Күн бұрын
14 күн бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@usergiodmsilva1983PT 20 сағат бұрын
37:15 Vale, vale. Sim por favor!
@usergiodmsilva1983PT 20 сағат бұрын
32:00 there's not much doubt about what happened. In fact in the British Isles it was far worse, with almost a complete population replacement. Just as it happened with neanderthals before.
@usergiodmsilva1983PT 20 сағат бұрын
Só estes comentários?!... Well, regarding the question, considering that hunter gatherers still have a very hard life, with high mortality rates, and little creature comforts... Yeah, plant that grain baby.
@musmerized658 Күн бұрын
nice
@ksbridge Күн бұрын
🇳🇱😤
@theclassicalrepublican9226 2 күн бұрын
Very nice. I would like to hear more about the politics of the 1650s to 1720. Thank you.
@elliottprats1910 15 сағат бұрын
He has a series o podcasts called “the history of Spain” which goes over the entire history in-depth with numerous episodes that probably average over 40mins in length
@jaumejoseoranies7948 8 күн бұрын
Yes! This kind of principality is similar to a republic but with hereditary prince or count. The sovereign had to swear the laws in order to access the position. If not he didn't became count of Barcelona.
@gwynedd4023 9 күн бұрын
ok cool video
@maud3444 10 күн бұрын
I've often wondered why the Valencians or Baleares don't consider themselves to be Catalonians. They speak the same language, no?
@newhistoryspain 9 күн бұрын
They do speak the same language yeah, although in the Valencian region for instance the use of the language has substantially declined. They just developed different identities as they didn't belong to the same political entity (the Crown of Aragon is just how we refer to all the possessions under the same monarch, but they barely shared common institutions, unlike the Crown of Castile). So you could argue it is the same as an American and British not considering themselves the same even though they speak the same language.
@maud3444 9 күн бұрын
@@newhistoryspain Gracias 🙂
@jaumejoseoranies7948 8 күн бұрын
@@newhistoryspain In the western part of the autonomous community (CA) of Catalunya it's mostly spoken the same dialect as the CA of València. The north-western dialect is like tortosian valencian spoken until near Castelló de la Plana. Nothing changes when you cross the Sènia river but the Spanish province and the CA.
@user-rb3bb7mi3u 8 күн бұрын
Very simple, they speak similar languages, but are not catalán, same as Nigerians are not British and they speak english.
@neochris2 4 күн бұрын
All Valencians I know are socially and politically fed up with Catalonia. They want nothing to do with the idea of "the Catalan Countries" that here in catalonia I hear about so much. As an outsider, it's funny to watch.
@JoRdi-ul4xg 10 күн бұрын
los catalales odiamos cualquier institucion monarquica de todas formas, no se cual de nuestros raritos realmente dice que fuimos un reino.
@mugen7819 10 күн бұрын
very well explained. very informative. good use of examples too. thank you.
@newhistoryspain 10 күн бұрын
I recommend you to check other videos in the channel, like the story of an influential Spaniard in the Kingdom of Hawaii 😊
@Benito-lr8mz 12 күн бұрын
Soy Valenciano y como esta comunidad antiguo Reino de Valencia dentro de la Corona de Aragon a secas de hecho en la acta de union con el Condado de Barcelona se especifico que apareciera primero y digamos como nombre del reino como Corona de Aragon como sabras mi region fue su " padre fundador" el gran Jaime l de Aragon " El Conquistador" saludos
@robertmyers6488 12 күн бұрын
I love Spain and you bring really unique information. I hope your channel grows.
@newhistoryspain 12 күн бұрын
Thank you Robert!
@robertmyers6488 12 күн бұрын
@@newhistoryspain I am very impressed by the story of Berenguela. So much smarter than her grandmother, yet so much less know. Before, we visited in 2021, my daughter and I watch a good KZfaq series that ran from her to the rise of Trastamara. We went many places but I made a point of going to the Cathedrals in Murcia and in Seville where respectively two parts of Alfonso X are interred.
