Although I agree about the heinousness of the genocide in Gaza, you're whitewashing and reducing a lot in these so-called historical notes. For starters, Inquisitions were not the sole source of heretical death in Europe, they are a very small part of a larger tapestry, and witch hunts in many places were decentralized and not particularly well-documented. The Inquisition's horror should not be measured in deaths, as most of their victims were people forcibly expelled from regions, and although they didn't kill that many people comparatively, they torture far more than they killed. Europe's population was also smaller in these times so the raw numbers may only seem small in a modern context. Next, referring to Nahua gods as foul immediately shows your bias. Where did you get the supposed "more than 40000 a year" metric? Juan de Zumarraga? The guy whose job it was to explicitly create anti-Aztec propaganda to convert indigenous people to Catholicism? The guy who famously spent very little time with Nahua people and was extremely ignorant? Tenochtitlan housed at most 60k sacrifical skulls TOTAL, which when you see they had a 1000 year history means a rate 60 deaths a year... except we don't even know if that part is true because we've never seen that amount of skulls as most were moved or damaged in the conversion process. You can't honestly take these colonial missionaries at their word for the scale, they were all exaggerating, much like Cortés. If there were 40000 people dying a year, where did all the bodies end up? How did they dispose of mass bodies so easily and leave so little evidence in a salt water lake that preserves bones so well? They carted them off to the desert? Think about this harder than just throwing in your lot with Spanish Catholics because Tlaxcala and the Triple Alliance had a rivalry. The Otomi people's oppression was real, but you're framing it like it was a holocaust. Finally, I agree that the Zugarramurdi witches were not witches. But that doesn't mean they weren't something outside the framework of what was considered Spanish Catholicism. They probably practiced folk christianity and thus had rituals, beliefs, and superstitions outside what was considered acceptable. However we know that Alonso de Salazar Frias was not convinced of any satanic, demonic, or even pagan dealings and rituals in the regions of Euskal Herria he investigated. Famously, only 6 people were executed at all in this largest witch hunt in history. But it is worth noting that prior to Salazar joining proceedings the other two Inquisitors were scrambling to get hundreds if not thousands killed and the Inquisition's skepticism as well as those two Inquisitor's refusal to designate a third seat for their branch led to Salazar being sent over, so even his skepticism was likely a tool for an internal struggle in the Inquisition. Everything must be made in context, and although you are pushing back on pop myths, which I appreciate, you are also towing a Catholic apologia line and pulling the same ridiculous strawman version out for attacking the Nahua and Mexica peoples. You yourself are clearly a vengeful source on the subject, instead of trying to dig in deeper to the updated research.