The Eternal Life Of SimCity 4
28:59
The Legacy Of The SimCity Series
1:01:58
The Art Of RPG Maker Horror
33:51
2 жыл бұрын
Gris And The Death Of An Artist
22:14
What Makes An RPG Maker Horror Game
26:17
Voxel Memories (2021) - absoluteproblem
1:01:19
The Memories Made In Virtual Worlds
1:02:47
connecting to the upstairs
0:31
3 жыл бұрын
Keep It Simple SimCity
14:32
4 жыл бұрын
level-type=BIOMESOP
19:29
4 жыл бұрын
Dark Bedroom
20:38
4 жыл бұрын
Rapid Eye Movement
20:58
4 жыл бұрын
Lucid Dreaming
20:37
4 жыл бұрын
Two People Watch A Children's Film
31:05
Mine Craft SMP
1:53
4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@stonewolf1980
@stonewolf1980 3 күн бұрын
28:49 Maybe Jack attacked Danny earlier, chocking him to unconsciousness. Then Jack wonders downstairs in a daze. He dozes off, having a nightmare about what just happened. Meanwhile, Danny's oxygen deprived brain hallucinates being attacked by the ghost.
@yukithesnowman314
@yukithesnowman314 9 күн бұрын
Subbing cuz didn't expect someone to mention George Carlin the icon in a NSO vid.
@webcityguymyclubb4032
@webcityguymyclubb4032 26 күн бұрын
What makes The Shining “A Masterpiece” - is the fact that The Viewer will always come back to it…time after time after time. It’s almost like The Viewer is also caught up in the web of the Overlook…like we’re just another one of the “spirits” doomed to re-live its horrors. How else can you explain that we all can watch this movie endlessly and never get enough?
@almyroh3517
@almyroh3517 29 күн бұрын
why is 2/3 of ur vid analizyng on why the suscriber count of ame is not realistic 😭 the hell
@rachellewalters8111
@rachellewalters8111 2 ай бұрын
The ghost of the former undertaker speaks to Jack as if Jack is "the owner of the manor" instead of the current undertaker. He appears before Jack dressed as a butler and tell's Jack that he needs to "deal with his family."
@Lunarrbase
@Lunarrbase 2 ай бұрын
all that yapping and you didn't even realize the main point of the game nor the actual story. good job on being the first person on doing that :P
@LeKongz
@LeKongz 2 ай бұрын
mERCI MR MON HOBBY FAVORI C DE REVOIR SHINING AVEC QQN QUI N L A PAS ENCORE VU
@RealMusicHype
@RealMusicHype 2 ай бұрын
Very nice.. We would love to feature your music on our blog
@rayname908
@rayname908 2 ай бұрын
Shelley is the only actor to have a character arc. Yet critics attacked her acting in 1980. I think straight men are more likely to identify with Jake and agree with his character mocking Wendy . women are mixed in identifying with or hating Wendy. Wendy defends Jack's dislocation of their son's arm to the Doctor. Danny refuses to tell about abuse. If you watch reactors on KZfaq the Shining works as a ghost story or an abusive family story. My take is Jack is molesting Danny and Tony is the way Danny deals with it. Seeing visions of horror while defending and living Jack. Wendy sees the horror visions after accusing her husband of hurting Danny. The theory that the bear man having sex with the old man is a representative of Danny and jack
@jsj297
@jsj297 2 ай бұрын
It’s a simple re birth sequence movie. Just like EVERY single “horror” film ever made. Dick is important character; he was the “christ” sacrifice. This is a basic movie by no means a “zenith” of esoteric writings brought to film. If you can’t get this movie, you can’t get any other movie. But yes, it was filmed and produced at a high level for its time, I will give it kudos for that. And a few very esoteric manifestations that I appreciated.
@fredricclack7137
@fredricclack7137 3 ай бұрын
NO- it's 🚫🙄😒 📺 BTR!
@ilovebutterstuff
@ilovebutterstuff 3 ай бұрын
"Man takes a drink. Drink takes a drink. Then, the drink takes a man."
