Venom should have been rated R, since the beginning.

Daemon is the fuck around and find out kinda man. Just ask the guy who called Rhaenyra a whore.

When aemon and daemon have their showdown it’ll be great

This show gives so much more if you know how these characters’ stories end

He just looked at him and he backed off. Wicked!

I CANNOT WAIT FOR THIS!!! 13 MORE DAYS!!! Know your place boy!!

What happened to Legolas?

08 Hulk was too manly🤷🏽‍♂️ Disney don’t play that unless you make the male a joke or part of the rainbow brigade

This was really good! Reva should have not been in Kenobi.

2008 hulk is best hulk, i don't care people hate him i love him

Dude 08 hulk was baddass

Furiosa was good

I like eggs 🥚

I love all the Mad Max movies. Mad Max: Fury Road was great. Mad Max is one of the most influential movies in cinematic history.

Bro you are lost

Mark Ruffalo was the reason the Hulk NEVER WORKED in the movies after Ed Norton's version. The WORST Hulk is the Ruffalo Hulk. AWFUL.

Sorry, but this video is full of stuff that just shows that you don't know much about the whole saga. I'm hesitant to call it dumb, but it seem to suggest that you don't have much knowledge about the whole series and maybe even cinematic history at large. 1st) Even the 3rd movie with Tina Turner was heavily critized when it came out, due to its more polished designer-punk look. It wasn't as grounded as the first two, and far away from being regarded as a perfect movie by a whole lot of people. 2nd) "Fury Road" was more of an origin-story for Mad Max. That should have probably been made clearer, and Miller corrected this mistake with this new movie. 3rd). Furiosas' story had been fleshed out by Miller when he did Fury Road, to give the actors a background to their characters, and he had always expressed that he wanted to delve deeper into their stories. You, and so many others, complaining that some "side character" gets their own movie is kinda childish and selfish, imho. You want more stories, but at the same time, you are against anything that takes the shine away from your beloved heroes. It's your way, or no way. 4th) Miller was honest with this movie, as the title made pretty clear that this wasn't about Mad Max, but that it played in the same universe. In fact, it was planned from the beginning as an origin-story for Furiosa. You could put both moves together, the first being Furiosa, the 2nd being Fury Road, without even noticing a break. Both are just equally bonkers. 5th) Oh yeah, all those people with magic eyes who see CGI from a mile away. I take none of you seriously, you're in the same ballpark as people stating that they could hear the difference between lossy music formats and vinyl. Besides, Miller isn't known for his heavy use of CGI and from all we know, this movie is no difference. Was there CGI *somewhere*? Probably yes. Did it look bad? Not to me, and I saw it on a big-ass cinema-screen. But maybe the difference is just that I go into a movie to delve into another world, not to look for the needle in the haystack in every scene... 6th) You're complaining about Furiosa not speaking much sounds like people complaining about Conan not speaking much in the Schwarzenegger-movie. Did you even bother to follow the story just one bit? There's a very good reason for Furiosa not talking much and that's to masqerade her being a girl/woman. That makes complete sense in the world she's living in. Everybody has their own taste, of course. Not liking the movie is fine. But giving some bs-reasons that have mostly good explanations is not. I can only say that I thoroughly enjoyed both Fury Road and Furiosa and I'm planning to see the last one at least once more, if not a 3rd time., and I would gladly go into a double feature as well.

lol its rich of you to criticize art whilst using an ai voice and generated images

Fury Road “wasn’t the best movie”??? How to take you seriously after that?

It was a good movie

Fun fact: Immortal Joe = Toecutter… same actor

I thought it was pretty good.

Sinners it is time to rise and get your tattoos in optimal condition. Mister Siniter has been sponsored by Painless Tattoo that I have been using for over 3 years. Ye do not need to worry about pain anymore. PAIN FREE for 4-5 hour sessions. Check out our numbing cream and aftercare products. Great for piercings too. Use code: mister sinister- at check out and go to painlesstattoo.co/?ref=muigcclb.