@elliottprats1910 15 сағат бұрын
He has been doing KZfaq videos for years and has other channels.
@MrCount84 14 күн бұрын
Oh yeeeaaaaaaah this guy is finally back!!!!!!!!!!
@newhistoryspain 15 күн бұрын
Patreon: patreon.com/newhistoryspain Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/newhistoryspain
@newhistoryspain 15 күн бұрын
Patreon: patreon.com/newhistoryspain Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/newhistoryspain REFERENCES: Baydal, Vicent, and Cristian Palomo Reina. Pseudohistòria contra Catalunya: De l’espanyolisme a la Nova Història. Eumo Editorial, 2020. Palomo Reina, Cristian. “Noves perspectives per a una qüestió no resolta: Per qué Catalunya fou un principat i no un regne?” Anuario de estudios medievales 50.1 (2020): 323-352. Palomo Reina, Cristian. Identitat i vocabulari polítics a Catalunya durant la guerra de successió. 2018. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, dissertation.
@xc8487 22 күн бұрын
The problem is that facism is an inherently unstable ideology that is almost impossible to keep sustaining without it's own practitioners eventually causing it's fall. It's also usually pretty bad about adopting the worst aspects of multiple economic and social ideologies.
@davidhinkley 20 күн бұрын
That describes Capitalism to a tee. So, I agree.
@xc8487 20 күн бұрын
@@davidhinkley Capitalism has been around for about 500 years. Facism has really only existed for about 100-150. Capitalism is also an economic system, not a political system.
@newhistoryspain 20 күн бұрын
I think fascists regimes can be sustainable if they are not expansionist/imperialistic. If they attempt to constantly expand their borders, then yeah, that attitude puts the entire world against you.
@monsternbt 22 күн бұрын
israel is Fascist State
@RogerKrow78 22 күн бұрын
Just watch KZfaq, you will witness fascism promoted and endorsed by KZfaqs algorithms. You are welcome to prove me wrong but will likely only expose KZfaq in the process.
@newhistoryspain 20 күн бұрын
Yeah social media platforms actively promote right-wing ideology, it is not just that they show up more because they generate more engagement.
@pc_suffering6941 22 күн бұрын
Fascism is something one doesn't like. Anything can be a fascism if you try hard enough.
@davochinomalo 22 күн бұрын
La mejor definición la ha dado la escuela de Gustavo Bueno.
@sonnysantana5454 22 күн бұрын
a nationalistic view and love of country , a strong respect and love of the their military , a strong belief in god and industries , but this is the 1930's & 40's interpretation , now they white wash and blame it on the opposition and twist it around
@xanmontes8715 22 күн бұрын
Mi madre... Thank God someone is saying this.
@RobiFM90 23 күн бұрын
I disagree, fascists are not extreme right wing on economic policy, they are not Libertarians or Ancaps
@NikasInParis_777 23 күн бұрын
actually they are fascists are corporatists which is based of medieval guild systems which then became capitalism or they are capitalists
@RobiFM90 23 күн бұрын
@@NikasInParis_777 a corporatist is not a Libertarian or a Anarcho Capitalist, the further right on the economic spectrum.
@NikasInParis_777 23 күн бұрын
@@RobiFM90 well thats in libertarian economic right you see as but authoritarian right economic principals tends to be corporatist, nationalization, or free marketism and less total freedom as you say
@RogerKrow78 22 күн бұрын
Let's be realistic, is any government any resemblance of what it labels itself? They've all devolved into some form of corruption they are all basically some form of totalitarian tyrannical dictatorships. It's all propaganda and illusion. The sad part is how they've convinced billions they are handicapped of any choice and must accept tyranny. Imagine how the future will look back on these times and those who were too weak willed to sacrifice anything for the fate of the species. We deserve to fail and slip into oblivion as our will is weaker than the will to oppress the species into extinction. Congratulations to social media and governments propaganda campaigns for the belittlement of the mental state of the species and its degeneration. Good job.