@NorthernPanzer666
@NorthernPanzer666 3 ай бұрын
The infamous "stair" scene, has the record for the most 'retakes', it was reshot on camera 127 times & the axe scene, Jack Nickolson had to destroy more than 70 times. Scatman Crothers, rumours also mentioned his kitchen scenes with Danny was shot more than a hundred times. But I am sure, ANY other director, that was satisfied with 3-5 retakes, would have made a movie, which wouldnt still, in 2024, be discussed & analyzed as insanely many times as Kubrick's masterpiece. His small hidden messages & his very strange death, just before the premiere on "Eyes wide shut" + his filming of the fake moonlanding + the 25min of footage, missing when they mixed his last movie. With appearance of members of the Illuminati... But thats a research worth, if it sounds to far out or to much of a conspiracy.....
@jeffreycopeland8972
@jeffreycopeland8972 3 ай бұрын
There's very disturbing image @ 5:50 If look on left of "Danny " i believe it confirms that Jack was sexually abusing Danny because there's a image of Danny or ,(could be a different boy ). However, has the profile of danny giving "HEAD" looks like a "glory-Hole " or is could it be jack"?? "Unbelievably FKN " disturbing!!!! Ive watced this movie like 100 times and I just now noticed that disturbing image WOW!!!!
@zackf3688
@zackf3688 4 ай бұрын
I've always viewed the booze as metaphorical and indeed ghostly. He mentions a beer for his soul and gets "Jack Daniels" instead. (Lets call it "Jack Danny" for short.) I'm of the mind that the ghosts are real enough and Jack bumping into Dalbert Grady is quite the bridge between psychology and the (malevolent) supernatural.
@bobbyokeefe4285
@bobbyokeefe4285 4 ай бұрын
People seriously need to stop with this Shelley was abused nonsense,Stanley was a demanding Director who didn't take any shit from method actors who overly complicated everything on set,there are other stories of him doing this on other sets with other actors,this claim of abuse is a modern snowflake wah-man are always victims mindset and it needs to stop being blindly propagated in every Shining review,he didn't hit her,shove her or cuss at her,he just was pushing her to give the best performance,that used to be called good directing,it's no abuse,end of the story.
@moodyharvest
@moodyharvest 4 ай бұрын
A movie is not just story and characters. These two ingredients are nothing without being intertwined with cinematography, sound, music. While listening to "analyzes" (explanations) of Shining and Eyes Wide Shut I have come to believe that Americans are overwhelmingly fixated with the individual and the core family. Therefore themes, currents that hints (or screams) about something wider like mythology, fairy tales, politics, racism, economy and social power get lost as veils, red herrings that hides, symbolizes or only doubles the central family dramas that already are presented explicitly. But where does that leave the fluid, stalking camera movements in the beginning and inside the Overlook and the maze. Just documenting characters as they move around? The dissonant music with choirs performing something ritual-like? Are these just red herrings? And where does that leave the Gold Room with Loyd, Grady and the elite party, the world of the powerful Jack desperately will become a part of? Where does that leave the fundamental, cold "alien-ness" of the different ghosts? And all the mythological associations with wolves, minotaur, Theseus, werewolves, native American spirits, ghosts, shapeshifters, witches, hags, adventurers? Take all this in and the Shining will be an even richer film.
