Appreciate it!

PS - what software are you using to do the opaque code overlays on your video?

Awesome job with TypeSpec Mario, big fan of where it’s going. Looking forward to seeing backend code generation.

As for the effect. It’s the screen record with opacity that creates the overlay effect. However it’s really how I light the room, set the lumetri on the cam record and screen record that allows me to achieve the effect

How respectful of you. There are other channels, if you can't cope.

lol, tell me about it, I have a light sensitivity hence why I wear the glasses. I don’t think anything but my sunglasses will fix that, sadly

@@chrishayuk Ignore the troll, thought your video was great - thanks for sharing.

thank you, appreciate it

thank you, appreciate it

yes, i need to do that video. i've been distracted by building a faster pipeline for the finetune

Will be interesting when doing something particularly fancy like complex compound math sequences and also with loops. I think we can do it with enough getting our minds around the syntax. The most extreme would be understanding how the binaries work on the instruction by instruction level and wrapping our minds around that and write it in a HEX EDITOR (old days, we called that ML Monitors).

Just bear in mind that what I said about WAT text in relation to binary format is analogy not as exactly literal like assembly language to Machine language because a direct parallel of WASM to assembly like text would be to inverse the hex values of machine code to the instruction in the instruction set table in binary but really... close enough. You can if you are careful eye, can correlate the WAT textual instruction to the particular hexadecimal values and the particular instruction set and opcode of the WASM binary in a textual mneumonic style that would correlate in some fashion with the instruction set table for the WASM version (presuming a future version of WASM can break compatibility with the older/current if they want to make room for expanding and the version number begins to have greater importance in the future at some point in the future. However, WASM binary hex code values will or should correlate closely with the instruction set table of the particular WASM version. WASM version would matter, of course. Si it would be conceivable to write an almost pure WASM Assembly Opcode/Operand mneumonic format to hexadecimal format. When I say, mneumonic style, I am referring to ( webassembly.github.io/spec/core/appendix/index-instructions.html ) but of course, there is stuff one has to kind of observe between WAT to WASM and analyzing the hex values and understanding the structure of the system altogether. But at first, working in WAT then "assemble" to WASM would be a good place to start and over time, explore how to manipulate the wasm binary code and then write code straight in the binary for those that want to explore that but I would not say it would be practical for professional work involving a lot of code. Coding WAT by hand, maybe if you get it down to science, you can do some impressive stuff but in a lot of cases, most just won't get into that level of tight woven advanced handwritten webassembly like some ML coder did in the demo scenes or old school programmers of the age of NES/SNES/DOS/C64/Amiga era and how we got into the nuts and bolts.

Yeah, open source is the key thing for me

yes, deepseek is pretty cool also

lol, very kind, I’m okay with the views and glad you find the content useful

Glad it’s useful

I aim to please

lmao

you can bring your current line into the chat model with command l, and then reapply back to your code with the insert

Yes you can! llama.cpp is supported

Welcome 😊

I'm so glad!

Yes, except I moved the 2 background lights out of shot for later videos

@@chrishayuk you got that trance edm ethereal lighting respect

it's pretty cool right

you can't have a model install containers...

@@chrishayuk I'm not saying the LLM to install containers (even though it can, since it's just a function call). I'm saying to use containers (docker, podman, containerd) instead of webaasembly. Try creating a more complex tool, such as a tool that uses a dataframe in webassembly...maybe using pyodide and micropip

@@MavVRX yeah, maybe i didn't explain this video so well.. function calling other agents, containers etc is a given. but this is more about integration of libraries and tools

I really like that idea

You're very welcome!

glad you enjoyed

glad you enjoyed

Very kind, I felt ReAct was a little magical, so thought it’d be good to show how it really works. Glad it was useful

In the video, I just do the compile and then open up the file, that’s all you need to do

Yes, but who knows what I actually said, my brain sometimes jumps ahead

Lol

I kinda went through this thought process myself but then landed back onto the up front design and ability to design schemas across services. If you’re doing a couple of services I could agree but if looking at a complex estate, I’d argue that it doesn’t get modelled and why this works as an approach. But I totally get your view as I was there with the same view originally

@@chrishayuk that makes sense too. I will give it some more thought. Thanks Chris!

I sort of agree that generating typescript boilerplate is a next logical step for this

Very kind, glad you like the channel

hey thanks for the reach out, but sponsorship isn't really a direction i'm going in, but appreciate the thought

Glad it was helpful!

agree, hence why i cut it for later videos. a bad experiment, appreciate your feedback

@@chrishayuk I didn't realize it was old. It's good content in any case. I had been watching your other videos; keep up the great work!

Cheers, appreciate it, weirdly I think webassembly is gonna become very relevant for ai. I think the thoughts in this video hold pretty true

yeeep