@RobiFM90 22 күн бұрын
@@NikasInParis_777 I disagree, I see many many corporatist in Center, Center Left and even Liberal parties. Fascism to me is a centrist chamaleon movement, they are certainly no neoliberals or Libertarians or Ancaps, most of these want the abolition or reduction of the state (right wing economic extremism) which is something that fascism definitely does not want
@hydnars 24 күн бұрын
As a new subscriber, I have to say this is really good content! I recommend this video on Neolithic Iberia by Survive the Jive as a complement to your video! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rrB8h7uerdupkn0.html
@newhistoryspain 26 күн бұрын
Patreon: patreon.com/newhistoryspain Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/newhistoryspain REFERENCES: Eco, Umberto. "Ur-fascism." The New York review of books 22 (1995): 12-15. Griffin, Roger, and Matthew Feldman, editors. Fascism: Critical concepts in political science. Routledge, 2003. Griffin, Roger. Fascism. Oxford University Press, 1995. Paxton, Robert O. The anatomy of fascism. Alfred A. Knopf, 2004. Payne, Stanley G. Fascism: Comparison and definition. University of Wisconsin Press, 1980. Ucelay-Da Cal, Enric, Arnau Gonzàlez i Vilalta, and Xosé M. Núñez Seixas, editores. El catalanisme davant del feixisme (1918-2018). Editorial Gregal, 2018.
@RobiFM90 27 күн бұрын
💪🏽
@RobiFM90 28 күн бұрын
A donde puedo conseguir tu show/podcast que es en Español? Ese canal Español tiene patreon?
@newhistoryspain 28 күн бұрын
Sí, La Historia de España - Memorias Hispánicas en KZfaq o en podcast. Tiene Patreon en patreon.com/lahistoriaespana
@RobiFM90 28 күн бұрын
@@newhistoryspain gracias por responder, y el contenido es lo mismo en ambos canales? Llevo como dos años viendo tus vídeos en KZfaq y Spotify pero solo en Inglés. No sabia que existía en Español
@newhistoryspain 28 күн бұрын
He cambiado un poco los guiones para simplificarlos, en ese sentido creo que está mejor en inglés. También ahí no uso música de fondo. Los contenidos pueden ser un poco diferentes, hay contenido en español que no tiene sentido hacerlo en inglés porque no atraería a una audiencia anglosajona, y es posible que también ocurra al revés.
@RobiFM90 28 күн бұрын
@@newhistoryspain soy puertorriqueño! Mi tatarabuelo era de Girona! Me subscribí orita al patreon del canal en inglés pero quizás cambie luego al de Español
@fusseluflecki 28 күн бұрын
@newhistoryspain 28 күн бұрын
Patreon: patreon.com/newhistoryspain Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/newhistoryspain REFERENCES: Amela Valverde, Luis. "La conquista del Norte peninsular: primeros tanteos según las fuentes literarias." (2013): 69-84. Barceló, Pedro, and Juan José Ferrer Maestro. Historia de la Hispania Romana. Alianza Editorial, 2016. Blázquez, José María, et al. Historia de España antigua. Tomo 2. Hispania romana. Cátedra, 1995. Bravo, Gonzalo. Hispania: la epopeya de los romanos en la Península. La esfera de los libros, 2007. Bravo, Gonzalo. Nueva historia de la España antigua. Alianza editorial, 2014. Domínguez Ortiz, Antonio. Historia de España 2: La España romana y visigoda (siglos III a.C.-VII d.C.). Planeta, 1992. Orfila Pons, Margarita. "Circunstancias y consecuencias de la intervención militar de Quito Cecilio Metelo sobre las Baleares (123 a. C. 121 a. C.)." Revista de Menorca 90.1 (2007): 69-113. Pisa Sánchez, Jorge. Breve Historia de Hispania. Nowtilus, 2009. Plácido Suárez, Domingo. Historia de España 1: Hispania Antigua. Editado por Josep Fontana y Ramón Villares, Crítica, 2009. Roldán Hervás, José Manuel. Historia antigua de España I. Iberia prerromana, Hispania republicana y alto imperial. Editorial UNED, 2013. Salinas de Frías, Manuel. "El impacto económico de la conquista romana." Studia Historica. Historia Antigua 17 (1999): 125-152. San Vicente González de Aspuru, José Ignacio. "La victoria de Décimo Junio Bruto sobre los galaicos y la retirada de Emilio Lépido de Pallantia: algunas consideraciones sobre su cronología." (2013): 41-68. Varga, Daniel. The Roman Wars in Spain: The Military Confrontation with Guerrilla Warfare. Pen and Sword, 2015.
