring cars safer and faster! Ironically the safety of the car was proven when it wrecked at Bathurst in 1996 and was then sold off to Danny Osborne and written off in the crash with Craig Lowdnes at Adelaide three years later! Cheers.

If that is the case then it is amazingly bad communication. Seat put that same engine into Cordoba "Cupra" from 1999. And considering they started rallying in 1998 and stopped in 2000, it could have been much more successful.

yea it's like his audio is boosted 10db

Shouting some truth

I just noticed I left the gain switch in its maximum position. I didn't notice whilst editing because my voice does naturally have a sort of roughness to it at higher or lower ranges than usual, but I'm guessing the microphone was clipping here, but I've put the gain switch back to where it usually is, so it should be back to normal for the next video

People seem to complain about the audio and the mic. If you're short on cash and need a solid audio setup I can't help but recommend what I am running - Get some Chinese BM800 microphone with an arm set. Then throw away the USB or minijack cable for the microphone and instead fish around Ebay or your country's equivalent marketplace for a second hand Audio Interface. I got a Behringer UMC22 but there are many different options, used or new. What you want is to have something with phantom power to plug the XLR cable into. This entire setup cost me about the half of what Blue Yeti mic costs and I get all the features of an audio interface on top of that too.

the mic is fine, I just had a bad setting that I only noticed after I uploaded it

@@FailedRacers Yeah, I checked the FR Daily videos and the sound there is ok

It's definitely one on my radar

The Falcon was designed and manufactured in Australia

True, but there's quite a skill gap between Porsche Carrera Cup Benelux and Formula One