6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@chrisleech1565 Сағат бұрын
Why can't Autodesk manage this level of clarity? I am going to share this at every opportunity.
@Sam-wp4ps 4 күн бұрын
Hi Kevin. There is a new test piece for xomety milling out there now. Have you considered doing a tutorial for this new test?
@andrewwilmot1440 6 күн бұрын
The old videos are always the best. Thank you for the information! Very helpful.
@KawilTv1001 7 күн бұрын
I really appreciate your videos, im many learn it comes to my Job.
@rufustoad1 15 күн бұрын
Hi Kevin do you offer 1 on 1 for CAMing?
@MechanicalAdvantage 15 күн бұрын
That is probably the primary way I make my living. If you go to www.mechanicaladvantage.com you will see an orange schedule now button. You can buy time a one time support session, or you can buy a block of time and use the time as you need it. Feel free to email me Kevin @ mechanicaladvantage(dot)com if you have questions. You can also set up a free project consult if you want to talk about what you want to do before buying.
@billbyrd9845 18 күн бұрын
You have a very pleasant and effective teaching style. Very nice. You helped me. Sub'd up and liked.
@craigrogers4258 20 күн бұрын
How does fusion know where all the parts are and how do I program my fixture plate
@jcrackerjcrack6401 21 күн бұрын
Hi, I've been helping my friend mill some aluminum hubs with his Protrak. I was wondering how you ended up low on the first inspection. Was it programming or tool height error? We had to test everything multiple times, because on the KMX controll you set the Z offset on the base tool and all the others are relative to that height. Every time you turn off the machine the tools need reset 😂.
@jcrackerjcrack6401 21 күн бұрын
Wow, i always pick up little tips that will save hours over the years. Thanks!
@DieselRamcharger 21 күн бұрын
fusion just keeps fucking things up.
@MechanicalAdvantage 21 күн бұрын
@@DieselRamcharger Very helpful and descriptive feedback. Use your words. I know you can do it.
@DieselRamcharger 21 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage if it aint broke fix it till it is.
@MechanicalAdvantage 21 күн бұрын
@@DieselRamcharger Horses worked, but we don’t use them for transportation anymore.
@DieselRamcharger 21 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage and now we are 35 trillion in debt, with an energy crisis and half the world doesnt have access to water that isnt toxic. How progressive. But we got cell phones!!!
@MechanicalAdvantage 21 күн бұрын
@DieselRamcharger I don’t know how the automobile caused us to be $35 billion in debt.
@TrishMeyer99 22 күн бұрын
Thanks, this was really helpful. I've watched a bunch of tutorials this month and no one explained the difference.
@chrisleech1565 23 күн бұрын
This is arguably the best lesson on the F360 second side strategies. Well worth reviewing. I will sleep well tonight.
@IAmTheVector 27 күн бұрын
HAHAHAH TO MAKE A PLANAR JOINT YOU HAVE TO CREATE A SKETCH! HAHAHHA IMMAGINE DOING SOMETHING PROFESSIONAL LIKE THIS HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH! F360 joins are just stupid!
@MechanicalAdvantage 27 күн бұрын
No you don’t.
@IAmTheVector 27 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage 14:50 Total nonsense! Something that you do in 1 click on Sw... this is so dumb. And F360 users are just a fanbase.
@MechanicalAdvantage 27 күн бұрын
I'll have to look at why I did that in this case. You don't need a sketch to add a planar joint. Sounds like you are a fan of the SW guys. Don't you find it interesting that when the guys that built SW left and started Onshape and did the same joint type workflow instead of mates. Hmmmmm..........
@IAmTheVector 26 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage The only answer I have for this is proprietary software. I teach Fusion, Catia and Sw as well, the point is that only SW\Catia has an engineering way of treating joints. That's it. If you want to do something nearly professional of course. Fusion is for kids sw is for boys, catia is for men.
@MechanicalAdvantage 26 күн бұрын
@IAmTheVector Sure it is. It has nothing to do with being proprietary. I really don’t how people get to be such a fanboi of products. It’s just software; it isn’t a religion. Maybe traditional constraints are now obsolete.
@ericevans5480 Ай бұрын
I love how AutoDesk spends countless hours fixing problems nobody had while neglecting to fix basic issues that have existed for years, and then forces them on everyone causing compatibility issues with legacy files. AutoDesk Software Engineers: We specialize in designing the tools we think manufacturing engineers need!
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
@@ericevans5480 That isn’t remotely true. What compatibility issue does this heights change cause? Provide me a file and I’ll get it to the right people, but they went to great lengths to ensure there wouldn’t be any migration issue.
@craigchester1625 Ай бұрын
This did fix problems that users had… many requests to include top or bottom of fixtures for heights… Also, what compatibility issues? As stated, the developers designed this in a way that aims to avoid all compatibility issues with older files.