@padresfan60 29 күн бұрын
It's good to have you back David 👍
@newhistoryspain 29 күн бұрын
Thank you, Shane!
@remomojapelo1840 29 күн бұрын
I've fallen back in love with learning about European history recently so thank you not only for the video but for also giving us the sources to investigate if what you said is true. Cheers 🤝
@newhistoryspain 29 күн бұрын
Sadly this is something that should be considered required for all history creators, but it is not common to disclose.
@conradobillan 29 күн бұрын
Mejor en español!!!
@newhistoryspain 29 күн бұрын
Este canal está dirigido principalmente a estadounidenses y británicos, no hace falta que un español venga aquí 😂
@Benito-lr8mz Ай бұрын
Es muy triste oensar que la mayor parte de extranjeros y increiblemete alguna gente de aqui piensen que antes de los Romanos viviamos en cuevas y eramos poco menos que animales ya que muchos empiezan en la epoca Romana
@DawudShaukat Ай бұрын
I thought Spain was a strongly catholic country. Why isn’t your outlook towards such people more negative? Wouldn’t it be more objective to refer to them like you would with criminals?
@endermix5859 Ай бұрын
Spain was imposed catholicism during a 40 year dictatorship and after it people have left most of catholics believes. Though there's still lots of traditions on Spain that come from catholicism😊
@MetaleroNui Ай бұрын
Wtf do you mean
@remomojapelo1840 29 күн бұрын
Please elaborate on what you mean. Because if I'm understanding you correctly then you're saying if Visogothic Spain was so anti-homosexual and the sources speak so unkindly of homosexuals, then he should speak as unkindly of them. However, I disagree with you there because I don't believe you have to sound like the lawmakers of that time to speak about what they implemented. I should be able to speak about anti-Jew laws in Nazi Germany without sounding like an antisemite because "that's what the sources and lawmakers said". If you are saying that he should sound homophobic because he is a Spaniard and most Spaniards are devout Catholics then I also disagree with you. Projecting your own views onto history is wrong on so many levels. Speaking as a neutral observer is often times best unless you need to clarify that what you are speaking of is truly right or wrong. Referring back to that Nazi Germany example, it would be unjust for an educator not to call the Nazis out for how evil they were. And similarly it would be unjust for the presenter to not talk about how brutal the laws were because they were.
@RobiFM90 27 күн бұрын
Jesus taught that we can hate the sin, but not the sinner.
@DawudShaukat 24 күн бұрын
@@remomojapelo1840 what?! So you should call out Nazi evil but not homosexual evil? What double standard is this?
@IronySpidery Ай бұрын
This is exactly the kind of content I want. Spain, and especially its empire, is a subject I find so facinating and engaging. As a resident of a former Spanish territory (Texas, USA) Im in.😊
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
Thank you, I will certainly do videos on Spanish Louisiana, California, etc. before we get there in the chronological series (which will take years). Tomorrow I will publish here episode 5 on the Pre-Roman peoples of the Iberian Peninsula
@dylanjones7485 Ай бұрын
Kewl
@nalat1suket4nk0 Ай бұрын
This sounds like the most random subject your classmates have decided to make a presentation on
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
😂 i've way more random stories i could make videos about, but they probably wouldn't get many views
@ktall6749 Ай бұрын
You should check out what happened to gays in Sodom and Gomorrah.
