na mietitrebbia

NEAT! I'm a rote level flight student, my beliefs are longer mission times and lowers speeds are probably a dealbreaker. Aft center of gravity is probably awful; also more control of the relative wind into the rotor cage might be able to vector the thrust safely.

super cool. also super ugly ha. but super cool!!

was für eine miserable Darstellung - wo wird erklärt, wie das funktionieren soll????

PUT THE system on a antonov 2 biplane and see the difference. The AN2 ihas enough safety margin to do the experiment. (from a non-professional) 🤓

bro either this dude immigrated from the US or his accent is just that accurate. Its wierd though because he talks the exact same way you would expect a german dude to talk, even in terms of mannerisms. But the mf is also speaking with a perfect US accent too. Its kinda trippy tho.

You don’t need a scientist to experiment just a curiosity like the wright brothers. I’ve even thought of this myself.

This is an example of direct and indirect government employees who get paid to do nothing. There’s no expectation of a return on the investment. They call this truck “pure science”. Governments claim that expecting a return on an investment puts too much pressure on the employees. That’s done. We don’t need millions of guys just sitting around. And we don’t need junk “pure science” either. The only thing we need is a free market, with very low taxes. If a company wants to risk its own money on applied research, then it can. Taxpayers have no obligation to do so. No more grants of any kind. Period. And no more overstaffed agencies. The headcount at NASA needs to be reduced by eighty percent. Same for every other department and agency. “Scientists” are men who get paid for doing nothing of value. Their real job title is “Freeloader”.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qq-Eo9aAusnXj30.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9OUfrmWyLfMiKc.html

คุณมีโครงการไหนที่คิดไว้

ถ้าคุณสนใจผมว่าระดับประเทศหลายสถาบันเขาก็หมายถึงคุณอาจได้เงินไปพัฒนาร่วมกัน

มันก็น่าสนใจทุกโครงการนะครับแต่การจะพัฒนาน่าจะเป็นระดับสถาบันการศึกษาค่อยยกระดับสู่ระดับอุตสาหกรรมการบินคือผลิตขาย

This is very interesting. Something that will need to be considered is the resiliency of the aircraft if something damages the propeller (birds, etc.) during flight. How strong are the propellers and how will the aircraft maintain stability so it can get down safely?

Has anything more happened with this, I would be interested in purchasing the cross flow fan that is used in the wing for one of my projects.

Interesting in application in situ

Why are they reinventing the wheel?

Wow over 20 years to get this thing to fly, and 6 months to develop a vaccine too help people from a virus! and again wow, they must not want you to die from a fan-wing to crash, and again wow

That guy looks like Ice cube when he was young.

Mr Peoples is a people's people. 👍 Funny how names have meaning.

Every discovery, only ded people

Your so let

I guess this research didn't pan out since I've never seen a rotar wing craft

Such a wing could IMO be used to generate electricity. See kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p8qPm6ibxpzGqnk.html

If they want to use the wind tunnel for real world testing application, they need to throw in a goose or two and see what happens. 🤣

Bro I made sketches of this in middle school. I never knew people had already thought of it. Discovery is based on who publishes it first, I suppose.

Well on the bright side in they event of a bird strike 🐦 I'm guessing the fan wins 😂😂😅!

what about recharging in the air÷ off some big rigid solar powered 'eTankers' airships w tesla quick chargers for the planes to connect and recharge from ?

Is this actually new? cause im pretty sure ive seen people try this before albeit with less success.

Не правильно! Требуется доработка.

These clowns don't care if its practical or not, just as long as the research grant gets paid

Qué bueno ..me párese que tiene futuro .se me vino a la mente el ala perfecta con una gran capacidad de carga .....

Only garbage

Curious about the effects of rain, snow, icing conditions, and etc.

Look at the cover of the November 1934 Popular Science magazine.

Impractical..... Lets over complicate the wing......

One bird strike and we all die.

This is an old idea . Its called the "Magnus effect" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/faehf9yqzJileJ8.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jKuAZ66K1tGqZJ8.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l8mIqc9end7WcoE.html and so on

Good LORD that acronym was a stretch

The creator of this airplane should at least provide the same amount of engines as a Four-engined jet aircraft, where a malfunction can be "easily" managed using the remaining engines. Otherwise, a single malfunction could lead to a certain crash.

Old idea. Another dilettanti implementation without merit. However certainly some tax payers money where wasted because it's greeeeeen.

0.40 A bit scruffy and wears a tie. THIS MAN IS A PROPER INVENTOR.

Not a good recommendation there KZfaq...

useless. something for humanity? How about growing grain in a few hours - or corn - free electricity for all - cars without fuel - stop feeding the system.

NoOne: Birds: Are we joke to you?

When I was a kid in the 50's, I had a kite that had the same rotor system the same as shown. Here it is back again--they sure took their time thinking about it!

Can it take off in the rain? Ducted Fan designs are SUPPOSE to provide a lot of benefits but in practice these SUPPOSED benefits have yet to materialize. However kudos for thinking outside the box.

How well does it glide when the engine fails?

So a River Boat wheel on a plane, interesting.

Design it into the flying cars pls!