72 percent, what gap?

Promo SM

𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘮

fantastic time doing it. hahaha nice lie..

Social innovation is as important as innovation in technology. Why & how? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iLF4qM6JrZatm4E.html

Please someone make an updated version of this. I still use this video in my English As A Second Language classes but the numbers are now a bit out of date. Every other video I can find is too dry and/or too long.

What attainment gap, south Asians are the best performing in the UK the number of BAME students as a percentage is a lot higher than the demographic numbers. Stop splitting people up by skin colour

are you french ?

St Augustine's Hospital Chartham Kent.For the NHS mental hospital Whistleblowers & Kent Law Clinic kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aZlpeduJyKu4aYk.html&ab_channel=FREEDOMLIGHT

This is a very interesting video, one striking outcome for me is to realise that improvement takes time and commitment from both student and staff in HE. Understanding diversity can perhaps be helped by better realisation of the links between the various parts of diversity; whether that is based on race, gender, culture, belief or for the neurodiversity models. At the University where I both study and work, we have the Athena Swan movement which I am a member of which promotes an understanding of diversity within the study/workplace. Thank you for sharing especially given the recent news and tragic occurrences in the USA. What particularly struck me was the requirement for staff to get to know students. We need to break down barriers, address the concept that students are customers, and re-engage with students as fellow learners.

Diversity is not our strength and bame students get lower grades only because they don't work hard enough.

Fake

600th subscriber i love fish n chips 🇬🇧

Yeah as your way I appreciate you. But when it is come into enforcement. And is it real or just make a money from overseas students.

Turns out Martin Lewis DOES understand the dodgy aspect of student loans he just chooses plays them down (read no. 21 of his 'student loan myth busting' article www.moneysavingexpert.com/students/student-loans-tuition-fees-changes Appearing in government advertising footage seems to me a conflict of interest and hiding the negative aspects (which are pretty serious) seems to me disloyal.

A top lawyer reckoned UK student loans illegal and unenforceable (2016) www.independent.co.uk/student/study-abroad/news/student-finance-loans-brexit-article-50-illegal-and-unenforceable-says-top-lawyer-a7410261.html

Top lawyer believes student loans are illegal and unenforceable www.independent.co.uk/student/study-abroad/news/student-finance-loans-brexit-article-50-illegal-and-unenforceable-says-top-lawyer-a7410261.html

"The pound in your pocket says you can go". Boy does this guy talk drivel.

Whose paying this over-emotional guy to push these dodgy student loans? Martin is either evil or dim. He was screaming blue murder in Dec 2015 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jpyFpN1_ls3OiX0.html when Tories FROZE repayment threshold. And debt collectors WILL knock on your door if you fail to reply to correspondence because, like most young people, you move around a lot. Young people and parents are right to wary. Martin Lewis won't bail you out when you're worried sick about money.

What.... Is that even real Its a mini volcano Like a baby

Both colleges and students main focus is to get the degree and not the knowledge. They are altering their learning just to achieve high grades in the exam itself and not embracing the subject as a whole. If students think a certain topic isn't included in the exam they don't bother learning it, meanwhile our economy pays for their dodgy strategies as businesses are under the belief that these people have a basic all round understanding of the subject which they don't.

4:45 onwards Martin says, "INCOME THRESHOLD WILL RISE IN LINE WITH AVERAGE EARNINGS". This is not true. They were frozen 1 year later. This a dodgy, dodgy, loan agreement.