@absoluteproblem
@absoluteproblem 4 ай бұрын
Yeah that is an angle that I should have focused more on (most I touched on with cinematography was with the "all work and no play" scene). That's the thing that always makes this film in particular fascinating to look at over and over again because so much is delivered to the table to be looked at and is deserving of being looked at. On a related note, having to go through the film many times in Premiere to assemble the video wouldn't necessarily be me watching the film in its entirety multiple times, but it still had me rewatching fragments of it that on occasion made me realize something about the film or notice something for the first time. In my opinion you could make a video that is even an hour longer than the runtime of The Shining and something was still left out that could have been looked at. The book and the film I treat as independent things because the film has to stand on its own without the book; however, a thing I have thought about would be to do a full comparison of King's original text and Kubrick's vision. That could easily justify a full hour I imagine. But, in a way I think it could be an interesting analysis because one possible way of looking at things then would be to see how Stanley Kubrick took the source material and "edited" (in the literary sense) it to fit on the silver screen. The most apparent example that I mention in the video being how Dick Hallorann is portrayed in the film. One thing I'll say though (and pardon me because it's been a while since I wrote and edited this video) but I'm guessing I did say something in this video about a film being nothing without its story and characters or something to that effect. To me, when it comes to narrative filmmaking, that mostly hold true because there is something that is supposed to be said by the narrative. Now, how that is then told is where cinematography, sound, music, performances, set design, etc comes into play. Full Metal Jacket, which directly followed this film, is perhaps just as striking if not more so than The Shining in how it handles its themes for these very reasons that come down to the production choices. If I were to make a video on FMJ, I would absolutely have to focus on the performances of the actors. For some scenes (you know which one in particular), lighting and music would be the focus of what I'd talk about because given what Pyle does in that scene, it was those things that stuck in my mind equally as much. And once the film gets to Vietnam there is so much more to talk about just in cinematography alone.
@wickedcatsrodriguez
@wickedcatsrodriguez 4 ай бұрын
Just a sidenote, what you said about the woman who “survived” 911, she actually claimed that her fiancé died in 911.
@absoluteproblem
@absoluteproblem 4 ай бұрын
That too, but she did claim to be a survivor. I think her story was that she was in one tower, her fiance worked in the other tower, they were about to get married, but the truth was that she was actually in Barcelona or would have been in Barcelona when all of that happened. But she was part of the survivors' network, had interviews with politicians and the media, was in the spotlight for a while, all of that kind of stuff which was what made the 2007 New York Times expose so damning and crazy.
@absoluterefusal
@absoluterefusal 4 ай бұрын
What is their favorite film since 5/23/2020?
@absoluteproblem
@absoluteproblem 4 ай бұрын
A poorly aged cliff hanger. I planned to make a follow up about 2-4 weeks after this video came out on another film but some stuff happened, it got put on the back-burner, and I lost interest in that video project and instead wanted to do a different one. That will be the next video. I'll probably get around to finishing that other video on the film teased at the end eventually but it'll be well after I complete the project I'm currently working on.
@DreemurrsKid
@DreemurrsKid 4 ай бұрын
When NSO depicts Ame gaining an insane amount of followers really fast, I believe its meant to be a part of the parody elements of the game; Pretty girl gets insane amount of fans and subs because she's pretty. Ame herself explicitly states that she wants people to fawn over her, to be given attention and she *knows* she's pretty. Realistically, its way slower than that, but in the context of the game being both a psychological horror and a parody of streamer culture, I think it works quite well.
@DreemurrsKid
@DreemurrsKid 4 ай бұрын
Also spoilers for Comment Te Dire Adieu: P-Chan is heavily implied to be Ame's imaginary friend, or at least a figment of her imagination, and the game also implies that the P-Chan we play as is one of many she's made up. P-Chan stands for producer, and in Ame's words, "perfect", but it is also a Japanese pun for "boyfriend" ("ピ" (Pi) is a shortened abbreviation for that word in jp). The biggest theory/interpretation for NSO's gameplay in the game's world is that Ame is imagining the whole thing (perhaps due to a drug trip or reality escaping fantasy) since her backstory shows a history of bullying and abuse, which is why she craves attention
@waynegoddard4065
@waynegoddard4065 4 ай бұрын
The Thing is a great horror film.
@masudaharris6435
@masudaharris6435 4 ай бұрын
I don't know...the REDRUM on the door may have worked in the novel but was groan-inducing in the film. At the end, I couldn't get out of the theater fast enough.
