This is the easiest way to make one. Thanks for sharing. Will give it a try.
@stevetheduck14253 ай бұрын
Arthur C Clarke thought up a way to design a bow and arrow that would work on the moon. To my knowledge, no-one has done this, but it was a simple adaptation of something tried hundreds of years ago: guides that spin the arrow, and no fletchings.
@juanete69 Жыл бұрын
Have you tried different box sizes and different hole sizes and shapes?
@sprout_imbored26092 жыл бұрын
I wish my science class was this cool
@RealOny2 жыл бұрын
I hope one day this odd channel comes back
@dharmisthakahar87552 жыл бұрын
Very good
@gahagan64723 жыл бұрын
Respectable
@salt_61073 жыл бұрын
Ah yes the best air gun
@forbiddenscience19703 жыл бұрын
This is how all ancient cannons worked they never fired cannonballs that is just what we are led to believe.....
@TheLocalBomber13 жыл бұрын
If you make it bigger and more powerfull, you can shake your whole town
@hulkflattt78544 жыл бұрын
if you do a test at home with a falcon feather and hammer you will get the same results as moon results seen on TV
@stevetheduck14253 ай бұрын
- and air resistance will cause the feather to flip, turn, oscillate and take longer to fall. You could try pointing the quill of the feather carefully down at the start of the experiment, but that just proves air resistance, as this should not be needed, if all objects fall as we saw wherever they are, Earth or Moon, hm?
@RH-cs6km4 жыл бұрын
"true"
@miguelangelfigueroamendiol59435 жыл бұрын
CECyTEM 17 Rifa!!!
@greenbean32895 жыл бұрын
When are you coming back to youtube?
@carloszinck6085 жыл бұрын
So, now everything produces "gravity", ha? that's hilarious! Second, he must be 100% sure, with out a doubt that a man landed on the moon, 3rd, it is impossible to remove all the air from the tube...I can keep o going but you get the point, this experiment shows nothing...what a waste of time and money to believe such non sense.
@kitcanyon6582 жыл бұрын
And your explanation of why the feather falls faster in the vacuum is what, exactly?
@fatalx9166 жыл бұрын
The hammer still fell before the feather! Where is your gravity??
@fatalx9166 жыл бұрын
and? Where is your gravity?
@stevetheduck14253 ай бұрын
Gravity is everywhere, and it's invisible. Like money, if you think about it. -and money is real.
@sanjanacooking99256 жыл бұрын
Foxi
@mc25946 жыл бұрын
it not just about air resistance or hitting the ground together, its the speed of the fall, the hammer and feather fall faster on Earth or in your tube because it's on Earth. On the Moon they fall at 1/6 that speed (a given gravity field) isn't that what David Scott was demonstrating? Let me know if I'm wrong
This puts every fancy diy to shame. If Im gonna make a vortex cannon this is it hands down
@NappaZama7 жыл бұрын
intro,this is a sancho,i dont think either of these 2 can be a sancho
@michaelbrock33747 жыл бұрын
No Giant vacuum was required in Arizona to film this. It was much easier than that. Please note at 41 seconds, and 43 seconds into the video each object rotates, or twitches. the feather at its tip only bends by no other visible force except for the hidden wire. These thin wires are used extensively in the Moon hoax films. The hoax works because each object is supported by this thin wire and this controls the decent of each object, the hammer and the feather. Overhead is a bar connecting the two wires for ease of operation. this studio affect is commonly used. It is called a wire. So this fakery is quite amusing to me. Watch it several times and see the weird motion of the objects. This is just one of dozens of poor moon hoax fakery that I have studied for years. I can write an extensive book on all the deciept of the fake moon missions. It is a shame NASA is paid to deceive us. I wish I had the time to debunk every one of these supposed real life video's. Perhaps in time I will reveal every single misleading activity that NASA pulled on the American public. I have the facts, and the truth. Open your mind to the facts of it all.
@rubyfox34245 жыл бұрын
*descent*. If you're going to act like a deluded smarty pants, at least learn how to write first.
@grifffino15 жыл бұрын
Are you saying a feather and a ball bearing will drop at the same rate in Earth's atmosphere? And videos showing otherwise are a hoax?
