Packenham got married before he left for America in 1817? Strange...the battle was in 1815. Do better.

This presentation should have been supported by maps.

Only a few of the AI Pictures were accurate! I would tweak them next time.

As a descendent of one of those captured at Fort Donelson, I see Floyd and Pillow as men who should have never been in command of anything including cleaning out an outhouse.

Some points The battle is called Wilson’s Creek but took place along Wilson creek. This was the first campaign of the war, starting before the Bulls Run campaign and was the second major battle in time, second confederate victory. Missouri did pass articles of succession in government in exile.

Bloody awful AI pictures. Steel helmets and five-legged horses. Maps would have been nice.

wow

Well made video.

Convenient how they left out the part where Lincoln ordered flotillas of soldiers to invade a southern state prior to the war beginning. SC told the Union leadership that they would consider a landing of soldiers to be an act of war as it would be reinforcing a position that shut down their port. Effectively, the Union tried to seize South Carolina's port...again, for money. The Union Naval commander disagreed with Lincoln's order from his cabinet as it would kick off a civil war. The Army commander, a Major, disobeyed the Naval commander and landed the troops kicking off the battle. So no, the South didn't fire the first shots. The north unlawfully seized a port by force of arms.

It was NOT a revolution, it was a US invasion of a sovereign territory, the US first insisted the British give them Oregon, the British said "come and get it if u can." the US declined the offer and INSTEAD invaded Texas, this was NOT a war of freedom, quite the contrary, the US were the invaders !

AI "HISTORY" SUCKS

3:52. Price's horse has 5 legs. Puh'lease...

A . I . N a r r a t I o n s e e m s t o SUCK b y p a u s I n g a t w r o n g t I m e s.

As a Missouri armchair historian I offer a couple thoughts. Show only period relevant photos. Stay objective in your narrative. Missouri had the second most battles of the civil war. Missouri was accepted by the confederacy and represents the 12th star on the flag.

AI art ☹️

AI is pathetic. An already brain-damaged American citizenry will be unredeemable if AI is to be the history teacher in this country.

160 plus years later and we’re still balls deep in yankee propaganda telling us they didn’t participate in slavery and didn’t start a war because they were about to lose 90% of the federal government’s revenue if SC seceded. It was about money. Stop being a tool.

why no maps to make it easier to follow the battle?

🤘

Early battle with small casualties that indicated the war would be costly

The Union left Lyon's body behind they had to return and steal it and then buried it in John Phelps garden when the retreated. It eventually went to his family in Connecticut.

6:11 crap why not Panzer tanks as well

AI stands for Asinine Intelligence

Helmets in 1861. Come on, check your work before you publish.

The uniforms are totally incorrect.

In the absence of photos of place and time, AI imagery can carry the narrative. However, some that AI imagery are inconsistent with that period. Are those soldiers wear hard headwear? If so, I believe that was before helmets made their advent.

Can you really even call it a battle when there isn't 1 single casualty

Yes, the AI horse without a head is off putting.

Why all the fake AI generated art? It's of no value and historical significance.

Anderson: "Hm. Maybe I should just return to Washington." The devil on his shoulder: "Perhaps. But you know what'd be really funny?" *Cut to half-a-million dead Americans.

Well done, sir. Well done.

Why the completely historically inaccurate graphics? Why could you find period paintings for graphics?

Completely inaccurate uniforms thanks to AI. Bogus.

Stop Asking people to subscribe every ten seconds.

Horribly written narrative

In many ways, Texas is still a slave state

The first battle of the Civil War was fought at the Alamo 25 years before it started in 1861 Texas is always been a slave state and that’s when it started

The real reason for the Texas revolution was to protect and keep their slaves the Mexican constitution outlawed slavery. That’s what they were fighting to protect. All the other reasons are lies.

Why are all the photographs you show out of context? All the uniforms are anachronisms, the picture of the French general are wrong and so on. Did you let it be cerated by an AI? That would explain why they are so bad.

Love to see the cite for there being 200 there. Already very questionable video

Very historically inaccurate AI images. Should have just used photos from revolutionary reenactments.

You're use of AI is freaking mind-blowing. Did you even screen the pictures? Have some pride in your work & stay away from AI.

The pics are soooo bad being generated by AI it's lunacy!

The Patriots were fat? As in laying in weight? BTW, this could have been 3 to 4 minutes shorter without all the repetition. A video about a battle could show some fighting.

I can't imagine how the British and Continental soldiers were able to fight in their uniforms in the summer heat of the South.

You need a better writer! Repeating info is unnecessary!

Unveiled

A bit soft on the brutality of the so called "loyalists", especially what the did to captured Patriots.

I wrote a major paper on this war and the British Conquest of North America and I determined that it was a matter of who made the fewest mistakes. Wolfe was no genius, his Brigadiers hated him, Montcolme was the better commander but the mistakes added up to his end and the end of a French presence in North America.

I'm confused. Your thumbnail picture is neither Quebec City nor the Plains of Abraham. Anyone know where that is?