Before watching, I'm going to guess this is about the infinite small virtual particles that cancel each other out and is why proton weighs more than the 3 quarks that compose it. i think this is dark energy but I'm a nobody. I was right 🤘🤩

Meteorologist here. Plenty of money for bombs but not for education and science. As an 🇺🇸, we are just as guilty as anyone else.

Another really terrible quantum physics video

guys Epstien is gone - thats way theres all this mess in the scientist community

Not everyone, Cappintack productions have solved the mystery.

There’s rumors that the terrorists from 9/11 where targeting a nuclear plant, but the mission was later abandoned and the terrorist attacked the twin towers of the World Trade Center instead..

You have criminally low sub numbers.

Idk what it is about this guy, but I love the way he explains things well

Kool

Hi, for the medical branch the total of phony studies is much closer to 30% or even higher, bad methodology being one of the most common "practice", such as "studies" without a control group looking OK until you discover that or uneven/biased groups, etc - this is something that is almost always catch by statistics specialists (a very few number of the reviewers) but almost never by peers (most of the reviewers). Since 2019, there is a nuclear explosion of such malpractices, so draw your own conclusion.

When I learned to code the Data Structures professor kept talking about how Google uses red and black trees with indexing then we never learned it by the end of the course.... Got an A, but an empty A. Go community college!

I just use DuckDuckGo.

I bet your videos would get more views if you uploaded them 12 hours later for time zone populations

I keep A.I. away, by not creating an account. 😂

Meanwhile D-Wave makes 5000 qubit quantum 'annealing' computers. IBM does not want you to search that. 😂

As impressive as Grover's algorithm undoubtedly is, I can't help but suspect that it will one day be replaced with Oscar's algorithm. Okay I just made that up lol. That said, your video did bring back very distant memories of when I first learnt to code. First we had to write a bubble sort, and then we upgraded to the binary chop. That was well over 30 years ago now so I guess I should try to learn a bit more about Grover's algorithm. Sadly I suspect my brain may not be plastic enough anymore to properly comprehend it, sigh.

Wouldn’t entangling particles count as a measurement or interaction?

Interesting they used this in the film arrival where an alien species uses signs that can be read circular... I was just wondering how could we even start to understand an alien species if we cant even understand whales, and here I am...

sound like the cycle of a miniature universe.

Forgive my uneducated question, but im going to ask anyway. When you add so much energy into the proton while smashing, wouldn't it be normal to expect more particles to follow conservation of energy when energy and mass are essentially interchangeable?

❤

The more you look the more you will find. There is no end nor beginning 😊

Hashem's fascinating world

Have you heard fairly recent results about Einstein's GR correction that removed event horizon? Read: Newton-like Mechanics Replaces Einstein’s GR and Spacetime Surrogate

Better get YOUR language corrected. Human ARE animals! We are part of Animalia. So when you speak of language between human & animal, you err.

Is the quark sea always there, or did it just show up because of the energy released in the collision?

Really don't understand what's in Dias's mind. When he published his faked results on Nature, didn't he know that it would be under scrutiny? He really believe he can get away? Or he believe "fake it until make it?"

Can we stop with the marketing nonsense of '4nm transistors' please. Current EUV photo-lithography technology is incapable in doing so.

I can wet the coffee grinds. Why?

Quark said the space duck 🦆

Your channel deserves more views.. Keep uploading more cool videos..Keep it up Sir 🗿🍷👍🏼

I will say this: Quantum physics is a grab-asstic mess. You're demonstrating it this video just as I'd see in other KZfaq Pop-Science influencers. For example: 5:22 Bell Test rules out local hidden variable (LHVs) but there is still a possibility that there are "some" LHVs - but that is for another discussion later??? Why? After all, the Nobel Prize hander-outers said "We like this Bell Test stuff!!!"

I love how everyone is still confused when we already know matter has a 'wave' nature and is not a particle, yet we try to ascribe things to these entities like a radius artificially and wonder why things are inconsistent.

better animations like real engineering. and remember pace and diction. videos must be listenable at 2 x the speed

Great video but I wish your front camera wasn't so laggy, oh my god it almost made me dizzy watching. It's super tiring to watch and also distracting. And the worst part is, you constantly switch between your own footage and other demonstration videos and those videos are smooth, so smooth to laggy and smooth to laggy passing quickly is too tiring to follow. Please take this to consideration for your future videos.