@Mirandorl7 жыл бұрын
There's another way of doing it by putting the pipe or a straw in at an angle as you blow, which produces a pretty spiral burn
@brandonpaul1107 жыл бұрын
Lol this just helps disprove gravity, can't measure it, can't find a gravitron, object's don't fall at the same time in a vacuum. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, sounds like a duck, its probably?
@_________-__________-_______7 жыл бұрын
can't wait seems so awesome
@cameronsams91837 жыл бұрын
I want to make one
@JoseRodriguez-uf9pj7 жыл бұрын
need
@JoseRodriguez-uf9pj7 жыл бұрын
do you neef smoke
@ctaylor78747 жыл бұрын
Daps HIT THE DAB BRO
@shane87smith7 жыл бұрын
gay
@kaisheng42697 жыл бұрын
will it go further if the hole is smaller?
@astraybullet55227 жыл бұрын
but this has been done without a vacuum and both fell down at the same rate
@fatalx9166 жыл бұрын
Hes talking about the fake moon landings.
@invincible32637 жыл бұрын
cool bro.
@17teacmrocks7 жыл бұрын
if there was a way to make it silent -> great halloween tricks
@marklagbao22968 жыл бұрын
Make more vids plz
@bigdog45748 жыл бұрын
The tube is a pretty bad example of gravity.... Feather and tube produce static electricity that will cause the feather to drop at a slower rate. You need a bigger container where the feather has no contact with the walls!
@diplolazer7028 жыл бұрын
Can you guys show the video how to make it
@quinnisquinn95028 жыл бұрын
Wish I could blow O's like that
@quinnisquinn95028 жыл бұрын
We get it, you vape
@HyperSpify8 жыл бұрын
I took a parachute to the Mun several times in KSP. You need one to slow down after re-entering Kerbin/Earth's atmosphere. And I've never done the separation/rendezvous in lunar orbit like Apollo did with the LM and CM, so the parachute is coming down with me to the surface of the Mun.
@stevetheduck14253 ай бұрын
Parachutes in the CM, not SM or LM. Only the CM comes all the way back.
@stevetheduck14253 ай бұрын
Sorry, I mis-read what you said about the Mun landing in your Kerbal game. The old 'extra stage, take it to the surface and start back in a full ship' idea? I have seen that NASA planned to do this, landing what was essentially the CSM plus landing gear, and leaving the moon in either all of that, or part of it, until the Lunar Orbit Rendezvous idea was presented.
@kickpublishing8 жыл бұрын
Illuminati confirmed
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
Nice demonstration! I've just noticed after replaying the video at a slower speed, the hammer actually hits the bottom of the tube first, then bounces upwards. The feather then comes to rest followed by the hammer. Granted, after reading some comments it was stated that the reason for this was air may have remained inside the tube. But how much air? Where is the evidence for this? So I'm sorry to state that your experiment, sorry demonstration does not support the idea that all objects accelerate at the same rate. Moreover, if a perfect vacuum does not exist how then can one provide the necessary evidence to support the statement all objects accelerate at same speed? I would imagine, as written on the wipeboard, gravity simply gets people down!
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
SuperCorrector1 Sure, but the hammer did hit the bottom of the tube BEFORE the feather, right?
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
SuperCorrector1 quote - A perfect vacuum doesn't exist, but a GOOD ENOUGH one does. So what's the point of stating a good enough vacuum does exist when it seems frictional forces in this good enough vacuum impede the rate of fall? Moreover, what's the point of saying all objects fall at the same rate when it cannot be truly tested as a perfect vacuum is said not to exist? Absolute nonsense!
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
SuperCorrector1 what's the point of saying all objects fall at the same rate when it cannot be truly tested as a perfect vacuum is said not to exist? Absolute nonsense!
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
SuperCorrector1 But nobody ever been to the moon !!!!!
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
SuperCorrector1 Glad u agree!
@frankhughes768 жыл бұрын
think about it, if mass produced gravity then the mass of the hammer would produce more gravity then the mass of the feather causing the hammer to hit first in a vacuum but this isn't the case, they fall at the same rate proving mass has nothing to do with the cause of gravity
@PaulSchober8 жыл бұрын
+Frank Hughed No. The point is that the Earth's gravity affects them and pulls at them with the same force. That's why they hit at the same time. The hammer does produce more gravity than the feather, and so it theoretically "pulls" the planet up towards it by some infinitesimal amount, but seeing as they are falling right beside each other in the tube, they should hit at the same moment.