@classiclife7204
@classiclife7204 4 ай бұрын
Over the decades, Duvall has said more than once, including in Vivian Kubrick's Making Of, that she and Stanley Kubrick had a productive working relationship and that he did not "abuse" her. He got a bit snippy, and certainly mocked her claim that her hair was falling out in clumps (it wasn't). The subject comes again in the $1500 publication from Taschen, by writer Lee Unkrich, who evidently interviewed her in recent years and she reiterated the claim. This story of the tortured Shelley Duvall is almost as much of an urban legend as Marilyn Monroe's love affair with JFK, based on a jokey "sexy" Happy Birthday rendition at a campaign fundraiser. Also, the movie has ghosts. Source: Stanley Kubrick and Diane Johnson, the screenwriters. Secondary source: Stephen King, who wrote the book upon which the movie was based. It's about ghosts and the boy who has the psychic power to see them manifesting from the past into the present. Of course, if you think there are no ghosts, then Danny's shining (and "The Shining") is complete gibberish. Part of understanding film is understanding the material from which a film might be adapted. It also leads to new insights: what did the director change? What did he keep? Anyway, good luck in the future, and try not to believe everything you hear without researching it more thoroughly.
@thekillingfieldsable
@thekillingfieldsable 5 ай бұрын
The You're Distracting Me scene was based on an actual event in Nicholson's life whien he was married to Sandra Knight.
@mikerivera7509
@mikerivera7509 5 ай бұрын
I want to thank you now for deciding to NOT include the racial filth. Also, when you mentioned that Jack knew it would have been Halloran instead of Ullman, you are probably right but also Ullman didn't give a rip, and in the novel Ullman is made out to be a real A-hole
@jonc2648
@jonc2648 5 ай бұрын
My take on Hallorann is that he sacrificed himself. The hotel was going to claim the boy as the price for Jack selling his soul. The devil takes the role of god here, where Jack is Abraham and Danny is Issac. That makes Hallorann the lamb (the scapegoat). Halorrann's shining would surely have enabled him to know what was in store for him. He is the hero of the film.
@watermelonlalala
@watermelonlalala 4 ай бұрын
If Lloyd is the Devil, giving Jack liquor, then Grady would be the Old Testament God, telling Jack he has to correct his willful son.
@jonc2648
@jonc2648 4 ай бұрын
@watermelonlalala Nice. The realisation of a satanic inversion of a resonant myth is terrifying.
@ilovebutterstuff
@ilovebutterstuff 3 ай бұрын
Not sure if that was Kubrick's intent or not, but an interesting theory. In Doctor Sleep, the remains of the Overlook took on the qualities of what King called a "thinny", possessing the attributes of multiple separate realities, rolled into one quantification. If you've ever read "Wizard and Glass" you'll know what I'm talking about. It's really strange how things were set up for The Dark Tower before The Dark Tower was even began. Kubrick's version was more of a nasty take on the Stanley Hotel. Stephen said it was made to "hurt people" which I don't think is very true. This one director liked to take inspiration and twist it into the nightmares of reality. Absolute gold.
@watermelonlalala
@watermelonlalala 3 ай бұрын
@@ilovebutterstuff I think King meant himself when he said "people". And, I think King was correct. Not a fan of King, so I don't care, but I think Kubrick was mean to a lot of people.
@jedgould5531
@jedgould5531 5 ай бұрын
I like that you tied ADSR to story structure. And jump scares compared to that. Nicholson doing scary is a natural; if you think about it, his least successful films are of him being a lover or tender. Shining video after video and no one mentions Jack set aside 5 months in isolation for a story outline. Also, Ullman refers to Grady as his predecessor, not a former caretaker.
@donwanderley7156
@donwanderley7156 5 ай бұрын
The only intentional continuity error is when the Gold Room sign says “Cold Room.”
@nickd4310
@nickd4310 5 ай бұрын
When alleged supernatural occurrences happen in real life, sceptics look for a rational explanation. How one interprets such events depends largely on what one believes. In that sense, the film is similar to a real life occurrence. Some people would take Wendy's account at face value, while others, such as the police, would rule out supernatural causes before determining what happened.
@post1113
@post1113 5 ай бұрын
The Shining debunked, it's just a ghost story. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/os94e8R_trq8iJ8.html
@classiclife7204
@classiclife7204 4 ай бұрын
You're an absolute hero for this. That video puts to rest a LOT of nonsense. Of course, and back to this video, it's easy to carry on with the nonsense when the analyst refuses to even look into the material from which a film is adapted ... as a personal policy, no less! After all, why leave one's bubble to search for evidence, rather than just ignore all data that doesn't fit one's "theory"?