@Igor-kv1eg Ай бұрын
As a spanish speaker, let me suggest you improve your pronunciation cos it is v difficult to understand at times. Shame cos the rest is quite good.
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
Fácil de decir, difícil de hacer 😂 al menos hay subtítulos
@Kinotaurus Ай бұрын
I had no problem understanding...
@LimeDude9999 Ай бұрын
@@newhistoryspainas an English only speaker. I was able to follow you okay 👍 nice video
@Gen.HamzaAlSaeed Ай бұрын
Would it not make more sense to relay events without taking a side? The vast majority of people support and condone the persecution of such people.
@azazelazel Ай бұрын
Absolute nonsense. Gay marriage has been legal in Spain since 2005.
@miguelpadeiro762 Ай бұрын
It would make sense to relay events by supporting basic human rights What's next, we are gonna relay information on slavery "as a purely grey area"? No. It's evil.
@Extravidrigt Ай бұрын
It takes a great amount of either ignorance or evil to promote the castration and murder of people for simply existing. Have a blessed day.
@AFellowCyberman Ай бұрын
No and no. What are you yapping about?
@greeenjeeens Ай бұрын
It didn't seem like he was advocating for anything outrageous? If people think he is some kind of activist perhaps they are a bit sensitive on issues of sexuality.
@blueowlclassic Ай бұрын
Informative and well-researched video. Interesting to see how seemingly quickly attitudes changed on the practice of same-sex relations.
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
Thank you ☺️
@SireJaxs Ай бұрын
Get over it.
@scot1913 Ай бұрын
Get over what
@chrisbrown8640 Ай бұрын
@@scot1913 They got a bum deal....get over it !
@TonyGModesto Ай бұрын
What is this comment even trying to communicate. It’s just a part of history.
@stargazer7184 Ай бұрын
Your videos are quite excellent. I am so happy to have found your channel. I will refer many friends to you.
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
Thank you so much ❤️
@Julian-tf5rb Ай бұрын
This is not entirely accurate. Paganism in general is not homophobic like Abrahamic religions. Depending on the kind of Paganism in question, it can outright glorify homosexuality, especially male homosexuality.
@samuel-fg6wh Ай бұрын
modern paganism sure, but history hasn’t been exactly kind to *anyone*
@Julian-tf5rb Ай бұрын
@samuel-fg6wh At the risk of repeating myself, it depends on the kind of Pagansim in question. With Greco-Roman paganism, homosexuality was accepted as folklore. The concept of "Straight" and "Gay" did not exist as we know them in modern culture. You have to divorce yourself of many of the cultural biases you may personally have when trying to understand the ancient past.
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
We are talking about several Pagan religions of the Roman Empire in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, and again there was a generalized attack on sex for non-reproductive purposes.
@Julian-tf5rb Ай бұрын
@newhistoryspain With respect, other interpretations of the past do exist. History is a lore. It is not a science. Some interpretations of homophobia as we know it in modern times stem directly from Abrahamic religions. Again, Sir, or Ma'am; I do not wish to be rude. But there is a reason we have a difference of opinion here. I'm afraid we will have to agree to disagree
@miguelpadeiro762 Ай бұрын
Yeah, the Greo-Roman world didn't glorify male homosexuality. It did demonize female homosexuality and praise male dominance, but only dominance. As male, if you were the "taker" in a homosexual relationship, you would be humiliated and decredulated by society as a man, and that would branch out into all corners of your life, defiling your reputation in politics, etc. Basically it was accept for men to put their sword in any sheath, but for a man to be treated as the sheath was considered effeminate. This is why great male figures in ancient times took male lovers with no fuss. But once rumors started circulating that "they didn't wear the pants in the relationship", then there would be trouble. But iirc, Germanic pagans were even more extreme by downright no accepting any sorts of homosexual behaviour.
@ericmoore6769 Ай бұрын
Very well done.
@newhistoryspain Ай бұрын
Thanks!