@PeterPete8 жыл бұрын
+Frank Hughed I've just noticed after replaying the video at a slower speed, the hammer actually hits the bottom of the tube first, then bounces upwards. The feather then comes to rest followed by the hammer.
@frankhughes768 жыл бұрын
lol mass producing gravity is just a theory
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
We have experimental results to show that mass attracts mass. How do you think the universal constant of gravitation was even measured in the first place?
@neilwhitehead50878 жыл бұрын
I take it nobody else saw the metal ingot drop and bounce before the feather? Turn the speed down to 0.25 and watch it again, both instances you can see the metal ingot hit and bounce before the feather.
@robertolushi10368 жыл бұрын
+Gen Erator I think it's because there was still a little air left in the tube
@vladskiobi8 жыл бұрын
+Gen Erator Because there is no such thing as a perfect vacuum on Earth. There would still be a tiny bit of air, and hence air resistance, in the tube.
@intothemultiverse10337 жыл бұрын
If you look as he tips the tube the hammer is on the 'inside' edge and the feather on the outside so the hammer begins to slide down the tube as it is turned thus it lands a spit second before the feather. Also there will have been a small amount of air left in the tube thus a small piece of air resistance remained.
@rayrayner44266 жыл бұрын
All these experiments do is prove that air is a fluid, like water, and that light and heavy things sink at different rates. A golf ball would sink slower in the sea than a lead ball equal in size. It just explains density and buoyancy better. It is not proof of gravity
@gandalfthegrape27846 жыл бұрын
ray rayner You know that bouyancy is *caused* by gravity right?
@marcleblanc36029 жыл бұрын
Lot of nonesense, no proof of all school /jesuit disinformations; no gravitons ever found, no Sun turns around Earth that does'nt spin.... Nasa freemason liars.
@PaulSchober8 жыл бұрын
+Marc Sainte-Marie Ridiculous. You might as well say magnetism does not exist, because they haven't found any "magnetons".
@marcleblanc36028 жыл бұрын
Paul Schober I may? Hum not exactly the same we do have DIRECT (empirical) perception of its influence, and force that acts logicly thoughout the Universe. Attraction always occur with two magnets apposite poles brought together, as well as between a magnet and ferrous. Therefore both of the two pieces attracted to each other may be magnets or one may be magnet and other may be ferrous material. Whereas *repulsion is possible only* in case of two magnets (with equal poles brought together). Therefore *repulsion is a true test of magnetism*. You CAN demonstrate as conclusively such with Gravity, on Earth just by density /weight things fall, no NEED of invisible attractions. Universe does not display such strong Forces; planets stay put and *IT* is EXPANDING OUTWORD ! Losts of debunking evidences to such mass attraction. Mr Ridiculess PS: No LAW predicts or claims any "magnetons" kid... Fundamental forces are due to the exchange of specialized force-carrying particles: photons convey electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force is transmitted by gluons and the weak nuclear force is imparted by the movement of the W and Z bosons. And *gravity*... due to what kind of particle exchange ????? String theory predicts the existence of gravitons.