@Cinnabuns2009 27 күн бұрын
I just wish the interface wasn't laggy AF. You click in a box select drag and it hightlights the wrong direction or is wonky or its highlighted but the mouse isn't actually in that box so you type and then there's nothing registering so you have to reselect again nearly every time you select a box. Nutty. I've never used an app this laggy. Are they logging every click? If the box highlights it should AUTO SELECT everything in the box (like every other application that's ever been made) SO if I start typing it REPLACES whats there automatically. You have to manually highlight and if you move the mouse up or down too much it flips the select direction. This is just 1 super annoying issue that has been around for 5+ years?
@MechanicalAdvantage 27 күн бұрын
@@Cinnabuns2009 Something has to be off with your computer. I can’t say I’ve seen that lag.
@Cinnabuns2009 27 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage What does that mean? We upgraded them all 2 years ago to 5600X Ryzens, 16GB ram not even using half. We have 500/500 internet. Is that not good enough to run Fusion?
@rbyt2010 Ай бұрын
So, did feed height go away, or am I spacing on something?
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
Not every toolpath has a feed height. Are you not seeing it in any of them?
@rbyt2010 Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage Just me spacing :) Just happened to notice it missing from the example in the video. Thanks.
@samboles3670 Ай бұрын
thanks
@Terrestre1 Ай бұрын
Clever!! Thanks Autodesk
@mtnbikeman85 Ай бұрын
That new ui looks so much less intuitive. Why not just add the new options as part of the drop down? I do lots of vice work so now stock top is an extra step. Also on laptop monitors these long menus will often have the ok/cancel buttons off the bottom of the screen.... Super annoying.
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
@@mtnbikeman85 give it a try for a bit. They are interested feedback and are listening. You can also set your own choices for height defaults.
@matthewharrison8531 Ай бұрын
You saved my life
@adambergendorff2702 Ай бұрын
Seeing this before it just shows up will be helpful.
@matthewharrison8531 Ай бұрын
I literally was on the phone with autodesk today. I was heated 🤬. My post processor is toasted rn. 808d syil x7
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
I’m not sure why your post would just stop working. Which post are you using?
@matthewharrison8531 Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage I'm using Peter Betz Syil X7 post processor for Seimens 808D
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
Can you tell me more about the issue? Does the error come in Fusion when you post?
@matthewharrison8531 Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage The error comes from the machine actually. It seems as though it is trying to go past the z limit switch on certain file types. facing operations work just fine though.
@CraigLYoung Ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing 👍
@ericsandberg3167 Ай бұрын
So when I pull an existing CAM setup forward into this new version of F360 I will have to revisit the heights tabs and adjust as needed....??
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
@@ericsandberg3167 Nope. Your choices will carry through. No special revisit needed.
@jcrackerjcrack6401 Ай бұрын
Wow! How do you not have more subscribers than Product Design Online!?!? He's good, but you're great. Your videos have been the clearest, most succinct and detailed! If your introduction class was broken into sections it would be more accessible to a wider audience. Best of luck and THANK YOU!
@jcrackerjcrack6401 Ай бұрын
I'm very interested in the 3rd software video!
@dmsentra Ай бұрын
Hi, Kevin. First time posting here. I've been searching for feedback on Syil breakdowns and how the situation around fixing them came out. I'm looking at their L2 lathe actually. Do you have any feedback on PR with their tech and or repair situations?
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
Can you send me an email? Kevin @ mechanicaladvantage dot com.
@dmsentra Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage Sent a while ago with my assumed mods to the address.
@brucejackson8168 Ай бұрын
I am climbing the mountain, the functionality in Fusion is far ahead of my understanding, but when I find videos like yours, it get further. Thank you.
@klaus-the-german3541 Ай бұрын
Fantastic video. Helped me lot with one of my most annoying problem! Thx
@DIYGuitarMods Ай бұрын
Hi, does fusion360 somehow know where the 2nd and 3rd duplicate work pieces are? like I seemed you didn't have to specify where the other two are. I've been trying this, and I must be missing something. Subscribed!
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
It doesn’t know where the other parts are located. When the code is posted, it is posted multiple times. Once for G54, once for G55, once for G56 etc. When the user sets up the machine, they have to teach each workpiece as G54, G55, G56 and so on. Then Fusion will execute the program at each of those locations.
@DIYGuitarMods Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage OH! thankyou that makes sense, I figured I must be missing something. thanks for taking the time to respond!
@ansiaaa Ай бұрын
great info and well explained. even if it's a 6yo video, it's still very useful for newbies like me
@hi_is_this_clorox_bleach Ай бұрын
The noises you make swallowing are ridiculous
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
Just like it is ridiculous that your mom didn’t swallow you.