Yes they do actually collapse, but it is a collective phenomenon and the computer simulation of it requires an exponential-time algorithm. The simplest example is the interaction between an alpha particle and two molecules of nitrogen tri-iodide. This can lead to a radical increase in specific entropy and I would suggest adding tachyonic Brownian motion to get the destruction of unitarity that we will require. Unfortunately the simulation will need to run in dozens of dimensions of configuration space so my suggestion is a moot point. What we are up against is simply a numbers game. There are no issues with our ability to imagine what is happening.

actually, we passively slow down time around us because we have mass, albeit so tiny

Nearfield light is instantaneous and the effects of this will change all of modern physics, and can only be explained by the pilot wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Experiments have now shown that nearfield light is instantaneous, and it only becomes approximately a constant in the farfield, starting about 1 wavelength from the source. This is supported by Maxwell electrodynamic theory. This has been verified by many researchers. In addition, a resent experiment showed that the front (ie information) of a nearfield electromagnetic pulse propagated instantaneously across space. This is incompatible with Relativity theory, which only based on farfield speed c light. A derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light, yields Galilean Relativity, where time is the same in all inertial frames and no Relativistic effects are observed. This can be easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the Galilean Transform. So, Relativistic effects will observed if a moving body is observed using farfield light, but no Relativistic effects will be observed if instantaneous nearfield light is used. How can the effects of Relativity be real if they can be switched off by simply changing the frequency of the light used to observe them. The only possible conclusion is that Relativistic effects are just an optical illusion, and that Galilean Relativity is the correct theory of Relativity, where time is absolute, only the present exists, the past is gone, and the future is yet to be. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZfaq presentation of above arguments: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qcuAl61o27m1poU.html <kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qcuAl61o27m1poU.html> *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

Immortality would be terrifying. Well, on the bright side that means life could continue on forever in multiple multiple universes.

Where Is the link tò the new type of microscope ?

seems a very obvious solution... after doing several batches of samples with different angles for weeks ,... innovation follows patterns

Why you evryone is wrong in time this is not good opinion

# time IS measured in meters, no such unique thing as 'seconds' # time and distance ARE the same thing. # THIS MEANS that mass and Energy are also the same thing. No difference. # AND we do not have to do ANYTHING to the equations of energy, just realize # that a second is ~300 thousand kilometers. Not a trick. Reality. s 2.99792458e+08 m # Time is distance. Each second is 299.8 thousand kilometers c 1 # Light is unitless because of the above fact. ## The rest of this file are conversion factors for fun & energy<->mass equivelence comparisons. # Information to compare energy usage and generation to energy released # from nuclear devices. For giving a rough idea. tontnt ton_e ton_e ton_tnt_energy ton_tnt_energy 1e+9 calorie # calorie ktontnt =~ 4.184TJ # kton_e is 1e+12 calorie or 4.186 TJ kilotons as a metric mass measurement # (kilotonnes) of TNT gives a value of 1000 c/g, well within the reported range, # while treating it as "kilo short tons of TNT" gives 1102 c/g, at the extreme # upper end of the reported range. Thus a kiloton can be called a "kilo metric ton # of TNT" and a "kilo short ton of TNT" with about equal validity. #

s = 186k miles c = 1 e = m

I recently learned about side-channel data. The language mapping sounds like it's using side-channel data to translate 🤯👀

Prove it..

😮

Time doesn't exist.. it is just mistaken as rate of energy flow that allow change of one state to another. Every event has a pattern / frequency of happening (like 4 seasons). Also everything is reversible to some point (depends on entropy). That is if a system has enough energy it can return to previous state. But the problem is that nature tends to minimize the energy used & it's a bit hard.. getting back the energy you just gave away (as if reversible function :)

Time is simply, from a scientific sense, as a comparative measurement of motion and distance. Obviously, we need to take into account reference frames. Time is not, in this sense, mysterious.

Watch and Learn…. Atom-ist’s are mathematician’s… the mathematics of the universe IS the Platonic Solids… kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q6mKn9hz3LTSY3U.htmlsi=Lr7zYn0JiQYjY7_O