@jasonwalker3209
@jasonwalker3209 5 ай бұрын
I appreciate the analysis taken deeply from face value and combed over everything. Seems like there’s too many vids trying to impose theory over the script and not appreciating the movie for a thorough horror. Good stuff
@tomcat1020
@tomcat1020 5 ай бұрын
3X? Woah Woah Woah Slow Down Speed Racer. Kid I have seen it 50 times
@iest9290
@iest9290 5 ай бұрын
18 minutes in, felt like 5 minutes. Watched every second, this is an amazing/ underrated full analysis of the shinning. Just the video I’ve been looking for to help with my strange obsession with this film. 👍🏻
@gusmach
@gusmach 5 ай бұрын
Zzzzzzzzzzz….
@hankworden3850
@hankworden3850 5 ай бұрын
This may be the dumbest analysis out of all the dumb analyses I've seen. Congratulations.
@Xcalator35
@Xcalator35 5 ай бұрын
Oh no!! Another 'The Shining' interpretation!!!
@bfranklin3777
@bfranklin3777 6 ай бұрын
Aphex Twin...Deepcut... Ha!
@stevielove4778
@stevielove4778 6 ай бұрын
…why do you say the woman in 237 is Grady’s wife?? (I know we can’t take the book as gospel for the film, for sure,) but in the novel the woman in 237 is entirely fleshed-out (pun intended) - she has nothing to do w Grady. Either way, I don’t think there’s any implication of her being his wife in the film at all - wondering why you said that.
@hankworden3850
@hankworden3850 5 ай бұрын
This is why all this Shining over analysis is such garbage...because all these dorks completely ignore the novel.
@stevielove4778
@stevielove4778 6 ай бұрын
THANK YOU for giving Shelley the props she deserves - ! People are so hard on her performance, which to me is blasphemous. In a film which demands her to be at the HEIGHT of the most extreme human emotions for half of her screen-time - I find her performance to Be NUANCED, complex, controlled and entirely committed! Where Jack Nicholson is mugging (and - whether you’re on the side of “I love the mugging” or “I hate the mugging” - he IS mugging )- Shelley is grounded in whatever moment Wendy is in. Her Wendy has faced endless criticism for being “weak” , “a misogynist portrayal of a hapless woman” and (IDK why anyone thinks this word even classifies as worthy of being included as critique- but it OFTEN is -) “ugly”. (Err I guess all that is faulted to her and/OR sometimes Kubrick); I could not disagree more. Her Wendy is sharp, intuitive- she bravely fights for herself and her son, as reality slips away from the very few people around her. Duvall was small, she had a high-voice and a very trad-fem demeanor-- those traits do not make her performance WEAK. I think she finds just the amount of fragility you’d expect to see in someone surviving within this (if not ALWAYS abusive-) wildly UNSTEADY marital home. ((ESPECIALLY as a woman, 70s-into the 80’s ; like THE WHOLE COUNTRY WAS MISOGYNIST)). In the wrong hands, the film (particularly the violence) could strike far too close to the UNCANNY-GOOFBALL side -dark CAMP -material - but Shelly is so sincerely FEELING, so sincerely desperate for the man she loves to appear from within that monster and prove she is safe!! (which of course we all see she is not) - She keeps those scenes against Jack N, which could be garish and laugh-able-- ABSOLUTELY TRAGIC. Her performance reminds viewers what so many horror flicks tend to forget entirely : that violence has consequences. There’s terror, yes, but also real grief and extreme trauma - the devastating loss of the family unit - ; as Shelley’s Wendy pulls herself thru the film, we watch her slowly realize she’s witnessing the end of life as she knew it ; she watches the death of her own fairy-tale. As Wendy fights to save herself and her son, she slowly accepts and then mourns the life she thought she had; the vision of her sure-future, frozen for all time in that maze. For, certainly (live or die), the world will never be the same - Any mask of safety and trust has been shattered, and (if she gets out) it will take years to fully unpack what the fuq she went through in that hotel - she’ll have to question what it implies abt her entire life/marriage before the Overlook. THAT devastating tragedy , THAT is all in Shelley Duvall’s performance. It’s heartbreak. And I think her contribution is what reallllyyyy lifts the shining up to be just as powerfully-disturbing as it is; YES It’s spooky-ooky-creepy, but HER devastating-realizations elevate the story to Fully-Upsetting. I think she’s the absolute heart of the film (Scatman brings warmth, but is absent for most of it); without her the film could feel soulless. - ALSO, i think she’s goddamned LOVELY.