SOrry but this does not reassure. The HUGE levels of uncertainty in the government has prevented any reassurance you could provide. Over 21,000, ever since, the TERMS of repayment have changed multiple times, we are signing something where they keep changing it at will! that 9% will probably change too, just wait. And a EU person?wellthat changes now too as we are out, even with dual nationaility. Be honest. It is a mess! Suddenly the government is back-tracking when it is realising no one can go, especially mature students and the poor, most of which the grants are very tricky to navigate and uncertain, i have read the access statements of uni's charging the full whack-NOT good enough in widening particiption. Soon there will be no english at the english universities! Face it, we have many poor and social mobility has no been reduced in the UK. How do we ever expect to compete on the world stage with this restriction of education to those who are in certain circumstances only? British students are competing on the world stage-or trying to. I have been in industry, and the amount of people applying from overseas with 2 languages or more,2 masters, 2 degres, phd's and and and and and ...from places where it has been possible to train to the highest standard or places with more subsidised education..and have personally faced competing for my job where being economically disadvantaged is the normal. And now say how can the brits lead in research or industry if the funding is slashed in two? It is a "normal debt" in fact, regardless of if the governmentknows how unrealistic paying it back could be..it starts gaining interests soon as you take it out, rather than AFTER your degree, and it is VERY worrying to receive letters of how much it is going up while you are trying toconcentrate on studying... i got one while in hospital that it was already going up 28 a month!! I got very ill, went to australia for a bit to see if the weather improved my symptoms, i even got letters there. what were grants have, one afterthe other, even innhs, turned into loans and it WILL and IS putting people off studying and achieving great things for the UK>Not only that it was not there for a masters when i went, so many of my friends study stopped there-which everyone knows will NOT get you a good job in the industry, and now it has change 5 times since!! Even if you look on university websites, they can't keep up with the changes, in fact some state things untrue five years ago, the only definitive piece is one single document form parliament house of lords which the universities themselves don't know fully what is included to be able to advise anyone, student finance also seems confused and where and what applies. do we all ring the government for details? A friend of mine is a super brain, but has no parents, she did not go to university as she could not have debt it felt too risky. that is the reality-real talent going to waste for people of financial fluidity and/or affluence who are not worried. People who have had 10 aweek to live on through childhood areNOT going to take out a loan of 30,000 pounds, they would shake just suggesting it. I did, and had many sleepless nights panicking about it even beforei signed it. Sadly the government keeps removing things with great lack of accountability to those affected, so no it is not certain to remain with the "over 21,000" rule or the "no debt collectors" this tory government has shown us NOTHING is certain. Especially for the disabled or without family. I don't need to tell you about the cuts-no consultation-just rolled out one by one-cuts to DSA, terrible! Cuts to workplace adaptation grants, soon no one will hire us-it has gone backwards. Forget retraining too. SO better get it right first time-or don't go until you are absolutely certain, but under 25 or you may not even get the support by 2020. SOmeone from the top can try and reassure the poor and disabled that it is "fine" to be in debt by that much without a family home or support,it won't make it true. Who knows what the next government will do to those actual real debts in time. so yes it is "fine" -but only for the few not for the many.

How will discrimination against international students and brexit impact on British economy?

blyat

Probably one of the most patronising videos I've seen in a long time.

when we travelled to Barnsley training, we met a large number of African students whom had acquired scholarships for finance degrees. We bonded and started conversations, mainly about the weather.. it was freezing. However... when they arrived at their UK, uni destinations nations the uni had put them on lesser /fluffy courses claiming that the accounting and financial degree mastery courses were full up. This is after student had fulfilled the criteria,passed the tests and won the bursary, whilst in Africa.The college had recieved the grant for the finance degree prior to the students arriving... When the students questioned this, the UK universities informed them they would be sent back home and would have to reapply the following year. Which meant they wld no longer be eligible because of their ages. The students were also displaced in different/ lesser non RG Universities around the UK that were subsidiaries of the branded institution. Although on paperthwycwere said to b studying the financial Ba/MA's These scams should be reported as there is no scrutiny / due diligence in place...these students are getting exploited and God knows what else.

The years he's mentioning are wrong (min 1-2). In England or Wales - From 1st September 2012, Your student loan is cancelled 30 years AFTER you become eligible to repay (usually one year after you graduate). If you take a few years off during your uni, this will only add on interest. You start repaying when you earn over £21k. England or Wales - Before 1st September 2012 It will be cancelled if you: took out your first student loan in or before academic year 2005/06, then it will be cancelled when you turn 65; or took out your first student loan in or after academic year 2006/07, then it will be cancelled 25 years AFTER you became eligible to repay. You start repaying when you earn over £17.5k You will start receiving letters about paying the loan after your 2nd year at uni, even if you still have more loans to take out. You must respond or they will threaten with extra fees! Also, note the INTEREST will start from the first installment paid out. So when you finish uni you will already have accrued more liability on your borrowing. Also, the interest is (for those after 2012) based on the RATE OF INFLATION + 3%. With recent events, this will go up quickly. I really suggest to students not to study in the UK with the amounts currently payable, as you have so many options outside of this country which are free or much lower.

