Seit 10 Jahren arbeitet E Ink fleißig daran, die farbige Technologie zu entwickeln. Vom EPD mit Farbfilter und 4096 Farben bis hin zu 60K Farben bei 0 bis +50°C beim neuesten Spectra 6, welches schon sehr beeindruckend aussieht. Besuchen Sie uns auf der Electronica 2024 in München! Wir werden Ihnen diese Technologie gerne live vorführen.

@@beck-elektronik - Mir sind diese Technologien bekannt. Die Varianten mit Farbfilter sind kontrastarm und dunkel und Geräte mit Spectra 6 und Gallary 3+ sind nicht für den Endkunden zu erwerben.

We sell this and other colored ePaper displays. For further price information, please contact our customer service via [email protected] or use the contact form on our website under www.beck-elektronik.de/en/service/contact-approach Please note that we do not sell to end customers - only business. Thank you for your interest :)

I have an ACeP display. I don't know what color pigments they use, but they must be some type of inkjet pigment. They are filtering light, not reflecting it, that's why you can't use an opaque liquid. Yellow and magenta are very saturated. Cyan probably as well, but the color becomes very deep if the film is thick enough (You can look at cyan inside an inkjet cartridge to see what I mean). Red (yellow + magenta) is not very saturated, which probably comes from a less than ideal selection of pigments or my inability to get the perfect film thickness, because inkjet red is usually very saturated. The contrast isn't great because the default black is more like grey. I guess that's why the displays look so pale on video. The black I achieved is much deeper which greatly improves contrast. All-in-all the technology is just wonderful. The color rendering looks great as long as you don't hold a glossy magazine next to it. It definitely does not look like a reflective display (e.g. Game Boy Color). There is also a version that uses white, black, red and yellow pigments. You don't get any blue tones with those but the contrast is superb.

Please contact us here: www.beck-elektronik.de/en/service/contact-approach

Hello Thomas! Please use the contact form on our website for business inquiries: www.beck-elektronik.de/en/service/contact-approach/

Hey Patrik, thank you for your interest in this modules! Unfortunately we sell to business customers only.

Wenn man sich überlegt, dass vielleicht jeder hundertste Raspberry Pi - Besitzer sich so etwas kaufen würde... Ich glaube es würde sich lohnen den Markt der Hobbybastler zu erschließen.

Hey Jason, thanks for your question. This display is not a touch screen.

make screen better and they would

@@Greg00020 Not just better. I can live with slow refresh but the price has to come way down. This is not exactly one of a kind and for what E Ink wants to use it for is quite expensive compared to LCDs/LEDs. If the price goes down it can be widely adopted but these days you see alot of greed and not a hell of a lot of innovation!

Actually it is very acceptable for many office situations -> offices using LCD's for wall art - this is going to be MUCH lower energy and more pleasant to look at. Also for KPI and other monitoring applications likely going to be very good places. Also anyplace where you want a status / schedule in places with bright light (think conference schedules / room free / busy panels etc). They are not targeting your computer monitor and do not claim to be.

That's not intended as a replacement for workstation monitors, TVs, smartphones, etc. Think about more static applications, like restaurant menus on the wall, picture frames, signage in general. It's very low power consumption because it only needs power to change, not to keep displaying an image.

No, it is not flexible. Thank you for your interest.

There is a lot already, for example kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o8qIqJyb0rqtYnU.html

@@7gone that's an LCD

Congratulations, your wish has come true! =D kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d-B8jaWXs9jcfac.html and kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gKeGja9pmNGZkYk.html Refresh rate looks way better than this one.

@@hackerman7835 It's e-ink not the LCD

@@7gone It's not e-ink. "E-ink" refers specifically to devices made by E-ink Corporation. You probably meant it's e-paper. In any case, it *is* LCD, but it's not a traditional LCD. Fair to say it is an e-paper LCD.

31.2” EC312TT2 (color filter array) is not ACeP (micro-capsules), and can be driven by v5 board. 13.3” AC133UT1 is ACeP and needs T1000 board. More informations: www.beck-elektronik.de/en/service/newsletter/the-summer-of-color/

10 to 15 years? It should be way sooner.

@@Wabajak13 yes. I dont think EINK its complete. They have to fuse with Lcd tech (without any flickering or led light!!)

@@axel9546 LCD technology is a completely different design, so "fusing" (combining technologies) is impossible. But yes, it would be nice to see them further improve e-ink.

@@Wabajak13 10-15 years is actually a very conservative estimate, sorry friend.

Thank you! Of course we have good prices ;) For further price information, please contact our customer service via [email protected] or use the contact form on our website under www.beck-elektronik.de/en/service/kontakt-anfahrt/ Please note that we do not sell to end customers - only business. Thank you for your interest :)

@@beck-elektronik : $800 for a 13.5 inch version? OUCH!!!!!

@@CCoburn3 Yeah! Utterly pointless even for business applications. For 800$ you can power a simple LCD panel for quite some time.

Thank you, we will do it that way :)

this won't happen until a new waveform controller is developed

Totally false Josh - there are many use cases with much lower refresh rates.

@@auspiex i think so too. they should find some clever guy to rewrite the algorithm. obviously its not optimised.

@@ysts3452 Looking at the way it refreshes, it seems like every change requires a series of voltage changes to rearrange the ink particles one color at a time. That means at least 4 cycles per refresh of applying voltage and waiting what looks like 500ms for each color to respond. I wonder how much optimization can really be gotten out of this. It seems like a hard physical limit. In the demos it looks like they're always pulling white to top, then yellow, then cyan, then magenta, then pushing each one back down to wherever they need to go, for a total of 7 or 8 cycles. Assuming you know the last state of the pixel, even if all other colors remained still while shifting the target color (which I don't think they do), the best optimization you could ever make would be at least as many cycles as C,M,Y,W values which were being shifted. The weakest voltage moves one color, a slightly stronger current moves two colors, the strongest current moves all colors, so you have to repeatedly draw them all up and build the layers back down.