@ilovebutterstuff
@ilovebutterstuff 3 ай бұрын
Can't help but agree... For the most part. First off, her nickname is "Windy" not Wendy. The annunciation varies slightly throughout the film, but she is undoubtedly introduced as "Winnifer". Her character is undeniable, that of a typical lower middle class housewife, going through the trials and tribulations of the average woman during that time period. How you brought misogyny into the spotlight is beyond me. People in general are mean, angry, violent little sociopaths with each and every one possessing some kind of "main character syndrome", men and women alike. To put the blame completely on men just reaks of BS to me. Yes, Jack was an abusive asshole. Name one person who has been absolutely perfect their entire life. Windy could have diffused the situation had she been more "perfect", but this is how things played out. It's pretty well known that Kubrick abused the hell out of Ms. Duvall in order to get the performance he wanted from her. Do the ends justify the means? That's a matter for debate. I thought the acting from Nicholson, Duvall, Lloyd, Crothers were spectacular and I think Kubrick had a lot to do with that. What matters most is what people who like to read perceive from the final product. You seem to take away a feminist perspective. I take away a cultural icon. To each their own.
@stevielove4778
@stevielove4778 3 ай бұрын
@@ilovebutterstuff …lolllllllll no her name is Wendy dude. Read the credits, (or the book?)
@ilovebutterstuff
@ilovebutterstuff 3 ай бұрын
@@stevielove4778 --- If you're a fan, you'll know that there's a vast amount of differences between the book and Kubrick's vision (and yes, I have read the book)... It doesn't really matter, I just pay attention to detail. What does any of this have to with the underlying current of a cultural icon?
@kens2328
@kens2328 6 ай бұрын
Shelley Duvall should’ve won an Oscar.
@jotunfalls4026
@jotunfalls4026 6 ай бұрын
I personally see the shining as a psychological horror about various forms of abuse and how we’re doomed to repeat the sins of our past. I think that most of the “ghosts” we see in the film are caused by the psyche of the characters as they go insane because of the isolation.
@nbyrd2579
@nbyrd2579 6 ай бұрын
Lol, the original Halloween, an honorable mention.
@lmiddleman
@lmiddleman 6 ай бұрын
Jack may have suspected Danny was not actually his son. After all, he did, when confessing his troubles to Lloyd the bartender, call Wendy "the ole sp*rm bank."
@hankworden3850
@hankworden3850 5 ай бұрын
No
@idesof
@idesof 6 ай бұрын
What's wrong with your accent/voice???
@ThalassicMeasure
@ThalassicMeasure 6 ай бұрын
Why do nearly all the "ghosts" in this film appear with mirrors or in doorways framed like mirrors? The only time they arguably don't is the twins in the hallway. But notice how reflective the walls are when we see the girls. In fact, notice how much of the Overlook has reflective surfaces on the walls and floors. Everything's very shiny. It shines. Again, why mirrors/refections? What do we see in mirrors?
@clintvanderklok7269
@clintvanderklok7269 6 ай бұрын
great video, interesting insights and speculations. Like the opening theme from the Sopranos says "you have to burn to shine" food 4 thought.
@TreborPaulson
@TreborPaulson 6 ай бұрын
29:15 an alcoholic never forgets where he put the bottle He’s just fighting the urge
@franciscoortega7938
@franciscoortega7938 7 ай бұрын
oh! forgot... great video!
@franciscoortega7938
@franciscoortega7938 7 ай бұрын
the detail that shows that all of this is not just in jack's head is when he was left out of the food pantry... how did he get out if it was all in their mind?
@GungaLaGunga
@GungaLaGunga 7 ай бұрын
25:48 didn't Mr Grady have a british accent or was that another character?
@Marc-dj5fk
@Marc-dj5fk 2 ай бұрын
The actor was English