Of course the average graduate earns more than non-graduates... there is institutionalised discrimination against non-graduates in a wide range of jobs, irrespective of aptitude. What exactly does "broadening your horizons" entail and why is university the sole or best means of achieving this spurious ideal? More likely to be in work and less likely to be unemployed you say? Three times as many graduates (16%), as apprentices (5%), are unemployed upon their first year of entering the UK labour market (01). Furthermore, as of 2013, 47% of those who graduated in the UK in the last 5 years are working in non-graduate roles (02). Under-employment is increasing and this is likely to be exacerbated by the ever-increasing number of UK graduates, with a report from 2015 finding a “high percentage of graduates (58.8%) in non-graduate jobs” (03). I did not have a fantastic time while I was doing it. My six years at university were six years of time, money and effort wasted, six years of drudgery, three of them spent at one of the top-ranked universities in the world. Universities select those who are superior, by various metrics, (on average) to non-graduates... there is no evidence that they impart this superiority. Far more important than propagandizing the supposed benefits of university for the individual is the question of whether or not the higher education process intrinsically benefits those who undergo it, rather than simply exploiting pre-existing differences in aptitude between those encouraged to go to university and those who are not. (01) UK labour market insights - the entry-level dilemma, A totaljobs.com report prepared by IPPR, November 2014. (02) ONS, Graduates in the UK Labour Market 2013, Labour Force Survey. (03) CIPD, 2015, Over-qualification and skills mismatch in the graduate labour market. Policy Report.

This is so outdated,

What about a entrepreneur?

This video is, to put it bluntly, a pack of lies, misrepresentations and unsubstantiated assertions. Please present the *evidence* that higher education (HE) enhances the "skills" (I.E. economic productivity) of those who undergo it proportionately to its costs. To be clear, cite the studies that use matched controls to demonstrate a substantial benefit of HE; I don't even stipulate that they be randomised controls. Incidentally, how have you calculated the contribution of £73 billion pa to the economy? *The Demand for HE* Tony Blair's government set an arbitrary target in 1999 of having 50% of the UK population graduate. This has lead to the prevalence of HE more than doubling across the past couple of decades and NOT because of demand from employers but because the younger generation are now forced to get degrees to work in professions that the older generation already work in without. In my own industry, I had to get a very specific degree to advance, while the older generation require qualifications equivalent of no more than A-levels. This process is also ongoing... as of 2013, UK nurses are required to have degrees, the same will be true of UK police as of 2020. As far back as 2010, the Association for Graduate Recruiters were actually calling for the 50% target to be scrapped (01). *The Cost* Meanwhile, tuition fees have increased 9-fold (no exaggeration whatsoever) between 2006 and 2012 (02)... which is contributing to astronomical inter-generational inequity, with the average student now graduating with debts >£44,000 according to the IFS (03). In the UK, >£10 billion is loaned to students annually and “the Government expects the value of outstanding loans to reach over £100 billion in 2018 and continue to increase in real terms to around £330 billion (2014-15 prices) by the middle of this century” (04). In cash terms, that is actually £1 trillion by 2050 (i.e. pure insanity). *Student Satisfaction* According to the 2015 nationally representative survey of >15,000 current UK students, 29% think their degree is poor or very poor value for money and "with the benefit of hindsight, one-third (34%) of undergraduates would ‘definitely’ or ‘maybe’ have chosen a different course" (05). This equates, in one year alone, to ~500,000 who may regret their costly investment. Under-employment is increasing and this is likely to be exacerbated by the ever-increasing number of UK graduates, with a CIPD report from 2015 finding a “high percentage of graduates (58.8%) in non-graduate jobs” (06). Even assuming that the HE process is directly responsible for the earnings benefit, rather than factors such as selective admission by universities, a great many graduates are clearly not advantaged by their qualifications. *Miscellaneous* The 750,000 jobs "generated" presumably just refers to those employed within HE, which is wasted human effort unless you can demonstrate a benefit. My 6 years of HE did not equip me with any useful skills or knowledge. I transiently memorised enormous numbers of facts, only to forget them again simply because the HE process is indifferent to how we are evolutionarily predisposed to learn and the facts were irrelevant to my future professional work. I only went to university because I was forced to to advance my career; it wasted years of my life. As student attendance is indirectly forced, with the threat of lifelong financial penalties, the HE industry does not need to be effective to survive, unlike other industries. Please believe me when I say the above is only skimming the surface of my critique of HE. I welcome any debate. *References* (01) BBC News (09/03/2010), Call to scrap 50% university student target. (02) Paul Bolton (5/10/2015), Briefing Paper Number 917 - Tuition Fees Statistics, House of Commons Library. (03) Crawford & Jin, (April 2014) Institute of Fiscal Studies, IFS Report R93 (04) Paul Bolton, 2016, Student Loan Statistics. UK House of Commons Library. Briefing Paper No. 1079 (05) HEPI-HEA Student Academic Experience Survey (2015) (06) CIPD, 2015, Over-qualification and skills mismatch in the graduate labour market. Policy Report.