@hi_is_this_clorox_bleach Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage 💯💯💯
@MachinedInWood 2 ай бұрын
5 years later and this is still some of the best Fusion information on KZfaq. Great work!
@leenet2984 2 ай бұрын
2d chamfer works on modeled Chambers if you pick th top face profile edge and leave the chamfer width setting as 0
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
You can also adjust the heights to get it to work. However, it wasn’t design to work with actual modeled chamfers.
@user-kc4uz4uy8v 2 ай бұрын
You have to know on this day 19/04/2024 you help me thanks you!!!
@adambergendorff2702 2 ай бұрын
Excellent video for something that is rarely covered, 2nd op. I know the video is 3yrs old, You don't see many videos on cutting soft jaws for 2nd op, which almost all of my parts require.
@teo60hz 2 ай бұрын
I have a question. Whenever ever i have to put a nice chamfer along some 3d contours what i often do is to manually compensate a ball nose end mill (12mm ball nose for a 0.5mm chamfer) on every point basically via spherical coordinate s calculation given the chamfer angle and the cut path angle like literally R0=6 (tool radius) R1=45 (chmfr angle) R2=30 (path angle) G1 X=(R0*COS(R1)) Y=((R0*(COS(R1))*COS(R2))) Z=((R0*(COS(R1))*SIN(R2))) this is just the sphere comp. You need to ad the point location for every axis and ad or subtract the comp value based on what quadrant of the theorical circle you are then reduce R0 by 0.5 so the tool dive in to the part by 0.5 creating the chamfer. ALL THIS BY HAND on the machine. I have videos of it that i can upload for every one who disbelief. So my question is: is there a method in fusion for doing all this? Like a trace path but whit a ball nose one shot along 3d contours? Edit: The code i wrote is just an example I have some actual code that I can copy and paste here.
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
Deburr in the MFG extension.
@adrianharrison5208 2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much
@Patrick-wl6wp 2 ай бұрын
Hey Kevin, quick question. Did you set motion limits for the slider joints off camera before you created the motion link?
@martinsmith2948 2 ай бұрын
how is this man consistently putting out LITERALLY THE BEST CONTENT on the platfrom?
@martinsmith2948 2 ай бұрын
this man consistently putting out literally the best content on this webiste... how does he do it?
@martinsmith2948 2 ай бұрын
this video is literally amazing, thank you so much!
@karlk. 2 ай бұрын
You need to go more in depth on how you made these setups
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
Creating setups in general? If that is the case I have some playlists created for creating setups on the channel.
@karlk. 2 ай бұрын
Creating setups from a multibody part... Noone has that on yt
@karlk. 2 ай бұрын
Im good now tho...a coworker explained it
@Unicorninfortnite 2 ай бұрын
how do make this work for 2 vises sharing the same stock? i made my te-co setup with this video and it worked great. i have 2 of these holding a larger piece of stock, like 6x24x2? how does that work where both vises use the same piece of stock? any help is greatly appreciated. thank you!
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
Can you send me an email to kevin @ mechanicaladvantage.com? I have an example that I did for a customer that you can have a look at as a reference.
@iexcedo6918 2 ай бұрын
Legitimately learned a lot here
@this4948 2 ай бұрын
Bt40?
@kpurintun 2 ай бұрын
you get a gold star! (and a like)
@ArthurLeeLove 2 ай бұрын
Very good video, and very informative and simple to follow. My problem is I have the free version and when I go to pick as-built joint, I don't have one in my assembly tab???? Is it possible that as-built joint is not in the free version online?
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
It’s in all versions. You aren’t in history mode. Right click on the design name at the top of the browser and choose capture design history. As-built joint will then appear.
@BushCampingTools 3 ай бұрын
At 5:36, you say you can't do counter sinks but can you not extrude the dimensions for say a cap head screw, then extrude another through hole for the socket head bolt for example? This would be the long way but i'm not sure if Fusion today can like place opposing counter sunk socket heads, ie say counter sunk from oposite sides of a plate, unless one does it manually and not via the "Hole" function. At least this is how i read it when trying to perform this. So i would just make my counter sunk holes via a sketch and extrusion. Do you know any way to perform this in a more simple way? Great video BTW and u got another subber!
@bd9531 3 ай бұрын
Another excellent vid, thanks
@beyoungheouneoh 3 ай бұрын
The reason I want to know that function! It's nothing else but a "police mobile armored vehicle"! I asked this question because I want to model with this program, make the parts in 1/72, 1/24, or 1/35 scale and print them out as parts with a 3D printer! 8:02
@TechnicVisuals 3 ай бұрын
Hi mate, with being able to print it out, would making the flat pattern from the inside of the tube make it too small to wrap around the tube for cutting or is the detected material width already allowing for that? thanks!