Use code: mister sinister- to save on all orders, my sinners.

painlesstattoo.co/?ref=muigcclb We now have our first SPONSOR!! Painless Tattoo Numbing Cream. Why sit in pain when you can last 4-5 hours PAIN FREE. I have personally used this product on all of my tattoos as well as their aftercare. Click the link to save!!

This is incredible.

This is happening in comics too hulk is being use bad hes nerfed snd embarrassed by Dr Doom made into a degenerate character by impregnating his own cousin to have baby hulks pushing agnosticism and satanic propaganda with him . These characters belong in Jack Kirby's sons hand so they wouldn't be exploited by woke people . who are atheists leftist . the hulk has been put as a slave to Thanos like he was Thanos bitch . Doom slaps him around this wouldn't have happened in the 80s and 90s Stan Lee wouldn't liked it. Because Disney Marvel is ruled by the marxist matriarchal and hates masculinity and so stuck up on magic ✨ characters kabala Jewish mysticism and degenerate story telling. And senseless.blood and gore .

Black 🎉

Black 🎉

While 2003 isn't my favorite Hulk design, I do appreciate the comic accuracy with the speed and strength.

House Green!

82 per cent on rotton tomatoes.Great movie and series!!! WAS NOT BORED AT ALL GREAT MOVIE AND BY THE WAY WHO ARE YOU??????

Late 1960s. I enjoyed the movied, it wasnt boring at all for me.

Yes 2008 Hulk looks way better than the other ones

Thank you Mister Sinister!

Peter Jackson went woke on this one. He said for both the LOTR & The Hobbit, that he had to cut some of the book for time constraints. A scene by scene adaptation would have resulted in a 100 hour long movie. I accept that, for LOTR. But not The Hobbit. He said "What did Tom Bombadil add? Nothing!" Now if he felt he had to cut something, I can accept Bombadil being the character cut. But he didn't leave it there. He added that elf maid, what's her name. And even that wasn't enough; he added a whole beastial love affair between her and the dwarf. No where in the Legendarium does it even hint at such a liaison. Elves and men were "children of Iluvitar" and produced offspring. Dwarves were not "children of Iluvitar", but creation of a lesser God. Iluvitar blessed their existence, but a marriage between them would be beastiality, with no children possible. Jackson cut out Bombadil to same time, but added the mixed race romance to add time. This was all just virtue signaling bastardization. Further exaberated with the addition of black casting extras. Tolkien made it clear; blacks were "Southrons", not from any other part of Middle Earth. This also seriously detracts from his The Hobbit. Get woke, go broke.

Disneys first sociopathic female.

You sound like you're either drunk, have had injections into your gums, or both. Utter rubbish video.

Even Savage Avengers hulk is crap

08 Hulk is a true badass

Smart hulk is a bitch

hobbit may be bad but it would seem good compared to what amazon vomited out for us

The 2008 Hulk had to much toxic masculinity for Disney. They took one of the most powerful anti hero and turned him into a goofy big oaf sidekick.

ur wrong dude

The Hulk now serves tropical drink's at LGBTQ conventions 🍹

Glad to see 2008 hulk is getting the love it deserves. I always thought it was the best depiction of the hulk, and it went downhill after. And i hate when people say, "but professor hulk was in the comics"... yeah well, he sucked in the comic too...

While I enjoy the films as cinema, and they are certainly deserving of merit in that regard, I still say that Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy is one of the worst literary adaptations ever made. And a lot of the horrible choices made in regards to adaptation often lower the quality of the story as cinema: The dispensing of Tolkien’s morality. The uncanonical failures of nerve. The disregard for proper tone. The elasticity of pacing. The flattening of narrative. The interminable battle scenes. The complete destruction of characterization. The degradation of Tolkien’s prose, reducing beautiful sentiment to corny greeting card mush. The relentless trivialization of the story. And perhaps most egregiously, the facile appreciation of the book thinly veiling a profound and contemptible lack of comprehension of its themes. This is in addition to the enthusiastic copying of an alarming amount of shots, scenes, and entire sequences from Ralph Bakshi’s animated adaptation from 1978. While it may be true that Jackson’s interpretation of The Lord of the Rings is far greater qualitatively that his interpretation of The Hobbit, well... that isn’t really saying much.