I did four years at the University of Manchester studying engineering which cost £24k which I now pay £180 a month out of my pay for the next 25 years to pay it off. So, roughly five years paying for every year at Uni. Now with tuition fees at £9k from £3k an Engineer course would cost £51k with maintenance included....and as they have jacked up the payments to 9% it would cost more per month....and after selling the student loans and allowing retroactive increase in the "interest" or the "money that doesn't go to the loan but is pocketed away" as I call it.......that means you will be paying off your loans forever.... not financial slavery just yet but getting there folks.

don't do it . just don't do it. it's an evil trap.

Leave it to a scummy university to justify the fees because it is in their own self interest. Let's lay out the facts plain and simple. The fees are £9000 a year for tuition which itself is now out of date because it will now scale with inflation which at the moment is riding anywhere from 0% to the target level of 2%. This won't be for all universities BUT the government did the exact same thing with the £9K cap. Number 2, the repayment limit of £21K for which you don't pay anything on earnings up to that level is frozen, meaning that with inflation, the amount you are in real terms paying back will always go up and not be fixed. This was a retroactive action. Number 3, the maintenance grants are gone, replaced with further loans. The regular maintenance loan had a maximum value of £10,000(the absolute max if you go to university in London) and is graduated depending on level of income and where you study. Number 4 can come from outside of this and this is external fiscal factors. The cost of living for students is high due to high rents so many will be forced into an overdraft, taking out bank loans or in rare cases go homeless. They also don't typically make a net financial gain of money in their time at university either(if they do work, a lot of money is going towards the cost of living with little wiggle room to save much at all). Ignoring that and going off of the loans part, if a student were to study a 3 year long degree and they were studying in London and qualified for the highest loans and we go off of the tuition fees pre inflation hike(because no university has done it just yet), a student can look to graduate with £57,000 of debt. This doesn't factor in the interest on the loans that has to be repaid, the fact that the debt can and has partially been sold onto debt companies who will chase you up and harass you, the fact that the job market for students with questionable degrees like sociology or media studies is very weak and an enormity of other factors.

What if I am French applying to a university in the UK?

What about Student fee for the course and maintenance loan.

Students should definitely VOTE TO LEAVE. Let me put it this way the EU is responsible for the cuts and the student fees. When Cameron was at Uni he (students) got a grant of £3000 per year, housing benefits for student accommodation and unemployment benefits for holidays . Yes people used to joke that they will become students so that they can get free cash. As more and more of the EU or common market treaties came into play cuts were made and the money that used to go to students had to go towards the fees paid to the EU ( i think they are now about £55 million a day!) and we dont even get up to £4m back in terms of commonwealth . You may have completed or are nearing completion - think of your debts and also what your childrens time at higher eductaion will be like. VOTE LEAVE

I wonder why universities not schools make the difference? Because they set the foundation for university education? Twelve long years to set a foundation, to make people learn the basics of some subjects so they become able to choose one at uni? Really? Twelve years to get to that goal? We would be better off if we could go to school and finish off at the age of 12 max. School people will get 6 years to select from their material the most important to teach our students. After that universities could pick up those students and design some special, out of the ordinary, practice oriented classes for say 2 years to prepare those students for uni enrollment at the age of 14.

STAR TECHNOLOGY - INDIA - We are providing Research work project support for Information Technology ,Electronics & Computer science related all kind of topics .91+ 9994375693 - [email protected]

Check out our new video showcasing contribution of universities to the UK economy & society ~ bit.ly/1RL25rw

New animation: The value of UK universities

Watch our new funding video looking at the Devolution and Funding for Local Growth

Watch our new local growth funding video looking at the Spending Review and Funding for Local Growth

Universities and European Structural Funds - what's next? Kevin Richardson from HEFCE and Greg Wade from Universities UK discuss

Also 30 years, yet the government website says written off at 65.

£12,000 more than those that don't attend Uni? Total crap...

Watch Michael Wood of NHS European Office and Greg Wade discuss #universities, the #NHS and European funding

Link to the KPMG report www.kpmg.co.uk/creategraphics/07_2014/Magnet_cities/index.html