@PaulSchober8 жыл бұрын
+Marc Sainte-Marie You do know that even high-school students are doing experiments at science shows that demonstrate the (very slight) attraction between two massive lead weights hanging on strings, don't you? (my friend Martin beat me at the Physics 11 science fair using one). You are simply getting thrown by the fact that gravity is a force that is SO much weaker than electromagnetism or the strong and weak nuclear forces, but ITS effect is just as obvious to see. Evacuate a glass tube with a feather and stone, and you sill see them both attracted to the planet with the same force. It's called gravity. We may not yet understand its mechanics, but the laws governing attraction and distance have been worked out and proven in experiments perfectly over and over. So unless you have some experiment that disproves the currently accepted theory of gravity, you need to "go with it". Simply having a gut feeling or "faith" in something, isn't much of a counter-argument. Yes magnets are easy to demonstrate (and believe in:), but my point was, we don't need to understand the exact mechanism behind it, in order to accept the force's existence. We have no idea HOW a magnet can attract metal or another magnet over space, but only a fool would deny that it occurs, or call it "magic". Density? Not that ridiculous "buoyancy" explanation? Please. Like I said, every science school-kid has probably seen the vacuum-bottle-feather-and-coin experiment. Gravity works exactly as predicted even when no atmospheric or liquid medium is present. Yes the planets stay put, and yes it's believed the universe is still expanding from it's inception. So what? What does that have to do with "disproving" the force of gravity? All that means is that the initial expansion force is greater than the overall collective attraction of gravity. *PS: No LAW predicts or claims any "magnetons" kid...* Yes, thanks. Grandma. I was making a facetious joke, in that arguing gravitons or warped space is simply an exercise in trying to figure out the MECHANISM of the observable force, it has nothing to do with arguing its existence. Which is RIDICULOUS and rather pathetic. Photons convey magnetism? Haven't heard that theory. Never heard anyone detecting any photons coming off a magnet. But the prevalent theory of gravity is not gravitons these days, I believe it's still the warping of space-time by mass. But as I said, the mechanism is irrelevant. What you are doing is denying the EXISTENCE of the force. A force you can observe by sucking the air out of a glass tube!
@marcleblanc36028 жыл бұрын
+Paul Schober Sorry no I cant say I knew that, cant know everything, dont remember doing that in class. I find it hard to believe pal, no offense but if much bigger /stonger masses like planets dont come sticking together... after billions of years... well I see a problem. Beside straight cheating, maybe some magnetic minerals in those... or charge electricity (related to the magnetism), maybe you friend is smarter then you. I am thrown but the invisibility of it and all that I poster I guess you will ignore. Cavendish experiment, as if that myth is also factual! (enjoy!) Man who escaped science cult= /watch?v=lCnLRikqAws "So unless you have some experiment that disproves the currently accepted theory of gravity (yes hypocrite I mentioned it, as the Universe still expending instead of being attracted by all its inner mass...) , you need to "go with it". " YES THAT IS BASICLY IT, NO PROOF OF GRAVITY= Simply having a gut feeling or "faith" in something BECAUSE MASS TEACHED AND SOLD BY AUTHORITIES WITH CHILDHOOD BRAINWASHING. AND FALSE "SCIENCE" CONSENSUS, BUT YEAH A LOT OF SILENCE FROM SCARED SHEEP EMPLOYESS.
@PaulSchober8 жыл бұрын
+Marc Sainte-Marie Scared sheep. LOL The tired refrain from all you guys. Anyone who accepts anything "official", is a terrified sheep brainwashed by an evil cabal in a hollowed-out volcano somewhere. You really need to do some honest research into this stuff. Or do the experiments yourself, because you're clearly set to disbelieve anything I say or anything an "official" says. In class? Did you take any physics courses? Even high school ones? Planets should start "sticking together"? You're not noticing any collisions, so by that you believe that gravity does not exist? Let me get this straight, you believe in the existence of planets, but you don't believe that any force holds them in orbit around stars, or their moons around them? Forgive me if I've mistaken you for someone else, but you don't believe mass attracts mass, is that it? Because whatever mechanism THAT is, that is what we term "gravity". You linked to a video of some toothless moron cackling for 10 minutes about "two balls"? You do realize he doesn't' understand the physics behind the Cavendish experiment, right? He didn't even discuss its supposed flaws, he just cackled like an idiot for 10 minutes. I'm not a hypocrite. I ADDRESSED your argument about the expanding universe. And I said the prevalent theory there is the the initial expansion/explosion was MORE powerful than the overall gravitic attraction of the universe. It HAD to be, or there would not ever have BEEN a Big Bang/expansion event, right? Sheep employees. So now 99% of the world is also being paid off to believe we live on a spinning planet, huh?
@youngchanglee78459 жыл бұрын
FUS RO DAH!!
@TinchoX9 жыл бұрын
이영창 You know, that actually never crossed my mind but... it actually makes sense! xD
@crus_crus7 жыл бұрын
YOUNG CHANG LEE that's exactly what I was going to say!
@drkastenbrot9 жыл бұрын
Mount a subwoofer to it, put on a saw wave and enjoy your machinegun